[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: CNN investigation: Obama 'birther' claims have no merit -- Editor's note: Tune in to AC360° Tuesday beginning at 10 p.m. ET to see the remainder of Gary Tuchman's investigation into President Barack Obama's birthplace. (CNN) -- Was Barack Obama really born in America? A new CNN investigation reveals what most analysts have been saying since the so-called "birther" controversy erupted during the 2008 presidential campaign: Obama was born in the state of Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Period. Obama passes CNN birther investigation While the president has made light of the controversy, the question remains political red meat for some of his critics. A recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll showed that nearly 75% of Americans believe Obama was definitely or probably born in the United States. More than four in 10 Republicans, however, believe he probably or definitely was not born in America. The U.S. Constitution says only "natural born" citizens can become president -- a vague clause that some members of the birther movement contend disqualifies Obama because, they insist, he was born outside the United States. Skeptics contend, among other things, that Obama was born in his father's home country of Kenya. Potential GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump recently seized on the issue, saying he had doubts about Obama's background. Trump claims birth certificate missing CNN investigators in Honolulu, however, found nothing to reinforce those doubts. Obama passes CNN 'birther' investigation A setback for "Birthers" RELATED TOPICS Barack Obama Hawaii U.S. Politics Elections and Voting Cable News Network Dr. Chiyome Fukino, a former director of the Hawaii Department of Health and a Republican, told CNN in her most extensive comments to date that she has "no doubt" Obama was born in the state. Obama's 2008 campaign produced a "certification of live birth," a document legally accepted as confirmation of a birth and routinely used for official purposes. Fukino, however, went one step further, taking advantage of a state law that allows certain public officials to examine a person's actual birth certificate if there is a "direct and tangible interest." The president's actual certificate, she said, is stored in a vault in the building that houses the Department of Health. Ironically, unlike the certificate of live birth, it is no longer accepted for official usage. Obama's certificate is "absolutely authentic," she said. "He was absolutely born here in the state of Hawaii." In order to see what happens when someone born in Hawaii requests a birth certificate, CNN asked a current resident of the state -- Stig Waidelich -- if he could get a copy of the document. Waidelich was born just hours after Obama in August 1961. Like Obama, Waidelich's birth was announced at the time in the Honolulu Star Bulletin newspaper. Zakaria: The fantasy of Donald Trump Waidelich, like Obama in 2008, was given a certification of live birth in response to his request. Could Obama's 1961 birth announcement in the Honolulu Star Bulletin be a fake? Some conspiracy theorists say yes. Longtime Honolulu newspaper reporter Dan Nakaso says no. "It's not possible," Nakaso told CNN. "Under the system that existed back then, there was no avenue for people to submit information that way. ... The information came directly from the state Department of Health." Indeed, as CNN confirmed, all birth announcements at the time came directly from hospital birth records. Could Obama, a self-proclaimed Christian, be preventing the distribution of copies of the original birth certificate because it identifies him as a Muslim? Fukino says no. The original certificate includes no mention of the president's religion. And indeed, other original certificates from that time don't mention faith. Obama could file a Freedom of Information Act request to view his original birth certificate and make copies. But at this point, the White House maintains, nothing will satisfy the doubters. Rick Smethurst, a 2008 John McCain voter who now lives in Obama's childhood home in Hawaii, counts himself among the doubters. He wants to find someone who saw Obama immediately after the president was born. Current Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie says he did. Abercrombie, a Democrat, was friendly with Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, and remembers celebrating the birth. Arizona governor criticizes birther "distraction" "Of course, we had no idea at the time that the future president of the United States was that little boy, that little baby," Abercrombie recalled. But "we are very, very happy ... that took place." Professor Alice Dewey of the University of Hawaii was a faculty adviser to Dunham and also knew the future president when he was a child. She called the controversy "funny." She said there is "no way" Obama wasn't born in the state. Dewey remembered a conversation in which Dunham compared the birth of Obama with that of his sister, Maya, who actually was born overseas. "She said, 'When I had Maya, it was a lot of more difficult because Indonesia doesn't believe in painkillers while you're giving birth. ... Of course, in the United States, giving birth to Barry (Obama's childhood nickname) was quite different and much more comfortable,' " Dewey recalled. Waidelich's mother, Monika, believes she saw Obama in Honolulu's Kapiolani Medical Center next to her son back in 1961. "In those days, there were hardly any other black babies," she told CNN. The hospital wouldn't show patient records from 1961, but the state's African-American population was less than 1% at the time. Regardless of the evidence, there may be no convincing some of those who question the president's origins. "I find it a bit amusing in the sense that (the issue) keeps resurfacing over and over again," Fukino said. "It really tells us that the whole conspiracy notion is out there (and) that if there is an issue that needs a following, they will find one. "No matter what you do or say, it make no difference," she said. Abercrombie, who tried to put an end to the controversy when he became governor, told CNN he just hopes that "people who have this political orientation towards the president respect us here in Hawaii." "Respect his mother and father," the governor urged. "Respect the people I loved and the people that I knew, and the little boy who grew up here in paradise and became president." That, the evidence suggests, may be easier said than done. CNN's Alan Silverleib contributed to this story.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Obama blaming "speculators" for high oil prices has no merit either.
You are 100% incorrect. When 60-70% of the long market interest is by funds and investors who are incapable of taking delvery of the commodity it most certainly is an issue.
"Speculator" is a nonsensical term that leftist tyrants use to deflect attention away from their own disreputable policies. Every time I hear a politician use it, I know exactly what's going on -- they are trying to score political points with idiots like you, by creating boogie men that they can focus blame on. Oil prices are rising for three reasons: A.) Increased demand. There are 2.5 billion people in China, India, and Southeast Asia joining the world economy. They need energy. B.) Slowing supply growth. The left-wing lunatics in the U.S. have been forcing domestic energy production to slowly shut down since the 1970s. There is little new drilling. Virtually no new refinement capacity has been created in over three decades. C.) Increased risk. There is growing political turmoil in the Middle East. This increases the probability that the oil supply will be disrupted or even shut off at some point. It's just that simple, but dummies like you would rather blame the "rich", the "greedy", and the "speculators" instead of facing reality and doing something about the real issues. You leftist morons have been doing this for the better part of 100 years, so it's no surprise.
B.) Slowing supply growth. The left-wing lunatics in the U.S. have been forcing domestic energy production to slowly shut down since the 1970s. There is little new drilling. Virtually no new refinement capacity has been created in over three decades. Those are exactly the same arguments recycled, I heard when gas at the pump was around $4.50 a gallon during the Bush administration. It's just that simple, but dummies like you would rather blame the "rich", the "greedy", and the "speculators" instead of facing reality and doing something about the real issues. I do believe you just made that argument yur own self when you wrote: "There is growing political turmoil in the Middle East. This increases the probability that the oil supply will be disrupted or even shut off at some point." Speculation! As for facing reality, I agree. Rather than subsidize a dirty, politically expensive source of energy, we should be conserving through efficiencies in use and developing new, green sources
They are still valid today. So what's your point? As usual, you don't have one.
There are no replies to Comment # 24. End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|