[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Parties to battle over deficit cuts (Debt limit watch)
Source: Politico
URL Source: http://dyn.politico.com/printstory. ... 148-CDC1-1E8E-37B8551DC04C605C
Published: Nov 2, 2010
Author: Politico
Post Date: 2010-11-02 13:44:13 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 117
Comments: 2

After an election season marked by shrink-the-debt rallying cries, a Republican majority in the House would quickly have a chance to show whether it’s serious about cutting federal spending — so serious, it would threaten to shut down the government.

House Republican leaders insist the party wouldn’t take it that far. But tell that to a crop of tea party candidates who say they’re prepared to take that dramatic step, if needed, to stick by their campaign- trail pledges to rein in government spending.

The showdown could come after the next Congress convenes, when Republicans and Democrats would take up a routine Treasury request to increase the amount the federal government can borrow, known as the debt limit.

It has all the makings of a classic Washington standoff: President Barack Obama would have to persuade Congress to expand the borrowing limit, or risk a government default. Republicans, who pledged fiscal restraint, say they wouldn’t go along with it unless they extract major concessions on spending. And tea party activists would expect nothing less than full-on resistance — maybe even a government shutdown — from the Republicans they propelled into office.

Republicans across the country used TV ads to bash Democratic incumbents for raising the debt limit in February, from $12.4 trillion to $14.3 trillion. The debt now stands at $13.7 trillion, which means another vote will be necessary early next year, when there would be a GOP House majority if results go as expected Tuesday.

Utah Republican Senate nominee Mike Lee has said that the issue is worth shutting down the government over. “It’s an inconvenience, it would be frustrating to many, many people and it’s not a great thing.” And “at the same time, it’s not something that we can rule out,” he told NPR. “It may be absolutely necessary.”

In statements to POLITICO, Colorado Republican Senate nominee Ken Buck and Wisconsin Republican Senate nominee Ron Johnson both adopted no-compromise stances, as did Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“The American people have said pretty loud and clear that our debt is too high, and they are going to send people to Washington who are able to say no,” said Sarah Sendek, spokeswoman for the Johnson campaign.

Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, a tea-party-linked group that has been active in the midterm elections, said a government shutdown may be necessary.

He said he has a three-point litmus test for House Republicans if they win the majority: First, they must extend the moratorium on earmarks. Second, they need to force a quick vote to repeal the new health care law, as well as make attempts to revoke federal funding for individual elements of the law. And finally, they cannot fold on the debt limit, he said.

“It will be an early test for the assumed Republican majority,” Phillips said. “If they just simply, in a perfunctory way, sign off on it, it will send a disastrous message to the movement, which is expecting some fiscal discipline and guts.”

Obama, on the other hand, would need to show seriousness about reining in spending without estranging his base of union and progressive activists, which railed against the White House earlier this year for proposing a three-year freeze on non-defense, discretionary spending, instead of using the government to stimulate the economy. His own reelection fight begins in earnest on Wednesday, and every proposed cut has a constituency.

“Congress has never failed to increase the debt limit when necessary, and we are confident Congress will act in 2011 to ensure that the full faith and credit of the United States is protected,” said Steven Adamske, a Treasury spokesman.

A no-holds-barred stance isn’t necessarily a sure winner for the GOP. Republicans certainly remember what happened during the 1995 government shutdown, when then-President Bill Clinton managed to turn the blame on the GOP. Not to mention, establishment Republicans could prove as resistant to deep budget cuts as many liberal Democrats.

Still, for the GOP, a debt-limit vote would be a showcase to prove that a new Republican majority would not be the same as the old Republican majority, which voted to raise the ceiling when it was in charge.

House Republicans, if they regain control from Democrats, have pledged to hold weekly votes on spending-cut bills as a way to establish credibility with voters. But if Democrats maintain control of the Senate, those bills are likely to go nowhere.

That is where the debt-limit vote comes in. A higher debt ceiling is a must-have for the administration. If the ceiling isn’t raised, the government could default on its debt — a scenario that conservative economists describe as unthinkable, given the ramifications it would have on the global financial markets.

Republicans still see an opportunity to leverage their position and force Democrats to swallow deep budget cuts or spending freezes in exchange for the vote on the debt limit.

The issue is how far Republicans would be willing to go — and what kind of compromise would satisfy a conservative base that doesn’t just want to slow the growth in spending but force the federal budget to actually shrink over time.

“A lot of conservatives will believe they have a mandate to stop the debt spree, and a dangerous vote to raise the debt limit could be justified only by putting in place procedures to stop future debt-limit increases,” said Brian Riedl, lead budget analyst for The Heritage Foundation. “I don’t see conservatives going along with business as usual on borrowing.”

Ryan Hecker, a Houston lawyer who organized the tea-party-backed Contract From America, a grass- roots-driven governing manifesto, said the election is a mandate for fiscal conservatism, so the GOP needs to heed that message.

“Unless there is a real signal of a major, major attempt to decrease spending, Republicans are certainly going against their word if they vote to increase the debt limit,” Hecker said. “It would be very politically problematic if Republicans just raise the debt limit without receiving something” in return.

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia, who could become the majority leader in a Republican- controlled House, said the caucus will aim to establish a credible record of spending restraint by the time the debt limit vote is scheduled.

Republicans will prove they’re committed by reducing costs of running federal agencies and examining pay for federal workers, Cantor said in a conference call last week.

Another complicating factor is that any package of concessions that passes muster with the GOP base will need to make it through the Senate, which is projected to remain in Democratic control. Even the softest measure — such as a freeze on discretionary spending — would face a tough hearing in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to pass anything controversial, according to a senior Democratic aide.

“I’m unconvinced that even a Republican House that was committed to a serious cap in spending over a long period of time would be able to convince a narrowly divided, but Democratic-controlled, Senate to go along with it,” said Andrew Moylan, director of government affairs for the National Taxpayers Union. “I’m unconvinced at this point, given Congress’s history on spending, that we’re going to get anything significant.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#2. To: go65 (#0)

“Unless there is a real signal of a major, major attempt to decrease spending, Republicans are certainly going against their word if they vote to increase the debt limit,” Hecker said. “It would be very politically problematic if Republicans just raise the debt limit without receiving something” in return.

Go bankrupt and or into default.

Stop the madness.

Cut all welfare.

Cut Air forces from the Army, Marines and Navy.

Close military bases in every Blue State.

Pull troops from Germany and South Korea.

WhiteSands  posted on  2010-11-02   14:12:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

        There are no replies to Comment # 2.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com