[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Record snows hit New England; Brazilian floods kill 350; Brisbane underwater
Source: Accuweather
URL Source: http://www.wunderground.com/blog/Je ... ers/comment.html?entrynum=1726
Published: Jan 13, 2011
Author: Dr. Jeff Masters
Post Date: 2011-01-13 13:34:09 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 68782
Comments: 88

The Northeast U.S. is digging out today from the winter's third major snowstorm, and the nation's South continues to deal with travel disruptions caused by the nasty coasting of ice, snow and sleet the storm left behind early this week. Yesterday's Nor'easter has exited into Canada, and the storm is over for the U.S. It was a pretty average Nor'easter as far as intensity goes--the storm's central pressure bottomed out at 982 mb, and just the Massachusetts coast was subject to high winds that merited blizzard warnings. The storm did generate one hurricane-force wind gust--Provincetown airport on the tip of Cape Cod had sustained winds at 43 mph, gusting to 79 mph, at 6:35am EST yesterday, and a personal weather station at Humarock Beach in Scituate, southeast of Boston, recorded a wind gust of 64 mph at 5:51am EST yesterday.

Figure 1. A bit of work today needed before one can step out of the door in Southborough, Massachusetts! Image credit: wunderphotographer Megmdp.

But what was remarkable about the January Nor'easter of 2011 were its snow amounts. This rather ordinary-strength Nor'easter managed to assemble the perfect mix of conditions needed to transport moisture to a region of the storm highly favorable for heavy snow formation. Many heavy snow bands with snowfall rates up to 3 inches per hour formed over New England, with some of these bands intense enough to generate lightning and thunder. Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont all came within an inch of setting all-time state 24-hour snowfall records yesterday. North Haven, Connecticut received 29.5", falling just short of the 30.2" 24-hour snowfall record for the state, set at Fairfield in February 2006. Savoy, Massachusetts received 34.5", falling just short of that state's all-time 24-hour snowfall record, the 36" recorded at Milton in February 1997. Wilmington, Vermont got 36" in yesterday's storm, just missing the state record of 37", set at Peru in March 1984. The capital of Connecticut, Hartford, had its greatest snowstorm in history yesterday, with 24". The old record was 23.5", set in a February 1899 storm.

Some selected storm total snowfall amounts, taken from the latest NOAA storm summary:

New York City, NY 9.1"
Albany, NY 13.2"
Worcester, MA 21.1"
Boston, MA 14.6"
Augusta, ME 14.5"
Portland, ME 9.2"
Concord, NH 22"
Somerset, PA 15"
Philadelphia, PA 5.2"
Providence, RI 9.5"
Brattleboro, VT 19"
Elkin, WV 10"
Danbury, CT 17.9"
Wilmington, DE 4.3"

According to our weather historian, Christopher C. Burt, in his latest blog post titled, "Snowstorms in the South: A Historical Perspective", the 8.9" that fell on Huntsville, Alabama from this week's storm was that city's third heaviest snow on record. The post has a nice summary of the remarkable heavy snow storms that have hit the South in the past.

Brazilian floods, landslides kill at least 350 The globe's parade of massive flooding disasters in recent months continued yesterday in Brazil, where heavy rains of up to 10 inches in 24 hours inundated the region about 60 miles north of Rio de Janeiro. At least 350 are dead and 50 people missing, and the death toll is expected to go much higher once rescuers reach remote villages that have been cut off from communications. Brazil suffers hundreds of deaths each year due to flooding and mudslides, but the past 12 months have been particularly devastating. Flooding and landslides near Rio in April last year killed 246 people and did about $13 billion in damage, and at least 85 people perished last January during a similar event.

Figure 2. A woman trapped on the roof of her car awaits rescue during the Toowoomba flash flood on Monday. Image credit: Wikipedia.

New floods ravage Australia's 3rd largest city Flood waters swept today into Brisbane, Australia's 3rd largest city, inundating 14,400 homes and businesses, partially submerging another 17,200, and cutting power to 118,000, as the Brisbane River peaked at its highest level since 1974. Queensland Premier Anna Bligh, who has called the recent floods in Queensland the greatest natural disaster in their history, said, "What I'm seeing looks more like a war zone in some places. All I could see was their rooftops...underneath every single one of those rooftops is a horror story. We are facing a reconstruction effort of post-war proportions." Much of Brisbane's infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, including 55,000 miles of roads. The Port of Brisbane, one of Australia's busiest, has been closed because of debris, and the city's largest sports stadium is under several feet of water.

The search for bodies continues in Toowoomba, about 60 miles west of Brisbane, where freak rains of 6 inches in just 30 minutes triggered a flash flood that killed 12 and left 61 missing on Monday. The flood waters from the Toowoomba disaster poured into the Brisbane River, contributing to its rampage through Brisbane yesterday. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) reported that only scattered light rains less than 1/3" fell in the Brisbane area over the past 24 hours, and no further significant rains are forecast in the Brisbane area until Tuesday next week, so the worst of the flooding is now over for Queensland. According to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, the December - January floods in Queenland are the most significant flooding event in Australia since at least 1974. In 2010, Australia had its wettest spring (September - November) since records began 111 years ago, with some sections of coastal Queensland receiving over 4 feet (1200 mm) of rain. Rainfall in Queensland and all of eastern Australia in December was the greatest on record, and the year 2010 was the rainiest year on record for Queensland. Queensland typically has its rainiest years when La Niña events occur, due to the much warmer than average ocean temperatures that occur along the coast. The BOM notes, "Previous strong La Niña events, such as those of 1974 and 1955, have also been associated with widespread and severe flooding in eastern Australia. Sea surface temperatures off the Queensland coast in recent months have also been at or near record levels." The BOM's annual summary also reported, "Sea surface temperatures in the Australian region during 2010 were the warmest value on record for the Australian region. Individual high monthly sea surface temperature records were also set during 2010 in March, April, June, September, October, November and December. Along with favourable hemispheric circulation associated with the 2010 La Niña, very warm sea surface temperatures contributed to the record rainfall and very high humidity across eastern Australia during winter and spring." Beginning in December, the Queensland floods have killed at least 22, and damage estimates are now as high as $20 billion. Queensland has an area the size of Germany and France combined.

2010 tied for warmest year in Earth's history Earth's warmest year in history occurred in 2010, NASA reported yesterday. The globe's temperature beat the previous record set in 2005 by just .01°C, so we should consider 2010 and 2005 tied for the warmest year on record. Reliable global temperature records go back to 1880. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also announced yesterday that 2010 was tied with 2005 as the warmest year on record, with temperatures during 2010 1.12°F (0.62°C) above the 20th century average. I'll have a full blog post on the subject Friday morning.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-26) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#27. To: eskimo, All (#25)

If you said that to me in person, I'd be checking you for weapons...

LOL!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA 8D

Me too!! 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-15   11:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: mcgowanjm (#21)

Terrific ABC News story: “Raging Waters In Australia and Brazil Product of Global Warming” "Scientists: Climate Change No Longer a Theory, It's Happening" January 14, 2011

News reporters get paid for sensationalizm and I now fear, so do most climate "scientists".

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-15   11:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: mcgowanjm (#26)

The Boilerplate response. You're now exhausted and wish me to go away after demanding earlier that I return.

U sound kinda like a meth addict. You know Brett Favre's sister?

I responded to you in a very civil manner and you return with ignorant childish innuendo.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-15   11:17:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: eskimo (#28)

and I now fear,

no. not yet. ;}

BAGHDAD (AP) — Two U.S. soldiers were killed by an Iraqi trooper who opened fire on them during a training exercise Saturday, raising fresh concerns about Iraq's security forces as the Americans prepare to withdraw from the country by the end of this year.

Another soldier was killed Saturday during a military operation in central Iraq, making it one of the deadliest days for U.S. forces in the country in months.

A U.S. statement confirmed that two soldiers were killed and one was wounded in northern Iraq but gave no further details."

But soon. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-15   12:01:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: eskimo, All (#29)

I responded to you in a very civil manner

Facts are irrelevant to you.

You can now post the 'ignorant childish innuendo.

Starting of course with this:

"#23. To: mcgowanjm (#18)

I'll be needing your sources now for what they predicted..

If you do not believe me, do some research. References to the predictions should not be difficult to find.

eskimo posted on 2011-01-15 11:05:39 ET

#26. To: eskimo (#23)

I'll be needing your sources now for what they predicted..

If you do not believe me, do some research. References to the predictions should not be difficult to find."

---And thank you.

The Boilerplate response. You're now exhausted and wish me to go away after demanding earlier that I return.

U sound kinda like a meth addict. You know Brett Favre's sister? 8D

mcgowanjm

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-15   12:04:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: All (#0)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvdhN_pXTsc

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-15   12:21:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: mcgowanjm (#30)

OMG!! You are having a mental melt-down. I just wanted to have a discussion about the present-day climate "science" hoax. Sorry! Take a break.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-15   12:27:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: eskimo, All (#33)

#30. To: eskimo (#28)

and I now fear, OMG!!

no. not yet. ;}

And I note that you, inuit;}, aren't interested in Anything except debunking the fact that CO2 = HEAT.

Good Luck on that one. Like describing how the Sweet Baby Hesus' favorite dinosaur was with him thru out their lives. ;}

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Arctic Oscillation Index, January 15, 2011 ARCTIC OSCILLATION INDEX (1000 mb), January 15, 2011

* o Å8; December (10) o Å8; November (13)

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Alun Hubbard: rising temperatures over Greenland in 2010 had caused extensive melting in new upper parts of the ice sheet, generating at least double the quantity of melt water, compared with 2009 Greenland ice sheet future grim, says Aberystwyth study

Greenland ice sheet future grim, says Aberystwyth studyShare this page

8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   9:23:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: mcgowanjm (#34)

How do you know that this isn't just a natural, cyclical occurrence?

Over history ice sheets have come and gone many times.

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   9:45:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: We The People (#35)

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People

Sure is. 8D

Now where were we? O yeah.

"How do you know that this isn't just a natural, cyclical occurrence?"

O it is a natural occurence. Happened at least Six Times so far that we know.

When was the last time the Arctic was ice free?

When was the last time the Arctic was ice-free? - Democratic ... 10 posts - 8 authors - Last post: Dec 25, 2010 the same time frame Assessment, 2005]. There is no paleoclimatic evidence for a seasonally ice free Arctic during the last 800 millennia.

More like a million years. But they haven't got it nailed but to 800 000 so far.

Civilization Only shows up in the Holocene of 12 000.

Yeah, it's natural. CO2 = HEAT. You put x amounts of CO2 into the Atmosphere, you're going to force it. Simple. Natural.

Like taking a dump. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   9:58:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: We The People (#35)

Post Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:55 am by mcgowanjm We'll drill everywhere and no one but the planet will stop us.

The only question left is this:

Are we truly any different from yeast? The measure will be we're accelerating into our waste. Or we at least attempt to stabilize voluntarily. And I don't see that attempt. 8-)

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   9:59:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: mcgowanjm (#36)

Sure is.

Now James, there's no need to open with an insult.

My tag line is a joke. Have you no sense of humor?

We can disagree without being disagreeable. ;o)

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   10:21:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: mcgowanjm (#34)

And I note that you, inuit;}, aren't interested in Anything except debunking the fact that CO2 = HEAT.

Apparently there is no damned CO2 where I am right now. Maybe if I put some more wood on the fire I cam make some more CO2. I'll try that. LOL!!

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   10:30:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: We The People (#38)

Now James, there's no need to open with an insult.

My tag line is a joke. Have you no sense of humor?

We can disagree without being disagreeable. ;o)

Sure We,

No need at all. I love good humor.

AAMOF I'm LMFAO right now. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   10:51:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: eskimo (#39)

Apparently there is no damned CO2 where I am right now.

None? The Latest World measure has 391 ppm as a minimum Anywhere.

You need to patent that scrubber and become a zillionaire. Don't wait. Hurry. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   10:52:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: mcgowanjm (#36)

There is no paleoclimatic evidence for a seasonally ice free Arctic during the last 800 millennia.

But, there is no proof that such things have not happened before. So, if there is no proof one way or the other, you are guessing.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   11:05:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: mcgowanjm (#40)

AAMOF I'm LMFAO right now. 8D

LOL!

Me too!

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   11:11:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: mcgowanjm (#41)

None? The Latest World measure has 391 ppm as a minimum Anywhere.

LOL!! Then why is your CO2=HEAT thing not working here where I am?

Oh, I get it. You were just spoofing us.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   11:12:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: mcgowanjm (#41)

Look, seriously, if CO2 is distributed evenly, what is the "scientific" explanation for why some considerably large portions of the planet are colder than normal? Surely, there is one.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   11:32:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: eskimo, All (#44)

LOL!! Then why is your CO2=HEAT thing not working here where I am?

My CO2 = HEAt thing?

Because you live on another planet. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   11:54:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: eskimo (#44)

Oh, I get it.

No. You don't 'get it'. But you will.

Arctic goes ice free by 2013. PermaFrost not so perma. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   11:54:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: eskimo (#45)

Look, seriously,

I'll be needing a source other than your other world, where CO2 means something besides HEAT. Thank you.

if CO2 is distributed evenly....

it's not. Those 391 ppm are minimums from Mauna Loa, supposedly the cleanest of CO2.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   11:56:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: eskimo (#45)

Look, seriously, if CO2 is distributed evenly, what is the "scientific" explanation for why some considerably large portions of the planet are colder than normal? Surely, there is one.

Yes, there is.

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

And the Ocean has been doing a yeoman's job of absorbing a huge amt of the rest, acidifying now, eating away shellfish, coral, et al.

That HEAT is pushing the Cold down.

To say areas where there is now a whole bunches of moisture in the air, forcing the release of that moisture.

If the air is o say 31 degrees or lower to say 18, you'll get record snowfall in say Hartford-24 inches kinda .

Surely as the day is long. Anything else, feel free to ask. Always willing to help. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:01:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: mcgowanjm (#47)

Arctic goes ice free by 2013.

That's a pretty bold prediction.

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   12:10:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: mcgowanjm (#49)

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

Please explain.

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   12:10:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: mcgowanjm (#46)

LOL!! Then why is your CO2=HEAT thing not working here where I am? My CO2 = HEAt thing?

Because you live on another planet. ;}

OK, you do not have an answer for that.

But, are you not still quessing about all the stuff as I asked in #42.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   12:11:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: We The People, All (#51)

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

Please explain.

Explain what?

How HEAT rises?

Cold sinks?

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: mcgowanjm (#49)

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   12:15:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: eskimo (#52)

Then why is your CO2=HEAT thing not working here

OK, you do not have an answer for that.

EXACTLY. 8D I don't have an answer for why CO2 = HEAT thing not working there where you are.

Like just what do you get when you burn things where you live? Does the flame get colder? Can you burn an open wood fire w/ no vent in your living room and continue to have enough oxygen to breathe?

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:18:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: mcgowanjm (#53)

Explain what?

How HEAT rises?

Cold sinks?

No, how the fact that heat rises would make the poles warm faster.

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   12:18:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: eskimo (#52)

But, are you not still quessing about all the stuff as I asked in #42.

W/o looking at post #42, based on your posts so far, I'd have to give that a qualified 'yes'. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:19:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: eskimo (#54)

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

Do you think that Heat from Antarctica makes it past the Equator?

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:20:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: We The People (#56) (Edited)

No, how the fact that. heat rises would make the poles warm faster

Excuse me while I dump this to give you a Scientific Explanation for why HEAT rising goes to the poles.

How well an atmosphere transfers heat and the methods it uses will have a profound effect on the surface temperature and weather. There are three ways gases can transfer energy:

1. radiation---photons (energy packets) leak outward by scattering off gas particles. Nature prefers this way. 2. conduction---fast-moving atoms collide with other atoms imparting some of their motion to them. This is used by metals like copper or aluminum to transfer heat (eg., from your stove element to the food), but it is not used by a gas since the gas molecules are so far apart from one another. The process of conduction is too inefficient in a gas to worry about. 3. convection---big pieces of the atmosphere cycle between cold regions and warm regions. Hot air below expands and its density decreases so it rises. Cooler, denser air falls and displaces the hot air. As a hot bubble rises, it cools by giving up its heat energy to the cool surroundings. The gas will then fall and heat up when it comes into contact with the warm surface or interior.

energy conveyor belt of convection

It is a sort of ``energy conveyor belt'' motion of gas. Nature will use convection only if there is a large change in temperature over a small distance (a ``steep temperature gradient''). Such conditions are found in planet atmospheres (compared to size of a planet, atmospheres are very thin!) and the interiors of stars.

In addition to transporting energy outward to space, convection also distributes the heat across the planet, from the warm daylit equatorial regions to the cooler latitudes closer to the poles and to the night side of the planet. The warm air at the equatorial regions rises and the cooler air from other parts of the planet flows across the surface toward the equator to replace the rising air. All of the winds in a planet's atmosphere are due to convective processes. If the planet is rotating quickly enough, the motion of the air can be deflected sideways by the coriolis effect (see also the Galileo section in the history chapter).

planet's rotation deflects air circulation

If a pocket of air from the pole moves toward the equator without changing direction, the Earth will rotate beneath it. The packet of air has a sideways motion equal to the rotation speed at the pole, but the parts of the Earth's surface closer to the equator have a greater rotational speed because they are farther from the rotation axis. To an observer on the ground, the path appears deflected to the west. The coriolis deflections produce the spiral patterns of cyclonic storms and air flow away from high-pressure regions. "

Anything else you need?

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:22:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: mcgowanjm (#59) (Edited)

Excuse me while I dump this to give you a Scientific Explanation for why HEAT rising goes to the poles.

That doesn't give me any explanation of why rising heat would go to the poles faster, scientific or otherwise.

OK, slow down, take a deep breath, and think about it. Then type it out.

Your tag line is stupid.

We The People  posted on  2011-01-16   12:26:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: We The People (#60)

Excuse me while I dump this to give you a Scientific Explanation for why HEAT rising goes to the poles.

That doesn't give me any explanation of why rising heat would go to the poles, scientific or otherwise.

Of course it didn't.

But now it does.

Anything else you need? ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:33:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: We The People (#60)

OK, slow down, take a deep breath, and think about it. Then type it out.

Exactly. Waiting for your response.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:33:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: mcgowanjm (#58)

Do you think that Heat from Antarctica makes it past the Equator?

You have got to be kidding.

OK, let us take this slowly. From where does heat rise toward Antarctica?

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   12:34:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: eskimo (#63)

Do you think that Heat from Antarctica makes it past the Equator?

You have got to be kidding.

Note the question mark?

I wasn't kidding. I was giving you a flock of shit.

8D

#54. To: mcgowanjm (#49)

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

eskimo

"#58. To: eskimo (#54)

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

Do you think that Heat from Antarctica makes it past the Equator?

mcgowanjm

How well an atmosphere transfers heat and the methods it uses will have a profound effect on the surface temperature and weather. There are three ways gases can transfer energy:

1. radiation---photons (energy packets) leak outward by scattering off gas particles. Nature prefers this way. 2. conduction---fast-moving atoms collide with other atoms imparting some of their motion to them. This is used by metals like copper or aluminum to transfer heat (eg., from your stove element to the food), but it is not used by a gas since the gas molecules are so far apart from one another. The process of conduction is too inefficient in a gas to worry about. 3. convection---big pieces of the atmosphere cycle between cold regions and warm regions. Hot air below expands and its density decreases so it rises. Cooler, denser air falls and displaces the hot air. As a hot bubble rises, it cools by giving up its heat energy to the cool surroundings. The gas will then fall and heat up when it comes into contact with the warm surface or interior.

energy conveyor belt of convection

It is a sort of ``energy conveyor belt'' motion of gas. Nature will use convection only if there is a large change in temperature over a small distance (a ``steep temperature gradient''). Such conditions are found in planet atmospheres (compared to size of a planet, atmospheres are very thin!) and the interiors of stars.

In addition to transporting energy outward to space, convection also distributes the heat across the planet, from the warm daylit equatorial regions to the cooler latitudes closer to the poles and to the night side of the planet. The warm air at the equatorial regions rises and the cooler air from other parts of the planet flows across the surface toward the equator to replace the rising air. All of the winds in a planet's atmosphere are due to convective processes. If the planet is rotating quickly enough, the motion of the air can be deflected sideways by the coriolis effect (see also the Galileo section in the history chapter).

planet's rotation deflects air circulation

If a pocket of air from the pole moves toward the equator without changing direction, the Earth will rotate beneath it. The packet of air has a sideways motion equal to the rotation speed at the pole, but the parts of the Earth's surface closer to the equator have a greater rotational speed because they are farther from the rotation axis. To an observer on the ground, the path appears deflected to the west. The coriolis deflections produce the spiral patterns of cyclonic storms and air flow away from high-pressure regions. "

Anything else you need?

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:38:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: mcgowanjm (#57)

But, are you not still quessing about all the stuff as I asked in #42.

W/o looking at post #42, based on your posts so far, I'd have to give that a qualified 'yes'. ;}

OK, so we agree that you are just guessing but there has to be some science involved in your guesses. You have to realize that science is in question if it forces you to guess.

eskimo  posted on  2011-01-16   12:39:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: All (#64) (Edited)

#54. To: mcgowanjm (#49)

In addition to CO2 = HEAT, HEAT also rises.

Which is why the poles are heating up much more rapidly.

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

eskimo

"#58. To: eskimo (#54)

Are you saying heat rises both north and south?

Do you think that Heat from Antarctica makes it past the Equator?

mcgowanjm

www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s4.htm

Read up on it. The Church killed people for having this info. You get it free of charge. 8D

CO2 = HEAT

Heat rises. Cold sinks. Planet spins. Humans no smarter than yeast. The end. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:40:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: eskimo (#65)

OK, so we agree that you

live on a different planet where CO2 = something besides HEAT.

And the disappearing Ice of the Arctic doesn't phase youer belief at all.

If I was guessing that CO2 = HEAT yes, you'd be correct. But I'm not. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2011-01-16   12:43:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (68 - 88) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com