[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: WikiLeaks reveals that Arab allies urged U.S. to strike Iran Documents show how leaders have tried to get Tehran to renounce atomic ambitions. In late May 2009, Israels defense minister, Ehud Barak, used a visit from a Congressional delegation to send a pointed message to the new American president. In a secret cable sent back to Washington, the American ambassador to Israel, James B. Cunningham, reported that Mr. Barak had argued that the world had 6 to 18 months in which stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons might still be viable. After that, Mr. Barak said, any military solution would result in unacceptable collateral damage. There was little surprising in Mr. Baraks implicit threat that Israel might attack Irans nuclear facilities. As a pressure tactic, Israeli officials have been setting such deadlines, and extending them, for years. But six months later it was an Arab leader, the king of Bahrain, who provides the base for the American Fifth Fleet, telling the Americans that the Iranian nuclear program must be stopped, according to another cable. The danger of letting it go on is greater than the danger of stopping it, he said. His plea was shared by many of Americas Arab allies, including the powerful King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who according to another cable repeatedly implored Washington to cut off the head of the snake while there was still time. These warnings are part of a trove of diplomatic cables reaching back to the genesis of the Iranian nuclear standoff in which leaders from around the world offer their unvarnished opinions about how to negotiate with, threaten and perhaps force Irans leaders to renounce their atomic ambitions. The cables also contain a fresh American intelligence assessment of Irans missile program. They reveal for the first time that the United States believes that Iran has obtained advanced missiles from North Korea that could let it strike at Western European capitals and Moscow and help it develop more formidable long-range ballistic missiles. In day-by-day detail, the cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and made available to a number of news organizations, tell the disparate diplomatic back stories of two administrations pressed from all sides to confront Tehran. They show how President George W. Bush, hamstrung by the complexities of Iraq and suspicions that he might attack Iran, struggled to put together even modest sanctions. Vote: Is it right to release secret U.S. cables? They also offer new insights into how President Obama, determined to merge his promise of engagement with his vow to raise the pressure on the Iranians, assembled a coalition that agreed to impose an array of sanctions considerably harsher than any before attempted. When Mr. Obama took office, many allies feared that his offers of engagement would make him appear weak to the Iranians. But the cables show how Mr. Obamas aides quickly countered those worries by rolling out a plan to encircle Iran with economic sanctions and antimissile defenses. In essence, the administration expected its outreach to fail, but believed that it had to make a bona fide attempt in order to build support for tougher measures. Feeding the administrations urgency was the intelligence about Irans missile program. As it weighed the implications of those findings, the administration maneuvered to win Russian support for sanctions. It killed a Bush-era plan for a missile defense site in Poland which Moscows leaders feared was directed at them, not Tehran and replaced it with one floating closer to Irans coast. While the cables leave unclear whether there was an explicit quid pro quo, the move seems to have paid off. There is also an American-inspired plan to get the Saudis to offer China a steady oil supply, to wean it from energy dependence on Iran. The Saudis agreed, and insisted on ironclad commitments from Beijing to join in sanctions against Tehran. At the same time, the cables reveal how Irans ascent has unified Israel and many longtime Arab adversaries notably the Saudis in a common cause. Publicly, these Arab states held their tongues, for fear of a domestic uproar and the retributions of a powerful neighbor. Privately, they clamored for strong action by someone else. If they seemed obsessed with Iran, though, they also seemed deeply conflicted about how to deal with it with diplomacy, covert action or force. In one typical cable, a senior Omani military officer is described as unable to decide what is worse: a strike against Irans nuclear capability and the resulting turmoil it would cause in the Gulf, or inaction and having to live with a nuclear-capable Iran. Video: WikiLeaks exposes U.S.s overseas secrets (on this page) Still, running beneath the cables is a belief among many leaders that unless the current government in Tehran falls, Iran will have a bomb sooner or later. And the Obama administration appears doubtful that a military strike would change that. One of the final cables, on Feb. 12 of this year, recounts a lunch meeting in Paris between Hervé Morin, then the French defense minister, and Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates. Mr. Morin raised the delicate topic of whether Israel could strike Iran without American support. Mr. Gates responded that he didnt know if they would be successful, but that Israel could carry out the operation. Then he added a stark assessment: any strike would only delay Iranian plans by one to three years, while unifying the Iranian people to be forever embittered against the attacker. The fears of Arab states In 2005, Iran abruptly abandoned an agreement with the Europeans and announced that it would resume uranium enrichment activities. As its program grew, beginning with a handful of centrifuges, so, too, did many Arab states fears of an Iranian bomb and exasperation over American inability to block Tehrans progress. To some extent, this Arab obsession with Iran was rooted in the uneasy sectarian division of the Muslim world, between the Shiites who rule Iran, and the Sunnis, who dominate most of the region. Those strains had been drawn tauter with the invasion of Iraq, which effectively transferred control of the government there from Sunni to Shiite leaders, many close to Iran. In December 2005, the Saudi king expressed his anger that the Bush administration had ignored his advice against going to war. According to a cable from the American Embassy in Riyadh, the king argued that whereas in the past the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Saddam Hussein had agreed on the need to contain Iran, U.S. policy had now given Iraq to Iran as a gift on a golden platter. Regional distrust had only deepened with the election that year of a hard-line Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. During a meeting on Dec. 27 with the commander of the United States Central Command, Gen. John P. Abizaid, military leaders from the United Arab Emirates all agreed with Abizaid that Irans new President Ahmadinejad seemed unbalanced, crazy even, one cable reports. A few months later, the Emirates defense chief, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi, told General Abizaid that the United States needed to take action against Iran this year or next. The question was what kind of action. Previously, the crown prince had relayed the Emirates fear that it was only a matter of time before Israel or the U.S. would strike Iranian nuclear facility targets. That could provoke an outcome that the Emirates leadership considered catastrophic: Iranian missile strikes on American military installations in nearby countries like the Emirates. Now, with Iran boasting in the spring of 2006 that it had successfully accomplished low-level uranium enrichment, the crown prince began to argue less equivocally, cables show. He stressed that he wasnt suggesting that the first option was bombing Iran, but also warned, They have to be dealt with before they do something tragic. Story: Revealed: U.S. diplomats slam world leaders The Saudis, too, increased the pressure. In an April 2008 meeting with Gen. David H. Petraeus, then the incoming Central Command chief, the Saudi ambassador to Washington recalled the kings frequent exhortations to the U.S. to attack Iran, and the foreign minister said that while he preferred economic pressure, the use of military pressure against Iran should not be ruled out. Yet if the Persian Gulf allies were frustrated by American inaction, American officials were equally frustrated by the Arabs unwillingness to speak out against Iran. We need our friends to say that they stand with the Americans, General Abizaid told Emirates officials, according to one cable. By the time Mr. Bush left office in January 2009, Iran had installed 8,000 centrifuges (though only half were running ) and was enriching uranium at a rate that, with further processing, would let it produce a bombs worth of fuel a year. With that progress came increased Israeli pressure. After the Israeli defense minister issued his ultimatum in May 2009, the chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, followed up in November. There is still time for diplomacy, but we should not forget that Irans centrifuges are working day and night, he told a delegation led by Representative Ike Skelton, the Democratic chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. That, in turn, led Arab leaders to press even more forcefully for the United States to act before Israel did. Crown Prince bin Zayed, predicting in July 2009 that an Israeli attack could come by years end, suggested the danger of appeasing Iran. Ahmadinejad is Hitler, he declared. Seemingly taken aback, a State Department official replied, We do not anticipate military confrontation with Iran before the end of 2009.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All, *Islamofascists - We All Pay* (#0)
The pro islamo fascists have to be working the Julian Assange is Mossad angle by now.
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|