Satans Mark/Cashless
See other Satans Mark/Cashless Articles
Title: Happy Holidays from the RNC
Source:
RNC
URL Source: http://www.gopstore.com/cgi-bin/rnc/LTD104
Published: Nov 24, 2010
Author: Republican National Committee
Post Date: 2010-11-24 23:01:39 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 10506
Comments: 14
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#4. To: go65 (#0)
It's good for all the globalist holidays, rama-lama ding-dong, quanza, dia de muerta, and earth day too.
I'm glad that saying Happy Thanksgiving is still allowed.
The fact is, they work you like dogs in the United States. This should come as no surprise: the United States never got away from the plantation/sweat shop labor model and any real labor movement was brutally suppressed. Unless you happen to be a member of the ownership class, your options are pretty much limited to barely surviving on service-sector wages or playing musical chairs for a spot in a cubicle (a spot that will be outsourced to India next week anyway). The very best you can hope for is to get a professional degree and then milk the system for a slice of the middle-class pie. And even those who claw their way into the middle class are but one illness or job loss away from poverty. Your jobs aren’t secure. Your company has no loyalty to you. They’ll play you off against your coworkers for as long as it suits them, then they’ll get rid of you. Can we get farther away from afghanistan? LMFAO 8D
The revelation that the man presumed to be a high-ranking Taliban leader who had met with top Afghan officials was an impostor sheds light on Gen. David Petraeus's aggressive propaganda about the supposed Taliban approach to the Hamid Karzai regime. Ever since August, Petraeus had been playing up the Taliban's supposed willingness to talk peace with Karzai as a development that paralleled the success he had claimed in splitting the Sunni insurgency in Iraq in 2007. It is now clear, however, that Petraeus was deceiving himself as well as the news media in accepting the man claiming to be the second-ranking Taliban commander Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour as genuine, despite a number of indications to the contrary." Note how the Taliban sites are always being portrayed as dishonest agitprop. But have correctly/preciselt stated from the beginning of this charade that there would/will be no negotiations. 8D
btw, enjoy your football this week end. It'll be nothing but college (turning pro!?;} next. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
But instead of finding the sudden lack of interest in bargaining over those demands suspicious, Petraeus apparently approved giving the man a considerable amount of money to continue the talks, according to reports by the New York Times and Washington Post. That decision was evidently influenced by Petraeus's strong desire to believe that the vast increase in targeted raids aimed at killing or capturing suspected Taliban officials that had begun in March had caused top Taliban officials to give up their fundamental peace demands – and that he was now on his way to repeating what was believed to be his success in Iraq." Hey Petraeus!!! I represent the Taliban. I'll be needing $6 million cash in earnest money. And a trip to Vegas, Bitchez!!!!! 8D
#12. To: mcgowanjm (#11)
I can't believe Peaches got hoodwinked like that! Maybe we should come up with a fake armistice and depart while we still have a chance.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: hondo68 (#4)
#8. To: Fred Mertz (#5)
#9. To: All (#8)
#10. To: All (#9)
#11. To: All (#10)
Replies to Comment # 11. Hey Petraeus!!! I represent the Taliban. I'll be needing $6 million cash in earnest money. And a trip to Vegas, Bitchez!!!!! 8D
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]