[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Leaked Documents Show Middle East Consensus on Threat Posed by Iran
Source: foxnews
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201 ... t-consensus-threat-posed-iran/
Published: Nov 29, 2010
Author: foxnews
Post Date: 2010-11-29 21:08:01 by WhiteSands
Ping List: *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*     Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*
Keywords: Iran, WikiLeaks
Views: 52156
Comments: 86

The thousands of pages of newly leaked State Department documents are sprinkled with examples of name-calling and diplomatic horse-trading, causing consternation for Obama administration officials as they try to sustain vital alliances around the world.

But the seismic document spill by WikiLeaks showed one area of profound agreement -- that Iran is viewed in the Middle East as the region's No. 1 troublemaker.

Gulf nation leaders were known to dislike the Iranian regime and its nuclear program but rarely made those sentiments known publicly. The leaked cables and communications, though, show those officials talking about Iran with a degree of disdain and worry more commonly found among the Israelis.

According to the documents, Saudi King Abdullah frequently urged the United States to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, to "cut off the head of the snake." According to the Guardian, he warned that Iran's program could trigger a nuclear arms race in the region.

King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa of Bahrain and Jordanian lawmaker Zeid Rifai separately expressed similar concerns. Rifai told a U.S. official to "bomb Iran, or live with an Iranian bomb," warning that sanctions would not matter, according to the Guardian. Abu Dhabi crown prince Sheikh Mohammad bin Zayed fretted that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "is going to take us to war." Given the contents of these documents, Ahmadinejad on Monday accused the United States government of being behind the leak. Ahmadinejad also accused Israel and other Western government of being behind the killing of a prominent Iranian nuclear scientist. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor called that charge "absurd."

"We have pursued peaceful and diplomatic means to deal with Iran's nuclear program," Vietor said.

Despite the apparent consensus aired on Iran, though, the State Department documents covered a range of foreign policy topics that the Obama administration no doubt wishes was kept secret. The administration, in damage control mode Monday, moved to soothe ruffled feathers abroad while ordering a top-down review on safeguarding classified data and announcing a criminal investigation into the website.

Describing it as no laughing matter, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested any hurt feelings or embarrassment from the release may blow over. Saying "nothing laudable" came from WikiLeaks' action, she recalled that one counterpart told her, "Well don't worry about it. You should see what we say about you."

Still, administration officials condemned WikiLeaks for the release of more than 250,000 State Department documents that they claim jeopardize national security and put American lives at risk.

While previous releases by WikiLeaks of classified documents on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars forced the Pentagon to scramble to alert informants in the battlefields, the newly released documents aired in uncomfortable detail revealing conversations and dispatches among U.S. diplomats.

"This disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy interests. It is an attack on the international community -- the alliances and partnerships, the conversations and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity," Clinton said.

She said the administration is "taking aggressive steps" against those who "stole" the data, while implementing safeguards at the Pentagon and State Department to make sure a breach of this magnitude "does not ever happen again."

As many as 3 million U.S. government workers and soldiers may have had access to such classified material. Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said Monday that the ongoing criminal investigation into stolen government documents could hold accountable Defense Department officials who failed to set up the proper firewalls or who did not do enough to protect the documents.

Clinton expressed hope that the release would not damage U.S. diplomacy.

"I am confident that the partnerships that the Obama administration has worked so hard to build will withstand this challenge," Clinton said. "The United States deeply regrets the disclosure of any information that was intended to be confidential."

Saying the president is "not pleased" by the release, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs labeled the theft of classified information a "crime." That was after Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department is conducting an "active, ongoing, criminal investigation" into the situation.

"To the extent that we can find anybody who was involved in the breaking of American law and who has put at risk the assets and the people that I have described they will be held responsible, they will be held accountable," Holder said.

Responding to concerns that the massive leak of thousands of documents constitutes a government failure to contain its own secret files, Office of Management and Budget Director Jacob Lew issued a memo to department and agency heads saying such a failure is "unacceptable and will not be tolerated." Lew ordered all agencies dealing with classified information to put together a "security assessment team" to review how they protect it.

"Such review should include (without limitation) evaluation of the agency's configuration of classified government systems to ensure that users do not have broader access than is necessary to do their jobs effectively, as well as implementation of restrictions on usage of, and removable media capabilities from, classified government computer networks," he wrote.

The documents spanned a litany of foreign policy topics and figures. Publication of the secret memos and documents Sunday amplified widespread global alarm about Iran's nuclear ambitions.

It also unveiled occasional U.S. pressure tactics aimed at hot spots in Afghanistan, Pakistan and North Korea. The leaks disclosed bluntly candid impressions from both diplomats and other world leaders about America's allies and foes.

It was, said Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini, the "Sept. 11 of world diplomacy."

Clinton may have to confront the fallout firsthand after she leaves Washington on a four-nation tour of Central Asia and the Middle East -- a region that figures prominently in the leaked documents.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., ranking Republican on the House intelligence committee, called the leak a "colossal failure" with respect to the intelligence community.

"This database should never have been created. Hundreds of thousands of people should not have been provided access to it. This is a colossal failure by our intel community, by our Department of Defense to keep classified information secret," he said on ABC.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/29/leaked-documents-middle-east-consensus-threat-posed-iran/#ixzz16jALmjNS Subscribe to *WikiLeak - Jon Pollard Fans*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

#1. To: WhiteSands (#0)

better title - leaked documents show sunni hate shia, wish we hadn't invaded Iraq, want U.S. to be the protector of Saudi Arabia.

go65  posted on  2010-11-29   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: go65 (#1)

better title -

...would be 'there never was a conspiracy by the United States to fight a war with Iran'.

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   8:57:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Badeye (#3)

better title -

...would be 'there never was a conspiracy by the United States to fight a war with Iran'.

Other Titles:

Why does the FBI Orchestrate Fake Terror Plots? by Paul Craig Roberts

FBI: Olsen received ZERO calls from wife on 9/11.

Us bombs Yemen. When did we go to war there.

Why did we invade Iraq.

The obliteration of habeas corpus, the most necessary and important protection of liberty ever institutionalized in law and governing constitution, has become necessary for the US government, because a jury might acquit an alleged or mock "terrorist" or framed person whom the US government has declared prior to the trial will be held forever in indefinite detention even if acquitted in a US court of law. The attorney general of the United States has declared that any "terrorist" that he puts on trial who is acquitted by a jury will remain in detention regardless of the verdict. Such an event would reveal the total lawlessness of American "justice."

The United States of America, "the city upon the hill," "the light unto the world," has become Nazi Germany. It was the practice of the Gestapo to ignore court verdicts and to execute or hold indefinitely the cleared defendant in the camps. The Obama regime is in the process of completing Dick Cheney's dream by legislating the legality of indefinite detention. American law has collapsed to the dungeons of the Dark Ages.

This Nazi Gestapo policy is now the declared policy of the US Department of Justice (sic).

Anyone who thinks the United States is a free society where people have liberty, "freedom and democracy" is uninformed.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-11-30   10:30:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: mcgowanjm (#4)

FBI: Olsen received ZERO calls from wife on 9/11.

100% false.

I don't have time for 9/11 truther kook theory today.

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   10:32:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Badeye (#5)

FBI: Olsen received ZERO calls from wife on 9/11.

100% false.

100% true.

And now you can tell me and source your info on EXACTLY how many calls Olsen received for wife on 9/11.

Tick Tock. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-11-30   10:33:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: mcgowanjm (#6)

And now you can tell me and source your info on EXACTLY how many calls Olsen received for wife on 9/11.

Olsen.

run along.

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   10:43:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Badeye, All (#11)

And now you can tell me and source your info on EXACTLY how many calls Olsen received for wife on 9/11.

Olsen.

run along.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 8D

OMFG

So chenet too is a certified non liar. The Perp told me, so it's true.

I'll need the times. And number. Otherwise you've got ZERO. 8D

"Another agenda is to get rich. Terror plots, whether real or orchestrated, have created a market for security. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, former head of US Homeland Security, is the lobbyist who represents Rapiscan, the company that manufactures the full body porno-scanners that, following the "underwear bomber" event, are now filling up US airports. Homeland Security has announced that they are going to purchase the porno-scanners for trains, buses, subways, court houses, and sports events. How can shopping malls and roads escape? Recently on Interstate 20 west of Atlanta, trucks had to drive through a similar device. Everyone has forgotten that the underwear bomber lacked required documents and was escorted aboard the airliner by an official."

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-11-30   10:47:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: mcgowanjm (#14)

I'll need the times. And number. Otherwise you've got ZERO.

You claimed the FBI said the call didn't happen.

Got a link to the FBI stating THAT?

If you do, I'd love to see it.

But you don't. At best you have a link to 'conspiracy planet' or one of the other 9/11 truther kook sites.

Otherwise, you have ZERO, as you put it.

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   10:52:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Badeye (#16)

Got a link to the FBI stating THAT?

Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11 ... Apr 1, 2008 ... Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. ... calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred. ... former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11. ... www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514 - Cached - Similar

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-11-30   10:59:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: mcgowanjm (#24)

Got a link to the FBI stating THAT?

What part of 'to the FBI' in the above confuses you?

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   11:14:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Badeye (#28)

Got a link to the FBI stating THAT?

What part of 'to the FBI' in the above confuses you?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Semantics. That's what.

Dodge and Weave, bozo.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-11-30   11:25:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: mcgowanjm (#31)

Got a link to the FBI stating THAT? What part of 'to the FBI' in the above confuses you?

You made the claim the 'FBI says the phone call never happened'. You claim Ted Olsen was lying.

Back it up with the link to the FBI STATING THIS.

You have my interest. Give the forum the link.

Badeye  posted on  2010-11-30   11:39:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Badeye (#33) (Edited)

FBI says the phone call never happened'. You claim Ted Olsen was lying

# David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Cell Phone Calls: Exclusive CBC ... Anyway, the FBI says there was just one Olson cell attempt, not connected. ... And as you say, there are other witnesses who affirm Ted got a call from Barbara. ..... rather than as a final proof that Ted Olsen was lying or deceived. ... cell phone ID) that, according to the FBI's latest position, never happened, ... 911blogger.com/node/22192 - Cached

# Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11 ... Apr 1, 2008 ... The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. ... According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a ... who said: “I don't know what happened in that cockpit, ... Also, if Ted Olson's claim was false, then there are only two ... www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514 - Cached - Similar

All Day Long. Paid not to understand, they won't be ringing the bell when it's time to get the hell out of dodge. ;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:08:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: mcgowanjm (#36)

Apr 1, 2008 ... The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. ...

Rotflmao. You don't even comprehend what you did by cutting and pasting the above, do you?

And you have yet to provide a single link to the FBI demonstrating your bullshit claim 'the phone call never happened'.

And so it goes with another 9/11 truther.

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-01   10:20:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Badeye (#38)

ROTFLMAO even more.

You have zero ability to comprehend facts because they are irrelevant to you and history was yesterday.

Now you want to play gotcha, change the subject, squirm.

8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:23:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: mcgowanjm (#39)

Apr 1, 2008 ... The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. ... Rotflmao. You don't even comprehend what you did by cutting and pasting the above, do you?

And you have yet to provide a single link to the FBI demonstrating your bullshit claim 'the phone call never happened'.

And so it goes with another 9/11 truther.

Badeye  posted on  2010-12-01   10:25:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Badeye (#40)

Apr 1, 2008 ... The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. ... Rotflmao. You don't even comprehend what you did by cutting and pasting the above, do you?

And you have yet to provide a single link to the FBI demonstrating your bullshit claim 'the phone call never happened'.

And so it goes with another 9/11 truther.

By finally settling on this story, Olson avoided a technological pitfall. Given the cell phone system employed in 2001, high-altitude cell phone calls from airliners were impossible, or at least virtually so (Olson’s statement that “the signals from cell phones coming from airplanes don’t work that well” was a considerable understatement). The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004.7

However, Olson’s second story, besides being self-contradictory, was contradicted by American Airlines.

American Airlines Contradicts Olson’s Second Version

A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:31:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: All (#45)

In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been contradicted by the FBI.

Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI

The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:32:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: mcgowanjm (#46)

According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

How will BE handle this one?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-12-01   10:42:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Fred Mertz (#48)

According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

How will BE handle this one?

mcgowanjm (#39)

Apr 1, 2008 ... The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. ... Rotflmao. You don't even comprehend what you did by cutting and pasting the above, do you?

And you have yet to provide a single link to the FBI demonstrating your bullshit claim 'the phone call never happened'.

And so it goes with another 9/11 truther.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:47:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: All (#49)

Conclusion

This rejection of Ted Olson’s story by American Airlines, the Pentagon, and especially the FBI is a development of utmost importance. Without the alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 returned to Washington. Also, if Ted Olson’s claim was false, then there are only two possibilities: Either he lied or he was duped by someone using voice-morphing technology to pretend to be his wife.17 In either case, the official story about the calls from Barbara Olson was based on deception. And if that part of the official account of 9/11 was based on deception, should we not suspect that other parts were as well?

The fact that Ted Olson’s report has been contradicted by other defenders of the official story about 9/11 provides grounds for demanding a new investigation of 9/11. This internal contradiction is, moreover, only one of 25 such contradictions discussed in my most recent book, 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press.

www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01   10:50:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: mcgowanjm (#50)

lol owned.

continental op  posted on  2010-12-01   10:51:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 51.

#52. To: continental op (#51)

lol owned.

Hello COp. ;}

The reason for 9/11. Known and included I'm sure, in Cheney's Energy Task Force Plan. Still not released for some strange reason. LMFAO 8D:

“Altogether the citizens of the U.S. consume the same amount of oil as 4.8 billion people elsewhere.” [1]

We borrow 75% of that cost.

Okay, let's head deeper into the World Energy Outlook (WEO) 2010 report. Here's my quick summary of the report.

By 2035:

* Between 2008 and 2035, total energy demand grows by 36%, or 1.2% per year; far less than the 2% rate of growth seen over the prior 27 years. (Note: This comes from the "New Policies Scenario," which is the middle scenario of three in the report. We'll discuss this one throughout.)

* Renewables will be contributing very little to the overall energy landscape, just 14% of the total, and this includes hydro.

* 93% of all the demand increase comes from non OECD countries (mainly China and India).

* Oil remains the dominant fuel (although diminishing in total percentage).

* The global economy will grow by an average of 3.2% per annum.

* It's time to cut demand for oil by raising prices (they recommend ending energy subsidies for fossil fuels as the mechanism).

* Conventional oil has peaked, and this is a permanent condition. All oil gains from here forwards will come from non-conventional sources and gas and coal-to-liquids programs.

Name the TWO nations not experiencing PO yet.

Iraq. Iran.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-12-01 11:06:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com