United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Did Tea Party cost GOP 50-50 Senate?
Source:
The Plum Line
URL Source: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/pl ... ea_party_cost_gop_50-50_s.html
Published: Nov 3, 2010
Author: Greg Sargent
Post Date: 2010-11-03 18:01:13 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 1399
Comments: 3
For at least a year now, it's been an open question whether the Tea Party is a force for good or ill within the GOP. On the good side of the ledger, it's served as an energizing and rebranding force, and kept up pressure on GOP leaders to hold the line against Obama and Dems, which clearly served them well. But the flip side is now coming into focus, and with the results just in from the Colorado Senate race, we can now declare that it may have cost the GOP its only shot at a 50-50 Senate. The picture is complicated, but in raw numbers this appears to be the case. The math is pretty straightforward. Right now, after last night, the GOP has 46 seats, and is expected to add one more in Alaska, bringing the total to 47. Washington State is still outsanding, but many expect it to remain in Dem hands. Meanwhile, Tea Party candidates cost the GOP three seats they otherwise would have won. News orgs in Colorado have now declared that Senator Michael Bennet has defeated Tea Party candidate Ken Buck. Christine O'Donnell cost the GOP the Delaware seat, which they would have won in a walk if she hadn't prevailed in a fluke primary victory. And Harry Reid was widely written off as a dead Senator walking -- until Sharron Angle's victory in her primary gave him his only opening to retain his seat. Those three seats would have brought the GOP to 50. Now, as Josh Marshall notes, the picture is a bit more complex than this. Beyond costing the GOP those three seats, Tea Party energy surely helped buoy other GOP Senate and other candidates to victory. But in terms of raw numbers, the GOP's failure to gain a 50-50 Senate really does appear to vindicate the argument by the establishment GOP and the NRSC that these candidates couldn't win general elections -- an argument that earned that establishment a tremendous amount of abuse from the right. That said, last night's results also clearly vindicate the Dem argument, too. The NRSC and establishment GOP proved unable to control the unpredictable, unpolished and extreme candidates the Tea Party foisted upon them -- which is exactly what Democrats predicted would happen.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: go65 (#0)
What desperation! How many house seats, state legislatures and governorships did the Obama democrats lose?
Did you lose power?
Yes. The Tea Party was epic unprecedented fail. Just keep doing what you guys at KOS are doing. Work the; " some Americans need to get in the back of the bus" thing more. That really helped you guys.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Did Tea Party cost GOP 50-50 Senate?
#2. To: go65, All (#1)
#3. To: go65 (#0)
(Edited)
Barrack Hussein Obama
President of the United States of America said that some Americans ; "They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]