International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Libya: With the Failure Obama The ‘Unacceptable’ Is….Acceptable
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2011 ... he-unacceptable-is-acceptable/
Published: Feb 24, 2011
Author: Peter Schweizer
Post Date: 2011-02-24 11:30:05 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 1643
Comments: 6
President Barack Obama has a new favorite word when it comes to the violence in the Middle East, particularly when it relates to Gaddafi’s crackdown in Libya: “unacceptable.” He has used it numerous times. But with Obama the unacceptable is acceptable, at least when it comes to our adversaries. Picture of Obama requesting Larry Sinclair type relations with Gaddafi Unacceptable should spring you to action if its going to mean something. If I tell my child that something is unacceptable and they keep doing it, my failure to act means that I am in fact willing to accept it. My kid assumes that I really didn’t mean it. Even if I act too late, and put off responding to their “unacceptable” behavior, they don’t take it seriously. The same goes in the world of power politics. If something is truly unacceptable, it should lead to some action. It doesn’t need to be necessarily a military response. But what about sanctions? What about verbal support for the protesters? What about denouncing Gaddafi the man and not just his actions? President Obama, stop saying something is unacceptable and then accepting it. It makes us look weak. And we are weak, at least when it comes to our leadership.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
The above picture is unacceptable, but this is perfectly acceptable: Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
You speak with a forked tongue. You say it is ok for Obama to shake Khadaffis hand. That it in unaccptable for condi and company to be with Khadaffi. I say they are both acceptable. It makes you look like a political hack.
I don't think it is acceptable for any U.S. President to meet with or embrace Qaddafi. It was wrong when Bush did it, it was wrong when Obama did it. Qaddafi is a murderer responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people above the skies of Lockerbie. My beef is with shills who praised Bush for restoring relations with Qaddafi but then go ape-s**t over the above picture.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Fair enough. But who praised Bush for that here? Do you have any quotes?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671414/posts
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671414/posts I think you are confused. This is not freerepublic.
#2. To: go65 (#1)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
You speak with a forked tongue. You say it is ok for Obama to shake Khadaffis hand. That it in unaccptable for condi and company to be with Khadaffi.
#4. To: go65 (#3)
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
But who praised Bush for that here? Do you have any quotes?
#6. To: go65 (#5)
But who praised Bush for that here? Do you have any quotes?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]