[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Going Broke: Treasury Down to $58.6B in Cash, $130.5B Borrowing Authority
Source: CNS News
URL Source: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article ... ke-treasury-has-only-586b-cash
Published: Mar 31, 2011
Author: Terence P. Jeffrey
Post Date: 2011-03-31 05:04:47 by Happy Quanzaa
Keywords: Obama-doma-ding-dong, Obamanomics in Action
Views: 18172
Comments: 40

(CNSNews.com) - Imagine that you had an average monthly income of about $170 balanced against average monthly expenses of about $940--and that you were more than $14,000 in debt.

Then imagine that as of today, you had only $58.60 in cash left in your bank account and $130.50 left on your line of credit.

Now multiply these numbers by 1 billion and you will have the up-to-date financial situation of the U.S. government.

According to the Daily Treasury Statement released by the U.S. Treasury Department today at 4:00 p.m., the Treasury had $58.6 billion in cash in its accounts as of the close of business on Tuesday. That was down from $190.6 billion at the beginning of March and $309.8 billion at the beginning of this fiscal year on Oct. 1, 2010.

In the first five months of this fiscal year (Oct.-Feb.), the federal government averaged $169.6 billion per month in revenue. (During these months, the Treasury brought in a cumulative total of $845.3 billion—including all moneys from individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, payroll taxes, excise taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, estate taxes and other taxes.)

In the same five months that it was averaging this $169.6 billion in revenue, the federal government was averaging $943.4 billion in monthly spending. (During those months, the Treasury actually spent $4.717 trillion—including, for example, $2.492 trillion to pay off the holders of Treasury securities that had matured, $245.7 billion in Social Security benefits, $212.8 billion in Medicare benefits, $158.4 billion to pay defense contractors, $113.0 billion for Medicaid benefits, $111.6 billion for Department of Education programs, $94.3 billion in interest on debt, $73.4 billion in salaries for federal workers, and $26.7 billion in insurance benefits for federal workers.)

All of these cumulative federal expenditures--and more—from the period of October through February were itemized in the “withdrawal” column of “Table II” in the Daily Treasury Statement for Feb. 28.

Thus far in March, as itemized in the Daily Treasury Statement released today, the federal government has spent $927.3 billion while taking in $184.2 billion in revenue.

Currently, the legal limit on the federal debt (as set in law by an act passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama) is $14,2940 trillion. As of the close of business Tuesday, the portion of the national debt subject to this legal limit was $14,1635 trillion.

That leaves the federal government with just $130.5 billion in legal borrowing authority.

When that $130.5 billion in remaining legal borrowing authority is added to the Treasury’s $58.6 billion cash on hand, it leaves the government with a net $189.1 billion in spending room—or about one-fifth of the federal government’s $943.4 billion monthly spending habit.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

#1. To: Happy Quanzaa (#0)

Remember GO65 insisting Owe-bama, Pelosi Galore and Dingy Harry Reid DID NOT triple the national deficit?

Seems so quaint today....

Badeye  posted on  2011-03-31   8:49:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Badeye, Happy Quanzaa (#1)

So raise more money by taxing the rich who pretty much got rich by manipulation a corrupt financial system. Problem solved.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-03-31   9:45:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Godwinson (#2)

I see your grip on financial reality is tenuous at best given that 'suggestion'.

Badeye  posted on  2011-03-31   10:30:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Badeye (#3) (Edited)

Eisenhower taxed the oligarchs at 90%. Bleed them them till it hurts.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-03-31   10:34:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Godwinson (#4)

Eisenhower taxed the oligarchs at 90%.

Ah, no the Democrat controlled congress did that. And in the end JFK reduced it sparking massive economic growth til LBJ reversed it in much teh same way Owe- bama is doing today, to even worse effect.

Leaving that aside, the math shows your suggestion wouldn't come close to fixing the problem, a 15 trillion dollar national deficit, it would only excerbate it.

Replacing basic math and generally accepted accounting principals with liberal social theory always leads to economic disaster. History demonstrates this conclusively. The irony here is it was LBJ's 'Great Society' programs that Nixon didn't have time to kill that were at the heart of Carter's economic woes, and his termination for 'cause' by voters in 1980.

Again, thanks for bring up another similiarity.

Badeye  posted on  2011-03-31   10:50:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Badeye (#5)

Ah, no the Democrat controlled congress did that.

With Ike's blessing since he needed to balance the budget while waging the Cold War.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-03-31   11:20:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Godwinson (#6)

It was actually raised back up in the Congress prior to Ike. It had reached 94% during the last years of the war then the Dem Congress cut it to ~85% in 46 or 47 and then cut it again to 82%. When the GOP took over in 1949, one of their last acts was to RAISE it back. to 85%. They had the Congress for 2 years, screwed everything up and so the Dems were put back in.

When the dems re-took the Congress in 1951, they raised the top bracket to 92%. Eisenhower was then given a GOP majority for his first two years and they cut it to 91%.

Confused enough?

war  posted on  2011-03-31   11:29:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war (#7) (Edited)

Confused enough?

There is no confusion. Until that idiot Reagan came along - tax rates were not linked to Republican ideology. Balancing budgets were Republican ideology but not this trickle down ideology that stated if you lower taxes it means there will be more revenue because the tax money returned will serve as some sort of seed for economic growth.

That is BS and that is a recent ideology the GOP adopted in the 1980s and in never worked. When Clinton raised taxes in the 1990s and the economy boomed regardless I thought that would put an end to this BS theory the way Columbus discovering America put an end to the flat earth theory but I see it still persists.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-03-31   11:35:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Godwinson (#9)

Clinton's tweak of the tax rates resulted in the most optimal revenues since the early 1960's.

Boy Blunder and his GOP COngress totally screwed the pooch...revenues fell...business formation fell...borrowing in all sectors increased and debt went to the moon.

Gotta love shills like Dick tho...they shit all over the floor and leave...when they come back and see someone cleaning up their mess they ask with ironic incredulity: "Whatchoo do?!?"

war  posted on  2011-03-31   11:39:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#11)

Clinton's tweak of the tax rates resulted in the most optimal revenues since the early 1960's.

Boy Blunder and his GOP COngress totally screwed the pooch...revenues fell...business formation fell...borrowing in all sectors increased and debt went to the moon.

The majority of American voters did not support Bush's tax cuts preferring to pay down the debt.

Bush and his ilk managed to prove that government can't be trusted, raised the debt, and now few want to pay taxes to support a government that can't be trusted.

Republicans are using the mess they made as a weapon against the middle class hoping to distract long enough to make off with the whole enchilada.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-31   11:59:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: lucysmom (#14)

The majority of American voters did not support Bush's tax cuts preferring to pay down the debt.

The irony is the majority of Americans still want to pay down the debt, and Owe- bama chose to triple it instead.

Which is why he's going to be fired for 'cause' next year.

Badeye  posted on  2011-03-31   12:03:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Badeye (#17)

The irony is the majority of Americans still want to pay down the debt, and Owe- bama chose to triple it instead.

The difference is that they now want to reduce the debt by stabbing their fellow citizens (neighbors in the Christian sense) in the back.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-31   12:22:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: lucysmom (#20)

At least we are making progress, you admit Owe-bama and company tripled the deficit.

Now that its indisputable, its not surprising GO65 doesn't come around these days here.

You can make up any excuse you want about who is going to get screwed by reducing this unsustainable spending. But the bottom line is we are bankrupt, and the world won't continue to provide financial assistance to us much longer. The day the IMF stops using US currency as its basic financial instrument, the dollar goes to zero value. And every single one of us gets fucked, no matter who you voted for, what party you belong to.

Badeye  posted on  2011-03-31   12:54:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Badeye (#22)

But the bottom line is we are bankrupt, and the world won't continue to provide financial assistance to us much longer.

That's pretty much what one might expect when pursuing a starve the beast, lower taxes for the wealthy policy.

Some Americans are doing really, really well.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-31   22:43:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: lucysmom (#29)

Some Americans are doing really, really well

Yep...like those 'fat cats' on Wall Street Senator Owe-bama railed against. Then the various union 'fat cats' that benefitted from his insane 'stimulus that didn't stimulate' and the bailout of Government Motors.

Appreciate you mentioning it.

Badeye  posted on  2011-04-01   9:10:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Badeye (#32)

Yep...like those 'fat cats' on Wall Street Senator Owe-bama railed against. Then the various union 'fat cats' that benefitted from his insane 'stimulus that didn't stimulate' and the bailout of Government Motors.

So tell me why you object to taxing them at a higher rate on their ill-gotten gains?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-04-01   10:20:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: lucysmom, All (#34)

ill-gotten gains

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2011-04-01   10:39:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Happy Quanzaa (#35)

Yeah, ill-gotten gains.

Kind of weird to justify an economic theory with a quote from a novel, a work of fiction?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-04-01   10:55:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: lucysmom, Happy Quanzaa (#37)

Kind of weird to justify an economic theory with a quote from a novel, a work of fiction?

Yea, using a badly done work of fiction as a basis for an economic policy is like basing foreign policy on a Captain America comic book.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-04-01   10:57:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 38.

        There are no replies to Comment # 38.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com