United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: House Votes To Kill Pricey Jet Fighter Engine, A Victory For President Obama In Budget Showdow
Source:
Associated Press
URL Source: http://www.canadianbusiness.com/mar ... /article.jsp?content=D9LE2KNG0
Published: Feb 16, 2011
Author: Associated Press
Post Date: 2011-02-16 15:12:21 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 567
Comments: 4
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama won a showdown vote Wednesday in the GOP-controlled House to kill a costly alternative engine for the Pentagon's next-generation fighter jet. The win by Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates is a switch from where the House stood last year under Democratic control. It reflects a sustained administration push to win over the votes of scores of Republican freshmen elected last fall on campaign promises to cut the budget. Many taxpayer watchdog groups also weighed in against the engine program, slated to cost $3 billion over the next few years and $450 million this year alone. The 233-192 tally was a loss for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, whose state reaped thousands of jobs from the engine, built by the General Electric Co. and Rolls-Royce. It was a big victory for lawmakers from Democrat-dominated Connecticut, where the main F-35 fighter engine is built by Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp. Former President George W. Bush had also tried to kill the second engine. The showdown vote came just hours after Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen testified against the alternative engine before the Armed Services Committee, which has repeatedly backed it. "I've been doing money a long time, I can't make sense out of a second engine," Mullen said. The vote was an early test for 87 GOP freshmen who confronted a choice between cutting spending and injecting competition into the F-35 program, the costliest weapons program in Defense Department history. The money for the engine was included in a $1.2 trillion spending bill that would make deep cuts while wrapping up the unfinished business lawmakers inherited after last year's collapse of the budget process. That includes $1.03 trillion for agency operating budgets that need annual approval by Congress and $158 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Democratic-controlled Senate supports the second engine. That, combined with Boehner's backing, could yet keep the program alive. The engine battle divides along regional rather than party lines, in contrast to the partisan warfare on the underlying bill, which sharply cuts domestic programs and foreign aid and earned a veto threat from the White House budget office and a warning from Obama against unwise cuts "that could endanger the recovery." Debate on the bill is expected to take all week. A frosty reception awaits the bill in the Democratic-controlled Senate, which won't take up its version until next month. So it'll require passage of a separate short-term government funding bill by March 4 to prevent a government shutdown that neither side says it wants.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
If jobs get lost as a result of spending cuts, so be it. Right Mr. Boehner?
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
I'd rather they buy the Pratt & Whitny, screw the Government Electric model. It was the Democrat/RINO Congress that was insisting on 2 engines for the same plane, it was the Tea Party freshmen Republicans joining in that (maybe) killed the Ohio built engine. I don't see where that's any great victory for the Left. Even the statists hated Donald Rumsfeld was against the second engine.
I predict goobermint shutdown. Watch and see.
Soon to be a national seal.
The 233-192 tally was a loss for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, whose state reaped thousands of jobs from the engine, built by the General Electric Co. and Rolls-Royce.
#2. To: Brian S (#0)
The Democratic-controlled Senate supports the second engine. That, combined with Boehner's backing, could yet keep the program alive.
#3. To: Brian S (#0)
So it'll require passage of a separate short-term government funding bill by March 4 to prevent a government shutdown that neither side says it wants.
#4. To: Fred Mertz (#3)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]