United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Why Isn’t Anyone Talking About Bradley Manning?
Source:
Big Journalism
URL Source: http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/20 ... talking-about-bradley-manning/
Published: Dec 17, 2010
Author: Dana Loesch
Post Date: 2010-12-17 14:15:17 by Hondo68
Keywords: Bradley Manning, openly homosexual, also a traitor
Views: 4682
Comments: 11
Let's be frank: while I am no fan of the man, I thought the dramatic, solitary confinement incarceration of Julian Assange, prohibiting him any access to media or electronics, all on the suspicious accusation -- not charges -- of sexual molestation was a bit too much to justify. So he's a self-infatuated whore, we know this. Forgive me if I've lingering questions about the two women who, according to news reports, threw themselves at him like groupies before realizing they'd both been had in the same week, especially as one of the women reportedly once blogged about using the court systems to get back at unfaithful lovers. We can all agree that some things present questions here, is all, and that people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. (By the way, it cracks me up how the left predictably won't defend chicks who accuse the object of their fangirldom of sexual abuse -- think Clinton, Edwards, et al -- but instead have concocted elaborate schemes wherein the accusers work with the CIA. Are they also writing the story lines for the daytime soaps now, too?) All of these seems like nothing more than smoke and mirrors to avoid discussing the obvious: our government sucks at keeping secrets and Bradley Manning had a tantrum because he felt identity was more important than service, and he's also a traitor. Manning posted online about his unhappiness at having to fetch coffee for his superior officers. Because no other person working their way up the ladder has had to undertake such a humiliating and discriminatory gopher task ever in the history of the workplace or military, I can see how this would motivate him to steal classified information and leak it to a guy looking for a follow up hit to last summer's "Is That An RPG Or Are You Just Happy to See Me?" Stories abound on whether Manning's frustration at the military stemmed from his being an entitled brat or sexuality and anger at DADT. Don't you think if the subject of a story railed on about gay issues and dissatisfaction with the military that it might be valid to ask without assuming whether or not his crime was related to DADT? For instance, his Facebook description reads: "Take me for who I am, or face the consequences!" I personally know people currently serving in the military both at home and overseas, straight and gay, various ranks, who are not allowed to write such things on social networking sites because their activity can be monitored. If that had written such things as the below, they most certainly would have found themselves before a commanding officer: Mr Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast." At the beginning of May, when he was serving at a US military base near Baghdad, he changed his status to: "Bradley Manning is now left with the sinking feeling that he doesn't have anything left." Five days later he said he was "livid" after being "lectured by ex-boyfriend", then later the same day said he was "not a piece of equipment" and was "beyond frustrated with people and society at large". No one in the media is asking how someone so publicly angry at the military and society was allowed to stew, undiscovered, and even access secure areas. Of course, over three million people had access to the same information that Manning did which highlights our lack of security, which is where the blame for all of this belongs.Why won't the media explore this motivation? They indulge every conspiracy theory out there but ignore the possibility of Occam's Razor. They've played wingman to the government, deflecting attention away from the start of this mess -- the government's inability to secure classified information, spot the red flags of disgruntled individuals within their ranks, and act at all when Assange promised six months ago that another leak was coming -- to Assange alone. Granted, Assange acted with malicious intent, an intent to jeopardize the United States in some capacity, but the information released in this second batch has been rather un-noteworthy. The lie surrounding the first release falsely labeling our soldiers as killers was the biggest shock because the truth was so blatant on tape. If there exist criminal charges for which Assange can be brought up on I'm sure Eric Holder will get right on it and employ the same urgency with which he applied to the Black Panther voter intimidation case. No, this is how the media handles Manning: According to David House, a computer researcher from Boston who visits Manning twice a month, he is starting to deteriorate. "Over the last few weeks I have noticed a steady decline in his mental and physical wellbeing," he said. "His prolonged confinement in a solitary holding cell is unquestionably taking its toll on his intellect; his inability to exercise due to [prison] regulations has affected his physical appearance in a manner that suggests physical weakness." Manning, House added, was no longer the characteristically brilliant man he had been, despite efforts to keep him intellectually engaged. Of course this administration and media are unhappy with Assange; his leak in July reflected on Bush (even though it was later shown that those weren't cameramen, those were insurgents with RPGs); this batch of leaks vindicated Bush and showed the Obama administration as hapless buffoons. The media doesn't play the stock market, they play politics, and this move threatened their investment in this president, thus their motivation to carry water for the administration. Elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans alike, called Assange a "terrorist." (I myself questioned this weeks ago; I've since jumped off the fence.) He isn't a terrorist; he's a victim of his own hubris who had nothing to do with securing classified information (our government) or stealing it (Manning), he simply published it. There isn't a single blogger, liberal or conservative, who, if handed information vindicating a GOP or Democratic administration from accusations of lying to start a war, wouldn't publish it. I know people who've published private emails like journolist, people who dig into the divorce records of candidates (Jack and Jeri Ryan) so I call BS on any such denials. Again, Assange is different because he has malicious intent and published information within the scope of a invalid premise, something I know no conservative blogger would do, but you get my line of thought. Even if DADT was Manning's excuse: This isn't about DADT -- this is about an individual who was unfit for military service. Gays served before Clinton introduced DADT (is that what makes liberals so mad? That they have to address that their own party created this legislation therefor compromising their narrative about being so pro-gay rights?) and gays will still serve, regardless the outcome of the ruling. The emotion in the real world doesn't match the perspective self-importance and no one cares about your sexual orientation. No one cares if you like punk or pop-punk. No one cares if you've never had a girlfriend, if you were emo in high school, none of the little things which may you you matter in the military. Individuality does not matter. It is a hindrance. The only thing that matters is whether or not you can be stripped down by your commanders, rebuilt, and operate as part of one cohesive unit is strictly prohibited. The military does one thing and they do it well: fight. If you can't, then don't waste everyone's time in using the military as a social experiment by forcing the military to focus on sexuality over missions. This isn't a booster club. In the meantime, the media ignores this truth, Manning sits in a jail cell, the government has said nothing to assure us that they'll be more responsible (can Democrats secure anything? Clinton loses the nuke codes and now this?), and Assange is treated like a rockstar just because he posted what someone else gave him.
Bradley Manning's health deteriorating in jail, supporters say
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
Why isn't Breitbart in jail?
"I've really enjoyed meeting this community. They are so full of joy," - Sarah Palin to the thousands of cholera victims in Haiti
Because he's not a homosexual traitor.
I wouldn't be so sure about that.
"I've really enjoyed meeting this community. They are so full of joy," - Sarah Palin to the thousands of cholera victims in Haiti
because no one wants to draw attention to the fact that the u.s. army is full of homosexuals and cowards and weaklings.
Long live the Taliban Freedom Fighters!
teacher! my hands up! 8D
Brilliant people don't throw hissy-fits like a 13 year old school girl when they get dumped,and then start screaming about how "I'll show the world they can't mess with ME!" He's just a whiny little bitch of average intelligence and and underdeveloped and immature personality. He most likely grew up with his mother telling him what a "smart and SPECIAL boy you are!",and came to believe it and that he was too "good" to get somebody coffee. And I ain't buying the DADT bitching. Those were the rules when he ENLISTED,and he knew it.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
OK, you can go to the bathroom but if you shake it more than three times, it's a mortal sin.
He is gay and catholic. They get a pass.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Living in mouth breather's empty noggins 24/7/365 totally rent free!
Tough shit!
will you spank me then? ;}
#2. To: Skip Intro (#1)
Why isn't Breitbart in jail?
#3. To: hondo68 (#2)
Because he's not a homosexual traitor.
#4. To: hondo68 (#0)
#5. To: hondo68 (#0)
#6. To: hondo68 (#0)
Manning, House added, was no longer the characteristically brilliant man he had been, despite efforts to keep him intellectually engaged.
#7. To: mcgowanjm (#5)
teacher! my hands up! 8D
#8. To: hondo68 (#0)
Barrack Hussein Obama
President of the United States of America said that some Americans ; "They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
#9. To: hondo68 (#0)
#10. To: hondo68 (#0)
Bradley Manning's health deteriorating in jail, supporters say
#11. To: hondo68 (#7)
OK, you can go to the bathroom but if you shake it more than three times, it's a mortal sin.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]