To: TLBSHOW (#1) Here's Coulter from Chapter 1 of Godless: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct. Here's the Portland Press Herald, from the year 2000, in its list of the "Maine Stories of the Century": The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Strangely similar, no? By the way, that's a story from 1976. Coulter doesn't tell you that little tidbit, making you think it happened last week. The next one's from 1977:
Here's Coulter writing about an attack on the Alaska pipeline: A few years after oil drilling began in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, a saboteur set off an explosion blowing a hole in the pipeline and releasing an estimated 550,000 gallons of oil.
Here's something from the History Channel: The only major oil spill on land occurred when an unknown saboteur blew a hole in the pipe near Fairbanks, and 550,000 gallons of oil spilled onto the ground.
Do you support plagarism?
Excalibur posted on 2006-06-09 19:54:17 ET Reply
To: Excalibur (#2)
i'll tell ya what, you and your commie friends get the new york times to pull the book and after you have turned Ann into this
Kaavya Viswanathan's first book, "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life," has been permanently withdrawn from shelves, according to the Associated Press. Viswanathan's book came under fire when the publisher of her book found striking similarities to another author's works.
http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/5 9544
well then we can talk till then BLOW IT OUT YOUR COMMIE RAT ASS
TLBSHOW posted on 2006-06-09 20:07:05
Poster Comment:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/10/AR2006071000989.html
NEW YORK --
The syndicator of Ann Coulter's newspaper columns rejected allegations that she had lifted material from other sources, saying a review of the work in question turned up nothing that merited concern.
"There are only so many ways you can rewrite a fact and minimal matching text is not plagiarism," Lee Salem, editor and president of Universal Press Syndicate, said Monday in a statement.