International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Japan ministers ignored safety warnings over nuclear reactors
Source:
guardian.co.uk
URL Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/201 ... sters-ignored-warnings-nuclear
Published: Mar 14, 2011
Author: Robin McKie
Post Date: 2011-03-14 21:45:45 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 3081
Comments: 9
Seismologist Ishibashi Katsuhiko claimed that an accident was likely and that plants have 'fundamental vulnerability' The timing of the near nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi could not have been more appropriate. In only a few weeks the world will mark the 25th anniversary of the worst nuclear plant disaster ever to affect our planet – at Chernobyl in Ukraine. A major core meltdown released a deadly cloud of radioactive material over Europe and gave the name Chernobyl a terrible resonance. This weekend it is clear that the name Fukushima came perilously close to achieving a similar notoriety. However, the real embarrassment for the Japanese government is not so much the nature of the accident but the fact it was warned long ago about the risks it faced in building nuclear plants in areas of intense seismic activity. Several years ago, the seismologist Ishibashi Katsuhiko stated, specifically, that such an accident was highly likely to occur. Nuclear power plants in Japan have a "fundamental vulnerability" to major earthquakes, Katsuhiko said in 2007. The government, the power industry and the academic community had seriously underestimated the potential risks posed by major quakes. Katsuhiko, who is professor of urban safety at Kobe University, has highlighted three incidents at reactors between 2005 and 2007. Atomic plants at Onagawa, Shika and Kashiwazaki-Kariwa were all struck by earthquakes that triggered tremors stronger than those to which the reactor had been designed to survive. In the case of the incident at the Kushiwazaki reactor in northwestern Japan, a 6.8-scale earthquake on 16 July 2007 set off a fire that blazed for two hours and allowed radioactive water to leak from the plant. However, no action was taken in the wake of any of these incidents despite Katsuhiko's warning at the time that the nation's reactors had "fatal flaws" in their design. Japan is the world's third largest nuclear power user, with 53 reactors that provide 34.5% of its electricity, and there are plans to increase provision to 50% by 2030. Unfortunately its nuclear industry is bedevilled with controversy In 2002 the president of the country's largest power utility was forced to resign after he and other senior officials were suspected of falsifying plant safety records. Nor is the nature of its reactor planning inducing much comfort. The trouble is, says Katsuhiko, that Japan began building up its atomic energy system 40 years ago, when seismic activity in the country was comparatively low. This affected the designs of plants which were not built to robust enough standards, the seismologist argues. Since then, Japan has experienced more serious quakes as tension has built up on tectonic plates, culminating in Friday's devastating earthquake, the worst in Japan for more than 100 years. The result was an incident that came perilously close to triggering a nuclear meltdown. Starved of coolant, the reactor would have heated up dangerously until its fuel rods melted and released a cloud of highly radioactive material. Not surprisingly, the International Atomic Energy Agency has announced it is now urgently seeking details of what happened at Fukushima. The rest of the world – which includes many countries, including Britain, that are preparing significant nuclear expansion plans – will be looking very closely at what it finds. • This article was amended on 14 March 2011. The caption implied that the photograph was of Fukushima nuclear plant, not Chernobyl. This has been amended
The emergency at Fukushima's nuclear power plant comes almost 25 years after the meltdown at Chernobyl in Ukraine (above). Photograph: Sergey Dolzhenko/EPA
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Chicken Little call home.
Heh, the piece I posted is according to you a chicken little. I merely quoted and posted it. I have not stated anymore than my deepest hope that it is wrong. Nobody in their right mind wants a meltdown, especially one that breaches the reactor vessel.
btw weasel gurl, I agree with you on this. You libTURD whores are certainly NOT in your right mind(s). Nice of you to admit the TRUTH cornflake boy.
There are no replies to Comment # 5. End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestChernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING! Chernobyl, CHERNOBYL, melt down, MELT DOWN! The sky is falling, the sky is FALLING, the SKY is FALLING!
#2. To: Mad Dog (#1)
#5. To: Ferret Mike (#2)
Nobody in their right mind wants a meltdown, especially one that breaches the reactor vessel.
Replies to Comment # 5.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]