[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: Scary New Wage Data
Source: TAX.com
URL Source: http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.n ... alink/UBEN-8AGMUZ?OpenDocument
Published: Oct 25, 2010
Author: David Cay Johnston
Post Date: 2010-10-28 00:38:05 by lucysmom
Keywords: Reaganomics, wealth distribution, unemployment
Views: 35481
Comments: 46

Every 34th wage earner in America in 2008 went all of 2009 without earning a single dollar, new data from the Social Security Administration show. Total wages, median wages, and average wages all declined, but at the very top, salaries grew more than fivefold.

...

The number of Americans making $50 million or more, the top income category in the data, fell from 131 in 2008 to 74 last year. But that’s only part of the story.

The average wage in this top category increased from $91.2 million in 2008 to an astonishing $518.8 million in 2009. That’s nearly $10 million in weekly pay!

You read that right. In the Great Recession year of 2009 (officially just the first half of the year), the average pay of the very highest-income Americans was more than five times their average wages and bonuses in 2008. And even though their numbers shrank by 43 percent, this group’s total compensation was 3.2 times larger in 2009 than in 2008, accounting for 0.6 percent of all pay. These 74 people made as much as the 19 million lowest-paid people in America, who constitute one in every eight workers.

...

[Author from comments section]

Noel Chun, I think the generosity of millions of American blue collar workers who willingly and deliberately gave up their jobs so the poor in the police state called China and in the democracy called India, as well as other impoverished nations, can have a better economic life is the greatest untold story of human kindness in history.

Oh, but wait, they didn’t act out of altruism. In fact, they did not act at all. They were fired.

The trade rules, like tax rules, tend to be read by very few people and to be shaped mostly by campaign contributions to politicians, who pass laws and approve treaties. The subsidies for moving work offshore come from our elected officials, who depend on those getting the subsidies for the money to get elected.

The duty of a sovereign government is first to its own people, not to the people of another country. Read Adam Smith on policies that benefit the majority being by their nature good policies. What is going on here is not Darwinian economics, but bought-and-paid for economics.

Jim O., I am sure you appreciate my satirical comments above, but you also make an important point without quite explicitly stating it, capitalism and freedom are not linked (see China and Singapore) nor are capitalism and democracy (see India), no matter how much some people say they are.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#13. To: lucysmom (#0) (Edited)

The average wage in this top category increased from $91,200,000 in 2008 to an astonishing $518,800,000 in 2009. That’s nearly $10,000,000 in weekly pay!

The Democrats "solution" is to raise taxes on "rich" people who make a lousy $250,000 year. Therein lies the problem.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-28   11:00:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: jwpegler (#13)

The Democrats "solution" is to raise taxes on "rich" people who make a lousy $250,000 year. Therein lies the problem.

in the last 30 years we've seen wealth increasingly concentrated at the top, the GOP approach is to cut aid to the less well-off to preserve tax breaks on income over $250k.

Do you not see a problem with so much income concentrated in the hands of so few?

go65  posted on  2010-10-28   19:45:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: go65 (#19) (Edited)

$250,000 is not $518,000,000. People making $250,000 are not rich.

The very rich can buy off politicians to write special tax breaks for them. Raising the tax rate on the "rich" does not actually raise taxes on the rich. It raises taxes on the upper-middle class, many of whom are small business people.

Make the cut off for the top tax bracket $5 million or $10 million a year, and then we can talk, otherwise forget it.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   10:12:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: jwpegler (#21)

$250,000 is not $518,000,000. People making $250,000 are not rich.

The very rich can buy off politicians to write special tax breaks for them. Raising the tax rate on the "rich" does not actually raise taxes on the rich. It raises taxes on the upper-middle class, many of whom are small business people.

Make the cut off for the top tax bracket $5 million or $10 million a year, and then we can talk, otherwise forget it.

A realistic compromise would be to restore the pre-2001 top tax rate to income over $500k, but the GOP will not accept any tax hikes whatsoever, so what we will see next year is restoration of the Bush tax cuts at the expense of social programs for the poor.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   10:16:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: go65 (#22)

what we will see next year is restoration of the Bush tax cuts

If the GOP has a big majority, watch for a push to reform taxes to lower rates and eliminate many deductions. The same kind of thing that Bill Bradley and Reagan did in 96 where they lowered the top tax rate 50% to 28%

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   13:03:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: jwpegler (#28)

If the GOP has a big majority, watch for a push to reform taxes to lower rates and eliminate many deductions. The same kind of thing that Bill Bradley and Reagan did in 96 where they lowered the top tax rate 50% to 28%

I'd still like to see a push for a NST.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   13:55:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: go65 (#30)

I'd still like to see a push for a NST.

That is what I favor as well, but I don't want a flat rate sales tax. I'd like to see a variable rate sales tax where basic necessities (groceries, medicine, etc) are taxed at a low rate and other things (tobacco, alcohol, gas at the pump, etc.) are taxed at a higher rate.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-10-29   14:19:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: jwpegler (#37)

That is what I favor as well, but I don't want a flat rate sales tax. I'd like to see a variable rate sales tax where basic necessities (groceries, medicine, etc) are taxed at a low rate and other things (tobacco, alcohol, gas at the pump, etc.) are taxed at a higher rate.

you could exempt things like food/rent/medicine, or pay a rebate every year of something like $3k per person.

I don't think we want to exempt fuel from taxes if we still have a national goal of weaning the country off of imported oil.

go65  posted on  2010-10-29   14:27:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#40. To: jwpegler (#39) (Edited)

FYI:

In any case, an NST plan can be made progressive through a rebate mechanism that would shelter low- income people from paying the tax. One manner in which the NST could be made less regressive would be to exempt certain necessities--such as food and clothing--from the tax. That approach would exempt, however, the most expensive food (lobster and caviar) and the most expensive clothing ($1,000 designer suits). It is a very inefficient means of providing tax relief to lower and middle income Americans and would necessitate a much higher overall rate. [41] A more neutral and less distortive approach is to simply provide each family a level of consumption free of tax by providing a rebate of the tax on expenditures up to the poverty level. That is the device we recommend and the approach chosen by Representatives Schaefer and Tauzin in H.R. 3039. [42]

The rebate could work as follows: A family consumption refund would be established for each household at an amount equal to the sales tax rate times the poverty level. The poverty level is defined by the Department of Health and Human Services guidelines and should be raised by the sales tax rate. [43] For a family of four, the HHS poverty level for 1996 is $15,800, so the sales tax poverty level would be $18,588. The annualized rebate, which would be refundable for households with earnings below the poverty level, would therefore be $2,788. Assuming the head of household was paid 26 times per year, the rebate amount included in each paycheck would be $107.23. Earnings would be reported to the Social Security Administration. Employers would pay less payroll tax, and the Treasury would reimburse the SSA for the rebate amounts provided to families in order to ensure that the balance in the trust funds was unchanged. [44] Only the source of the payments to the trust funds would change. [45]

Families with no annual wages and salaries would apply directly to the Social Security Administration for a rebate check. Table 4 indicates the applicable poverty thresholds and maximum rebates for 1996 assuming a 15 percent national sales tax rate. [46]

All workers would receive a rebate up to the maximum rebate amount shown in the table. Thus, the average tax rate for a family of four earning and spending $37,176 would be 7.5 percent. The average tax rate for a family of four earning and spending $74,352 would be 11.25 percent. Figure 1 illustrates how the average tax rate increases with spending. This assumes that the sales tax falls on the consumer. The view that it falls on the factors of production is commonly, though by no means universally, held by economists.

The family consumption allowance approach has several effects. First, it makes the sales tax applicable only to consumption beyond the necessities of life. Second, it makes the tax in effect progressive, not only because it is based on consumption, a better index of true ability to pay, but because--if one wants to continue to view progressivity through an income tax lens--it entirely exempts lower income workers. Third, unlike most state taxes, it does not undertake the complex and politicized task of determining what to tax and what to exempt, thereby minimizing administrative and compliance questions and economic distortions.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-272.html

go65  posted on  2010-10-29 14:29:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com