Obama Wars
See other Obama Wars Articles
Title: King Hypocrite Obama: There Will be Blood in Libya (shock and awe)
Source:
Infowars.com
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/king-hypocr ... -there-will-be-blood-in-libya/
Published: Mar 19, 2011
Author: Kurt Nimmo
Post Date: 2011-03-19 12:13:15 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Keywords: fake rubric of humanitarianism, enforced through military acti, endangering many of our allies
Views: 3382
Comments: 3
On Friday, the teleprompter reader in chief and NCAA basketball picker Obama bellied up to the podium in the East Room of the White House and read his script. He said Libyan thug Moammar Gadhafi has to stop attacking civilians or face military retaliation. "Left unchecked, we have every reason to believe that Gadhafi would commit atrocities against his people. Many thousands could die. A humanitarian crisis would ensue. The entire region could be destabilized, endangering many of our allies and partners,” Obama read from the teleprompter. "These terms are not subject to negotiation,” said Barry, sounding like a Mafia don in a back room meeting between crime families. “If Gadhafi does not comply with the resolution, the international community will impose consequences, and the resolution will be enforced through military action.” In other words, there will be blood. Meanwhile, the wife of the man who bombed civilians in Serbia and Iraq with depleted uranium said nothing short of a “decision by Colonel Gadhafi to leave” will prevent cruise missiles from raining down on Libya. The Voice of America – otherwise known as the voice of the U.S. government and the CIA – said Madame Clinton was skeptical of any attempt by Gadhafi and crew to avoid shock and awe. Translation: the Europeans and their quisling Arab partners will attack Libya no matter what its thug leader in designer Bedouin clothes does. Obama's pretend concern for Libyan civilians is especially disgusting considering his inheritance of the neocon campaign to slaughter Iraqi and Afghan civilians. Barry Obama oversaw the expansion of this organized serial murder effort aimed at the tribal areas of Pakistan where we are told the intelligence asset al-Qaeda has settled (as the showtime terror group invariably settles in places on the bombing schedule). In an absurd and completely transparent half-ass effort to mask the truth about the Pentagon's killing sprees, the United Nations claimed that only 80 Afghan civilians were killed last year in U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. In fact, 2010 was the deadliest year to date for civilians in the Afghan “war” with 2,777 killed, a figure that represents a 15 percent jump in the death toll over the previous year. Large numbers of children and women were among the dead — 1,175 and 555 respectively, the AFP reported last week. In an especially embarrassing incident, nine young boys were killed recently while out collecting firewood in an air strike in eastern Afghanistan. U.S. installed president Hamid Karzai rejected a rare public apology in response to the incident from General David Petraeus. Bush era retread and current Defense Secretary Robert Gates also said he was sorry during a visit to the country. In an ongoing nightmare for the people of Pakistan that will apparently not end until the U.S. empire collapses – an event also on the itinerary of the globalists – commander in chief and head basketball fan Obama dispatched drones this week that killed 44 people. An unmanned aircraft fired four missiles at dozens of tribesmen, who were meeting to settle a dispute over hills containing reserves of chromite, in the Datta Khel area of North Waziristan district on Thursday. At least 47 people were wounded, according to Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Last year it was estimated that for every CIA patsy-jihadist killed by Lockheed Martin Hellfire missile, 140 innocent Pakistanis were slaughtered. Over 90 per cent of those killed in the deadly missile strikes were civilians, Pakistani officials claim. Soon after assuming office, Barry Obama put “yes we can” to work killing Pakistani children. Missiles fired from CIA drones killed at least 15 people inside Pakistan on January 23, 2009. The strikes came a mere day after Obama appointed the late Richard Holbrooke – a Bilderberger and globalist mucky-muck with experience as a functionary in Clinton's killing spree in Serbia over a decade ago – as a special envoy for the region. It is said Obama is very enthusiastic about killing Pakistan tribesmen and their women and children. Mass murder has become an everyday event in North and South Waziristan along the “troubled” – or maybe that should be cratered and grave strewn – Afghan border. No doubt he will also be enthusiastic about killing average Libyans. The twin invasions of Iraq by Bush Senior and his son specifically targeted civilians. Bush I and II were the frontmen for an effort to reduce Iraq to a preindustrial condition and that mission was accomplished, as Bush the Lesser announced from the deck of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. Now it is Libya's turn as the globalists crank up the heat under the fake rubric of humanitarianism.
These children lost their parents in the U.S. bombardment of the Karam village in south of Afghanistan.
Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
None of these president's understand war. They are conditioned by some historical drama about America's intervention of WW1/WW2 as some sort of monumental tribute to world peace and as a result continue their incredible military power to defeat "the enemy." If you and others take notice, "the enemy" changes each and every new intervention since WW2. And there hasn't been one clear military victory win by any intervention since WW2. As a nation, as a people, we don't seem to care; we are indifferent to our historical background of successes (since WW2) and believe in sort of "cause for good" because of military strength. Yet, when you add up the nearly 60 years of recent historical failures of military campaign after military campaign and see the total view; all we have done is support a system of international meddling, disarray and future discord compounded on a meager attempt for control on a situation that probably would have worked itself out without one thin dime thrown at it. All presidents bend the truth; they do so because it is their only REAL means of power as a sitting president. War is their only vehicle for publick acclaim; further international discord and intrigue is their excuse for failure resulting in the need for more war in ad infinitum. It is a perpetual motion machine in Washington DC to meddle on an international basis. That is the only reason for the current publick debt on a national basis: debt built on useless war designed by immature men and women and carried out by zombies beliving in some sort of "glory."
Gadaffi's got no yellow cakes, Bush ate em all. The "democratic" protests in neighboring Egypt and Tunisia took out their leaders. Very convenient for a I recall a re-run of MASH I saw where this uber right winger named Colonel Flagg... If there was a similar mass protest in the USA against this tyrannical and treasonous Washington DC monster, "officials" would be the first to turn the military on the citizenry. And, they are well known to do it in the past. And if the government doesn't use US military involvemnet, they use stateside Nationa Guard involvement and if they don't use that means, they use local police with federal SWAT training to perform the dirty work. Yet, not a peep out of the UN or the international community.
#2. To: buckeroo (#1)
US UN invasion.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Godwinson posted on 2011-02-23 11:47:32 ET
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=18011&Disp=46#C46
#3. To: hondo68 (#2)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]