Humor
See other Humor Articles
Title: Giggle of the Day
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 19, 2011
Author: ME
Post Date: 2011-03-19 09:51:59 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 26161
Comments: 52
Q: What's the difference between a liberal and a puppy? A: A puppy stops whining after it grows up.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#3. To: CZ82, Mad Dog (#0)
Leave Mad Dog out of this. He is a rock solid Palinite.
You fixate on people. You're one creepy motherf****r, you know that?
Liberal/socialist slugs are a vile parasitic infestation responsible for the destruction of many prosperous and thriving civilized societies throughout the history of this planet. Creepy is an understatement.
OH NO! Another useless Palinite shows up in defense of the defenseless!
LOL! And your only defense is stupid, childish innuendo. Have you no shame?
Shame? You Palinites have as much chance as getting Sarah into the White House as getting into her pants. All of you are losers.
LOL! I guess you don't.
Sarah is in India right now (many would be presidents travel the world over to provide other nations a chance at an interview process in the hopes of gaining more popular sentiment) and she was asked a question about her husband: A: My husband would be called the "First Gentleman." He would be known as "Head Stud" on the Internet, though.
Your obsession with that woman boarders on the psychotic and that does not surprise me given you adoption of a political dogma that has been an abject failure throughout human history. Your shame should be unbearable and apparently it is not.
Talk about "shame" ...... AND .... After publick controversy of BOTH of these two "kodak moments" she removed the efforts wearing Israeli flags and her "target" campaign. Her publick appeals rating have gone downhill since. Bringing Israel into some joint venture with the US while she begs for Israeli donations is a mockery and should be considered a crime of treason. Mocking legislative leaders with a "target" symbol should be considered a felony offense.
Instead of posting an ambiguous campaign flier why not post about Democrat violence in Wisconsin, the bomb throwing incident being reported today and the Jared Loughner wanna-be recently arrested? No ambiguity there. Unless you thrive on ambiguity to make your accusations. [snicker] (in memory of war)
Because that serious issue isn't a "giggle." That is a serious publick effort of protest whether right, wrong or indifferent. Yet, Palin is beyond a "giggle"; she is a LAFF A FUCKING MINUTE.
Even I find it difficult to believe you are that stupid. That woman, as she is presently being used, is a political distraction purposefully designed to make liberal/socialist slugs soil their undies and look foolish. You have fallen for a neo-con political ploy to use her to perpetuate the two party political farce.
Incredible. I guess Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich in 2012, then?
Angle/Odonnell.
Talk about bottom fishing.... whew!
There are no replies to Comment # 44. End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: buckeroo (#3)
#6. To: Rudgear, buckeroo (#4)
You fixate on people. You're one creepy motherf****r, you know that?
#7. To: eskimo (#6)
#8. To: buckeroo (#7)
#9. To: eskimo (#8)
#10. To: buckeroo (#9)
#12. To: eskimo (#10)
Q: What would Todd Palin be called if you were the next president?
#15. To: buckeroo (#12)
Sarah is in India right now...
#16. To: eskimo (#15)
(Edited)
Your obsession with that woman
#20. To: buckeroo (#16)
#21. To: Rudgear (#20)
#28. To: buckeroo (#21)
#34. To: eskimo (#28)
Even I find it difficult to believe you are that stupid. That woman, as she is presently being used, is a political distraction purposefully designed to make liberal/socialist slugs soil their undies and look foolish. You have fallen for a neo-con political ploy to use her to perpetuate the two party political farce.
#38. To: buckeroo (#34)
Incredible. I guess Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich in 2012, then?
#44. To: Rek (#38)
Angle/Odonnell.
Replies to Comment # 44.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]