[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: President Obama Goes to War - Without Congress
Source: American Thinker
URL Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog ... dent_obama_goes_to_war_wi.html
Published: Mar 20, 2011
Author: Wesley Clark, MD
Post Date: 2011-03-20 16:49:31 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 121661
Comments: 105

Regardless of one's inclination toward the "freedom fighters" and the "monster" in Libya, or the wisdom of United States military intervention, there are certain formalities that are required, and that President Obama and his administration, including Secretary of State Clinton, appear determined to ignore, in violation of both the Constitution and United States Law.

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution specifies that it is the Congress that has the power to declare war. United States Code (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548), the War Powers Act, specifically states that the president may undertake the use of military force only in the case of "... a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces." It further states that the President must consult with Congress, "...in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities ..."

Membership in the United Nations does not grant the Security Council the authority to order U.S. forces into action, and being the President does not permit Obama to violate the Constitution and the Law, to commit an act of war without the authorization of the People, through their Congress.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 67.

#1. To: We The People (#0)

.

and not a FUCKING word from so the called CONSTITUTIONAL and TRADITIONAL "CONSERVATIVES" meme here.

Ah yes.

Affectation as opposed to natural honesty.

Bullshit is the language.

Self is the true cause.

"Send lawyers guns and money, the sh!t has hit the fan!"

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-03-22   18:02:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Mad Dog (#1)

I'm absolutely amazed that the Republicans, ANY Republicans, are not saying a word about this. The only outrage I've heard has come from Democrats, unless I've just missed it.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-23   19:11:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: We The People (#2)

I'm absolutely amazed that the Republicans, ANY Republicans, are not saying a word about this. The only outrage I've heard has come from Democrats, unless I've just missed it.

The War Powers Act gives the President 60 days before he needs Congressional approval.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-24   0:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: lucysmom (#6) (Edited)

The War Powers Act gives the President 60 days before he needs Congressional approval.

That is not true.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat.[citation needed] The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

We The People  posted on  2011-03-26   17:28:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: We The People (#25)

That is not true.

Not so fast.

What does that little "[citation needed]" following the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat. mean?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-26   21:20:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: lucysmom (#26) (Edited)

Not so fast.

We both know what it means, but let's not play games. Let's forget the wiki site and go straight to the text of the resolution...

www.law.cornell.edu/uscod..._50_00001541----000-.html

(a) Congressional declaration

It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Congressional legislative power under necessary and proper clause Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer hereof.

(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

(1) a declaration of war,

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

www.law.cornell.edu/uscod..._50_00001542----000-.html

The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.

There is no way around it, facts are facts. Obama has violated the US Constitution as well as the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   10:24:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: We The People (#27)

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

Not knowing what that means, I looked it up. Here's what I found:

Section 8(b) states that further specific statutory authorization is not required

to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to the date of enactment of this joint resolution and pursuant to the United Nations Charter or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.

This section was added by the Senate to make clear that the resolution did not prevent U.S. forces from participating in certain joint military exercises with allied or friendly organizations or countries. The conference report stated that the "high-level" military commands meant the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, (NATO), the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) and the United Nations command in Korea.

www.fas.org/man/crs/RL32267.html

It kinda looks like Obama is covered by "specific statutory authorization". (not that that makes any difference)

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-27   11:51:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: lucysmom (#31)

It kinda looks like Obama is covered by "specific statutory authorization".

I'm sorry, but it doesn't.

A 'joint military exercise' is not actively engaging in hostilities against another country.

A 'joint military exercise' is a training mission.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   12:16:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: We The People (#35)

I'm sorry, but it doesn't.

A 'joint military exercise' is not actively engaging in hostilities against another country.

A 'joint military exercise' is a training mission.

He's covered because he commands the biggest military in the world that backs him up. Isn't that 'might makes right' stuff what 'conservatives' live and die for?

Rek  posted on  2011-03-27   12:22:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Rek (#37)

Isn't that 'might makes right' stuff what 'conservatives' live and die for?

They like that power over everything stuff when in power and still think its their birth right when out of power.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-03-27   12:41:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: lucysmom, Rek (#40)

Isn't that 'might makes right' stuff what 'conservatives' live and die for?

They like that power over everything stuff when in power and still think its their birth right when out of power.

Conservatives haven't been 'in power' for decades, neoconservatives or the left have.

Is that what this discussion is reduced to?

Irrefutable facts have been presented, clearly outlining an unconstitutional and criminal act by a President of the United States, and all you two have is insults for conservatives who have had nothing to do with any of this middle eastern adventurism.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   12:50:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: We The People (#42)

Irrefutable facts have been presented, clearly outlining an unconstitutional and criminal act by a President of the United States, and all you two have is insults for conservatives who have had nothing to do with any of this middle eastern adventurism.

Are you kidding? This is being done to obtain energy and security for that center piece of conservativism......"Free Markets"

Rek  posted on  2011-03-27   13:00:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Rek (#46)

Are you kidding? This is being done to obtain energy and security for that center piece of conservativism......"Free Markets"

Really? Cause that's not what Obama states is happening.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   13:13:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: We The People (#51)

Really? Cause that's not what Obama states is happening.

He's playing to HIS audience.

Rek  posted on  2011-03-27   13:23:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Rek (#55)

Really? Cause that's not what Obama states is happening.

He's playing to HIS audience.

I'd much rather discuss the facts of this issue, rather than your feelings or hunches. Unless you're privy to some high level communications that the rest of us aren't privy to, your comments are mere speculation and poor attempts at justification.

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   13:25:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: We The People (#57)

I'd much rather discuss the facts of this issue, rather than your feelings or hunches. Unless you're privy to some high level communications that the rest of us aren't privy to, your comments are mere speculation and poor attempts at justification.

Maybe selling it to the Tea Baggers would be a better move in your book.

Or believing Bush's rationale for two wars years after the true facts came out.

One fact that's set in stone is that all politicians lie to get their way.

Rek  posted on  2011-03-27   13:37:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Rek (#63)

Maybe selling it to the Tea Baggers would be a better move in your book.

Selling what? Your comments make little sense.

Or believing Bush's rationale for two wars years after the true facts came out.

Who believes Bush's rationale? Me? If that's what you think, then you are so far from correct it's ridiculous.

And why are you trying to change the subject of this thread?

We The People  posted on  2011-03-27   13:43:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 67.

#70. To: We The People (#67)

Who believes Bush's rationale? Me? If that's what you think, then you are so far from correct it's ridiculous.

And why are you trying to change the subject of this thread?

Okay..... you can believe every rationale that politicians give, please be my quest. Especially since they were presented as set in stone facts, very similiar to this situation.

Rek  posted on  2011-03-27 13:50:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 67.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com