[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Obama's Tepid State of the Union Speech
Source: Dissenting Opinions
URL Source: http://jwpegler.blogspot.com/2011/0 ... pid-state-of-union-speech.html
Published: Jan 26, 2011
Author: jwpegler
Post Date: 2011-01-26 10:24:30 by jwpegler
Keywords: None
Views: 30369
Comments: 58

Last night, President Obama delivered on of the most tepid state union speeches in recent memory. Obama's "winning the future" theme was exactly the right one. Unfortunately, very little of what he said will help us do that.

Obama should have held up the report from his own Deficit Commission. He should have told the American people that this is his program for moving forward. Then he should have turned around and handed it to John Boehner and asked him to pass it immediately.

Instead, we got a laundry list of disconnected new initiatives that just don't add up and won't do a thing to solve the looming fiscal crisis caused by too much government spending.

Here's the blow-by-blow analysis:

1.) Obama is calling for new "investments" on infrastructure. In this context, he's actually using the term "investment" correctly. Here's the problem: for years Democrats have called every bit of government spending "investments", including spending on transfer payments from one group to another. Only 2% of Obama's trillion dollar "stimulus" program was spent on real investments in our future. So, at this point it's difficult to trust what the Democrats say about this. Yes, we need to fix and upgrade our crumbling roads, bridges, ports, airports, water and sewage systems. But it has to be paid for by cutting subsidies and transfer payments.

2.) Obama mentioned China's "green energy" programs. Great! China is building the largest damn in the world. It's difficult to build a damn in the United States anymore because the extreme fringe of the environmental movement won't allow it. China has 30 nuclear power plants under construction. The last time the U.S. started a new nuclear power plant, Jimmy Carter was still president. Again, the nut case environmentalists won't allow it. Please tell us Mr. President, what specifically do you plan to do about your supporters, who have been blocking energy progress since the 1970s?

3.) Obama called for more "investments" in education. What he really means is more transfer payments to the rotten teacher's unions who have destroyed our school system. No thanks. Been there, done that. Not a single dollar more at the local, state, or federal level should be spent on public schools until: A.) the teacher's unions are decertified, B.) we abolish the entire notion of "tenure", which only serves to protect bad teachers, and C.) every school is taken away from the board of education bureaucrats and turned over to the parents who actually have kids in the school, i.e., every school is turned into a Charter school. Obama has claimed for years that he supports Charter Schools. Mr. President, it's time to put up or shut up.

4.) Obama called for building high speed rail lines in California and the Midwest. The last thing in the world we need is to waste money on a government run high speed rail system, which will cost a ton of money, almost no one will use, and will quickly degrade and stagnate like every other service the government tries to provide. A better answer to providing mass transit is to eliminate state and local laws which prevent private entities from competing to provide bus and other types of mass transit services. The Philippines have privately run mass transit systems, which do a great job at getting a lot of people where they need to go.

5.) Obama is right about the crazy organization of the federal government and all of the duplication across agencies. For example, the federal government has over 100 welfare programs. They could all be collapsed into a single program that provides cash subsidies to the poor and disabled. We'd save a TON of money on administrative costs. A TON. Do you actually think that he will do anything like this? I don't.

6.) Obama called for a 5 year "spending freeze" on domestic discretionary spending. This won't even come close to balancing the budget. His freeze might reduce the deficit by $400 billion over the next 10 years, but deficits are projected to be $14 TRILLION dollars over the next 10 years, which will double the national debt to $28 trillion. His freeze amounts to less than 3% of the projected new debt. It's not enough to keep the country solvent.

7.) Obama is finally paying attention to the trade agreements with Columbia and Panama which have been languishing on the shelf for years. That's a good thing.

8.) He paid some lip service to tort reform to help reign in heath care costs. This is a good thing, but I don't think he's serious given that Trial Lawyers are among the largest contributors to the Democrat Party.

9.) He also mentioned lowering the corporate tax rate, which is the highest in the world, and simplifying the tax code. This is the one recommendation from his deficit commission that he seems to be endorsing. It's a great idea and it should be done to help restore our competitiveness.

10.) Of course Obama had to throw some red meat to the fringe left by bashing oil companies and successful people. No surprise, but it is getting really, really old.

It's pretty obvious that Obama still doesn't understand that the country faces an almost insurmountable fiscal disaster caused by excessive government spending. Here are the two big questions: A.) Will the GOP actually do something about it? B.) If the GOP does do something about it, will Obama really do along? We'll see.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#1. To: jwpegler, ferret mike, go65, lucysmom (#0) (Edited)

he last time the U.S. started a new nuclear power plant, Jimmy Carter was still president. Again, the nut case environmentalists won't allow it. Please tell us Mr. President, what specifically do you plan to do about your supporters, who have been blocking energy progress since the 1970s?

So Obama is pro nuclear energy - a position that you right wingers are also for - and you attack him for that because you think a leftist segment of the population might be a against it?

How about this novel solution to this problem, you right wingers SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT on this initiative!!!!!!!

Godwinson  posted on  2011-01-26   10:40:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Godwinson (#1)

He didn't mention a thing about how he's going to restart the nuclear program and overcome the opposition of his own supporters.

ditto for education -- nothing constructive can be done unless the Democrat party grows the cajones to take on the teacher's unions who are blocking real reform.

It's time to put up or shut up.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-01-26   11:03:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: jwpegler (#4)

ditto for education -- nothing constructive can be done unless the Democrat party grows the cajones to take on the teacher's unions who are blocking real reform.

So then you want Obama to interject the federal government into state and local issues.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-01-26   11:10:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lucysmom (#6)

So then you want Obama to interject the federal government into state and local issues.

Unfortunately, the federal government is already involved in education. The Department of Education will spend $56 billion this year. What do we get for it? The worst performing schools in the developed world. It has to change. There is nothing more important than this.

Obama can use his bully pulpit to bully his comrades at the NEA to stop blocking school reform measures at the state and local level.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-01-26   11:15:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: jwpegler, lucysmom, go65 (#8)

What do we get for it? The worst performing schools in the developed world. It has to change. There is nothing more important than this.

Maybe its the Republicans who ran the dept for so many years?

here is the thing. You agree the rest of the world is beating America's education system. But the rest of the world is not doing it through decentralized "states rights" localized education programs or "home schooling".

The rest of the world is out performing America's schools via massive "socialism".

Conservatives want to make education better by inventing an education system no other advanced nation has on the basis of their ideology rather than on testes results around the world.

That's why you guys are nuts.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-01-26   11:22:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Godwinson (#11)

Maybe its the Republicans who ran the dept for so many years?

The schools are run by the NEA. The NEA also runs the Democrat Party. The worst performing schools are in big cities, which have Democrat mayors and school boards.

The NEA has routinely blocked any and all school reform in every state of the country for decades.

Charter Schools, Magnet Schools, pay for performance, etc. -- these are all ideas originally proposed by Democrat think tanks and a tiny number of courageous Democrat politicians, and the NEA won't allow them. They use their union dues to fight ballot initiatives and politicians who dare to propose them.

Without question, the NEA is a single biggest impediment to the future success of this country.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-01-26   11:27:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: jwpegler (#13)

Charter Schools, Magnet Schools, pay for performance, etc.

Finalnd laughs at Americans trying to invent a system on the cheap that they perfected.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8601207.stm

Why do Finland's schools get the best results?

The Finns don't have immigration like America does but the program can be adopted to it.

What Americans are plagued with - both left and right - are special interest groups - who see everything as an ideological battlefield. We even fight over which history version to have in text books.

The Finns have no ideology really. It's all "just the facts" and that's it.

Americans freak out if they find out a biology class will teach about how the reproductive organs work.

So Americans are self doomed.

Like I said, I was once ideologically driven but now I am results oriented. I could care less what the left right origin is on an issue as long as it works.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-01-26   11:34:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Godwinson (#14) (Edited)

I was once ideologically driven but now I am results oriented

Of course, which is why you reflexively propose socialism (a word you champion) at every opportunity.

I've already demonstrated that your are wrong about socialist healthcare -- the two best systems in the word (Singapore and Switzerland) have more market- oriented healthcare systems than we do.

I've just demonstrated that you are wrong about education as well -- two of the best education systems in the world (Singapore and Japan) have lot's of private schools.

Singapore works as a country. In many ways they have a much more free market economy than we do. In other ways, they have more social controls than we do. There is very little welfare in Singapore, but you are required to save for your own retirement. The government spends a tiny fraction of what we do on healthcare, but you are required to save for your own healthcare. Instead of redistributing income, they make you save it for yourself. It's not laissez faire, but it's a better approach to social welfare than we have.

China is starting to work precisely because their stated goal over the last 30 years is to become a giant Singapore.

Japan used to work, and still does in many ways like education, but they have the same problem we do -- their financial sector has too much power over their politicians so no real reform is possible.

Unfortunately, in the U.S. MANY special interest groups -- Teachers, Trial Lawyers, Wall Street, AARP, Farmers, etc. -- have too much control over the system. Nothing will change unless we put an end to that.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-01-26   12:09:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: jwpegler (#21)

I've already demonstrated that your are wrong about socialist healthcare -- the two best systems in the word (Singapore and Switzerland) have more market- oriented healthcare systems than we do.

Singapore and Switzerland are not the two best systems in the world unless you are using an ideology driven ranking system.

1 France, 2 Italy, 3 San Marino, 4 Andorra, 5 Malta, 6 Singapore, 7 Spain, 8 Oman, 9 Austria, 10 Japan, 11 Norway, 12 Portugal, 13 Monaco, 14 Greece, 15 Iceland, 16 Luxembourg, 17 Netherlands, 18 United Kingdom, 19 Ireland, 20 Switzerland

www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

lucysmom  posted on  2011-01-26   12:27:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: lucysmom (#26)

unless you are using an ideology driven ranking system.

From the web page you posted: The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000... 11 year old data doesn't cut it. ROTFLMAO.

Today, Italy's healthcare system is a complete disaster (like the U.K. and Spain). Switzerland completely reformed their system.

Yes, France's system is still highly rated but's also one of the most expensive. Their system is not a socialized, single payer system like the U.K., Canada, Italy, and Spain. The French system is a mixed public and private system with mandatory insurance, very high copays (except for chronic illnesses), and a mix of public, private and non-profit hospitals (like the U.S.)

Look, I've told you this before -- you can't just google this stuff, cut and paste the first thing you see and be credible. You either know the information or you don't. You just don't.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-01-26   12:56:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

#33. To: jwpegler, lucysmom, go65 (#31)

From the web page you posted: The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000... 11 year old data doesn't cut it. ROTFLMAO.

So the USA's health system improved since then?

You right wingers do this all the time when confronted with facts you can't stand - you find any excuse to not accept them.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-01-26 13:02:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: jwpegler (#31)

Look, I've told you this before -- you can't just google this stuff, cut and paste the first thing you see and be credible. You either know the information or you don't. You just don't.

I would appreciate it if you would provide a source for your claims so I can evaluate it for myself.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-01-26 13:07:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: jwpegler (#31) (Edited)

From the web page you posted: The World Health Organization's ranking of the world's health systems was last produced in 2000... 11 year old data doesn't cut it. ROTFLMAO.

I did find this source from 2001 ranking Singapore number1:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=7923

A new study shows that Singapore's health-care system places first when compared with the health-care systems of seven other countries. Canadian health economist Cynthia Ramsay ranked the health-care systems of Singapore, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany, Australia and South Africa.

What the site has to say about itself:

The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization, established in 1983. Our goal is to develop and promote private, free-market alternatives to government regulation and control, solving problems by relying on the strength of the competitive, entrepreneurial private sector.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-01-26 13:18:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com