[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: 27% Avoid Buying GM Cars Due to Bailout (Mr. Goodwrench a Marxist)
Source: Rasmussen Reports
URL Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub ... _buying_gm_cars_due_to_bailout
Published: Oct 1, 2010
Author: Rasmussen Reports
Post Date: 2010-10-03 12:57:15 by Hondo68
Keywords: Government Motors, bought a Ford, government takeover
Views: 6773
Comments: 8

Think the auto bailouts are still unpopular? Fifty-four percent (54%) of Americans say they are less likely to buy a General Motors car because the federal government is the automaker’s majority owner.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just nine percent (9%) say they are more likely to buy a GM car for that reason, while 33% say the government’s majority stake in the company has no impact on their purchasing decisions. (To see survey question wording, click here).

Twenty-seven percent (27%) say they or someone they know has avoided buying a GM car because of the bailout and government takeover. Fifty-three percent (53%) say that’s not true for them, but another 21% are not sure.

A year ago, 17% favored a boycott of GM products.

The bailout story has been helpful to one of the Big Three U.S. automakers. Ford did not seek a government bailout and 55% of Americans say they are more likely to buy a Ford car for that reason. Ten percent (10%) say they’re less likely to do so. Thirty percent (30%) say Ford’s decision not to ask for a bailout has no impact on whether they buy a car from the company or not.

In fact, 18% say they or someone they know has bought a Ford car just because the company did not take any bailout funding. Sixty-nine percent (69%) say that isn’t their experience. Thirteen percent (13%) aren’t sure.

The survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted on September 29-30, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Fifty-three percent (53%) of Americans still think the federal government bailout of GM and Chrysler was a bad idea. Most adults were opposed to the taxpayer bailout of the two auto companies right from the start

The bailouts are one of the reasons why 65% of voters remain at least somewhat angry at the current policies of the federal government, with 40% who are Very Angry. 

The majority of adults across virtually all demographic groups say they are less likely to buy a Ford because of the company’s new ownership. Government employees and African-Americans are among the only exceptions. But even 53% of government employees say they are more likely to buy a Ford because the company didn’t take a bailout.

Seventy-four percent (74%) of Republicans and 51% of adults not affiliated with either party say they are less likely to buy a GM car because of the government ownership. Just 37% of Democrats agree.

Interestingly, however, a plurality (45%) of Democrats say they are more likely to buy a Ford because it didn’t take a taxpayer bailout. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans and a plurality (45%) of unaffiliateds share that view.

Republicans and unaffiliated adults are more than twice as likely as Democrats to know someone who already has not purchased a GM car or has a family member or friend who has chosen not to buy one because of the government’s role in the company.

Similarly, Republicans and unaffiliateds are more likely than Democrats to have purchased a Ford or to know someone who has because the company didn’t seek a bailout.

Still, in a separate survey in early June, 48% of those who planned to buy a new or used car in the next year said they are at least somewhat likely to buy either a Ford or a vehicle made by General Motors. Those findings included 20% who were Very Likely to buy a Ford and 26% Very Likely to buy a GM product instead.

Most voters (57%) have more confidence in the judgment of a member of Congress who voted against the bailouts than on one who voted for them.

Fifty-one percent (51%) believe the government as the majority owner of GM has a conflict-of-interest when it comes to regulating competing automakers, as in the recent case of Toyota’s safety problems. Twenty-five percent (25%) think the government was criticizing Toyota in the spring to help GM.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#1. To: hondo68 (#0)

Think the auto bailouts are still unpopular? Fifty-four percent (54%) of Americans say they are less likely to buy a General Motors car because the federal government is the automaker’s majority owner.

So this 54% would rather have had a few million more unemployed? Do they not realize that Ford got loan guarantees from the federal government too?

go65  posted on  2010-10-03   15:37:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: go65 (#1)

So this 54% would rather have had a few million more unemployed? Do they not realize that Ford got loan guarantees from the federal government too?

But Ford DIDN'T take the money.

You still don't get it, do you?

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-10-03   15:47:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Nebuchadnezzar, go65 (#2)

Ford Secures $5.9 Billion Government Loan to Retool Plants


(Dearborn, Michigan) – Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) will receive $5.9 billion in federal loans to help transform factories across Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio to produce more fuel efficient models.

The loan is part of the first batch of commitments from of the Department of Energy's Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing program.

Facilities impacted by the announcement include Chicago Assembly, Louisville Assembly, Dearborn Assembly, Dearborn Engine, Livonia Transmission, Michigan Assembly, Van Dyke Transmission, Kansas City Assembly, Cleveland Engine, Lima Engine and Sharonville Transmission.

The Department of Energy plans to make additional loans under this program over the next several months to large and small auto manufacturers and parts suppliers up and down the production chain. First appropriated in the fall of 2008, the program will provide about $25 billion in loans to companies making cars and components in US factories that increase fuel economy at least 25 percent above 2005 fuel economy levels.

Nissan also received funds from the first batch of loans ($1.6 billion) to retool its Smyrna, Tennessee factory to build advanced electric automobiles and to build an advanced battery manufacturing facility. And Tesla Motors got $465 million to advance electric vehicle production in California.

For more information about Ford visit http://www.ford.com/

www.mfrtech.com/articles/2223.html

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,528409,00.html

Brian S  posted on  2010-10-03   17:18:16 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Brian S (#5)

Not a bailout. That loan wasn't made to keep Ford afloat.

Nice try, but like a bad shooter, you keep missing.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-10-03   17:25:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#6)

But they did indeed take 'government' money.

Brian S  posted on  2010-10-03   17:39:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 7.

#8. To: Brian S (#7)

But they did indeed take 'government' money.

There is a different between "needing" and taking.

It wasn't a bail-out. You know that.

And for the record, I'm opposed to it, but that is life.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-10-03 19:42:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com