Weve been told a lot of things since the global economic crisis first became apparent in 2007. In March of that year Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the sub-prime markets seems likely to be contained. Clearly, Mr. Bernankes assessment was incorrect and the sub-prime real estate issues were only part of a broader, systemic issue.
The fundamental problems within our economy became mainstream news in the latter part of 2008 when stock markets around the world were in free fall and most major financial institutions were on the cusp of insolvency. In response, our government, with the full support and confidence of Congress, took unprecedented steps to save the system by injecting, first billions, and then trillions of dollars to bailout failed companies, stabilize deflationary price collapses and stimulate the economy.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson eventually wrote a book about the crisis, aptly titled On the Brink. But how close to the brink were we? If Representative Brad Sherman is to be believed, we were close. So close, in fact, that according to Sherman, Congressional members were told that if the bailout was not authorized by Congress the collapse would be so severe that martial law may have to be declared - basically, tanks in the streets. The following short video is Brad Sherman discussing the situation on the House floor:
Are we now to believe that the actions taken by Congress, The President, US Treasury and The Federal Reserve have resolved the fundamental problems facing our nation?
I am writing in response to your request for an estimate by the Treasury Department of when the statutory debt limit will be reached, and for a description of the consequences of default by the United States.
Never in our history has Congress failed to increase the debt limit when necessary.Failure to raise the limit would precipitate a default by the United States.Default would effectively impose a significant and long-lasting tax on all Americans and all American businesses and could lead to the loss of millions of American jobs.Even a very short-term or limited default would have catastrophic economic consequences that would last for decades.Failure to increase the limit would be deeply irresponsible.For these reasons, I am requesting that Congress act to increase the limit early this year, well before the threat of default becomes imminent.
70;
Treasury would prefer not to have to engage again in any of these extraordinary measures [suspension of the issuance of certain types of government debt and government investment vehicles].If we are forced to do so again, these measures could delay the date by which the limit is reached by several weeks.Once these steps have been taken, no remaining legal and prudent measures would be available to create additional headroom under the debt limit, and the United States would begin to default on its obligations.
The Treasury Secretary of The United States of America just said that if we dont get another $1 trillion or so dollars by March of this year then this country will begin to default on its debt obligations. These remarks are extremely serious and should be understood for what they are.
We are, literally and without mixing words, on the brink of economic catastrophe.
The scary thing is, according to Mr. Geithner and the many supporters of raising our debt ceiling, that borrowing more money is the only solution available.
In a recent commentary we pointed out the opposing view from Karl Denninger of Market Ticker, who said that raising the debt ceiling would essentially lead to the very same consequence as leaving it as is:
Let me be clear: If you extend the debt ceiling and by doing so allow deficits of this sort to continue for another year, say much less two, you will have placed a loaded shotgun in the mouth of this nation and pulled the trigger.
It will go off, and you will splatter this nations economic and political system all over the wall.
Its a Catch 22 and theres no way out.
Defaulting on or inflating away our debt are the only viable solutions. Both of these will lead to the same end - a complete and total collapse of the way of life Americans have become used to.
Just as Henry Paulson, President Bush, et. al. warned of economic collapse and depression in 2008, Mr. Geithner warns of the very same today. All of the trillions spent, all of the laws passed, and all of the manipulations of global asset markets, have done absolutely nothing to resolve the fundamental systemic problems we faced prior to the onset of the crisis.
It is, quite literally, going to be the end of the world as we know it - and it cannot be stopped.
Only if insane members of the GOP decide to block a raise in the debt ceiling.
Maybe you should actually READ the article, so that you won't like a complete asshole.
Just a *hint.*
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of their experience but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.
The heresy of heresies was common sense. -- George Orwell, 1984 --
Maybe you should actually READ the article, so that you won't like a complete asshole.
Just a *hint.*
I did read the article (not sure why, i've been hearing folks like Denninger talk about how we're on the brink of collapse for many years now).
BTW, maybe you should proof-read what you post before hitting the "post without preview" button so you wont [MISSING WORD GOES HERE] like a complete moron. :-)
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
Since you said " We are, literally and without mixing words, on the brink of economic catastrophe. Only if insane members of the GOP decide to block a raise in the debt ceiling," and you INSIST you read the article, there are only two possible explanations:
1. You're a liar (which wouldn't suprise me- you do it a LOT), or 2. you have absolutely NO reading comprehension.
Either way, you've once again made yourself a fool.
But hey, don't feel bad... In the real world, socialists invariably lose.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of their experience but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.
The heresy of heresies was common sense. -- George Orwell, 1984 --
The normalcy bias refers to an extreme mental state people enter when facing a disaster. It causes people to underestimate both the possibility of a disaster occurring and its possible effects. This often results in situations where people fail to adequately prepare for a disaster, and on a larger scale, the failure of the government to include the populace in its disaster preparations. The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred that it never will occur. It also results in the inability of people to cope with a disaster once it occurs. People with a normalcy bias have difficulties reacting to something they have not experienced before. People also tend to interpret warnings in the most optimistic way possible, seizing on any ambiguities to infer a less serious situation.[1]
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of their experience but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.
The heresy of heresies was common sense. -- George Orwell, 1984 --
Either way, you've once again made yourself a fool.
i took you off filter, that was obviously a mistake. When you are capable of a discussion without resorting to acting like a child, have someone let me know and I'll consider taking you off again. Bye bye.
Since January 3, 2011, Republicans have controlled the power of the purse.
In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of their experience but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy.
The heresy of heresies was common sense. -- George Orwell, 1984 --