United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Electile Dysfunction The GOP's incredible shrinking Boehner.
Source:
Slate
URL Source: http://www.slate.com/id/2273344/
Published: Nov 3, 2010
Author: William Saletan
Post Date: 2010-11-03 15:12:10 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 7044
Comments: 16
Sixteen years ago, in the wake of the election-night landslide that brought him to power, Newt Gingrich asserted a mandate for his Contract with America and a new leadership role for himself. "The Republican Whip in a minority role is a middle linebacker," he said of his previous job. "The Speaker of the House is a head coach." Last night, in the wake of another landslide, incoming Speaker John Boehner sent a very different message: "While our new majority will serve as your voice in the people's House, we must remember it's the president who sets the agenda for our government." The president? You've just been handed 60 House seats by voters disgusted with the president, and you're deferring to him? This is the difference between Gingrich and Boehner. Gingrich set the agenda. He put forward a platform, treated the election as a referendum on it, and tried to implement it. He governed. He played quarterback, or at least head coach. For this, Gingrich paid a steep price. Against his offense, President Clinton played middle linebacker. In 1995 and 1996, Clinton ran against Gingrich's agenda and beat it. From this episode, Boehner seems to have learned a political lesson: Don't play offense. Stay in the role of middle linebacker. Let the president set the agenda. For two years, with an eye on the midterms, Boehner has followed this strategy, refusing to put forward a clear program that President Obama could attack. What's surprising is that Boehner is sticking with this defensive posture even after winning power. He has been thrust into leadership but doesn't want it. On election night 1994, Gingrich told CBS News that the GOP's victory was a mandate for an agenda. "I would start with our Contract With America, which we put in TV Guide, which is very specific, which 330 House Republican candidates signed," he said. "The American people tonight seem to be accepting the contract." Gingrich called on his party to "accept the contract with the American people" and implement the "changes people voted for." Gingrich acknowledged Clinton's authority but cast him as a responder to the new agenda. "At least half of our Contract With America are things that the president should be able to support," Gingrich argued. He added: "We are bound, to some extent, by the contract. But within that framework, we'd like to work with the president." Boehner asserts no such mandate or central role. In his speech last night, he framed the referendum of 2010 in strictly negative terms: "Across the country right now, we're witnessing a repudiation of Washington, a repudiation of big government, and a repudiation of politicians who refuse to listen to the American people." As to his own agenda, Boehner offered only the vaguest boilerplate: "cutting spending," "reducing the size of government," and "giving government back to the people." Instead of clarifying these terms, he repeatedly promised to "listen" to voters and do their bidding. "The people's priorities will be our priorities, and the people's agenda will be our agenda," he said. "We are humbled by the trust that the American people have placed in us. And we recognize that with this trust comes the responsibility to listen, and listen we will." He sounded like the wretched gelatinous boyfriend who promises to be whatever you want. Nor did Boehner proclaim a new relationship between Congress and the public, as Gingrich did. On the contrary, Boehner emphasized the centrality of Obama's relationship with the public: "We hope President Obama will now respect the will of the people, change course, and commit to making changes that they are demanding. And to the extent that he's willing to do that, we're ready to work with him." Video: John Boehner leads the GOP takeover of the House Politically, Boehner's deference makes sense. Voters are angry. They want the economy fixed, but it's too messed up to be repaired before the next election. In these circumstances, the worst place to be, from an electoral standpoint, is in power. You want to be the linebacker, not the quarterback. You're better off with Boehner's vacuous Pledge to America than the substantial Contract With America. But politics, too, has its price. Fear of electoral failure can make you impotent in office. You spend the years between elections ducking the risks of leadership. You wedgislate and hedgislate, but you never really legislate. For the sake of your career, you waste it. That's what I admire about Gingrich and Obama. Obama may lose more seats in Congress than Clinton did. He may be thrown out after one term. But he'll have accomplished more than Clinton did, because he focused on doing the job, not keeping it. The voters have spoken, Mr. Speaker. It's time to lead. Do it, and take the consequences.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Badeye, jwpegler, skip intro (#0)
How do you win 60+ seats then argue you have no mandate and will follow the President's lead?
Boenher is no Newt Gingrich. Him and McConnell are going to part of the problem moving forward.
What the hell have you been ingesting, Saletan? Obama and the democrats have been repudiated and rejected. They are nothing more than limp dicks.
(roaring with laughter) For the past week you've claimed repeatedly that voters aren't voting 'for the Republicans' and therefore it would be a mistake to think winning the election cycle would NOT be a 'mandate'. I know this for the simple reason I agreed with you on that. Boehner did NOT say he would blindly 'follow the President's lead'. He said the exact opposite in his speech. The American People disagree with POTUS's policies. The question is 'Will Owe-bama follow the PEOPLE'S LEAD?' I doubt it, but we'll see.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Oh no they aren't, Badeye just told me they are still responsible for the economy.
All spending bills originate in the House. It's time for the GOP to deliver on its promises to cut spending and create jobs.
Yes, limp dicks!
Owe-bama has to sign, or veto. Helluva a choice he's going to have to make. Can't vote 'present' and he can't just let the House determine domestic policy ala Nancypants regime, which as we all know was fired last night in resounding fashion. Either way, he bought this economy with the faux stimulus that wasn't.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Its rather amusing to note GO and his friends are admitting to the incredible shrinking Presidency of Barack Hussein Owe-bama..mmmm...mmmm...mmmm. INadvertently, but still an admission none the less.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
He can't sign or veto an increase in the debt ceiling unless the House & Senate first passes it, that means that Republicans have to support it. So again, it's put up time for the GOP - they can't blame Obama for spending/deficits when they own the power of the purse.
"While our new majority will serve as your voice in the people's House, we must remember it's the president who sets the agenda for our government." John Boehner
Pssst. Pelosi is the Speaker of the House til January. Guess its not 'time' huh? rotflmao.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
John Boehner Its true. John Boehner has read the Constitution and understands it. Will you make the time to do so before January?
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
John Boehner The Orange Mandarin has spoken.
“You know, the two wars that we’re in right now is exactly what we’re in.” - Sharron Angle, Tea Party Loon and Ah, already going ethnic, huh, skippy? Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Skidmark is such a patheticm loser.
On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.
#2. To: go65 (#1)
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson
#3. To: go65 (#0)
But he'll have accomplished more than Clinton did, because he focused on doing the job, not keeping it.
#4. To: go65 (#1)
How do you win 60+ seats then argue you have no mandate
#5. To: Ibluafartsky (#3)
What the hell have you been ingesting, Saletan? Obama and the democrats have been repudiated and rejected. They are nothing more than limp dicks.
On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.
#6. To: Badeye (#4)
The question is 'Will Owe-bama follow the PEOPLE'S LEAD?'
On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.
#7. To: go65 (#5)
they are still responsible for the economy.
#8. To: go65 (#6)
The question is 'Will Owe-bama follow the PEOPLE'S LEAD?'
#9. To: Ibluafartsky (#7)
#10. To: Badeye (#8)
Owe-bama has to sign, or veto.
On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.
#11. To: Badeye (#9)
On January 3, 2011 the GOP assumes responsibility for deficit spending.
#12. To: go65 (#10)
So again, it's put up time for the GOP - they can't blame Obama for spending/deficits when they own the power of the purse.
#13. To: go65 (#11)
"While our new majority will serve as your voice in the people's House, we must remember it's the president who sets the agenda for our government."
#14. To: go65 (#11)
"While our new majority will serve as your voice in the people's House, we must remember it's the president who sets the agenda for our government."
future US Senator
#15. To: Skip Intro (#14)
#16. To: Badeye, Skip Intro (#15)
Ah, already going ethnic, huh, skippy?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]