[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Bush vs Gore 10 years later
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2010/12/bush-vs-gore-10-years-later/
Published: Dec 22, 2010
Author: tygrrrrexpress
Post Date: 2010-12-22 10:13:10 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 35709
Comments: 65

Ten years ago, Al Gore tried to steal the presidency of George W. Bush.

That is how the story should be written for all of history, but the left will try to spin it otherwise.

Rehashing every single moment in the 36 day 2000 Election drama would be more boring than an Al Gore speech. A decade later, some things that were true in 2000 remain true in 2010.

Richard Nixon could have sued to challenge the election of John Kennedy in 1960. There was real election fraud, with dead people in Chicago and other dirty tricks in LBJ’s home state of Texas providing the difference. Nixon refused to challenge the results because he did not want to plunge America into a constitutional crisis.

Republicans are the party of laws. Democrats are the party of lawyers. Even when Nixon was on the rocks, he resigned to avoid an impeachment trial. At his two lowest moments, he wanted to spare the country from crisis. Bill Clinton and Al Gore continued the tradition of Democrats trying to win at all costs, regardless of who gets hurt.

The 2000 election combined with the Clinton impeachment also led to the left embarking on a poisoning of our culture that we may never recover from.

While the original politics of personal destruction began in 1987 with drunk driver and negligent homicide perpetrator Ted Kennedy verbally butchering Judge Robert Bork, the 2000 election finally allowed the leftist lunatic fringe to run wild.

George W. Bush did not steal the election. He simply won a close election. There was no fraud, unless one counts Al Gore trying to manufacture votes with concepts such as “undervotes.” Voter intent became whatever Gore said it was.

Yet to the rabid frothing left, President Bush was an evil murderer, torturer, Nazi, Fascist, racist (stop me when you’re bored from the slurs) bigot who “stole” the presidency.

The left never ever gave him a chance. They despised him from the moment he was declared the winner. On every issue, their predetermined opinion of him led them. By responding with civility, Bush made them more enraged. They will never accept that he won the presidency honestly.

The left did not complain when the the liberal media led by Bush-despising “fake but accurate” memo supporting Gunga Dan Rather gleefully called Florida for Gore before the heavily Republican Panhandle polls closed.

The left had no complaints when that same liberal media in conjunction with Al Gore broke the Bush drunk driving scandal four days before the election. In 2000 and 2004, the left did everything they could to get into the gutter to drag President Bush down with 11th hour hit jobs. No gutter is too low for the left.

The left complains that he was a “Supreme Court appointed” president based on a 5-4 vote. Would the left say the same thing had Gore won 5-4? Of course not. The Florida Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in favor of Gore, and the left was hailing the decision. The left has used the courts for decades to force their agenda, yet dare to criticize the courts the rare times they lose.

Lower district court rulings went in favor of Bush, and those judges were Democrats, including N. Sander Sauls. Liberals dismissed this as rulings by “Southern Democrats,” as if that should mean anything other than liberals dismissing anything not in total agreement with them.

Then Al Gore did what liberals do. He tried to simply make up new rules. Rather than agree to a statewide recount, he tried to only have a recount in four heavily liberal areas. The goal was simple. Get the lead, declare that the American people were “exhausted” by the process, and declare that we should all “move on.”

This tactic allowed Al Franken to steal the Minnesota Senate seat from Norm Coleman and for Christine Gregoire to steal the Washington State Governorship from Dino Rossi. Those elections had real voter fraud.

Eventually it was ruled that Gore had to have a statewide recount, but that there was no time to get it done in time by the deadline.

Had this been New Jersey, the deadline would have been ignored, which is how Frank Lautenberg illegally got back on the ballot to steal another election.

Yet all Florida did was enforce the law.

Democrats claimed that Republican Secretary of State Katherine Harris was a partisan hack. Yet they had no problem with a Democrat Attorney General using every legal trick in the book to get Gore over the goal line.

Again, conservatives are about laws. Liberals are about lawyers.

Governor Jeb Bush was accused of rigging the election for his brother, yet any honest assessment showed that he recused himself from every major decision, an act of unilateral disarmament given that his Attorney General kept shilling for Gore.

(This is where the left goes berserk for being conservative and existing. What they cannot and will not do is say I am wrong. Every fact I laid out is right, so their hyperventilating is boring.)

George W. Bush would go on to lead America during trying times punctuated by the horrors of 9/11. His heroism on that day will be remembered forever. He retired to his ranch happy and at peace.

Al Gore turned into a raving lunatic resembling the homeless man in the town square rambling to anyone who would listen. Despite making about a billion dollars thanks to Google, he remained empty and unsatisfied. He won meaningless statuettes like Nobel prizes and Academy awards, but lost his marriage. His one area where he received adulation was his environmental lunacy, and he even recently admitted what we all knew. He is a fraud. He said so himself, regarding Ethanol subsidies.

When all is said and done, Al Gore was willing to destroy anything and everything to become president. The nation did not matter. He wanted power, and to heck with all who got in his way. Now he has unchecked power, burning lear jet fuel in the name of conservation and celebrating climate change through Winter Break party junkets in Cancun based on science extracted from equally fraudulent “scientists.”

Looking back, we now know that the better man won the election. Those who support hatred and poison and confuse enemies with opponents will still cling to Al Gore, but their arguments are as hollow as the Goracle himself once the self-righteous tree stump is removed from his hide.

George W. Bush is a far better man than Al Gore will ever be.

Legally and morally, the better man won the 2000 election.

In 2010, the gulf between these two men is wider than ever.

Al Gore is only relevant because the Daily Kos, Huffington Post, and Moveon.org lunatic bigots will not let him leave. They share a mutually parasitic relationship, empty shells reassuring each other that they are not vapid morally bankrupt wastes of space.

President George W. Bush is a gracious man of honor, integrity, and character.

He is a man comfortable in his own skin, a man at peace.

Al Gore leaves a legacy of lawsuits, election disruptions, and lies.

George W. Bush leaves a legacy of leadership.

That is what is left of the 2000 election.

The right man won.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: no gnu taxes (#0)

Ten years ago, Al Gore tried to steal the presidency of George W. Bush.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 8D

Historical Revision Anyone?

So why did Scalia STOP the Vote count, not once, but twice! the Second time just before it was announced that Gore had taken the lead.

12122000 The First part of the Rolling Coup. 9-11 The Second Passage of the Patriot Act and COG wraps it up.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:18:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: mcgowanjm (#1)

The fact of the matter is that if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted, he would have lost.

Every single court except the FL SC sided with Bush every step of the way. It was the FL SC who tried to steal the election.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   10:24:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: no gnu taxes (#2)

The fact of the matter is that if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted, he would have lost.

The fact of the matter is that the SCOTUS stepped in to block the Florida State Supreme Court's decision violating State's Rights.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:26:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All (#3)

And tell me again how Pat Buchanan got those thousands of votes out of W Palm Beach? 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#4)

And I can do this all day long. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:28:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: All (#5) (Edited)

Like this:

Just who told NBC's Russert to reverse his call?

Jack Welch maybe?

# Å8; # What If Dems Fought Back Against Corporate Media Shills Like Tim ... On NBC Nightly News on November 8th, Russert said that Gore “can't extend it too long .... an unbiased journalist just because he was asked an uncomfortable question. ...... the GOP hitman he is. Jack Welch OWNS Ru$$ert's ass and his loyalty. ... ordered his network and cable stations to reverse course and call the ... demopedia.democraticunder...om/discuss/duboard.php?... - Cached

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:28:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: mcgowanjm (#3)

Many liberals underwent instant conversions of convenience: They became champions of states' rights when the U.S. Supreme Court (seven of nine Republican appointees) unanimously overturned that extension. But the U.S. court reminded Florida's court to respect the real "states' rights" at issue — the rights of state legislatures: The Constitution gives them plenary power to establish procedures for presidential elections.

And it really doesn't matter anyway. It has already been proven that if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted, he would have lost.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   10:35:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: All (#6)

Everything the SCOTUS has done since 12122000 is null and void.

No Taxes On the Non-Rich Filed under: Regulation Can't Work — Tags: austerity, taxation — Russ @ 2:26 am

We must get over any and all fixations on “good government”. We face a terminal kleptocracy. That means lots of things, including the fact that all the nice-sounding things in the civics textbooks and progressive training primers are no longer valid. They’ve been hijacked.

It’ll never happen again that this government will extract taxes and then trickle the money back down in a fair, constructive way. From here on, any taxation will only go down the corporate rathole. Every cent taken from the productive people is stolen. So a basic slogan and absolute demand must be:

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:35:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

Many liberals underwent instant conversions of convenience: They became champions of states' rights when the U.S. Supreme Court (seven of nine Republican appointees) unanimously overturned that extension. But the U.S. court reminded Florida's court to respect the real "states' rights" at issue — the rights of state legislatures: The Constitution gives them plenary power to establish procedures for presidential elections.

Too bad. The Precedent was set by Scalia and the SCOTUS.

Everything was running smoothly acording to ALL Constitutional Law.

Then the SCOTUS stepped in. Not once. But Twice. Just as Gore was going to tale the lead.

a Civil suit elevatede above the Most Important Democratic Function.

Ted Olsen's rise begins here btw.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:37:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

And it really doesn't matter anyway. It has already been proven that if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted, he would have lost.

O yes it does matter.

A Coup took place. Florida was reversed by who at Fox/NBC?

9-11 got under way with the first bush43 cabinet meeting.

no bush. no 9-11.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:39:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: All (#10)

How about some history. 8D

By Robert Parry December 12, 2010

Ten years ago, the United States stood at a crossroads though the dimness of the future made it hard for many to see which path led toward a brighter day and which headed toward disaster. But then, a partisan Republican majority of the U.S. Supreme Court made the choice for them.

At 10 p.m. on Dec. 12, 2000, the Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial rulings ever, telling Florida that its recount of the presidential election must include all legally cast ballots but giving the state the absurdly short time of two hours to complete the process.

Everyone immediately understood what the five partisan Republicans – William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy – had done: they had awarded the presidency to George W. Bus

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   10:42:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: mcgowanjm (#9)

Everything was running smoothly acording to ALL Constitutional Law.

No it wasn't

The FL SC ignored clear unequivocal election procedures Constitutionally established by the FL legislature.

And they were the only judicial body to do so, and the US Sc rightly called them on this.

Deal with it.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   10:42:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: mcgowanjm (#4)

And tell me again how Pat Buchanan got those thousands of votes out of W Palm Beach? 8D

Even Buchanan thought most of the votes cast for him in W Palm Beach were a mistake.

Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. Thomas Jefferson

lucysmom  posted on  2010-12-22   11:00:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: All (#11)

How about some history. 8D

They did this even though it was clear that Bush had lost the national popular vote to Al Gore by half a million votes. It also appears that Bush would have lost Florida if the full recount had been given the necessary time.

Even if the butterfly ballot fiasco and other irregularities were ignored, Gore still was likely to prevail narrowly if all the legally cast ballots – those expressing the clear intent of the voters – were counted, as an unofficial tally by news organizations determined a year later.

So, instead of the deeply qualified Gore becoming president, the largely unqualified Bush took over, carrying with him an anti-government philosophy of tax cuts tilted toward the rich and reduced regulation for business, combined with a tough-guy-ism toward the world – essentially the script crafted three decades ago by President Ronald Reagan.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:02:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: mcgowanjm (#14)

It also appears that Bush would have lost Florida if the full recount had been given the necessary time.

Bush won every single recount in Florida.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   11:05:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Badeye, All (#15)

It also appears that Bush would have lost Florida if the full recount had been given the necessary time.

Bush won every single recount in Florida.

9-11 was the Day the Official Recount was to appear.

8D

“What made the decision in Bush v. Gore so startling was that it was the work of Justices who were considered, to greater or lesser extents, judicial conservatives,” writes Toobin, a lawyer and legal analyst for CNN. “[But] the Court stopped the recount even before it was completed, and before the Florida courts had a chance to iron out any problems – a classic example of judicial activism, not judicial restraint, by the majority.”

And the result, Toobin continues, is that the high court – headed by Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts, who worked on Bush’s behalf in the Florida recount – has continued this kind of conservative activism, marked by its “willingness, even its eagerness, to overturn the work of legislatures.”

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:07:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: no gnu taxes (#0)

The left complains that he was a “Supreme Court appointed” president based on a 5-4 vote.

Actually, the USSC vote was 7 - 2 that the Florida Supreme Court violated the US Constitution repeatedly throughout this insanity.

They split 5 -4 on HOW the Supreme Court violated the Constitition repeatedly.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   11:08:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: mcgowanjm (#16)

writes Toobin, a lawyer and legal analyst for CNN.

rotflmao.

Nuff said.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   11:09:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: All (#16)

Ten Years After Bush v. Gore, the Stench Lingers By Elie Mystal

* * 137Share

When asked about the decision in Bush v. Gore, Justice Antonin Scalia — one of the best legal minds in modern American history — tells questioners to “get over it.” That’s right, the Supreme Court decided the winner of a popular presidential election, and one of the architects of that decision wants people to not care about it anymore. Is he serious? I wish Scalia could just “get over” the fact that privacy is a right now, but nobody begrudges him the right to ask questions about it.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:09:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: mcgowanjm (#14)

It also appears that Bush would have lost Florida if the full recount had been given the necessary time.

No, he wouldn't have as has been shown.

George W. Bush would have won a hand count of Florida's disputed ballots if the standard advocated by Al Gore had been used, the first full study of the ballots reveals. Bush would have won by 1,665 votes — more than triple his official 537-vote margin — if every dimple, hanging chad and mark on the ballots had been counted as votes, a USA TODAY/Miami Herald/Knight Ridder study shows.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2001-04-03-floridamain.htm

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   11:09:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Badeye (#15)

Recalling the idyllic past?

Looking back, over the past ten years, I guess things couldn't have been better with unfounded wars, a tanked economy and increasing encroachment on our personal liberties.

Things just couldn't be better, correct?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-22   11:11:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Badeye (#17)

The 7-2 decision was that the FL SC violated "equal protection" by demanding a Statewide recount with different Counties using different standards.

The 5-4 decision was the decision to end the election because no valid Constitutional recount could be conducted by the December 12 Legislative deadline.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   11:20:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Badeye, All (#18)

writes Toobin, a lawyer and legal analyst for CNN.

rotflmao.

Nuff said.

So. here's the deal. Be thinks he has a winning arguement, he posts me.

Otherwise, he's outtahere. Which I predict will happen again on this thread.

8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:25:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: buckeroo (#21)

Recalling the idyllic past?

Looking back, over the past ten years, I guess things couldn't have been better with unfounded wars, a tanked economy and increasing encroachment on our personal liberties.

Things just couldn't be better, correct?

w/o 12122000 the Kleptocracy does not take over.

Or takes over with more violence.

Everytime you go thru a boob/ball check by TSA, thank Scalia and 12122000:

Pakistani military leaders are warning the United States to keep their troops on the Afghan side of the border, with officials cautioning that the long-standing anti-terror alliance between the two countries would be ended formally if the United States invades.

US military officials are said to be pushing not only for permission to launch raids into Pakistan’s tribal areas, but are hoping to increase the rate so much as to make such raids a “routine” part of the Afghan War.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:26:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: All (#24)

Writing in the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin tells us that in the decade since the five “conservative” justices stopped Florida’s recount, the Supreme Court has cited Bush v. Gore exactly zero times. Think about that: it’s been ten years since the Supreme Court picked the president, and the Court is kind of hoping everybody forgets about it. Bush v. Gore is like a stripper the Court killed in Vegas when it was there for a bachelor’s party. “She’s got no friends or family, strippers die all the time in Vegas, let’s get back to the hotel and NEVER SPEAK OF THIS AGAIN.”

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:30:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: All (#25)

The Day the Presidency Was Stolen from Al Gore and the American People: December 12, 2000, and the Supreme Court Coup Share Submitted by BuzzFlash on Wed, 12/12/2007 - 4:35am. * Analysis A BuzzFlash News Analysis "About 10 p.m. EST on December 12, the United States Supreme Court handed down its ruling in favor of Bush by a 5–4 vote, effectively ending the legal review of the vote count with Bush in the lead. Seven of the nine justices cited differing vote-counting standards from county to county and the lack of a single judicial officer to oversee the recount, both of which, they ruled, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution."

* The Fateful Moment in the Silent Coup That Stole a Presidency

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:30:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: All (#26)

Sorry buddy, but that ship has already sailed.

The very same statement can be said for every month of every year with every new Police State/Empire action. Obama attacked his 'supposed' base on the Top 50 000 Tax Give Away. Like that. 8D

Justice ain’t blind, she just wears a blindfold to keep you in the dark about what she’s looking at. That’s the real scar from Bush v. Gore, and it’s a scar that ABA president (and Boies Schiller partner) Stephen Zack desperately wants to heal. He writes an impassioned editorial in the New York Daily News:

The Dec. 12, 2000, ruling against Gore – the culmination of what was likely the most politically charged case ever decided by American courts – was very difficult for his supporters and attorneys. But we must now look ahead and beyond politics to ensure our courts remain strong, respected, fair and free of influence by whoever holds sway at the moment. Perhaps that’s why, today, David Boies (my law partner) and Ted Olson, antagonists in Bush v. Gore, are working together on the ABA Task Force for the Preservation of the Justice System to ensure our courts are protected, respected and adequately funded.

Lady Justice need not remove her blindfold and hold her finger in the air in order to feel the direction of the currently blowing winds. It is crucial, however, that she remain strong and healthy. That’s a message we must all get behind.

Sorry buddy, but that ship has already sailed. The message you want everybody to get behind no longer comports with any understanding of reality.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:34:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

And it really doesn't matter anyway. It has already been proven that if Gore had gotten the recount he wanted, he would have lost.

that's actually true - but if there had been a statewide recount, Gore could have won (depending on the standard used for recounts).


On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.

go65  posted on  2010-12-22   11:34:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: mcgowanjm (#25)

Writing in the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin tells us that in the decade since the five “conservative” justices stopped Florida’s recount, the Supreme Court has cited Bush v. Gore exactly zero times. Think about that: it’s been ten years since the Supreme Court picked the president, and the Court is kind of hoping everybody forgets about it. Bush v. Gore is like a stripper the Court killed in Vegas when it was there for a bachelor’s party. “She’s got no friends or family, strippers die all the time in Vegas, let’s get back to the hotel and NEVER SPEAK OF THIS AGAIN.”

it's the only ruling I can think of that specifically said it shouldn't be used as precedent in future cases.


On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.

go65  posted on  2010-12-22   11:34:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: All (#27)

It’s all politics; Bush v. Gore proved that. That is its legacy. Both parties are dirty, both judicial philosophies are compromised. Both sides will shape “the law” to support whatever political outcome they prefer.

But I suppose we should just “get over” that too — right, Justice Scalia?

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: go65 (#29) (Edited)

it's the only ruling I can think of that specifically said it shouldn't be used as precedent in future cases.

And thank you. 8D IT Couldn't be used as a precedent.

November 29, 2010 4:52pm Just How Bad Was Bush v. Gore? It's been ten years since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, and everyone involved--especially the justices themselves--would like it to slip out of our collective memories. Brown v. Board of Education was cited 25 times in the decade after it was decided, Roe v. Wade 65 times. But not a single time has the court cited the ruling that ended the 2000 election. Justice Antonin Scalia frequently urges audiences to just "get over it."

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:40:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: go65 (#28)

but if there had been a statewide recount, Gore could have won (depending on the standard used for recounts).

By a handful of votes only under the most favorable conditions.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   11:42:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: no gnu taxes (#32)

By a handful of votes only under the most favorable conditions.

yep.


On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.

go65  posted on  2010-12-22   11:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: go65 (#29)

it's the only ruling I can think of that specifically said it shouldn't be used as precedent in future cases.

The Real pisser is that with the SCOTUS stealing the 1872 Election at least the South got free of Reconstruction.

To this day I can think of nothing the Dems got in return for this butthurt. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:42:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: mcgowanjm (#34)

1872 Election

1876

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-12-22   11:44:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: no gnu taxes (#20)

No, he wouldn't have as has been shown.

George W. Bush would have won a hand count of Florida's disputed ballots if the standard advocated by Al Gore had been used,

Again, because Scalia got scared and violated the State Law, killing the stripper at the bachelor's party....

It's the Cover Up that gets you.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   11:45:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: no gnu taxes (#20)

It also appears that Bush would have lost Florida if the full recount had been given the necessary time. No, he wouldn't have as has been shown.

The fact these clowns are still bitchin about this tells you its a waste of time to even discuss it.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   12:03:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: buckeroo (#21)

Recalling the idyllic past?

Nope. Just noting the facts about this, bucky.

As for how things are today...compare pre Pelosi Galore Speaker to what we have today, across the board.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   12:04:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: mcgowanjm (#23)

So. here's the deal. Be thinks he has a winning arguement, he posts me.

Otherwise, he's outtahere. Which I predict will happen again on this thread.

8D

As wrong as your prediction the Gulf Coast was going to be evacuated... (laughing)

I don't think about 'winning an arguement' with the insane. Nor do I post for anyone's benefit but my own.

If you weren't nuts, and self absorbed, you'd have realized it a long time ago.

Atascadero sure has a large number of idiots (laughing my ass off)

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-22   12:07:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: no gnu taxes (#35)

1872 Election

1876

Yes. I confuse the Panic of 1873 and the End of Reconstruction with the Compromise of 1876.

Thank you.

James ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   13:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Badeye, All (#39)

As wrong as your prediction the Gulf Coast was going to be evacuated... (laughing)

The Perfect Kill Shot.

The US Empire now collapses.

The fact that the Empire will not evac anyplace ever, does not mean that the GoM is not dying.

Editorial board tell readers to “ignore” Feds’ latest report — “Florida should listen to the outsiders” December 22nd, 2010 at 11:58 AM Email Post 1retweet Share

The BP Spill: Hold off on the high-fives after Coast Guard report, Palm Beach Post, December 21, 2010:

Floridians should have this reaction to the federal government’s latest smiley-face report about oil in the Gulf of Mexico: Ignore it. …

Researchers who caught mullets filled with oil “did not catch non-oiled fish” December 22nd, 2010 at 10:22 AM

Email from John Pierce Wise, Sr., Ph.D., Director of the Maine Center for Toxicology and … Read more >>

Leave a comment Finfish, Fish, Seafood grandisle, johnwise, mullet, oilspill Times Picayune: “Many” Gulf residents are “experiencing serious physical” problems December 22nd, 2010 at 09:18 AM

Gulf residents, businesses say they’re still suffering from BP oil spill effects, Times-Picayune, December 22, … Read more >>

We're just getting started. Decades away, with every Cat3/5 creating a Brand New HazMat Superfund Site.

And that makes you laugh, be. Good to know. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-22   13:52:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (42 - 65) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com