Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Obamanomics: U.S. deficit up 15.7% in first half of fiscal 2011
Source:
Google News
URL Source: http://www.google.com/hostednews/af ... 51497966fd4c6461748e63e3ee.921
Published: Apr 12, 2011
Author: afp
Post Date: 2011-04-12 17:59:01 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Obamanomics in Action, Obama-doma-ding-dong, Obamatuer Hour
Views: 197468
Comments: 215
(AFP) – 2 hours ago WASHINGTON — The US budget deficit shot up 15.7 percent in the first six months of fiscal 2011, the Treasury Department said Wednesday as political knives were being sharpened for a new budget battle. The Treasury reported a deficit of $829 billion for the October-March period, compared with $717 billion a year earlier, as revenue rose a sluggish 6.9 percent as the economic recovery slowly gained pace. The Treasury argued that the pace of increase in the deficit was deceptive because of large one-off reductions in expenditures made during the first half of fiscal 2010, compared with previous and subsequent periods. Those included a $115 billion reduction in funds spent on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) -- the financial institution bailout program -- in March 2010. But 2011 so far has also seen significant increases in spending on defense, Social Security, health and debt service, while receipts have not grown as fast. "The jump in outlays mostly owed to a smaller estimated reduction in TARP outlays this year versus 2010," said Theresa Chen at Barclays Capital Research. However, she said, the trend shows that taxable income is rising at a 6.9 percent annual pace, and individual incomes taxes are up 20.6 percent, "consistent with general economic improvement." The figures came amid a sharp, politically partisan battle in Washington over cutting spending and raising taxes, with President Barack Obama preparing Wednesday to release his plan for reducing the long-term deficit. He also faces a looming battle over increasing the country's official debt ceiling, so that the government can continue to borrow to finance the deficit.
US deficit up 15.7% in first half of fiscal 2011
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 130.
#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)
Financial slavery for you, your children and your grand children..... thank you Libtards....
have you forgotten the tea party celebrating the extension of the Bush tax cuts, which added $858 billion to the deficit over 2 years? Nobody takes tea partiers/conservatives seriously when they complain about debt/deficits.
If Obama hadn't spent 3.7 Trillion instead of the 2.2 trillion the government took in then there wouldn't be a deficit..... now would there?????? Why don't you ask the "Village Idiot" why he doesn't have a "laser like" focus on creating jobs????? that would increase revenues greatly.... and reduce the deficit..... and also reduce the amount of people dependent on the government (you don't want that do you).... less people to vote for "The Party of Losers"....(Democrats)!!!!! Have you gotten your weekly handout yet?????? By the way I thought you were gone for good because of people posting about the "Wookie"???????
Obama's not spending a dime anymore without approval by the GOP controlled House of Representatives.
Hey, you're back and lying! How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out? (laughing)
How's that 10% unemployment you told us we'd see after the November election?
How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out? How's that 10% unemployment you told us we'd see after the November election? In reality, its about 20%...as predicted.
Chuckles...about as real as your house actually sitting on a stone cliff...
in the words of George Costanza - 'it's not a lie if you believe it' Remember when the GOP claimed it would cut $100 billion from the budget this year? Instead, they ended up cutting less than $30 billion. Again, read the tag line, the GOP owns the deficit now. And their own plan, with its ridiculous assumptions, STILL doesn't project a balanced budget until 2030.
What 'budget'? The GOP will produce one this fall....Pelosi Galore didn't get a budget done last year... And honestly, if you want to quote the delusions of the dwarf, don't bother, GO65. He makes things up due to his insane fixation on me. Christ, last time I checked he was claiming I did backgrounds on posters (how you do that escapes me) that my house isn't exactly as I describe (even though some in the forum have knowledge of it, and google earth is available)...he even claimed I fucked with his credit cards at some point.... If you need 'help' speaking about politics with me...well, just go away. Its simply to pathetic to deal with.
You might want to flip on the news - the GOP controlled house just passed a spending bill for the remainder of 2011 that failed to cut spending. Sorry, I don't pay much attention to the obsessions some posters have with each other. Point is, in this case he's right and you are wrong. Now, shall we revisit your prediction that the GOP wouldn't raise the debt celling in light of this weeks news that McConnell is advising Republicans not to filibuster a Senate vote on increasing the cap while Boehner is asking wall street how long he can go before he eventually agrees to raise the cap?
You might want to learn the difference between a 'spending bill' and a budget pass by the House of Representatives, ratified by the Senate, and signed off on by POTUS. Or you can continue to impersonate Pelosi Galore, who couldn't produce a budget last year...first time in century or so as I recall.
spin spin spin. I can't blame you - you touted how the results of the November election were going to change things, and all your beloved Republicans have done since taking control of the power of the purse in January is more of the same. Maybe things will be different in 2012! :-)
How is there GOP "control" when the Senate owns a RAT-majority? Not to mention the "control" via the veto pen of the Dem President.
In all seriousness, you are right - the House, Senate and Presidency all share responsibility for the deficit. But I'm dealing with Badeye, who blamed the deficit of 2007-08 on House Democrats. Therefore, by that logic, House Republicans are responsible for the current deficit. And, keep in mind that House Republicans touted a spending cut "deal" that didn't actually cut spending.
January of 2007 - January of 2011. This is why I don't have time for your bullshit today.
And yet you keep spewing it:
Your graph is bullshit, promoted by a classic "tax and spend" organization, but you are too stupid too realize that.
Yea... tell me about it...
It takes a pretty amazing ability to deny reality to argue that Bush's tax cuts, the GOP medicare expansion, Bush's TARP program, the Bush war in the Iraq, and the Bush recession didn't cause an increase in the deficit. Keep in mind, the GOP could have sent the Senate a balanced budget rather than a bill full of phony cuts that actually increased spending.
ANd keep in mind the Democrats failed to produce a budget for 2011 and added almost $1 trillion to the deficit in 8 months...... What were you saying about Bush???
That he pissed away 200bkn in surplus funds...made a couple hundred billion and then pissed away a trillion bucks IN ONE YEAR...
Where????
If you are going to blame Obama for the FY09 deficit, then blame REpublicans for the FY11 deficit. Deal?
Deal? It was the Democrats in the House and Senate that are responsible for the 2009 budget..... And the GOP is only "partially" responsible for the last 5 months of 2011. They tried to get more cuts and couldn't get them, so they said OK we will fight the big battle later for 2012.....
The 2009 budget that was submitted [in 2008] was a joke. The WH KNEW that the US was in recession and totally mis-projected revenues. Before Obama took office, the deficit projected out @ 1.2trillion. Before he could blink in office the revenues plummeted and unemployment was over 8% on it's way to 10%. You folks continually discount the downward momentum that existed in the economy when Obama took office and that was then stopped nearly dead in its tracks within 6 months of the stim.
Nobody is discounting the disaster that occurred when the Democrats took Congress in 2007, which is why they were promptly thrown out.
The dems were put into the Congress because Boy Blunder and the GOP Congress totally screwed the US in every way imaginable. The dems inherited every prpblem that the US has.
The dems
Wha...chuckle...huh? The GOP created them...the oil crisis of the 1970's was Nixon...stag and then hyperinflation...Nixonomics...explosion of debt and deficits, meltdown of S&L's and then a bank panic...Reagan...further erosion of debt and deficits and then recession and the INSANE embarkation of massive military intervention in the mideast that has made the US less safe and led directly to 9/11...Poppy...a moronic tax cut and fiscal and regulatory policies that resulted in the worst downturn since the 1930's...Boy Blunder. Stack that up against Clinton getting a blow job.
The dems created the entitlements and the entitlement mentality. Get rid of them and no more debt. Democrats are evil, they are so evil they even murder little innocent babies. In Obamas case even after being born.
What do you propose we do with the sick, poor and elderly? Why is it that other nations take care of them but the Greatest Nation in the History of the World cannot?
Why is it that other nations take care of them but the Greatest Nation in the History of the World cannot? "GOVERNMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS" have created that mess you describe..... Socialized medicine in other countries does not do a good job of taking care of the sick/elderly. If they determine that treating you is a waste of money you get no treatment, at least here you have "still" the option to seek and get treatment..... pay for it out of your own pocket if you have to but still available.... but not for much longer if ObozoCare gets fully implemented.... If you want an example I will show you.... I'm retired military on the government sponsored insurance plan called Tricare. I recently had an ear infection and called the Base Hospital to get an appointment for treatment. I was told over the phone it would be "9" days before I could be seen... yea right.. I guess maybe me possibly loosing my hearing in that ear wasn't very important to them. So I went to the local emergency room and got seen in 2 hours, cost me a $20 copay but was well worth it... One idea out there is to give "vouchers" to people to enable them to get private insurance that would be much cheaper for the taxpayer and more effective for the patients.... in essence do away with Medicare and Medicaid.. but as it stands right now that's not going to happen with the Dems in charge. They are totally against anything other than ObozoCare, it's their Holy Grail for getting control of you, take your freedoms away from you..... that make you happy????? As far as the poor goes.... well "most" of them are that way because they want to be that way.... I know that sounds stupid but it's true in more ways than one.. Ignorance is probably the biggest reason for poverty, laziness is probably #2, single parentage is probably #3... All of those Welfare programs that are "SUPPOSED" to be helping these people are actually doing the opposite..... they aren't solving the problems, only exacerbating them..
I notice war didn't respond to your well made points.
Huh?
This is an "intelligent" reply by Stone Standards: "The democrat platform is evil. It is what their party is based on. It is like a magnet and it pulls evil people to it. " No need to go into specifics. No need to even address the topic at hand. Democrats are the Spawn of Satin. That's the only point you need to make. It save a lot of typing, and even better, you don't even have to think to use it.
Skip. Obama did vote for a bill to allow babies born alive to be simply left alone to die. Obama has no problem with people sticking up sharp metal up in its living quarters and ripping them to shreds. Their actions make them evil. You hated Bush for his wars. I didn't agree with them either. Obama doubled down on them and started a new one. Not a peep from you liberal/commies.
1) I'm not a liberal/commie 2) I'm appalled by Obama's new war, just as I'm appalled that he did nothing to end the Bush ones. I wish someone would challenge him on the D side in 2012. Sadly, that doesn't look like it's going to happen.
You sure defend them a lot.
No, I think if you actually look at my posts you'd see that I'm anti-stupid, not pro Obama. Unfortunately for people like you, nearly all of the pure stupid these days is coming from the far right. With a cast of characters like Newt, Sarah, Michelle, Donald, Christine, Breitbart, et. al. it is a target rich environment.
It just seems like everytime someone says something about Obama. You want to change the subject to establishment Republicans.
Maybe because there is a difference with taking exception to something President Obama did, said or believes in and sounding like an extreme wacko on the subject of the President. I wouldn't sign on to the extreme views your emotional reaction to Obama distorts your outlook on the man to either. Your rather unfair portrayal of him works to his favor, not yours.
There are no replies to Comment # 130. End Trace Mode for Comment # 130.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: CZ82 (#1)
Financial slavery for you, your children and your grand children..... thank you Libtards....
#4. To: go65 (#3)
have you forgotten the tea party celebrating the extension of the Bush tax cuts, which added $858 billion to the deficit over 2 years?
#5. To: CZ82 (#4)
If Obama hadn't spent 3.7 Trillion instead of the 2.2 trillion the government took in then there wouldn't be a deficit..... now would there??????
#6. To: go65 (#5)
Obama's not spending a dime anymore without approval by the GOP controlled House of Representatives.
#7. To: Badeye (#6)
How's that tripled deficit Owe-bama, Reid and Pelosi brought down on us all working out?
#8. To: go65 (#7)
#9. To: Badeye (#8)
In reality, its about 20%...as predicted.
#10. To: war, badeye (#9)
(Edited)
Chuckles...about as real as your house actually sitting on a stone cliff...
#15. To: go65 (#10)
Remember when the GOP claimed it would cut $100 billion from the budget this year? Instead, they ended up cutting less than $30 billion.
#31. To: Badeye (#15)
What 'budget'? The GOP will produce one this fall....Pelosi Galore didn't get a budget done last year...
And honestly, if you want to quote the delusions of the dwarf, don't bother, GO65. He makes things up due to his insane fixation on me. Christ, last time I checked he was claiming I did backgrounds on posters (how you do that escapes me) that my house isn't exactly as I describe (even though some in the forum have knowledge of it, and google earth is available)...he even claimed I fucked with his credit cards at some point..
#32. To: go65 (#31)
You might want to flip on the news - the GOP controlled house just passed a spending bill
#33. To: Badeye (#32)
You might want to learn the difference between a 'spending bill' and a budget pass by the House of Representatives, ratified by the Senate, and signed off on by POTUS.
#44. To: go65 (#33)
your beloved Republicans have done since taking control of the power of the purse in January
#56. To: Liberator (#44)
How is there GOP "control" when the Senate owns a RAT-majority? Not to mention the "control" via the veto pen of the Dem President.
#57. To: go65 (#56)
But I'm dealing with Badeye, who blamed the deficit of 2007-08 on House Democrats.
#58. To: Badeye, liberator (#57)
This is why I don't have time for your bullshit today.
#59. To: go65 (#58)
#62. To: no gnu taxes (#59)
Your graph is bullshit, promoted by a classic "tax and spend" organization, but you are too stupid too realize that.
#63. To: CZ82 (#62)
(Edited)
Yea... tell me about it...
#64. To: go65 (#63)
Keep in mind, the GOP could have sent the Senate a balanced budget rather than a bill full of phony cuts that actually increased spending.
#76. To: CZ82 (#64)
#79. To: war (#76)
That he pissed away 200bkn in surplus funds...made a couple hundred billion and then pissed away a trillion bucks IN ONE YEAR...
#80. To: CZ82 (#79)
#81. To: go65 (#80)
If you are going to blame Obama for the FY09 deficit, then blame REpublicans for the FY11 deficit.
#83. To: CZ82 (#81)
It was the Democrats in the House and Senate that are responsible for the 2009 budget...
#88. To: war (#83)
You folks continually discount the downward momentum that existed in the economy
#91. To: no gnu taxes (#88)
Nobody is discounting the disaster that occurred when the Democrats took Congress in 2007, which is why they were promptly thrown out.
#93. To: war (#91)
inherited created every prpblem that the US has. The GOP often hasn't done enough to fight them.
#97. To: no gnu taxes (#93)
#98. To: war (#97)
#100. To: A K A Stone (#98)
The dems created the entitlements and the entitlement mentality. Get rid of them and no more debt.
#107. To: war (#100)
What do you propose we do with the sick, poor and elderly?
#111. To: CZ82, war (#107)
#113. To: A K A Stone (#111)
#115. To: war (#113)
Huh?
#118. To: Skip Intro (#115)
#119. To: A K A Stone (#118)
Obama doubled down on them and started a new one. Not a peep from you liberal/commies.
#121. To: Skip Intro (#119)
I'm not a liberal/commie
#125. To: A K A Stone (#121)
You sure defend them a lot.
#128. To: Skip Intro (#125)
#130. To: A K A Stone (#128)
Replies to Comment # 130.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]