Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: The Class War Launched by America's Wealthiest Is Getting More Savage
Source:
AlterNet
URL Source: http://www.alternet.org/economy/149 ... thiest_is_getting_more_savage/
Published: Jan 17, 2011
Author: Larry Beinhart
Post Date: 2011-01-17 17:55:46 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 7646
Comments: 17
It’s the corporations and the very wealthiest against all the rest of us. We’re losing. In 1962 the wealthiest 1 percent of American households had 125 times the wealth of the median household. Now it’s 190 times as much. Is that a case of a rising tide lifting all boats, just a few of them a little bit higher? No. From 1950 to 1965, median family income rose from $24,000 a year to $38,000 a year. That’s close to 4 percent a year, close to 60 percent over 15 years. That’s a rising tide. In 1964 there was a big tax cut. That’s when things started to slow down for average people. By the mid-'70s the rise of the middle class stalled. From 1975 to 2010 median family income rose $42,936 to $49,777. That’s not quite 16 percent over 25 years, less than six-tenths of 1 percent per year. Briefly, when taxes went up under Clinton, median income rose, peaked at $52,587 in 1999, and then, after Bush cut taxes, declined. Keep in mind that this is median family income. In the '50s and '60s, family income was usually earned by a single person. Today, family income normally comes from at least two people. At the same time, income for the richest soared. In 1979 the richest 1 percent of Americans earned 9 percent of all U.S. income. Now they earn 24 percent of all U.S. income. One percent of Americans earn nearly one-fourth of all the income in the country. Then came the crashes of 2001 and 2008 and the recessions that followed. The crash hasn’t changed anything. Things have become worse. From 1990 to 2005, adjusted for inflation -- the minimum wage is down 9 percent, production workers’ pay is up only over 15 years 4.3 percent. At the same time, the rich get richer: Corporate profits are up 106.7 percent. The S&P 500 is still up 141.4 percent since 1990. CEO compensation is up 282 percent. Call it transfer of wealth. Or call it class warfare. What’s wrong with the rich getting richer? Slate's Timothy Noah, in "The United States of Inequality," wrote, “Income distribution in the United States [has become] more unequal than in Guyana, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and roughly on par with Uruguay, Argentina, and Ecuador.” Take a look at that list. Countries with wide income inequality don’t lead the world in research, technology, industry, and innovation. They’re unstable. They have large underclasses. They have high rates of crime. They have little opportunity. In such countries the rich have disproportionate power. They take control of all aspects of society, especially government, the police, and the judiciary. They become self perpetuating. If current trends continue, “The United States by 2043 will have the same income inequality as Mexico.” (Tula Connell, Mar 12, 2010, AFL-CIO Now.) Countries with high levels of income inequality are third-world countries. Here’s how regular people can deal with cultures of high inequality. The primary, and best, weapon is a progressive tax structure. As people move up the income ladder they pay a higher rate at each rung. Unearned income –from dividends and capital gains – is taxed at least as high as earned income (money that people actually work for.) Tax cuts for the wealthy mark, with great precision, the decline in fortunes of ordinary Americans. Tax cuts for the wealthy mark, with equal precision, the increase in inequality. We had a chance to slow the process by letting the last round, the Bush tax cuts, expire. We’ve lost that round. People can become educated and move on up. Back in the '60s, when I was growing up, New York City had free universities. The burgeoning SUNY system charged $400 tuition a semester. The minimum Regents scholarship was $400 a semester. If a student didn’t get one, he or she could easily earn enough to pay tuition with a summer job. The same held true for most state university systems across the country. Today, students have to borrow. The median student debt for an undergraduate degree – forget about a doctorate, law school, and med school – is $20,000. The first, and truest, lesson you learn when you go to college is how to be in service to the banks. We’ve lost that battle. What does it mean? “Children from low-income families have only a 1 percent chance of reaching the top 5 percent of the income distribution, versus children of the rich who have about a 22 percent chance. “Children born to the middle quintile of parental family income ($42,000 to $54,300) had about the same chance of ending up in a lower quintile than their parents (39.5 percent) as they did of moving to a higher quintile (36.5 percent). Their chances of attaining the top five percentiles of the income distribution were just 1.8 percent.” (Understanding Mobility in America, April 26, 2006, Tom Hertz, American University.) Working people can organize and form unions. Unions do more than raise wages. They improve working conditions and safety. They provide protection against abuse, intimidation and wrongful dismissal. Non-union employers have to compete, partly to keep out unions, so the existence of unions helps everyone. Unions also have political power, they spend money and mobilize their members to vote. Businesses have become very good at beating unions. And they’re getting better at it. According to Business Week, ("How Wal-Mart Keeps Unions at Bay,” 10/28/2002),"over the past two decades, Corporate America has perfected its ability to fend off labor groups." In the 1940s a third of private sector employees were unionized. Now it’s down to just 7.2 percent. Unions only remain strong in the public sector, where membership is 37 percent. If you read the papers or watch the news, you will see an anti-public service union story almost everyday. These are the people who teach your kids, pick up the trash, clean the sewers, drive the buses and trains, they’re the police and fireman. The stories will tell you their pension fund liabilities will bankrupt the states; that it’s unionized teachers who have ruined our schools. Charter schools – without unions – are the new favorite charity for billionaires. When a country is, or becomes, a third-world country, the other thing people can do is run. To some place richer and freer. Like America. But when America becomes Mexico, where you gonna run to?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
Who is making it that way?
What does it mean? Big oppressive government doesn't work. It stifles economic incentive. Jobs are outsourced to countries with less restrictions on business. Then Fartsky cuts one, inhales it, and blames the victims for buying the products. It couldn't be the DEMS, and his beloved REPS on the take from big business, could it? A globalist neocon will be along shortly, to save us all. All hail Saint Sarah, of the frozen north! /s
It couldn't be the DEMS, and his beloved REPS on the take from big business, could it? A globalist neocon will be along shortly, to save us all. All hail Saint Sarah, of the frozen north! /s Bottom line,....we the people have to be pro active when it comes to items.
Are you suggesting that Communism provides a friendlier business climate than the US? From the Index of Economic Freedom: Business Freedom: The government has allowed some business freedom, but the overall regulatory framework lacks transparency and remains complex, arbitrary, and unevenly implemented. Enforcement of regulations can be ineffective, hampered by petty corruption and bureaucracy. www.heritage.org/Index/Country/China The Index ranks China 135; the US rank 9. What's China got going for it? Cheap labor and a low standard of living.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
It's called "Socialism." An oligarchal political system of the elites against the population. It's what YOU promote, because it's the natural end-result of the policies you pimp. I have opportunities in other countries. But the financial virus that is the latest, greatest product of the financial elites, has infected the entire world, and every country will suffer. So there's no place to escape to. We chose to make our stand here. Because this is the last country left, where a citizen still has arms to defend himself against tyrannical government.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. ... The heresy of heresies was common sense. ME: Thanks for admitting that you ARE trying to spin this (AZ shooting, and terrorism) onto Palin, and conservatives in general. ME: THERE IS NO MORE MONEY. Inescapable conclusion? Socialists are unable to accept reality. I.e., they're INSANE.
1964, LBJ reverses jfk's order and starts Vietnam War. !971, US peaks oil production. 1971, Nixon defaults on gold. 1982, Greenspan Debt Derivatives Act. 1974 was the peak for the Middle Class, then loans were subbed for wage gains. Just like 2005 the peak for world oil, US housing.
It's called "Socialism." Now that's insane. I'll need to see that dictionary now. LMFAO
i'll have to dig, but I remember seeing an article recently that argued it wasn't cheap labor, but China's infrastructure that makes it more favorable for manufacturing. They simply have the facilities that we now lack, and while their government subsidizes its manufacturing industry, we subsidize corn.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Not true. How has that worked for Afghans? To fill the void created by inadequate police and courts, guns settle many disputes here, whether tribal, domestic or personal -- and there is often little doubt who the winner is. “Guns are the cause of all miseries in this country,” says a local village elder. http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2010/01/inside-afghanistan-guns-guns-guns.html Somalia? Somalia is ruled by the gun," I was told by Bashir, a militiaman. And as I was interviewing him, I was reminded just how cheap that has made life in Somalia. snip Weapons are even used as a way to break up the horrendous traffic jams which partly result from a lack of police. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4076011.stm In both countries we see weak government coupled with well armed citizens, each pursuing his own self interest, producing chaos. The choice between living under the "tyrannical" government of, say Denmark vs the tyranny of an Afghan warlord, is a no-brainer. I would rather pay higher taxes and see my neighbor's health care provided in Denmark than employ body guards and live Somali freedom.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
Many of those facilities were moved from US soil to Chinese. According to this article, the growing Chinese middle class offers more opportunity for American companies making the navigation of China's bureaucratic hurdles worth the effort. Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
here's the article: http://www.scienceprogress.org/2011/01/rising-to-the-challenge/ China is undergoing a big cultural transformation from a society that produces lots and consumes little to one that consumes as well, the markets there present much more of a growth opportunity for global firms. And while China invests in infrastructure, education and worker training, we invest in tax cuts for those making more than $250k per year and military occupations.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Yep, and that's the policy that will do us in. In the end we will need China's permission to carry out our occupations as more and more weapons and replacement parts are produced in China. www.pacificprogressive.co...ay-of-the-automobile.html US manufacturing has abandoned the American middle class. see my tag line.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
You and go56... LOL. Talk about an echo-chamber of stupidity. And yes, I put his numbers down backwards, because he's ass-backwards on EVERYTHING. But then again, so are you. Are you married to each other? If yes, then PLEASE quit procreating.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. ... The heresy of heresies was common sense. ME: Thanks for admitting that you ARE trying to spin this (AZ shooting, and terrorism) onto Palin, and conservatives in general. ME: THERE IS NO MORE MONEY. But then again, so are you. Or maybe its you.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
Eric has some serious issues. That's why I have him on bozo.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Those serious issues would be my stubbornly refusing to back down, and that I keep posting FACTS. Of course, given my proclivities for plainly stating the truth, most of you socialists find me... annoying. Oh, and with regard to MY wanting to put in a grading system for parents, I think it's a stupid idea. But then again, it's in the socialist mindset (the state knows ALL)... And since you both are socialists, unable to conjure a single unique thought, it seems obvious that you two would both receive a grade of F. It's unfortunate, when the paradoxical nature of such ideas are lost on you both. But again, you're both socialists, and I shouldn't be surprised.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. ... The heresy of heresies was common sense. ME: Thanks for admitting that you ARE trying to spin this (AZ shooting, and terrorism) onto Palin, and conservatives in general. ME: THERE IS NO MORE MONEY. It greatly saddens me to tell you that you don't have facts. You have propaganda the radical right has been repeating over and over again until you think its facts.
Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson
But when America becomes Mexico
#2. To: Brian S, Yu-Canary, Ibluafartsky (#0)
We’ve lost that battle.
#3. To: hondo68 (#2)
Big oppressive government doesn't work. It stifles economic incentive. Jobs are outsourced to countries with less restrictions on business. Then Fartsky cuts one, inhales it, and blames the victims for buying the products.
I'm a hobbyist,...enjoy building 1/35 scale and diorama's.
Tamiya has discontinued many items they formerly sold.
Some model kits are hard to come buy,....stores know this,..and mark the item up bigtime.
The sellers on the net know this aswell,....so you pay big and get nailed shipping.
Model kits which cost $15.00 a few decades ago are well above $50.00 now.
Dragon makes a good product,...but the price range is high,....$31.00 for a Panther Ausf A is a good deal.
yet,...I'm buying Blueray's for $5/10.00 at Wallmart
so ya....the addiction at least provides some avenue if your smart shopper.
still,...food is becoming the beating stick.
It must be out of this world expensive to raise a family with 3 children today.
#4. To: hondo68 (#2)
Jobs are outsourced to countries with less restrictions on business.
#5. To: Brian S (#0)
It’s the corporations and the very wealthiest against all the rest of us.
When a country is, or becomes, a third-world country, the other thing people can do is run. To some place richer and freer. Like America. But when America becomes Mexico, where you gonna run to?
-- George Orwell, 1984 --
Brian S(ocialist): I have never hidden that fact...
GO65: There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more.
#6. To: Brian S (#0)
#7. To: Capitalist Eric, Brian S, All (#5)
It’s the corporations and the very wealthiest against all the rest of us.
#8. To: lucysmom (#4)
What's China got going for it? Cheap labor and a low standard of living.
#9. To: Capitalist Eric (#5)
Because this is the last country left, where a citizen still has arms to defend himself against tyrannical government.
#10. To: go65 (#8)
They simply have the facilities that we now lack...
#11. To: lucysmom (#10)
(Edited)
According to this article, the growing Chinese middle class offers more opportunity for American companies making the navigation of China's bureaucratic hurdles worth the effort.
#12. To: go65 (#11)
And while China invests in infrastructure, education and worker training, we invest in tax cuts for those making more than $250k per year and military occupations.
#13. To: lucysmom, go65 (#12)
-- George Orwell, 1984 --
Brian S(ocialist): I have never hidden that fact...
GO65: There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more. 
#14. To: Capitalist Eric (#13)
Talk about an echo-chamber of stupidity. And yes, I put his numbers down backwards, because he's ass-backwards on EVERYTHING.
#15. To: lucysmom (#14)
Or maybe its you.
#16. To: go65, lucysmom (#15)
Eric has some serious issues. That's why I have him on bozo.
-- George Orwell, 1984 --
Brian S(ocialist): I have never hidden that fact...
GO65: There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more.
#17. To: Capitalist Eric (#16)
Those serious issues would be my stubbornly refusing to back down, and that I keep posting FACTS.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]