[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Obamanomics: U.S. deficit up 15.7% in first half of fiscal 2011
Source: Google News
URL Source: http://www.google.com/hostednews/af ... 51497966fd4c6461748e63e3ee.921
Published: Apr 12, 2011
Author: afp
Post Date: 2011-04-12 17:59:01 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Obamanomics in Action, Obama-doma-ding-dong, Obamatuer Hour
Views: 201752
Comments: 215

US deficit up 15.7% in first half of fiscal 2011

(AFP) – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON — The US budget deficit shot up 15.7 percent in the first six months of fiscal 2011, the Treasury Department said Wednesday as political knives were being sharpened for a new budget battle.

The Treasury reported a deficit of $829 billion for the October-March period, compared with $717 billion a year earlier, as revenue rose a sluggish 6.9 percent as the economic recovery slowly gained pace.

The Treasury argued that the pace of increase in the deficit was deceptive because of large one-off reductions in expenditures made during the first half of fiscal 2010, compared with previous and subsequent periods.

Those included a $115 billion reduction in funds spent on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) -- the financial institution bailout program -- in March 2010.

But 2011 so far has also seen significant increases in spending on defense, Social Security, health and debt service, while receipts have not grown as fast.

"The jump in outlays mostly owed to a smaller estimated reduction in TARP outlays this year versus 2010," said Theresa Chen at Barclays Capital Research.

However, she said, the trend shows that taxable income is rising at a 6.9 percent annual pace, and individual incomes taxes are up 20.6 percent, "consistent with general economic improvement."

The figures came amid a sharp, politically partisan battle in Washington over cutting spending and raising taxes, with President Barack Obama preparing Wednesday to release his plan for reducing the long-term deficit.

He also faces a looming battle over increasing the country's official debt ceiling, so that the government can continue to borrow to finance the deficit.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 200.

#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)

Financial slavery for you, your children and your grand children..... thank you Libtards....

CZ82  posted on  2011-04-12   18:33:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: CZ82 (#1)

Financial slavery for you, your children and your grand children..... thank you Libtards....

have you forgotten the tea party celebrating the extension of the Bush tax cuts, which added $858 billion to the deficit over 2 years?

Nobody takes tea partiers/conservatives seriously when they complain about debt/deficits.

go65  posted on  2011-04-12   20:52:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: go65 (#3)

have you forgotten the tea party celebrating the extension of the Bush tax cuts, which added $858 billion to the deficit over 2 years?

If Obama hadn't spent 3.7 Trillion instead of the 2.2 trillion the government took in then there wouldn't be a deficit..... now would there??????

Why don't you ask the "Village Idiot" why he doesn't have a "laser like" focus on creating jobs????? that would increase revenues greatly.... and reduce the deficit..... and also reduce the amount of people dependent on the government (you don't want that do you).... less people to vote for "The Party of Losers"....(Democrats)!!!!!

Have you gotten your weekly handout yet??????

By the way I thought you were gone for good because of people posting about the "Wookie"???????

CZ82  posted on  2011-04-12   21:50:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: CZ82 (#4)

If Obama hadn't spent 3.7 Trillion instead of the 2.2 trillion the government took in then there wouldn't be a deficit..... now would there??????

Obama's not spending a dime anymore without approval by the GOP controlled House of Representatives.

go65  posted on  2011-04-13   0:40:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: go65 (#5)

Obama's not spending a dime anymore without approval by the GOP controlled House of Representatives.

Hey, you're back and lying!

How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out?

(laughing)

Badeye  posted on  2011-04-13   9:57:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Badeye (#6)

How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out?

How's that 10% unemployment you told us we'd see after the November election?

go65  posted on  2011-04-13   10:00:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: go65 (#7)

How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out? How's that 10% unemployment you told us we'd see after the November election?

In reality, its about 20%...as predicted.

Badeye  posted on  2011-04-13   11:34:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Badeye (#8)

In reality, its about 20%...as predicted.

Chuckles...about as real as your house actually sitting on a stone cliff...

war  posted on  2011-04-13   11:52:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: war, badeye (#9) (Edited)

Chuckles...about as real as your house actually sitting on a stone cliff...

in the words of George Costanza - 'it's not a lie if you believe it'

Remember when the GOP claimed it would cut $100 billion from the budget this year? Instead, they ended up cutting less than $30 billion.

Again, read the tag line, the GOP owns the deficit now. And their own plan, with its ridiculous assumptions, STILL doesn't project a balanced budget until 2030.

go65  posted on  2011-04-13   18:56:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: go65 (#10)

Remember when the GOP claimed it would cut $100 billion from the budget this year? Instead, they ended up cutting less than $30 billion.

What 'budget'? The GOP will produce one this fall....Pelosi Galore didn't get a budget done last year...

And honestly, if you want to quote the delusions of the dwarf, don't bother, GO65. He makes things up due to his insane fixation on me. Christ, last time I checked he was claiming I did backgrounds on posters (how you do that escapes me) that my house isn't exactly as I describe (even though some in the forum have knowledge of it, and google earth is available)...he even claimed I fucked with his credit cards at some point....

If you need 'help' speaking about politics with me...well, just go away. Its simply to pathetic to deal with.

Badeye  posted on  2011-04-14   10:19:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Badeye (#15)

What 'budget'? The GOP will produce one this fall....Pelosi Galore didn't get a budget done last year...

You might want to flip on the news - the GOP controlled house just passed a spending bill for the remainder of 2011 that failed to cut spending.

And honestly, if you want to quote the delusions of the dwarf, don't bother, GO65. He makes things up due to his insane fixation on me. Christ, last time I checked he was claiming I did backgrounds on posters (how you do that escapes me) that my house isn't exactly as I describe (even though some in the forum have knowledge of it, and google earth is available)...he even claimed I fucked with his credit cards at some point..

Sorry, I don't pay much attention to the obsessions some posters have with each other. Point is, in this case he's right and you are wrong.

Now, shall we revisit your prediction that the GOP wouldn't raise the debt celling in light of this weeks news that McConnell is advising Republicans not to filibuster a Senate vote on increasing the cap while Boehner is asking wall street how long he can go before he eventually agrees to raise the cap?

go65  posted on  2011-04-14   17:29:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: go65 (#31)

You might want to flip on the news - the GOP controlled house just passed a spending bill

You might want to learn the difference between a 'spending bill' and a budget pass by the House of Representatives, ratified by the Senate, and signed off on by POTUS.

Or you can continue to impersonate Pelosi Galore, who couldn't produce a budget last year...first time in century or so as I recall.

Badeye  posted on  2011-04-15   8:31:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Badeye (#32)

You might want to learn the difference between a 'spending bill' and a budget pass by the House of Representatives, ratified by the Senate, and signed off on by POTUS.

spin spin spin.

I can't blame you - you touted how the results of the November election were going to change things, and all your beloved Republicans have done since taking control of the power of the purse in January is more of the same.

Maybe things will be different in 2012!

:-)

go65  posted on  2011-04-15   9:19:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: go65 (#33)

your beloved Republicans have done since taking control of the power of the purse in January

How is there GOP "control" when the Senate owns a RAT-majority? Not to mention the "control" via the veto pen of the Dem President.

Liberator  posted on  2011-04-15   14:13:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Liberator (#44)

How is there GOP "control" when the Senate owns a RAT-majority? Not to mention the "control" via the veto pen of the Dem President.

In all seriousness, you are right - the House, Senate and Presidency all share responsibility for the deficit.

But I'm dealing with Badeye, who blamed the deficit of 2007-08 on House Democrats. Therefore, by that logic, House Republicans are responsible for the current deficit.

And, keep in mind that House Republicans touted a spending cut "deal" that didn't actually cut spending.

go65  posted on  2011-04-15   15:47:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#129. To: go65 (#56)

In all seriousness, you are right - the House, Senate and Presidency all share responsibility for the deficit.

Thank you for some sense of honest analysis.

But I'm dealing with Badeye, who blamed the deficit of 2007-08 on House Democrats. Therefore, by that logic, House Republicans are responsible for the current deficit.

Well 65, Dems did control both Houses, did they not?

House Republicans are guilty of being bamboozled into financing two fake wars and mostly responsible for the deficits we're incurred thus far.

OTOH, why hasn't 0bama pulled out of Iraq like he promised? And why aren't Dems pressuring him about it? Moreover, why are the Dems supporting the Nobel Peace Prize winning warmonger for his foray into Libya?

Liberator  posted on  2011-04-16   14:54:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: Liberator (#129)

Well 65, Dems did control both Houses, did they not?

But not the Presidency.

House Republicans are guilty of being bamboozled into financing two fake wars and mostly responsible for the deficits we're incurred thus far.

Agreed, and don't forget Medicare Part D - supported by Paul Ryan among others.

OTOH, why hasn't 0bama pulled out of Iraq like he promised? And why aren't Dems pressuring him about it? Moreover, why are the Dems supporting the Nobel Peace Prize winning warmonger for his foray into Libya?

Our withdrawal from Iraq is still scheduled for completion by the date negotiated by the Bush administration. Obama never promised an immediate pullout.

And many Democrats have been outspoken in their criticism of Obama for his actions in Libya.

go65  posted on  2011-04-16   15:55:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#157. To: go65 (#131)

Our withdrawal from Iraq is still scheduled for completion by the date negotiated by the Bush administration. Obama never promised an immediate pullout.

And many Democrats have been outspoken in their criticism of Obama for his actions in Libya.

a) 0bama certainly did schedule a pull out.

b) Few Dems have been outspoken in their criticism of 0bama, and IF they have, it's been barely a whisper compared to the cacophony of screeching criticism of Bush for the same thing. The hypocrisy and lies of Bamster and the Dems has been rife.

Liberator  posted on  2011-04-16   23:02:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#158. To: Liberator (#157) (Edited)

a) 0bama certainly did schedule a pull out.

You may want to review the "U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement" negotiated by the Bush administration and the Iraqi government in 2008. It calls for all U.S. troops to leave Iraq by the end of 2011. As of now, there are about 40,000 U.S. troops left in Iraq.

b) Few Dems have been outspoken in their criticism of 0bama, and IF they have, it's been barely a whisper compared to the cacophony of screeching criticism of Bush for the same thing. The hypocrisy and lies of Bamster and the Dems has been rife.

Several high-profile Democrats have sharply criticized Obama, along with liberal bloggers and pundits. Examples include Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.). Kucinich even called for Obama to be impeached.

See: http://nation.foxnews.com/libya/2011/03/20/house-democrats-freak-out-after-obama-takes- military-action-libya#ixzz1JkLNlcop

Can you point me to a single Republican who called for Bush to be impeached over invading Iraq? And speaking of "hypocrisy", with all these Republicans complaining over the cost of our involvement in Libya, can you point me to any of them who argued we should have paid for our war in Iraq?

go65  posted on  2011-04-16   23:14:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#159. To: go65 (#158)

And speaking of "hypocrisy", with all these Republicans complaining over the cost of our involvement in Libya,

I think it's because they feel what the hell are we doing there anyway??? There doesn't seem to be a goal or stategy for that matter....

I would imagine they also think why are we helping the rebels, when Obozo wouldn't even open his mouth to support the citizens of Iran when Amendenijad was slaughtering them in the streets......

Nothing foreign policy wise we've done in the last couple of years makes any sense..... Especially in the Middle East, if they don't get that area quieted down and get rid of the radicals the whole world will suffer for it.....

CZ82  posted on  2011-04-17   7:41:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#168. To: CZ82 (#159)

I think it's because they feel what the hell are we doing there anyway??? There doesn't seem to be a goal or stategy for that matter....

And yet Republicans like Gingrich and Limbaugh were clamoring for the President to act before he did.

go65  posted on  2011-04-17   9:52:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#171. To: go65 (#168)

And yet Republicans like Gingrich and Limbaugh were clamoring for the President to act before he did.

Gingrich is a douchebag anyway so nothing would surprise me with him....

I listen to Rush everyday and don't remember him saying anything about taking any action against Khadafy. I do remember him asking the question "Just who are these Rebels anyway"??? Muslim Brotherhood??? Al Qaeda????? Iranian militants??

He also made the comment we were probably going to do it for Europe so they can keep their oil coming in from Libya....

CZ82  posted on  2011-04-17   14:08:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#200. To: CZ82 (#171)

I listen to Rush everyday and don't remember him saying anything about taking any action against Khadafy. I do remember him asking the question "Just who are these Rebels anyway"??? Muslim Brotherhood??? Al Qaeda????? Iranian militants??

That's not surprising. :-)

Check out: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/for-the-war-before-he-was-against-it/73387/

Limbaugh March 7:

This guy's got a chip on his shoulder about the country. He doesn't believe in exceptionalism about America, doesn't believe in America's greatness. One of the reasons he's not doing anything in Libya with Khadafy -- has anybody got a clue? -- is he doesn't believe we have the moral authority to do anything other than mouth a bunch of words in the first place.

March 10:

We had a caller say, "Why doesn't Obama stop the bullying in the Middle East?" I think it would help everybody to recall what Obama's opinion of this country is. He thinks this country has been a bully in the world. Look, you know it and I know it. He believes that this country is a bully. It's one of the reasons why he's not doing anything in Libya.

March 15:

Where is Obama? I'm still amazed at how utterly out of it Obama is. Where is he? Has he checked out, is he sick? Are his handlers busy in other parts of the world? Get this. Mrs. Clinton has met with Libyan rebel leaders in Paris. Now, it's safe to do that, I figure, now that the revolution against Khadafy is safely lost. Khadafy's probably gonna win this or has won, so now it's safe to go meet with the rebel leaders, probably trying to arrange a place for 'em to live, Paris, Miami, LA. LA looks a lot like Libya, certain parts of it. I've been there. I have seen it. You've got that going on. I mean it's baffling. His handlers are busy in other parts of the world and unable to give him direction? What's going on? He's acting like a child.

March 17:

Okay, so here's Libya. He doesn't even seem to care much less do anything about it, and people chalk it up to traditional explanations. "Well, he's looking at polling data, can't go in there because he criticized Bush, would look bad," all the standard conventional wisdom stuff of people trying to come up with the explanation. That's not it.

It's very simple. He doesn't look at America as the solution. We're the problem. He doesn't think the United States has any moral authority in places like Libya. In fact, I would venture to say that if you get Obama to be honest, he'd tell you that there have been times in our history when we have been Libya. We're no different. He probably thinks, who are we telling Khadafy what to do? Who are we to stand up for people around the world who want freedom? Hell, the way Obama looks at it, we've been denying freedom to our own citizens for who knows how long. I'm serious. I think the explanations for Obama's inaction, indecision are quite simple. He just doesn't have the view of America as an exceptional place, as a solution to the world's problems. He just doesn't.

March 18:

Now, back to the Middle East for just a second, 'cause when I offered my theorem here that could it be the rebels in Libya are in fact the Muslim Brotherhood? We know that they probably are supported by Al-Qaeda. The Iranians are involved in supporting rebels in other parts of the Middle East. My friend Andy McCarthy has raised this point. Let's say that these rebels do represent the Muslim Brotherhood or Iran or Al-Qaeda and they are engaged in trying to get rid of Khadafy. Are we doing their dirty work? Now, this is something that has to be considered. We had a very long, drawn out discussion yesterday about US national interests, why it takes incredibly deep, intelligent, responsible people to make these kinds of judgments. We can topple the regime in Libya if we want to, but what would follow Khadafy? If it's the Muslim Brotherhood, then make no mistake, we are advancing Sharia law, we are helping the advance of Sharia law, we are empowering Iran.

March 30:

Obama and Mrs. Clinton are suggesting now that we make it official, that we start arming the rebels in Libya. They are suggesting that we arm Al-Qaeda - and yet, ladies and gentlemen, we, you and me, are the extremists. We are arming Al-Qaeda in Libya!

So in the span of few weeks he goes from complaining that Obama didn't act in Libya because he doesn't love America and doesn't see the greatness of America, to complaining that Obama is acting in Libya because he's arming Al Qaeda.

Hopefully you listen to Limbaugh for the entertainment value, because you seem to smart to take him seriously.

go65  posted on  2011-04-18   10:37:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 200.

        There are no replies to Comment # 200.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 200.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com