Historical
See other Historical Articles
Title: THE DAY OUR CONSTITUTION WAS STOLEN
Source:
forbidden knowledge
URL Source: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.co ... truth/charles_duke_on_1933.htm
Published: Feb 7, 2011
Author: Senator Charles R. Duke
Post Date: 2011-02-07 20:04:45 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 24501
Comments: 33
In this column, several references have been made to the Emergency Banking and Relief Act of 1933. Those who read this column now know that Republicans in both California and Texas have taken steps to have this law repealed. Dr. Eugene Schroder of the American Agricultural Movement has alleged that this may be considered to be the genesis of the loss of our Constitutional rights. Could it be there is one law responsible for all subsequent laws that trample our Constitutional rights? What was it about this law that many believe declared the American people to be enemies of the government? President Herbert Hoover (in the final days of his term) had refused to implement this law, which was based on a recommendation from the Federal Reserve. Why, then, did succeeding President Franklin Delano Roosevelt so warmly embrace this unconstitutional law? Why did FDR find it necessary to declare a national emergency, the effect of which was to suspend our Constitution, a suspension that exists to this day? On October 6, 1917, the Congress had passed the Trading with the Enemy Act, dealing with how the government may control the activities of those considered to be enemies or allies of enemies of our government. Prior to 1933, Paragraph 5(b) of that Act read, "That the President may investigate, regulate or prohibit, under such rules as he may prescribe by means of foreign exchange, export or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any form (other than credits relating to transactions to be executed wholly within the United States)..." Since 1917, then, the President had the power to seize or block financial transactions of those considered to be our enemy. It is also very clear that, in 1917, the Congress wanted to exclude the American people from the oppression of such powers. The bill was, after all, supposed to define our government's posture in dealing with our enemies or allies of our enemies. The Emergency Banking and Relief Act, passed by Congress in special session on March 9, 1933, modifies paragraph 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act just discussed. The modified paragraph reads, "Section 2. Subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: (b) During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and the President may require any person engaged in any transaction referred to in this subdivision to furnish under oath, complete production of any books of account, contracts, letters or other papers, in connection therewith in the custody or control of such person, either before or after such transaction is completed. Whoever willfully violates any of the provisions of the subdivision of any license, order, rule or regulation issued there under, shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000..." This Act granted to the President broad sweeping investigative and prosecutorial powers against anyone, including the American people, found by the President to be an enemy. By removing the former "...transactions to be executed wholly within the United States..." the Congress was effectively putting the American people in the same category as our nation's enemies, and gave the President essentially dictatorial powers. This Act was, of course, unconstitutional. Historians tell us FDR stacked the U.S. Supreme Court with judges who would vow to continue his dictatorial powers. Those powers have been assumed by all Presidents since FDR, including the one presently in the White House. Small wonder, then, that none have adhered to a strict upholding of our Constitution, despite swearing an oath before God to do so. The dictatorship would end, the Federal Reserve's stranglehold on our government would end, and our Constitutional Republic would be restored. Later in 1933, Colorado's Governor Ed Johnson radically transformed Colorado state government, creating all the departments to handle such "licensing" privilege assumed by the President. That is the year a licensing authority was assumed by state governments to regulate marriages, driving, hunting, automobiles, and trade. Preliminary research indicates many other states were being transformed, as well. The governors, you see, had agreed to this unconstitutional assault a few days before March 9, 1933. There are many subsequent laws to further reinforce and verify Dr. Schroder's contention. For those who wish to know more, you may contact him directly at P.O. Box 89, Campo, CO 81029, (719) 787-9958. He has, in this author's opinion, accurately documented the beginning of the assault by your government on our Constitution. He has a number of books that will explain matters in any detail you would care to explore. The solution to this exploitation of the American people is solely within the hands of the President. By simply issuing an Executive Order to end the state of emergency, our Constitution could be returned as the Supreme Law of the Land. So far in 1995, no Presidential candidate, except for Republican Charles Collins of Georgia, has had the courage to tell the truth about our nation's real troubles. Only a public demand of the highest magnitude will force our Constitution to the front again.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
I hope Dr. Schroder is a better veterinarian than he is a Constitutional scholar.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
I'm inclined to believe there are
those here who hope you And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
"I'm inclined to believe there are those here who hope you fuck better than you post, just for your sake. OH SHIT, there goes my coffee again....lmao.... I was wondering why she would even post about such a thing, since most gubmint teat sucking leeches couldn't pass the exam to be either one, veterinarian, or Constitutional scholar....
Guess he should of asked you to set it down when he came over to do you huh?
Jealous twinkle toes?
If that's what you waste your time thinking about, you need to get a life.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
You mean, do I want my (DELETED) Not likely.
Nah. It's not. I waste my time thinking about the likes of you (who most likely falsely takes a female screen name as a peremptory defense against opponents) making hijacking non-sensible posts. How you fuck doesn't interest me in the least. I wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole. Louis Wisconski, a ten foot Pole, said he wouldn't touch you either. Now, address the subject of the thread.
And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
Don't worry, the Flying Spaghetti Monster will get him for that comment.
Well! That's something you'll never have to worry about, you have to be a man in order to have a ....
Your date for the article is only off by around 16 years, Stone. Par for the course for you.
You haven't rebutted anything in this article.
Hey, what's 16 year when you think the universe is only 6,000 years old?
How is it that Ferret Mike can post images yet bypass the software that indicates when an image is posted on a thread. For example, in post #4, post #7, Ferret Mike posted an image. The http (without the spaces) is < img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQWTKFpdsQYN9ZB74roszDNMkJTxyHy0dZMJ72KuhhOb9ukbLPmdzzWkH8dzg" / > Two images in post #9, yet the software says only one image was posted. One was < img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQWTKFpdsQYN9ZB74roszDNMkJTxyHy0dZMJ72KuhhOb9ukbLPmdzzWkH8dzg" / > , the same image as in #4 and #7. the other, the one that shows as being posted by the software is: < img src="http://epicblackcar.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/flying-spaghetti-monster- lives.jpg" How is mike able to post images without your software catching it? You do realize this can be used to get the ip's of your posters? How is mike able to posts images without your software seeing he's doing it?
And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
Quite a lot, actually.
Because the yellow is his tagline and it is automatically inserted.
I did? Good question. I did the usual; I clicked source and got properties; put it in hyper tag 'Img SRC' and added width=700 because otherwise that picture would of resized the thread.
Well, I hope he's keeping track this year since he's going to be Raptured this May. It's a 100% certainty this time. I read it on a billboard.
So in other words, even though an image in his tagline is accessed at an outside website for import, your software shows no image posted in the post, even though clearly, there's an image in his tagline? Can't I then get a record of all the ip's that post at LF by placing an image hosted by a server I control in my tagline? Can't I then match a specific ip to a poster by comparing the time of that poster's post against a log of when that specific image was accessed at my server?
And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
I saw that billboard too, in late December down south.
Looking at your post again, those are different than the smoky FSM pic, so I don't know. I just posted a picture. I'm at a cybercafe posting here on one computer and playing Entropia Universe's multi player interface game on my lappie. Guess one just you don't know what you are capable of when you use so much high tech equipment, huh?
So in other words, even though an image in his tagline is accessed at an outside website for import, your software shows no image posted in the post, even though clearly, there's an image in his tagline? Can't I then get a record of all the ip's that post at LF by placing an image hosted by a server I control in my tagline? Can't I then match a specific ip to a poster by comparing the time of that poster's post against a log of when that specific image was accessed at my server? Can you forward this message to Neil, Neil can trace above what I quoted also.
I guess we know now what happens when old combat arms war vets like Choppie has a head swimming in HTML tags, huh?
Seems the software here doesn't "tattle" on images posted in a tagline, just in a post. It's easy for a lot of folks here to get your ip. Once they have that, any number of bad things can happen.
And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
Captain Queeg is going to higher authority for answers too.
Well then, If he asks for the Wicked Witch of the North's broom in payment for the answer, then don't be surprised if he gets back to the tin Woodie to do a trade.
Interesting. Adventure, strange new script interactions, death defying taglines. That's why I'm here online. It just doesn't get any better than this.
Let me guess, you learned that about men in back seat of a Yugo while testing it's rear suspension.
Yes. But you could just get Adblock and not allow any images to show from this site. Any image loaded from a page hosted on this site won't show, even if the image is hosted on a different site.
Thanks. Does Ad-Block actually stop the browser from contacting the site where the image is hosted, or just stop the browser from displaying an image the browser has downloaded?
And the sheep will bleat their submission, Burma Shave.
I haven't internalized all this stuff so here is a cut and paste rebuttal: Schroder claims that this section of the U.S. Code means that everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has done since March 4, 1933 and anything that the President or the Secretary of the Treasury is hereafter going to do is automatically "approved and confirmed." However, research reveals that Dr. Schroder is wrong. Doing as he suggests, this author went to the library, picked up a copy of Title 12 USC, and went to section 95(b), where he found the following: Looking in section 95(b) of USC Title 12, this writer found, in place of Dr. Schroder's reference to the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act, a reference to "section 95(a) of this title." Section 95(a) refers only to a time of war, not to a period of national emergency. Dr. Schroder quoted from an outdated version of the U.S. Code. In addition, the 1995 resolution passed by the Texas Republicans contains the very same error. John Tello told The New American that Schroder "became aware of the change in 1987." But Tello added that the change in this law is reflected neither in his resolution nor in Schroder's book because they both believe the government is still operating under the older phraseology. snip In 1976 Congress passed the National Emergencies Termination Act, which specified that any national emergency not extended by the President on an annual basis will be automatically terminated. Also, the act recognized the power of Congress to terminate a national emergency. Schroder claims that the national emergency declared by FDR in 1933 was expressly exempted from this act. But he fails to note that this exemption was done away with one year later in a measure amending the Trading With the Enemy Act. www.constitution.org/pub/nam6205a.htm Southern Poverty Law Center says this about Eugene Schroder: Returning home to Campo, Colo., after finishing veterinary school in the 1970s, Eugene Schroder found local farmers losing their land in a devastating recession and decided to do something about it. With his father and friends, Schroder founded the American Agricultural Movement, which in 1978 organized a famous "Tractorcade" protest in Washington, D.C. Schroder soon grew more radical, however, allying himself with the anti-Semitic Posse Comitatus and adopting many of the Posse ideas that would later animate the "common-law" court movement. In 1992 and 1995, he outlined in two books a core Patriot theory: Using the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act and the 1933 Emergency Banking Act, President Franklin Roosevelt imposed martial law that still remains in effect today, benefiting a secret cabal of Washington, D.C., plotters. Schroder heavily promoted common-law courts, helping to organize a 1995 Wichita, Kansas, meeting that helped spread the pseudo-legal bodies throughout the country. He also wrote articles for the anti-Semitic United Sovereigns of America. But in 2000, Schroder, the antigovernment theorist, changed course radically, suing the federal government for not protecting farmers. Where a few years ago Schroder argued angrily that the government should butt out, the Colorado veterinarian now insists that it should intervene to stop farm foreclosures and support farmers. webcache.googleuserconten...overty+law+center&ct=clnk That most famous Constitutional law expert, Orly Taitz is a big believer in "common-law" courts.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
That's a good question. I thought it would obviously not even get the image, rather than get it and decide not to display it, but it's not so easy to get a clear answer. I did some looking into it and it seems that it changes the HTML of the page to NOT include the HTML that would load the image from the server. So it wouldn't even visit the site, if that site has been blacklisted. I used to right-click on the images and block images from each site but then everytime that idiot byteshredder, or byeltsin, or happytobeanidiot, or mammy would use a different source I'd have to reblock more sources. I ended up having a shitload of sites that adblock had to process before it could decide to load an image or not. Then I noticed you could apply a rule only to a particular site, so I block all jpg's, for example, when they are loaded to pages on libertysflame, or libertypost or whatever. I only need four rules per site, bmp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, etc and then you see no images. There aren't any images worth viewing anyway, lol, you don't miss much!
Dr. Eugene Schroder of the American Agricultural Movement has alleged that this may be considered to be the genesis of the loss of our Constitutional rights.
#2. To: lucysmom (#1)
(Edited)
I hope Dr. Schroder is a better veterinarian than he is a
Constitutional scholar
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#3. To: Wood_Chopper (#2)
"I hope Dr. Schroder is a better veterinarian than he is a Constitutional scholar"
#4. To: Murron (#3)
#5. To: Ferret Mike (#4)
Guess he should of asked you to set it down when he came over to do you huh?
#6. To: Wood_Chopper (#2)
I'm inclined to believe there are those here who hope you fuck better than you post, just for your sake.
#7. To: Murron (#5)
#8. To: lucysmom (#6)
If that's what you waste your time thinking about, you need to get a life.
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#9. To: lucysmom (#6)
#10. To: Ferret Mike (#7)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#12. To: lucysmom (#1)
I hope Dr. Schroder is a better veterinarian than he is a Constitutional scholar.
#13. To: Skip Intro (#11)
#14. To: A K A Stone (#12)
(Edited)
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#13)
Hey, what's 16 year when you think the universe is only 6,000 years old?
#16. To: Wood_Chopper (#14)
#17. To: Skip Intro (#15)
#18. To: Wood_Chopper (#14)
#19. To: Ferret Mike (#17)
Yeah, but when you are man overwhelmed by all the religious questions around you, you know how easy it is to lose focus regarding the calendar, and how fast it moves.
#20. To: A K A Stone (#16)
Because the yellow is his tagline and it is automatically inserted.
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#21. To: Skip Intro (#19)
#22. To: Wood_Chopper (#14)
(Edited)
#23. To: Wood_Chopper, pinguinite, jethro tull (#20)
Because the yellow is his tagline and it is automatically inserted.
#24. To: Fred Mertz (#21)
#25. To: Ferret Mike (#18)
I did? Good question.
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#26. To: Ferret Mike (#24)
#27. To: Fred Mertz (#26)
(Edited)
#28. To: Wood_Chopper (#25)
(Edited)
#29. To: Murron (#10)
(Edited)
"Well! That's something you'll never have to worry about, you have to be a man in order to have a ...."
#30. To: Wood_Chopper (#20)
(Edited)
#31. To: Abu el Banat (#30)
Any image loaded from a page hosted on this site won't show, even if the image is hosted on a different site.
Seeing the others as fools,
Not knowing nor even caring,
They've become no more than tools.
#32. To: A K A Stone (#12)
You haven't rebutted anything in this article.
"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by section 95a of this title, are approved and confirmed."
#33. To: Wood_Chopper (#31)
(Edited)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]