United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Nevada Senate hopeful Sharron Angle: Muslim law takes hold in Dearborn, other U.S. cities Read more: Nevada Senate hopeful Sharron Angle: Muslim law takes hold in Dearborn, other U.S. cities
Source:
AP
URL Source: http://www.freep.com/article/201010 ... ing-over-Dearborn-other-cities
Published: Oct 8, 2010
Author: AP
Post Date: 2010-10-08 15:44:21 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 75426
Comments: 116
LAS VEGAS — U.S. Senate candidate Sharron Angle told a crowd of supporters that the country needs to address a “militant terrorist situation” that has allowed Islamic religious law to take hold in some American cities. Her comments came at a rally of tea party supporters in the Nevada resort town of Mesquite last week after the candidate was asked about Muslims angling to take over the country, and marked the latest of several controversial remarks by the Nevada Republican. In a recording of the rally provided to the Associated Press by the Mesquite Local News, a man is heard asking Angle : “I keep hearing about Muslims wanting to take over the United States ... on a TV program just last night, I saw that they are taking over a city in Michigan and the residents of the city, they want them out. They want them out. So, I want to hear your thoughts about that.” Angle responds that “we’re talking about a militant terrorist situation, which I believe it isn’t a widespread thing, but it is enough that we need to address, and we have been addressing it.” “My thoughts are these, first of all, Dearborn, Michigan, and Frankford, Texas, are on American soil, and under constitutional law. Not Sharia law. And I don’t know how that happened in the United States,” she said. “It seems to me there is something fundamentally wrong with allowing a foreign system of law to even take hold in any municipality or government situation in our United States.” Dearborn has a thriving Muslim community. It was not immediately clear why Angle singled out Frankford, Texas, a former town that was annexed into Dallas around 1975. Responding to the same question, she also drew comparisons between the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the Nazi Holocaust. She said the property owners behind the proposed Islamic community center near ground zero should move it in deference to the people who died there. “There was, in Auschwitz, I think it was Auschwitz, it was at least a prisoner of war camp, where the Catholic Church owned some property and they were going to build a church there. They had every right to do it but they stepped aside and said, no, we are going to allow the Jewish people to make a monument because they lost lives,” she said. “They had a responsibility to be sensitive to what had happened there and it is exactly the same thing as 9/11. Ground zero, we have a responsibility to be sensitive to the loss of a nation, to the loss of families, to the loss of life that happened there.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-76) not displayed.
.
.
.
#77. To: A K A Stone (#73)
As I said...you're kind of slow. Going to the zoo tomorrow?
BTw, you've been pinged to at least two other threads. Are you going to respond?
Are you going to cry, dwarf?
So tell me how the govt should shut them up. Come on you think you know it all tell me/us. You can't answer this simple question. war this is constitution 101 and you are flunking. Lets see if you run away again.
So when the government arrests anti-war protesters, is it imposing Sharia?
This shows you are not seriously debating. You are afraid to answer. You are looking more and more like a troll.
no
DELETED Strike 1
The question was answered, "restart". You claiming that it was not, is a lie. You didn't like the answer because it reduces your argument to the level of stupidity in which it exists. Hey Exxon...courtesy PING dinner on me tomorrow...whaddaya say?
Ban me now dick and fuck you very much...
It is much more fun ridiculing and laughing at you, dwarf! You're such a little bitch!
Ok lets play your asinine game. No one is saying inanimate objects can talk. (Is he really that stupid?) The laws are based on the constitution. It was passed first. In order for the govt to stop a person from a corporation from speaking. Or someone hired by a corporation. What do they have to do to accomplish that task?
You couldn't answer the question. Your goal is not to debate but push an agenda. People have said you are a paid shill. That is probably true and why you can't answer the question. I had you checkmated. As you wish, you have banned yourself. Have a good day.
Folder: Inbox Date: October 9 9:47:32 PM From: war To: A K A Stone Subject: Re: Guatemala Syphilis Experiment Exposed – Video [ Democarts infect people with STD's ] You're a fucking asshole, douchebag
Tell us oh wise one why our FF didn't pick up on this? Many owned businesses and yet none of their businesses are on record as having voted or otherwise exersized their rights as citizens. I wonder why?
Ok I will answer your question then you answer mine. No businesses back then voted and no businesses today vote. The founders didn't have to pick up on anything. They made the constitution and it says free speech period. Your argument is irrelevant and it doesn't matter if anyone on record (you made that up anyway you haven't read every document) the constitution says no laws against free speech. Anything they would want to do would require a law. And it says "no law". So it would require a constitutional amendment. This isn't debatable the language in the constitution is perfectly I repeat perfectly clear. Now you may disagree and think it is wrong. But you can't say it is constitutionally incorrect and be telling the truth.
But the SCOTUS says they now can, so it's just a matter of time.
ha HA!
What is wrong with that sentence? Here I will tell you. You said they can now. Then you said it's just a matter of time. Self contradiction and you probably can't even see it. So show me where it says a business can vote. Or maybe your point is that business owners shouldn't be able to vote because they own a corporation.
Like I said month ago, this is what dwarf does on every board he's ever belonged to. He just can't help himself.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
I think you have been saying that for more then a month.
Here I will tell you. You said they can now. Then you said it's just a matter of time. Self contradiction and you probably can't even see it. So show me where it says a business can vote. Or maybe your point is that business owners shouldn't be able to vote because they own a corporation How do you know they haven't? Have you investigated every election to find out? The point of the decision is the giving of corporations the same rights as individual private citizens. Do you vote? Hint hint, it's the ultimate expression of free speech. Or maybe you think because they are owners of a corporation(s) they should be able to vote multiple times. Like at stockholder meetings.
So I have...so I have. Gotta tell ya, Stone, you have a lot of patience.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
He's very repetitive and boring which is why he's here. He would be at Sally's place if she would have him. The Bozo function seems to have the so called "conservatives" here who constantly call for others to be banned flummoxed.
Yes and I am also aware that Yaki Indians have a right to believe that they should eat Peyote buttons as part of their religious practice, yet the Supreme Court has struck down the notion of them having the right to actually do it. Same thing here. Muslims should not have a right to send their noise pollution across an entire city. It's a form of trespass.
"Thank you. -----------------------------------------------------------
You're aware of the first amendment, aren't you? Chuckles.....looks like our elegantly lycra/spandex attired fraud has lost his last argument here:):) BBBBWWWWHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAHHHHAAAAAA!!!! This flush should do it...no more clinging to the side of the bowl in temporary banning and being able to "hang dog" his way back on. The evil racist STD growth on dwarf's left ballsack (aka fred jerx) is working his way out soon too:):) Whatever will we DO without their snippets of well thought out disagreement/discourse????? AHHHHHHHHHHH.....the site may just become more normal rather than emulating DU's mirrorsite (sometimes it seemed that way). Piss on these evil bastard slug pricks:):):)
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way. Famous Dwarfisms : "the shorts and bibs I wear are of a carbon/lycra/nylon composition...and maaaaaannnnnn....just letting everybody know that makes my balls SWELL... #2. To: e_type_jag (#1) "I hate that you're off the plantation" 9-03-2010 Sheets Jerx .........(Why Fred???why the hate???....was it because my left Vibram sole made a lasting imprint on your face as I stepped over your constantly prone body and hopped the plantation wall .....:):)
Ah, wrong again, ming. Whats gone on in Sally's insane playbox - Storm Front Lite - is of no interest to me. Course we know as the resident Hitler Youth leader its right up your alley.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Now this is HILARIOUS!
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
I don't think there are many political website left for him to troll now.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Then the 24 dollar questions is: why do you care? And you know you would be over at LP in a hearbeat if Sally would put out the red carpet complete with bells and whistles welcoming a poster of your self admitted but still delusional 'worth'. Why there was even a 'rumor' a couple of years back some posters were letting you post under their ID's over there.
1. I don't really care, just find it amusing how history repeats itself. 2. Nope, I wouldn't post on Sally's Stormfront Lite if I was paid to do so. 3. Kooks have a wide variety of 'theories'. Its what makes them kooks. The fact that I've been gone from LP for years, and STILL the kooks have me in the forefront of their tiny minds is hilarious, but thats it.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
And no one can say you still aren't delusional after all these years. LOLOL
Kooks say lots of things, ming...as you demonstrate daily. Those you appear to be referring to were convinced I was posting from the Whitehouse....(laughing). Still cracks me up to this day.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Nope. But it's fun to get you to demonstrate your trollish grandiose qualities.
Be honest, ming. You are very lonely person, and you're grateful when ANYONE responds to you. Its okay.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Its okay. Aaaah.. I appreciate your concern but I wish there were more hours in the day.
Stone, There are times when we all push each other's buttons--this happens even with people we like, and with people we don't--well we have really, really good excuses for being irritated. Why not take it down a notch? If war doesn't want to participate anymore, that's his decision and he can opt to go gently into that good night. You don't need to step in an make a final decree. The first is an exit; the second is a banishment. Why banish? Just because someone has a different opinion doesn't make him or her a troll or a shill; it's just another person who challenges us to rethink and reexplain our positions. This is a worthy exercise. One of the good things about your site was that, after Goldi had one-too-many of her webmaster meltdowns, people drifted here. They weren't all of the same belief about anything, but they were willing to discuss--and some were too willing to insult. Still, it became a forum for a free exchange of ideas. Would you really want a site where a poster says "Hang 'em high," and the posters respond with "I agree," "Oh, I so totally agree," and "Me and my dawg agree." Wow...now that's one interesting site. So...do you want to run an interesting site where ideas fly from various directions or do you want just one prevailing hot wind to blow?
well said.
The irony of it all is that A K A Goldi censored war's remarks on a thread about free speech. War is gone on his own volition.
A CAN OF BEANS CAN'T TALK.
#78. To: A K A Stone (#73)
(Edited)
#79. To: war, A K A Stone (#78)
Are you going to respond?
#80. To: war (#78)
#81. To: A K A Stone (#80)
So tell me how the govt should shut them up. Come on you think you know it all tell me/us.
Reality check - Government spending is down, the deficit is down, government employment is down, and private hiring is up.
#82. To: war (#77)
Going to the zoo tomorrow?
#83. To: go65 (#81)
#84. To: A K A Stone (#80)
#85. To: A K A Stone, ExxonMonbil (#82)
#86. To: All (#84)
#87. To: war, All (#86)
Ban me now
#88. To: war (#85)
#89. To: war (#86)
Ban me now dick and fuck you very much...
#90. To: war (#86)
#91. To: A K A Stone (#67)
Tell us wise one how the govt would stop people who are members of a corporation from speaking freely. Tell us o wise one.
#92. To: mininggold (#91)
Tell us oh wise one why our FF didn't pick up on this? Many owned businesses and yet none of their businesses are on record as having voted or otherwise exersized their rights as citizens. I wonder why?
#93. To: A K A Stone (#92)
No businesses back then voted and no businesses today vote.
#94. To: A K A Stone (#90)
You're a fucking asshole, douchebag
#95. To: mininggold (#93)
But the SCOTUS says they now can, so it's just a matter of time.
#96. To: A K A Stone (#89)
#97. To: Badeye (#96)
#98. To: A K A Stone (#95)
(Edited)
What is wrong with that sentence?
#99. To: A K A Stone (#97)
#100. To: A K A Stone (#97)
I think you have been saying that for more then a month.
#101. To: war (#28)
You're aware of the first amendment, aren't you?
Rule of law: B students wind up working for C students. A students teach.
#102. To: A K A Stone (#90)
Folder: Inbox Date: October 9 9:47:32 PM From: war To: A K A Stone Subject: Re: Guatemala Syphilis Experiment Exposed – Video [ Democarts infect people with STD's ]
Thank you very much." 
Liberals are now pro nuclear proliferation and in support fundamentalist religions that are against homosexuality.
#103. To: jwpegler (#101)
To: war
#104. To: mininggold (#100)
He would be at Sally's place if she would have him.
#105. To: WhiteSands (#102)
#106. To: e_type_jag (#103)
#107. To: Badeye (#106)
(Edited)
I don't think there are many political website left for him to troll now.
#108. To: mininggold (#107)
Then the 24 dollar questions is: why do you care? And you know you would be over at LP in a hearbeat if Sally would put out the red carpet complete with bells and whistles welcoming a poster of your self admitted but still delusional 'worth'. Why there was even a 'rumor' a couple of years back some posters were letting you post under their ID's over there.
#109. To: Badeye (#108)
3. Kooks have a wide variety of 'theories'. Its what makes them kooks. The fact that I've been gone from LP for years, and STILL the kooks have me in the forefront of their tiny minds is hilarious, but thats it.
#110. To: mininggold (#109)
And no one can say you still aren't delusional after all these years. LOLOL
#111. To: Badeye (#110)
Those you appear to be referring to were convinced I was posting from the Whitehouse....(laughing).
#112. To: mininggold (#111)
#113. To: Badeye (#112)
You are very lonely person, and you're grateful when ANYONE responds to you.
#114. To: A K A Stone, war, fred mertz, meguro (#89)
As you wish, you have banned yourself. Have a good day.
#115. To: Suzanne (#114)
One of the good things about your site was that, after Goldi had one-too-many of her webmaster meltdowns, people drifted here. They weren't all of the same belief about anything, but they were willing to discuss--and some were too willing to insult. Still, it became a forum for a free exchange of ideas. Would you really want a site where a poster says "Hang 'em high," and the posters respond with "I agree," "Oh, I so totally agree," and "Me and my dawg agree." Wow...now that's one interesting site. So...do you want to run an interesting site where ideas fly from various directions or do you want just one prevailing hot wind to blow?
Reality check - Government spending is down, the deficit is down, government employment is down, and private hiring is up.
#116. To: Suzanne (#114)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]