[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science-Technology Title: Oil Spill Dispersants Don't Disappear When nearly 800,000 gallons of a chemical dispersant were injected into the oil gushing from the busted wellhead on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico during last year's Deepwater Horizon disaster, nobody knew for sure what would happen. Now, scientists are getting their first answers, and the results are mixed. Tests for a key component of the chemical concoction reveal that the dispersant worked its way into the oil-laden plume in the deep ocean. The dispersant also stayed in the deep ocean and didn't rise toward the surface. But the chemical did not degrade as fast as scientists thought it would. "It is hard for me at this point to say whether or not it is bad or good that it stuck around," study lead author Elizabeth Kujawinski, a chemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, told me today. But she and colleagues were surprised that little or no biodegradation of the dispersant substance had occurred. Molecule measurements By September, the plume had drifted 200 miles away from the wellhead, and concentrations of DOSS were detected there in parts-per-billion concentrations. The finding suggests that the degradation of the molecule was insubstantial relative to other factors such as simple dilution, Kujawinski said. While the researchers expected the molecule to degrade faster, they note there is a dearth of data on the fate of the molecule in seawater and dispersants in the deep ocean, making any interpretation scientifically tentative. Instead, they see this study as a foundation for future studies. "The results indicate that an important component of the chemical dispersant injected into the deep ocean remained there and resisted rapid biodegradation," another study co-author, David Valentine from the University of California at Santa Barbara, said in a statement. "This knowledge will ultimately help us understand the efficacy of the dispersant application as well as the biological effects." Environmental impact Kujawinski noted, however, that she's unclear on how long organisms were exposed to the chemical in those toxicity studies. In any case, most if not all of those studies were conducted on coastal organisms such as blue crab. "One of the concerns about this deepwater application is that it affects a different group of organisms, deep sea corals, deepwater fish, and so on," she told me. "And the question is whether or not they would be as sensitive, more sensitive, or less sensitive, as the organisms that were actually studied." Findings were published online today in the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science & Technology.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
like concentrated antifreeze. And us Dirty Fuckin Hippies screamin' from Day 1 not to use it. Tipping Point past.
They were just trying to kill you vermin so they wouldn't have to evacuate you to a FEMA concentratioon camp, mcgoon.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|