Title: Obama's Birth Certificate Released - Proof it is Has Been Altered. Possible Fake? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 27, 2011 Author:3truthseeker33 Post Date:2011-04-27 19:48:44 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:32384 Comments:79
Of course it is. However, 0bama brought this on himself. This BC issue has followed him since he was an Illinois Senator. It should have been cleared up with all the publicity concerning it.
0bama knew he would be resented by a large segment of society for many reasons. He should have dispelled as many popular issues as quick as he could before those issues have caused his "leadership" to be tweaked by political speedbumps.
However, 0bama brought this on himself. This BC issue has followed him since he was an Illinois Senator. It should have been cleared up with all the publicity concerning it.
Maybe, but I think it's pretty obvious that no matter what he releases the crazies will just up the ante.
Wasn't World Nut Daily demanding he release his kindergarten records a while back? With all the legitimate things to go after this guy for, why these losers focus on this eludes me completely. It's almost like they want to lose the next election.
A scanned document, and that's what this fake purports to be, would not have layers. It would scan as a one dimensional graphic with no differentiation between background and text. Why would it have layers? A scanner or PDF program isn't intelligent. It can't distinguish between readable text and background. But someone deliberately constructing new text over another document would layer it, piece by piece.
btw, screw you. Hide behind your filter, coward and liar that you are.
I agree. But, in many ways that is 0bama's fault. Trump has NOW just come out about a new issue:
Donald Trump has moved on from the "birther" conspiracy to allege President Barack Obama didn't get good enough grades to warrant entry to Harvard Law School, an assertion that CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer called absurd on the "CBS Evening News" on Wednesday.
Why would it have layers? A scanner or PDF program isn't intelligent. It can't distinguish between readable text and background.
That isn't entirely true, Rudgear. In today's world most scanned images use a vectored approach (layers) towards graphics for electronic data distribution. And very often Adobe PDF Writer is used to perform that task. In fact, Adobe CAN extract text from an image, minimizing manual re-typing.
I have the Professional version of Adobe and use it all the time.
Well said. I have no argument with your statements. I think a lot of folks just don't understand contemporary graphic art and associated software is all.
Well said. I have no argument with your statements. I think a lot of folks just don't understand contemporary graphic art and associated software is all.
I didn't understand it myself when the layer issue was brought up, so I spent all of five minutes testing it. Like you, I have the pro version of Acrobat as well as Illustrator.
It's funny that not one of these internet "experts" thought of doing the same thing.
Speaking of stupid sacks of shit, and cowardly ones at that, it supposedly began life as a paper document that at some point in its short existence was scanned into the White House web page. Why it was created as a PDF document is interesting and solely unnecessary. Unless it was created as a PDF document. Then the question becomes: why?
I also know you and everyone else likes to ignore the raised seal absence, but when I applied for my drivers license and got into the military, I was specifically reminded to bring a raised seal birth certificate with me.
It's funny that not one of these internet "experts" thought of doing the same thing.
It isn't their fault from a true sense. Technology is moving so rapidly that it is hard for the average layman to keep up with much less experts in a given field.
There is no argument about the authenticity of 0bama's birth as a US Citizen; there never really was one. Just like the Internet production of the COLB from some four years ago from Hawaii, it has been challenged.
What does it matter what format they released it in? Is there any format that you wouldn't question?
I wouldn't question a format of the actual, original document being examined by an impartial forensic document examiner. Anything else might as well come from Barnum & Bailey.
Is there any format you would not accept as gospel?
I wouldn't question a format of the actual, original document being examined by an impartial forensic document examiner.
I think the State of Hawaii has already vouched for the authenticity of the document.
As far as finding an expert forensic examiner, who would choose? Ever been in court and seen each side bring out their expert witnesses? Guess what? Without fail, they always agree with them that brung 'um.
For a new position, I had to have BOTH certified copies of my BC and College transcripts available; not copied or electronic format. The folks wanted sealed copies of the documents with no method of my possible alteration or tampering delivered directly to them for evaluation.
It costs bucks, not a lot but it also costs time. I can see why 0bama doesn't do it; what create 300,000,000 certified copies of his personal records? That is nonsense and it doesn't PROVE a thing.
What is required is a formal method of "vetting." There isn't any. So this entire CT has produced one notion for me; a federal committee formally organized to review USSC requirements needs to be in effect. You would think that out of some 25,000,000 government workers that a committee could be organized with little budget requirements, wouldn't you?
All PDF files have layers. All of them. There's no conspiracy, it just the technology.
Is that better?
OK, I believe you. All PDF files have layers.
Then why is in pdf? Would something NOT layered be more readily believable?
And for the record, ANY digital format can and could be edited. This release is proof of nothing, yet look at you arguing it as fact and insulting anyone with the audacity to question a digital document.