[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Israel Braces for a New Egypt
Source: WSJ
URL Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100 ... 3313304576131461322124274.html
Published: Feb 10, 2011
Author: By RICHARD BOUDREAUX in Jerusalem and JO
Post Date: 2011-02-10 14:36:35 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 4435
Comments: 11

Israelis are bracing for a more adversarial regime in Egypt, one they expect could lead their country to expand its army, fortify the two countries' desert frontier and possibly re-invade the Palestinian-ruled Gaza Strip.

Israeli analysts remain concerned about possible new threats to the country's security amid unrest in Egypt and elsewhere in the Middle East. Special correspondent Martin Himel reports from Tel Aviv.

Three decades after Israel settled into a "cold peace" with Egypt—breaking its encirclement by hostile Arab states but failing to win much popular sympathy from Egyptians—Israeli officials are reviewing the ways the U.S.-backed transition in Cairo could affect the Jewish state.

The most likely scenario, say people familiar with the review: A new leadership, swayed by Islamist support and popular sentiment against Israel, would downgrade diplomatic and commercial ties, casting doubt on the long-term survival of the two countries' 1979 peace treaty.

On Wednesday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak voiced Israel's apprehension at a meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and White House National Security Adviser Tom Donilon. An administration official said the three assured Mr. Barak of the United States' "unshakeable commitment to Israel's security."

Mr. Barak had requested the White House meeting after President Barack Obama initially pressed for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's quick exit from power, a step that left Israeli officials surprised and dismayed.

Senior Israeli officials have warned that the crumbling of Mr. Mubarak's rule has already diminished U.S. and Israeli strategic clout in the Middle East, in the face of regimes in Iran and Syria that support armed Islamist groups and now seek to draw Egypt into their camp. "It will become more difficult for Israel to control events and their outcomes" over the coming year, Maj. Gen. Amir Eshel, chief of planning for the Israeli armed forces' general staff, told a security conference in Israel this week.

Israel has reacted to Egypt's unrest by moving to shore up gas supplies and promising steps to bolster the Palestinian economy. It has quietly signaled support for a gradual transition backed by the army and controlled by Omar Suleiman, Egypt's vice president and longtime intelligence chief. Mr. Suleiman has close ties with Mr. Barak and other Israeli leaders.

Seeking to shore up Israel's security, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has permitted the temporary deployment of 800 Egyptian troops into the Sinai, a sparsely populated peninsula demilitarized under the peace treaty. The aim is to prevent smuggling of weapons to Gaza, the neighboring Palestinian enclave ruled by Hamas.

Mr. Netanyahu also ordered the army to speed construction of a 13-foot-tall, radar-monitored fence it began putting up in November to plug 124 miles of desert frontier with the Sinai, a border now easily infiltrated by nomadic Bedouin smugglers of drugs and migrant workers.

"Everything is porous," said Menachem Zafrir, a 54-year-old resident of the Nitzanei Sinai border outpost, where backyards look into Egypt.

"Until now it's just Sudanese [migrants], but it could be militants," he said, gesturing to the thin deployment of Egyptian guards on the other side of a border now marked by a chest-high cordon of sagging barbed wire. "Today the Egyptian army patrols over there. But if there is a mess, they will flee."

As their elders learned of a Bedouin attack last Friday on Egyptian positions just 30 miles away, children at Nitzanei Sinai played capture the flag outside the grocery store.

"It's bizarre that this is the quietest place in the country despite the fact that it's a border," said Robert Fischer, a Nitzanei Sinai resident who owns a transport company. If an unfriendly regime comes to power in Egypt, "they will need to evacuate us."

Israel's security concerns extend to the West Bank. Wary that an Islamist-influenced regime in Cairo might inspire a Hamas-led uprising of Palestinians there, Mr. Netanyahu last week promised to spur economic growth in the West Bank and Gaza.

But Israel's leader has resisted Western pressure to make compromises that would help revive talks on statehood for the Palestinians. Taking such a step, his critics say, would defuse criticism across the Arab world.

Israeli officials also have urged stepped-up development of recently discovered Israeli offshore gas reserves. That would hedge against any shutdown by Egypt of the natural-gas pipeline that powers one-fourth of Israel's electricity network.

On top of such steps, however, Israel would have to remake strategic and military planning if Egypt were to turn unfriendly, officials and analysts say.

Israel's apprehension stems mainly from the strength of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's best-organized opposition force, and the Brotherhood's close ties to Hamas. But Israeli leaders are also unsettled by doubts about the peace treaty voiced by Mohamed ElBaradei, the leading secular opposition figure.

"It's impossible to make peace with a single man," Mr. ElBaradei told German news magazine Der Spiegel last week. "At the moment, [the Israelis] have a peace treaty with Mubarak, but not one with the Egyptian people."

The U.S.-brokered 1979 treaty signed by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin gave up Israeli occupation of the Sinai in return for peace between neighbors who had waged four wars against each other. It also gave Egypt U.S. military aid that now exceeds $1 billion per year.

But while Israelis rushed to take advantage of tourism, trade and investment opportunities opened by the treaty, few Egyptians did so.

Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon embarrassed Egyptian leaders, already under fire in the Arab world for making peace with the enemy. Mr. Mubarak, who had taken over after Mr. Sadat's 1981 assassination, supported the treaty, but Israelis say his government has done little to encourage contact between the two peoples and has allowed Egyptian media to demonize the Jewish state.

Largely because the Israeli-Palestinian conflict festers, Egyptian businesses, labor unions and civic organizations with ties to the wider Arab world have shunned Israel, even as hotels welcome Israeli visitors.

"Israel sat on the Palestinians, built settlements on their land and put down two Palestinian uprisings, and the peace with Egypt lasted," said Janet Aviad, an Israeli peace activist who has visited Egypt five times. "But [the peace] couldn't warm up under those circumstances, no way."

Israeli officials say they believe the peace treaty would survive under an orderly transition in Egypt that preserves the powerful role of the U.S.-backed military and is led by Mr. Suleiman. According to a 2008 U.S. Embassy cable released this week by WikiLeaks, Mr. Suleiman has long been Israel's preferred successor to Mr. Mubarak. The cable said Mr. Barak's office and Mr. Suleiman's intelligence service were in daily contact over a telephone hotline.

Israeli officials are also pondering a worst-case scenario in which the Muslim Brotherhood dominates the next government, abrogates the treaty and ends the partial blockade that Egypt imposed on Gaza to help Israel isolate Hamas and choke off Gaza-bound weapons shipments.

A more likely outcome in Egypt, say Israelis familiar with the government's forecasting, is a ruling coalition that is sensitive to domestic public opinion and has minority Muslim Brotherhood representation. Such a coalition, they say, would likely maintain the peace treaty and gas exports for now but would also be likely to adopt a more critical tone toward Israeli policies and might become less accommodating to Israeli officials, entrepreneurs and other visitors.

More than 200,000 Israelis visit Egypt each year, drawn by Nile cruises, ancient monuments and the Sinai's pristine Red Sea beaches. Two-way trade is a small fraction of each country's imports and exports, however, so a reduction wouldn't cause significant economic harm to either side. It would, however, represent a symbolic setback to the relationship.

Far more damaging to Israel's economy would be the loss of the treaty's peace dividend.

Dan Schueftan, director of national security studies at Haifa University, said the rise of a less friendly regime in Egypt, even if it doesn't cancel the treaty, would create enough uncertainty that Israel would feel compelled to enlarge its army and raise defense spending. Mr. Netanyahu hinted as much when he called last week for "bolstering Israel's might."

"Egypt was the cornerstone of our security in the region, and when that stone is eroding, the whole Middle East changes in a profound way," Mr. Schueftan said. "Israel would have to operate in a completely different strategic environment with an army that has become very, very small compared to the threats that surround us."

Thanks to the treaty with Egypt, he said, Israel had reduced its defense expenditure from 23% of its gross national product in the mid-1970s to about 9% today. The relationship with Egypt also allowed Israel to end a costly military occupation of Gaza in 2005, as Egypt covered Gaza from the south.

Several former military and intelligence officials are arguing publicly that Israel must be prepared to reoccupy Gaza, or at least a wide swath of the enclave along its eight-mile border with Egypt. Other experts counsel caution, warning that such an operation would plunge Israel into years of fighting.

"There's no reason for us to make any decisions in the next few weeks or even more than that," said Giora Eiland, a former Israeli national security adviser. "We have to observe, and if the situation changes in a bad way, we will have time to shift whatever has to be shifted." Subscribe to *Apartheid On Parade*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Israelis are bracing for a more adversarial regime in Egypt, one they expect could lead their country to expand its army, fortify the two countries' desert frontier and possibly re-invade the Palestinian-ruled Gaza Strip.

What this means to you American infidel, dogs is that you are about to double your $3.5Bn/yr free donations to Israel. Grab that chump change from your penny and cookie jars now!

Kafir  posted on  2011-02-10   14:50:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Kafir (#1)

What this means to you American infidel, dogs is that you are about to double your $3.5Bn/yr free donations to Israel. Grab that chump change from your penny and cookie jars now!

I fear you are right.

The second we stop aid to Egypt, the filthly zionists will squeal like the stuck pigs that they are and DEMAND they receive Egypt's monies to bolster their 'security'.

Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!

Brian S  posted on  2011-02-10   14:56:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Brian S (#2)

The second we stop aid to Egypt, the filthly zionists will squeal like the stuck pigs that they are and DEMAND they receive Egypt's monies to bolster their 'security'.

You seem to have international government agreements backwards. Egypt shall receive a double stipend of their current $1.5Bn/yr as a reward for forging democracy, too.

How you American infidel dogs reward everyone for anything is curious to note; it is as though you want to have piles of friends EVERYWHERE, popping champaigne corks off in Washington DC patting each other on the back for a job well done, that is quickly dismissed by anyone that appears to be knowledgeable; meanwhile, in America your tax base has collapsed and your debts have risen to the moon.

Kafir  posted on  2011-02-10   15:25:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Kafir (#3)

your debts have risen to the moon.

Those debts are Obamas and the people in the legislature that voted for them. The people don't owe that money. The people owe nothing.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-02-10   15:26:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Brian S, Kafir, A K A Stone, go65, war (#2)

The second we stop aid to Egypt, the filthly zionists will squeal like the stuck pigs that they are and DEMAND they receive Egypt's monies to bolster their 'security'.

If I were wargaming this in the role of Obama - I would use this as an opportunity to make the Tea Part branch of the GOP look stupid because just last week or so Ron Paul called for ending aid to Egypt and Israel.

Playing politics, I would say this proves the Tea Party Republicans are too extreme and unrealistic for political office and hammer them on this point.

Americans, I think, would agree that giving Egypt aid in the period of transition to democracy would be a good investment and thus the Tea Party anti-foreign aid to all look more like kooks and get marginalized taking the GOP with them.

"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-02-10   15:33:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#4)

The people don't owe that money. The people owe nothing.

Yes you do, American swine. Now, belly up your taxes before April 15th or off to the hoosegow for ya!

Kafir  posted on  2011-02-10   15:41:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#4)

What about the 10trillion in debt run up mostly by Reagan, Poppy and Boy Blunder prior to January of 2009. Who owes that?

war  posted on  2011-02-10   15:44:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: war (#7)

What about the 10trillion in debt run up mostly by Reagan, Poppy and Boy Blunder prior to January of 2009. Who owes that?

First off Reagan is dead and his debt has already been repaid. The people who created the debt are the debtors. Not the citizens.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-02-10   16:49:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone, war (#8)

First off Reagan is dead and his debt has already been repaid. The people who created the debt are the debtors. Not the citizens.

Stone, come on man. You wonder why I can't hang withthe American conservatives? It's statements like this.

"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-02-10   16:59:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Godwinson (#9)

It is natural law. Natural law is superior to man made law and constitutions. The truths are self evident. Someone who is not born right now is not responsible for the debt of dead people. Here Jefferson said it better.

Selected Papers of Thomas Jefferson: Public Debt and Banking TO: JOHN W. EPPES, FROM: THOMAS JEFFERSON Monticello, June 24, 1813.

Dear Sir,

This letter will be on politics only. For although I do not often permit myself to think on that subject, it sometimes obtrudes itself, and suggests ideas which I am tempted to pursue. Some of these, relating to the business of finance, I will hazard to you, as being at the head of that committee, but intended for yourself individually, or such as you trust, but certainly not for a mixed committee.

It is a wise rule, and should be fundamental in a government disposed to cherish its credit, and at the same time to restrain the use of it within the limits of its faculties, 'never to borrow a dollar without laying a tax in the same instant for paying the interest annually, and the principal within a given term; and to consider that tax as pledged to the creditors on the public faith.' On such a pledge as this, sacredly observed, a government may always command, on a reasonable interest, all the lendable money of their citizens, while the necessity of an equivalent tax is a salutary warning to them and their constituents against oppressions, bankruptcy, and its inevitable consequence, revolution. But the term of redemption must be moderate, and, at any rate, within the limits of their rightful powers.

But what limits, it will be asked, does this prescribe to their powers? What is to hinder them from creating a perpetual debt? The laws of nature, I answer. The earth belongs to the living, not to the dead. The will and the power of man expire with his life, by nature's law. Some societies give it an artificial continuance, for the encouragement of industry; some refuse it, as our aboriginal neighbors, whom we call barbarians.

The generations of men may be considered as bodies or corporations. Each generation has the usufruct of the earth during the period of its continuance. When it ceases to exist, the usufruct passes on to the succeeding generation, free and unencumbered, and so on, successively, from one generation to another for ever. We may consider each generation as a distinct nation, with a right, by the will of its majority, to bind themselves, but none to bind the succeeding generation, more than the inhabitants of another country. Or the case may be likened to the ordinary one of a tenant for life, who may hypothecate the land for his debts, during the continuance of his usufruct; but at his death, the reversioner (who is also for life only) receives it exonerated from all burthen.

The period of a generation, or the term of its life, is determined by the laws of mortality, which, varying a little only in different climates, offer a general average, to be found by observation. I turn, for instance, to Buffon's tables, of twenty-three thousand nine hundred and ninety-four deaths, and the ages at which they happened, and I find that of the numbers of all ages living at one moment, half will be dead in twenty-four years and eight months. But (leaving out minors, who have not the power of self-government) of the adults (of twenty-one years of age) living at one moment, a majority of whom act for the society, one half will be dead in eighteen years and eight months.

At nineteen years then from the date of a contract, the majority of the contractors are dead, and their contract with them. Let this general theory be applied to a particular case. Suppose the annual births of the State of New York to be twenty-three thousand nine hundred and ninety-four: the whole number of its inhabitants, according to Buffon, will be six hundred and seventeen thousand seven hundred and three, of all ages. Of these there would constantly be two hundred and sixty-nine thousand two hundred and eighty-six minors, and three hundred and forty-eight thousand four hundred and seventeen adults, of which last, one hundred and seventy-four thousand two hundred and nine will be a majority.

Suppose that majority, on the first day of the year 1794, had borrowed a sum of money equal to the fee simple value of the State, and to have consumed it in eating, drinking, and making merry in their day; or, if you please, in quarrelling and fighting with their unoffending neighbors. Within eighteen years and eight months, one half of the adult citizens were dead. Till then, being the majority, they might rightfully levy the interest of their debt annually on themselves and their fellow-revelers, or fellow-champions. But at that period, say at this moment, a new majority have come into place, in their own right, and not under the rights, the conditions, or laws of their predecessors. Are they bound to acknowledge the debt, to consider the preceding generation as having had a right to eat up the whole soil of their country in the course of a life, to alienate it from them (for it would be an alienation to the creditors), and would they think themselves either legally or morally bound to give up their country, and emigrate to another for subsistence?

Every one will say no: that the soil is the gift of God to the living, as much as it had been to the deceased generation; and that the laws of nature impose no obligation on them to pay this debt. And although, like some other natural rights, this has not yet entered into any declaration of rights, it is no less a law, and ought to be acted on by honest governments. It is, at the same time, a salutary curb on the spirit of war and indebtment, which, since the modern theory of the perpetuation of debt, has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burthens ever accumulating.

In seeking, then, for an ultimate term for the redemption of our debts, let us rally to this principle, and provide for their payment within the term of nineteen years, at the farthest. Our government has not, as yet, begun to act on the rule, of loans and taxation going hand in hand. Had any loan taken place in my time, I should have strongly urged a redeeming tax. For the loan which has been made since the last session of Congress, we should now set the example of appropriating some particular tax, sufficient to pay the interest annually, and the principal within a fixed term, less than nineteen years. And I hope yourself and your committee will render the immortal service of introducing this practice. Not that it is expected that Congress should formally declare such a principle. They wisely enough avoid deciding on abstract questions. But they may be induced to keep themselves within its limits.

I am sorry to see our loans begin at so exorbitant an interest. And yet, even at that, you will soon be at the bottom of the loan-bag. We are an agricultural nation. Such an one employs its sparings in the purchase or improvement of land or stocks. The lendable money among them is chiefly that of orphans and wards in the hands of executors and guardians, and that which the farmer lays by till he has enough for the purchase in view. In such a nation there is one and one only resource for loans, sufficient to carry them through the expense of a war; and that will always be sufficient, and in the power of an honest government, punctual in the preservation of its faith. The fund I mean, is the mass of circulating coin. Every one knows, that, although not literally, it is nearly true, that every paper dollar emitted banishes a silver one from the circulation.

A nation, therefore, making its purchases and payments with bills fitted for circulation, thrusts an equal sum of coin out of circulation. This is equivalent to borrowing that sum, and yet the vendor, receiving payment in a medium as effectual as coin for his purchases or payments, has no claim to interest. And so the nation may continue to issue its bills as far as its wants require, and the limits of the circulation will admit. Those limits are understood to extend with us, at present, to two hundred millions of dollars, a greater sum than would be necessary for any war. But this, the only resource which the government could command with certainty, the States have unfortunately fooled away, nay corruptly alienated to swindlers and shavers, under the cover of private banks.

Say, too, as an additional evil, that the disposable funds of individuals, to this great amount, have thus been withdrawn from improvement and useful enterprise, and employed in the useless, usurious, and demoralizing practices of bank directors and their accomplices. In the war of 1755, our State availed itself of this fund by issuing a paper money, bottomed on a specific tax for its redemption, and, to insure its credit, bearing an interest of five per cent. Within a very short time, not a bill of this emission was to be found in circulation. It was locked up in the chests of executors, guardians, widows, farmers, etc. We then issued bills, bottomed on a redeeming tax, but bearing no interest.

These were readily received, and never depreciated a single farthing. In the revolutionary war, the old Congress and the States issued bills without interest, and without tax. They occupied the channels of circulation very freely, till those channels were overflowed by an excess beyond all the calls of circulation. But although we have so improvidently suffered the field of circulating medium to be filched from us by private individuals, yet I think we may recover it in part, and even in the whole, if the States will co-operate with us.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-02-10   17:18:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A K A Stone (#10)

Your post is about intentions never written or codified into US law that is about 200 years old. In today's world it means nothing other than some sentimental value.

You owe your government far more than a debt of gratitude for saving your deadbeat carcass, war after war after war; the proceeds of your entire fortune should be forfeited to the bureaucrats as they worked their fingers to the bone providing for your care and comfort. And your children and their children owe your government into perpetuity for making America, indeed the entire planet a safe place for all.

Now, get on your knees and cast your voluntary tithings to Washington DC before April 15th or you will be known as public enemy No.1, even before Osama bin Lauden.

Kafir  posted on  2011-02-10   17:32:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com