[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: Scary New Wage Data
Source: TAX.com
URL Source: http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.n ... alink/UBEN-8AGMUZ?OpenDocument
Published: Oct 25, 2010
Author: David Cay Johnston
Post Date: 2010-10-28 00:38:05 by lucysmom
Keywords: Reaganomics, wealth distribution, unemployment
Views: 36220
Comments: 46

Every 34th wage earner in America in 2008 went all of 2009 without earning a single dollar, new data from the Social Security Administration show. Total wages, median wages, and average wages all declined, but at the very top, salaries grew more than fivefold.

...

The number of Americans making $50 million or more, the top income category in the data, fell from 131 in 2008 to 74 last year. But that’s only part of the story.

The average wage in this top category increased from $91.2 million in 2008 to an astonishing $518.8 million in 2009. That’s nearly $10 million in weekly pay!

You read that right. In the Great Recession year of 2009 (officially just the first half of the year), the average pay of the very highest-income Americans was more than five times their average wages and bonuses in 2008. And even though their numbers shrank by 43 percent, this group’s total compensation was 3.2 times larger in 2009 than in 2008, accounting for 0.6 percent of all pay. These 74 people made as much as the 19 million lowest-paid people in America, who constitute one in every eight workers.

...

[Author from comments section]

Noel Chun, I think the generosity of millions of American blue collar workers who willingly and deliberately gave up their jobs so the poor in the police state called China and in the democracy called India, as well as other impoverished nations, can have a better economic life is the greatest untold story of human kindness in history.

Oh, but wait, they didn’t act out of altruism. In fact, they did not act at all. They were fired.

The trade rules, like tax rules, tend to be read by very few people and to be shaped mostly by campaign contributions to politicians, who pass laws and approve treaties. The subsidies for moving work offshore come from our elected officials, who depend on those getting the subsidies for the money to get elected.

The duty of a sovereign government is first to its own people, not to the people of another country. Read Adam Smith on policies that benefit the majority being by their nature good policies. What is going on here is not Darwinian economics, but bought-and-paid for economics.

Jim O., I am sure you appreciate my satirical comments above, but you also make an important point without quite explicitly stating it, capitalism and freedom are not linked (see China and Singapore) nor are capitalism and democracy (see India), no matter how much some people say they are.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#13. To: lucysmom (#0) (Edited)

The average wage in this top category increased from $91,200,000 in 2008 to an astonishing $518,800,000 in 2009. That’s nearly $10,000,000 in weekly pay!

The Democrats "solution" is to raise taxes on "rich" people who make a lousy $250,000 year. Therein lies the problem.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-28   11:00:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: jwpegler (#13)

The Democrats "solution" is to raise taxes on "rich" people who make a lousy $250,000 year. Therein lies the problem.

in the last 30 years we've seen wealth increasingly concentrated at the top, the GOP approach is to cut aid to the less well-off to preserve tax breaks on income over $250k.

Do you not see a problem with so much income concentrated in the hands of so few?

go65  posted on  2010-10-28   19:45:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: go65 (#19) (Edited)

$250,000 is not $518,000,000. People making $250,000 are not rich.

The very rich can buy off politicians to write special tax breaks for them. Raising the tax rate on the "rich" does not actually raise taxes on the rich. It raises taxes on the upper-middle class, many of whom are small business people.

Make the cut off for the top tax bracket $5 million or $10 million a year, and then we can talk, otherwise forget it.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   10:12:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: jwpegler (#21)

$250,000 is not $518,000,000. People making $250,000 are not rich.

The very rich can buy off politicians to write special tax breaks for them. Raising the tax rate on the "rich" does not actually raise taxes on the rich. It raises taxes on the upper-middle class, many of whom are small business people.

Make the cut off for the top tax bracket $5 million or $10 million a year, and then we can talk, otherwise forget it.

A realistic compromise would be to restore the pre-2001 top tax rate to income over $500k, but the GOP will not accept any tax hikes whatsoever, so what we will see next year is restoration of the Bush tax cuts at the expense of social programs for the poor.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   10:16:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: go65 (#22)

what we will see next year is restoration of the Bush tax cuts

If the GOP has a big majority, watch for a push to reform taxes to lower rates and eliminate many deductions. The same kind of thing that Bill Bradley and Reagan did in 96 where they lowered the top tax rate 50% to 28%

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   13:03:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: jwpegler (#28)

If the GOP has a big majority, watch for a push to reform taxes to lower rates and eliminate many deductions. The same kind of thing that Bill Bradley and Reagan did in 96 where they lowered the top tax rate 50% to 28%

I'd still like to see a push for a NST.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   13:55:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: go65 (#30)

I'd still like to see a push for a NST.

That is what I favor as well, but I don't want a flat rate sales tax. I'd like to see a variable rate sales tax where basic necessities (groceries, medicine, etc) are taxed at a low rate and other things (tobacco, alcohol, gas at the pump, etc.) are taxed at a higher rate.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   14:19:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: jwpegler (#37)

That is what I favor as well, but I don't want a flat rate sales tax. I'd like to see a variable rate sales tax where basic necessities (groceries, medicine, etc) are taxed at a low rate and other things (tobacco, alcohol, gas at the pump, etc.) are taxed at a higher rate.

you could exempt things like food/rent/medicine, or pay a rebate every year of something like $3k per person.

I don't think we want to exempt fuel from taxes if we still have a national goal of weaning the country off of imported oil.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   14:27:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: jwpegler (#39) (Edited)

FYI:

In any case, an NST plan can be made progressive through a rebate mechanism that would shelter low- income people from paying the tax. One manner in which the NST could be made less regressive would be to exempt certain necessities--such as food and clothing--from the tax. That approach would exempt, however, the most expensive food (lobster and caviar) and the most expensive clothing ($1,000 designer suits). It is a very inefficient means of providing tax relief to lower and middle income Americans and would necessitate a much higher overall rate. [41] A more neutral and less distortive approach is to simply provide each family a level of consumption free of tax by providing a rebate of the tax on expenditures up to the poverty level. That is the device we recommend and the approach chosen by Representatives Schaefer and Tauzin in H.R. 3039. [42]

The rebate could work as follows: A family consumption refund would be established for each household at an amount equal to the sales tax rate times the poverty level. The poverty level is defined by the Department of Health and Human Services guidelines and should be raised by the sales tax rate. [43] For a family of four, the HHS poverty level for 1996 is $15,800, so the sales tax poverty level would be $18,588. The annualized rebate, which would be refundable for households with earnings below the poverty level, would therefore be $2,788. Assuming the head of household was paid 26 times per year, the rebate amount included in each paycheck would be $107.23. Earnings would be reported to the Social Security Administration. Employers would pay less payroll tax, and the Treasury would reimburse the SSA for the rebate amounts provided to families in order to ensure that the balance in the trust funds was unchanged. [44] Only the source of the payments to the trust funds would change. [45]

Families with no annual wages and salaries would apply directly to the Social Security Administration for a rebate check. Table 4 indicates the applicable poverty thresholds and maximum rebates for 1996 assuming a 15 percent national sales tax rate. [46]

All workers would receive a rebate up to the maximum rebate amount shown in the table. Thus, the average tax rate for a family of four earning and spending $37,176 would be 7.5 percent. The average tax rate for a family of four earning and spending $74,352 would be 11.25 percent. Figure 1 illustrates how the average tax rate increases with spending. This assumes that the sales tax falls on the consumer. The view that it falls on the factors of production is commonly, though by no means universally, held by economists.

The family consumption allowance approach has several effects. First, it makes the sales tax applicable only to consumption beyond the necessities of life. Second, it makes the tax in effect progressive, not only because it is based on consumption, a better index of true ability to pay, but because--if one wants to continue to view progressivity through an income tax lens--it entirely exempts lower income workers. Third, unlike most state taxes, it does not undertake the complex and politicized task of determining what to tax and what to exempt, thereby minimizing administrative and compliance questions and economic distortions.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-272.html

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   14:29:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

        There are no replies to Comment # 40.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com