LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: 500 Years From Now
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.moviewavs.com/php/sounds ... cracy"e=whatplantscrave.tx
Published: Mar 11, 2011
Author: N/A
Post Date: 2011-03-11 12:38:06 by Ignore Amos
Keywords: None
Views: 41987
Comments: 47
Has anyone seen the 2006 movie "Idiocracy"? I haven't seen it yet, but I understand it describes a world 500 years in the future. This is a sound clip from the movie - see if it sounds like your typical liberal enclave . . . http://www.moviewavs.com/php/sounds/?id=bst&media=WAVS&type=Movies&movie=Idiocracy"e=whatplantscrave.tx
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Joe: "For the last time, I'm pretty sure what's killing the crops is this Brawndo stuff." Secretary of State: "But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes." Attorney General (Sara Rue): "So wait a minute. What you're saying is that you want us to put water on the crops." Joe: "Yes." Attorney General: "Water. Like out the toilet?" Joe: "Well, I mean, it doesn't have to be out of the toilet, but, yeah, that's the idea." Secretary of State: "But Brawndo's got what plants crave." Attorney General: "It's got electrolytes." Joe: "Okay, look. The plants aren't growing, so I'm pretty sure that the Brawndo's not working. Now, I'm no botanist, but I do know that if you put water on plants, they grow." Secretary of Energy (Brendan Hill): "Well, I've never seen no plants grow out of no toilet." Secretary of State: "Hey, that's good. You sure you ain't the smartest guy in the world?" Joe: "Okay, look. You wanna solve this problem. I wanna get my pardon. So why don't we just try it, okay, and not worry about what plants crave?" Attorney General: "Brawndo's got what plants crave." Secretary of Energy: "Yeah, it's got electrolytes." Joe: "What are electrolytes? Do you even know?" Secretary of State: "It's what they use to make Brawndo." Joe: "Yeah, but why do they use them to make Brawndo?" Secretary of Defense: "'Cause Brawndo's got electrolytes."
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Secretary of State: "But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes." My browser won't run it. But the assertion made according to your transcripts is false as will be any analogy. Most plants do NOT crave electrolytes of which the primary are sodium and chlorine. You should have turned it off as soon as you heard that and saved yourself some time.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
it's a great movie, it shows a future where folks like michelle bachmann are considered intelligent.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Is she the statist's new boogey-(wo)man now? Tsk tsk tsk . . .
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ I think the movie is satire . . .
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ I don't know I can't run it. But in order for something to be funny or satirical, it (at least for me) has to have a ring of truth and accuracy.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
Yes, it's satire - Mike Judge wrote it. In the movie the only source of news is Fox.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
This is a sound clip from the movie - see if it sounds like your typical liberal enclave . . . Ignore Amos actually provided an example of how the so called right wing in America thinks - they don't investigate or learn facts and make declarations based on assumptions / truthiness. "Idiocracy" is anti capitalist, anti FOX news. anti corporation, anti NASCAR culture and one can easily see this when watching a very funny movie that FOX refused to promote because of this message.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
The movie is about a future where people are of your level of intelligence (i.e. lack there of). The Brawndo scene simply is a display of their lack of an ability to think (a concept anybody familiar with you could easily relate to).
Now, I know I’m not going to change the minds of any of the True Believers…those who read all of Reverend Al’s sermons, and say things like, “You know, global warming can mean warmer OR colder, wetter OR drier, cloudier OR sunnier, windier OR calmer, …”. Can I get an ‘amen’??
Yes, it's a movie based on the idea that the fox news crowd becomes the majority.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
I know it's a foreign concept to you (multi-dimensional thinking). You ought to try it sometime. First step - unplug your DNC hard-wired fax machine. I first heard this clip on the Mike Church show. I googled it and found out it was from Idiocracy. It sounded interesting, and like I said I do plan to rent it at some point. Mike Church (the Mike Church show, heard on satellite) would probably be classified as a paleo-conservative (closest one on any media to my philosophy) You wouldn't be interested, though. Since he can't be pigeonholed into your little R vs. D. world - he's a non-entity. Right?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Another boogey-man?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ You wouldn't be interested, though. Since he can't be pigeonholed into your little R vs. D. world - he's a non-entity. I am a Christian democrat - European style conservative. It is you types that can't classify me.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
This is what you did - it's like you saw a clip from the movie "THE EXORCIST" and declared it sounds like it's bases around Buddhists.......
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Huh???
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ You said you haven't seen the movie - you might want to watch it before commenting on it further. In the movie, the only source of news for the idiots is Fox.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
You missed my point about "boogey-men" You on the Left seem to need to have those. First it was Reagan. (Actually, it was probably Nixon before that. He committed "original sin" by going after Alger Hiss - and no matter what he did after that - creation of EPA, wage and price controls, making nice with China - you wouldn't forgive him) Then it was J. Danforth Quayle. Then Newt. Then Bush Jr. Then Palin. Then Bachman. Then Fox News. Okay - so Fox news (in your opinion) is the worst thing to come down the pike. What do YOU like? MSNBC? Mother Jones? C'mon - you can do it. Be FOR something. Tell us what you like. (by the way, if Fox News is still around in 500 years, it must be doing something right. Even empires don't last that long.)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ What about PMSNBC??????
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning
C'mon - you can do it. Be FOR something. Tell us what you like. If you don't like the "boogey-man" then when are you referring us to a movie that makes fun of those who get their info from Fox news? Did you not realize that before you posted the thread?
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
I think I have said this before ... but you are brilliant in some and often replies. That post should be considered a +10, just for the yucks.
No. I had never heard of this movie. In post #12 I explained how I came to learn of it. Have you ever watched the "Tonight" show where Jay Leno does his "Jay Walking" segments? The idiots that appear there (who typically consider themselves "educated" but don't even know when the US Civil War was fought. Hell, most are doing good to put it in the correct century) reminded me of the idiots in the sound clip. And news flash: Since the Tonight Show eminates from Los Angeles (not known for being over-run with conservatives), it's a safe bet that the majority of the "idiots" are libs. But back to your question: Even if I had realized that ultimately Fox News was the "target" - why would it have mattered? If humor and satire is clever, can it not be appreciated even if it might not line up totally with one's worldview? I don't know if the movie itself is clever, but the clip I heard was. I'll reserve judgement on the entire movie until I see it. One more thing to buttress my point: Not long after I got satellite TV, I was scanning the guide and saw a movie that intrigued me. (It's been a while, so I may have the name wrong - I think it was called something like "CSA - Confederate States of America." I read the synopsis, and it was a movie that speculated what would have happened if the South had won the Civil War. That looked intriging, so I set up my DVR to record it. The movie was done as a "Ken Burns" like TV documentary, taking the viewer from 1865 (when the South won the war) to the present. The first half or so WAS very imaginative and (there's that word again) clever. But the second half became preachy and PC. I was disappointed - what was a great idea had become bogged down. Then, when the credits ran, I saw why. It was produced by Spike Lee - a racist to the core. Oh well. But my point is - I could STILL see humor and imagination even from someone whom I mostly (hell, probably 99.9 percent) disagree with. Isn't that being "liberal" (old meaning)?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ it's like you saw a clip from the movie "THE EXORCIST" and declared it sounds like it's bases around Buddhists. I think I have said this before ... but you are brilliant in some and often replies. That post should be considered a +10, just for the yucks. Well, it's clear you both understand the same language
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ You get a -10 however. Poor observation; poor consideration; bad review; silly post and more than that you are PURE BORING. Is there a way to somehow use a formula for the Internet to ensure I can't YAWN anymore than you have alredy created? Please ensure I have that method because, you suck not just because of lack for and about intelligence but because of overall humour and fine spirit.
the You win for the saying prize least words more while together stringing. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Get off the Internet. You can't handle it. You are boring and have no personality; you lack originality, conviction of personal comment or experience worthy of anyone looking at your posts. Stay watching FOXNEWS and EIB as a listener. They are your friends and need your hardearned bucks to make them richer beyond belief. SHOO!
Nah, Bucky. I think I'll stick around. At least until you graduate to training wheels. Besides, you know you'd miss me if I were to go.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ I don't have time to read your fuckedupped posts day-in and day-out because you have nothing else to do in life. In fact, these are the first posts I have made towards you; you are boring; you are akin to a snail crawling the wet grass after a rain awaiting my shoe to crunch your hollow back and slime you into the ground where you belong. Now, Shoo! Come back when you are creative with posting style, ya hear slugger?
Now, Shoo! Come back when you are creative with posting style, ya hear slugger? Here ya go, Bucky. I'll even contribute the nickel if you're in a bind After all, what are friends for?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Maybe he created this thread to show the rest of us through his replies and posts how well he has learned to imitate the Attorney General. He's a dead ringer.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
Omigosh the reinforcements are here!!!!!!!!!!! Does one half-wit plus one half-wit equal one wit? The following post should tell the tale.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ You don't have a nickel much less a penny. Now Shoo! You don't know anything; you don't contribute anything; you lack originality; you have no personal opinions; you can't think for yourself other than realizing the world is over your own fucking head. Go contribute your posts to some-far-away-make-believe-place that you call home. Now, SHOO!
Apparently not - it must be a case where the sum of the parts is equal to less than the whole
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Does one half-wit plus one half-wit equal one wit? The following post should tell the tale. I'm happy you are still proving my original observation to be accurate. Your imitation of the AG character has an uncanny resemblance. I can just imagine him reciting those exact same lines complete with !!!!!!!!
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
One half-wit plus one half-wit equals a dimwit.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Your point of "non-synergistic" is a perfect banner for you. Since LibertyFlame is attempting to kill the cretins while stimulating the talents of creative posters, exactly, where do you fall in? Below the cretin level? Well, I have never enjoyed your posts. The lack of creativity proves it. Nothing original; no personal remark or post to substantiate or merit your own performance other than an awkward re-broadcast of EIB of some twit on FOXNEWSTV. Have you ever considered taking up alms for yourself? Alms for the poor of heart, the politically dis-enfranchised and incredibally stupid? I shall keep an eye out for you from here on end. A penny for your personal thoughts?
You get a -10 however. Poor observation; poor consideration; bad review; silly post and more than that you are PURE BORING. Is there a way to somehow use a formula for the Internet to ensure I can't YAWN anymore than you have alredy created? Please ensure I have that method because, you suck not just because of lack for and about intelligence but because of overall humour and fine spirit. buckeroo posted on 2011-03-11 23:39:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #26. To: Ignore Amos (#25) Get off the Internet. You can't handle it. You are boring and have no personality; you lack originality, conviction of personal comment or experience worthy of anyone looking at your posts. Stay watching FOXNEWS and EIB as a listener. They are your friends and need your hardearned bucks to make them richer beyond belief. SHOO! buckeroo posted on 2011-03-11 23:57:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #28. To: Ignore Amos (#27) I don't have time to read your fuckedupped posts day-in and day-out because you have nothing else to do in life. In fact, these are the first posts I have made towards you; you are boring; you are akin to a snail crawling the wet grass after a rain awaiting my shoe to crunch your hollow back and slime you into the ground where you belong. Now, Shoo! Come back when you are creative with posting style, ya hear slugger? buckeroo posted on 2011-03-12 0:19:53 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #32. To: Ignore Amos (#29) You don't have a nickel much less a penny. Now Shoo! You don't know anything; you don't contribute anything; you lack originality; you have no personal opinions; you can't think for yourself other than realizing the world is over your own fucking head. Go contribute your posts to some-far-away-make-believe-place that you call home. Now, SHOO! buckeroo posted on 2011-03-12 0:43:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #36. To: Ignore Amos (#33) it must be a case where the sum of the parts is equal to less than the whole Your point of "non-synergistic" is a perfect banner for you. Since LibertyFlame is attempting to kill the cretins while stimulating the talents of creative posters, exactly, where do you fall in? Below the cretin level? Well, I have never enjoyed your posts. The lack of creativity proves it. Nothing original; no personal remark or post to substantiate or merit your own performance other than an awkward re-broadcast of EIB of some twit on FOXNEWSTV. Have you ever considered taking up alms for yourself? Alms for the poor of heart, the politically dis-enfranchised and incredibally stupid? I shall keep an eye out for you from here on end. A penny for your personal thoughts? buckeroo posted on 2011-03-12 1:17:21 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ blah, blah blah ... you said nothing creative; all you performed was the "magic" of using your computer to re-capture my posts; you have no summation; no original thought; no concept of or about what I have suggested; all you have done is silly but waste the bandwith of the Internet much less any readers coming to LibertysFlame. You fucked yourself upped. As I told you up the thread, I was going to step on your frail and hollow hardshell back. I have proven the point with this retort, cretin.
A long long time ago, i can still remember how that music used to make me smile.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ You've captured the essence of the AG perfectly. It finally makes sense as to why you posted this thead.
"http://first-draft-blog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c5ced53ef0148c7a28c4b970c-320wi"
No more musick; now, SHOO. We are taking Libertysflame to a higher level of debate than your memory of musick. All of us are doing it; no more LibertyPost shenanigans; no more FreeRepublick wannabes; no more mama cass on Freedom4um; no more pirates on Freedomunderground; no more Bob_J on a failing TBL channel that was started. The buck stops right here. But you don't have a goddamned original thought in your pea brain, do you? So SHOO! Leave me alone.
Comments (42 - 47) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#2. To: Ignore Amos (#1)
(Edited)
Joe: "For the last time, I'm pretty sure what's killing the crops is this Brawndo stuff."
#3. To: Ignore Amos (#0)
#4. To: go65 (#3)
michelle bachmann
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#5. To: Rek (#2)
But the assertion made according to your transcripts is false as will be any analogy. Most plants do NOT crave electrolytes of which the primary are sodium and chlorine. You should have turned it off as soon as you heard that and saved yourself some time.
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#6. To: All (#5)
Here's the clip from Youtube:
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#7. To: Ignore Amos (#5)
I think the movie is satire . . .
#8. To: Rek (#7)
(Edited)
#9. To: Ignore Amos, Rek, go65 (#0)
I haven't seen it yet, but I understand it describes a world 500 years in the future.
#10. To: Rek (#7)
But in order for something to be funny or satirical, it (at least for me) has to have a ring of truth and accuracy.
#11. To: no gnu taxes (#10)
The movie is about a future where people are of your level of intelligence (i.e. lack there of).
#12. To: Godwinson (#9)
Ignore Amos actually provided an example of how the so called right wing in America thinks - they don't investigate or learn facts and make declarations based on assumptions / truthiness.
At least I do think . . . And I can enjoy humor from the LEFT as well as humor from the RIGHT. As long as its creative. It must be a bitch to be wound as tightly as you are. Are your idols so fragile they can't take a little poking? "Idiocracy" is anti capitalist, anti FOX news. anti corporation, anti NASCAR culture and one can easily see this when watching a very funny movie that FOX refused to promote because of this message.
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#13. To: go65 (#11)
fox news
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#14. To: Ignore Amos (#12)
Mike Church (the Mike Church show, heard on satellite) would probably be classified as a paleo-conservative (closest one on any media to my philosophy)
#15. To: Ignore Amos (#12)
#16. To: Godwinson (#15)
and declared it sounds like it's bases around Buddhists.......
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#17. To: Ignore Amos (#13)
(Edited)
Another boogey-man?
#18. To: go65 (#17)
In the movie, the only source of news for the idiots is Fox.
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#19. To: go65 (#17)
You said you haven't seen the movie - you might want to watch it before commenting on it further. In the movie, the only source of news for the idiots is Fox.
#20. To: Ignore Amos (#18)
Okay - so Fox news (in your opinion) is the worst thing to come down the pike. What do YOU like? MSNBC? Mother Jones?
#21. To: Godwinson, Ignore Amos (#15)
it's like you saw a clip from the movie "THE EXORCIST" and declared it sounds like it's bases around Buddhists.
#22. To: go65 (#20)
(Edited)
Did you not realize that before you posted the thread?
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#23. To: buckeroo, Godwinson (#21)
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#24. To: Ignore Amos (#23)
#25. To: buckeroo (#24)
Is there a way to somehow use a formula for the Internet to ensure I can't YAWN anymore than you have alredy created?
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#26. To: Ignore Amos (#25)
#27. To: buckeroo (#26)
(Edited)
SHOO!
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#28. To: Ignore Amos (#27)
#29. To: buckeroo (#28)
I don't have time to read your fuckedupped posts day-in and day-out because you have nothing else to do in life. In fact, these are the first posts I have made towards you; you are boring; you are akin to a snail crawling the wet grass after a rain awaiting my shoe to crunch your hollow back and slime you into the ground where you belong.
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#30. To: buckeroo, Ignore Amos (#28)
Now, Shoo! Come back when you are creative with posting style, ya hear slugger?
#31. To: Rek, buckeroo (#30)
(Edited)
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#32. To: Ignore Amos (#29)
#33. To: All (#31)
(Edited)
Does one half-wit plus one half-wit equal one wit?
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#34. To: Ignore Amos (#31)
(Edited)
Omigosh the reinforcements are here!!!!!!!!!!!
#35. To: Rek (#34)
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#36. To: Ignore Amos (#33)
it must be a case where the sum of the parts is equal to less than the whole
#37. To: buckeroo (#36)
Who's boring, bucky?
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#38. To: Ignore Amos (#37)
#39. To: buckeroo (#38)
Political tags -- such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -- are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
-- Robert A Heinlein
#40. To: Ignore Amos (#35)
One half-wit plus one half-wit equals a dimwit.
#41. To: Ignore Amos (#39)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]