United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Christine O'Donnell: 'Evolution Is A Myth. Why Aren't Monkeys Still Evolving Into Humans?' (VIDEO)
Source:
Huffington Post
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/ ... volution-monkeys_n_739131.html
Published: Sep 25, 2010
Author: Nicholas Graham
Post Date: 2010-09-25 21:39:30 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 19186
Comments: 84
Bill Maher has so far kept his promise to air an embarrassing clip of Tea Party favorite and Delaware Republican Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell every week that she refuses to be a guest on his HBO show, "Real Time." Last night Maher showed a video from an appearance she made in 1998 on his old program "Politically Incorrect" in which she calls evolution "a myth" and backs up her claim with the question: if evolution is real, "why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?" This latest uncovered statement comes on the heels of a clip unearthed from an old "Scarborough Country" episode in which she insists that we stop the whole nation from having sex. Since she was a guest on Maher's previous show 22 times, it's unlikely that the steady stream of past statements coming to light will stop any time soon. For more on Christine O'Donnell's controversial statements and positions, click here and here.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-43) not displayed.
.
.
.
#44. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#38)
(Edited)
Only if I didn't want to see you crying like a little school girl. Fuck off, yukon. What are you going to do about it if we were in the same room? Type something?
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
Tell me again that you believe the RINO REPUBLICAN PARTY NOMINEE FOR VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is really a rouge at extreme odds with the SAME PARTY THAT MADE HER THEIR VICE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, even though she adores McCain who said the argument over global warming is over, because global warming is real, and who also wants amnesty for illegals.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
You understand very little. You believe you know most everything. You have a huge ego.
So you're using your senility as an excuse, chipper? Repeating the same nonsense incessantly certainly makes it appear that way.
Yukon, you really gotta look up "projection" in psychology. Really.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
Neo-cons like to post bullshit to bump down posts so they aren't seen. So, yukon, you want to address Palin's support of McCain (who wants amnesty and believes in global warming), or do I keep bumping it to the top until you do? You're a propagandist yukon. You can address this (which you won't) or you can keep bumping it out of sight, proving my point. Up to you, neb.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
You really are a fookin obsessed, drug-addled, liberal asshole! It must have been a real ass-kicking you suffered.
OMG! Now you are a conspiracy nut plus being an obsessed, liberal asshole.
Gee, nothing about Palin's support of McCain. I'm shocked I tell ya, SHOCKED. I never suspected this! LMAO. G'night yukon/neb/iblu yadda yadda yadda.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
You are a liberal, asshole, conspiracy kook, chipper. You suspect everything.
because humans are evolving back into monkeys. This is insane. Like this. All this and against the extending the tax cuts for the rich...we're obviously very very powerful, because Congress is so very afraid of us: A new AP poll finds that Americans who think the law should have done more outnumber those who think the government should stay out of health care by 2-to-1. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_poll And I really love when god is called on to stop the gulf oil geyser, but s/he can stand back as we abuse the laws of average.
So instead of saying that humans evolved from apes millions of years ago, and that anybody who says any different doesn't understand, just post the proof of such you say exists. Bur we all know this "proof" consists of nothing more than bone finds with the assertion it really means something. Java man, Nebrasaka man, Piltdown man etc.
Keep kicking the evolutionists ass.
So instead of saying that humans evolved from apes millions of years ago, and that anybody who says any different doesn't understand, just post the proof of such you say exists. Bur we all know this "proof" consists of nothing more than bone finds with the assertion it really means something. Java man, Nebrasaka man, Piltdown man etc. Nobody needs to prove completely accepted scientific theories to uneducated internet posters. You aren't even qualified to judge the merits of the evidence since you are totally uneducated in biology. Just like you can't judge the evidence for general relativity, or germ theory. The ignorant have no say in scientific consensus.
Is every Biology department in the world retarded or part of a conspiracy?
So instead of saying that humans evolved from apes millions of years ago, and that anybody who says any different doesn't understand, just post the proof of such you say exists. Bur we all know this "proof" consists of nothing more than bone finds with the assertion it really means something. Java man, Nebrasaka man, Piltdown man etc.
No, they just drink the koolaid. Creationist biologists are just as effective in real world issues as these defenders of evolution. Maybe more so. Was Mendel an evolutionist?
So instead of saying that humans evolved from apes millions of years ago, and that anybody who says any different doesn't understand, just post the proof of such you say exists. Bur we all know this "proof" consists of nothing more than bone finds with the assertion it really means something. Java man, Nebrasaka man, Piltdown man etc. I find it hilarious that you think scientific theories can be prove on one internet message board post.
No, they just drink the koolaid. Creationist biologists are just as effective in real world issues as these defenders of evolution. Maybe more so. Was Mendel an evolutionist? Every damn biology department in the world accepts evolution, except for a handful of schools started by evangelical preachers. Newton wasn't a general relativist? Does that mean General Relativity was wrong?
I love the world you guys live in. Expert opinion is irrelevant because the bible said so. Haha.
What University did you two research Biology at?
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/vie...64.2655&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Typical answer of every evolutiontard. Hint: genetics is not evolution. Newton wasn't a general relativist? Does that mean General Relativity was wrong? Are you making the argument that the "law" of gravity should be questioned as should the "law" of evolution? It's damn funny the only response one ever gets on this manner from you evolutiontards is "you are stupid."
Are you making the argument that the "law" of gravity should be questioned as should the "law" of evolution? Newton's Law of Gravity is wrong broheim. See General Relativity. You might not be stupid, but you are ignorant. You are totally uneducated in biology and dismiss every expert in biology. Why do you think you know better than people who studied this topic for decades?
You being a "primate" example, mcclown?
oh please. There's not a single argument in favor of evolution I haven't heard. You might not be stupid, but you are ignorant. You are totally uneducated in biology and dismiss every expert in biology. Hint: genetics is not evolution.
oh please. There's not a single argument in favor of evolution I haven't heard. Because you've never taken a college level biology course! What the fuck do you expect to happen? A professor to show up to your house with a lecture series!
I've had biology courses. hint: genetics is not evolution
hint: genetics is not evolution Where? What did they cover? And why does taking that course make you more of an expert than the PhD who taught the course?
And hint, genetics is a very significant part of evolution.
Instead of impugning me and what I may or may not know, can you make any kind of cogent argument for the validity of evolution outside of what any young earth creationist would agree with in the realm of genetics?
You realize the evidence for a scientific theory isn't small enough to be contained in posts right? People write hundreds of pages about small facts about scientific theories, all researched and peer reviewed in the PhD thesis. If you want a book that does a decent job at laying it out for a layman, you can read The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins. Though I suspect you won't believe the other despite his expertise in Evolutionary Biology. But there are hundreds of other books. Hell you cold go by any college biology book for a short version. Or cruise wikipedia. But what you'd do is challenge their assertions. And without expertise your challenges are worthless and don't need to be responded too.
LOL Do you think any knowledgeable person on the subject isn't already familiar with that clown? Face it, both creationism and evolution are nothing more than tautologies, with advocates of both rearranging the evidence to fit their own realities.
DPHIL in biology from Oxford. Yea what a clown.
Clinton attended so I wouldn't use Oxford as a credible measuring stick. Even lunatics and rapists attend Oxford.
So the education card is supposed to be meaningful? Then suck on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Sarfati
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Sarfati >>PhD in Spectroscopy (Physical Chemistry) Wrong science. You can quote him for Chemistry related stuff though.
Are you naive enough to believe evolution has anything to do with biology? Anything that an evolutionary biologist believes that is in any way verifiable, a creationist also believes.
If you won't even admit Evolution is studied by biologists I'm going to have to bid you farewell.
Not going to happen. Remember when the black chick he hired to pretend to be his fiancee so he could "prove" he was "more evolved" that people with non-black girlfriends took him to court for non-payment of her fees? That was a 1 day story buried in the middle of the newspapers. Nothing more was ever said about it as far as I know. He's got all his media bases covered. He is a far leftie Catholic who claims to be a Jew. His whole success in show biz is based on that.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
You need to be able to discern between Mendelian genetics which everybody accepts from "goo to you via the zoo" (from lack of a more conveniont way to put it). Everybody accepts things like bacterial drug resistance, speciatiton, etc.
Also, if you were in the same room with me, you wouldn't have such a smart mouth.
Remember that when you post here.
#45. To: Ibluafartsky (#40)
#46. To: Rhino (#43)
I cannot begin to understand
#47. To: Wood_Chopper (#45)
#48. To: Ibluafartsky, Rhino (#46)
You understand very little. You believe you know most everything. You have a huge ego.
#49. To: Ibluafartsky (#47)
So you're using your senility as an excuse, chipper? Repeating the same nonsense incessantly certainly makes it appear that way.
#50. To: Wood_Chopper (#48)
Yukon,
#51. To: Wood_Chopper (#49)
bump down posts so they aren't seen.
#52. To: Ibluafartsky (#51)
OMG! Now you are a conspiracy nut plus being an obsessed, liberal asshole.
#53. To: Wood_Chopper (#52)
I never suspected this!
#54. To: go65 (#0)
"why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?"
#55. To: Rhino (#41)
You are essentially arguing every biology department in every university on earth is totally full of shit,
#56. To: no gnu taxes (#55)
#57. To: no gnu taxes (#55)
#58. To: A K A Stone (#56)
Keep kicking the evolutionists ass.
#59. To: Rhino (#57)
Nobody needs to prove completely accepted scientific theories
#60. To: Rhino (#58)
Is every Biology department in the world retarded or part of a conspiracy?
#61. To: no gnu taxes (#59)
#62. To: no gnu taxes (#60)
#63. To: All (#62)
#64. To: All (#63)
#65. To: All (#64)
(Edited)
#66. To: Rhino (#62)
Every damn biology department in the world accepts evolution, except for a handful of schools started by evangelical preachers.
#67. To: no gnu taxes (#66)
It's damn funny the only response one ever gets on this manner from you evolutiontards is "you are stupid."
#68. To: mcgowanjm (#54)
humans are evolving back into monkeys.
#69. To: Rhino (#67)
You might not be stupid, but you are ignorant.
#70. To: no gnu taxes (#69)
#71. To: Rhino (#70)
#72. To: no gnu taxes (#71)
I've had biology courses.
#73. To: All (#72)
#74. To: Rhino (#72)
#75. To: no gnu taxes (#74)
Instead of impugning me and what I may or may not know, can you make any kind of cogent argument for the validity of evolution outside of what any young earth creationist would agree with in the realm of genetics?
#76. To: Rhino (#75)
If you want a book that does a decent job at laying it out for a layman, you can read The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins.
#77. To: no gnu taxes (#76)
Do you think any knowledgeable person on the subject isn't already familiar with that clown?
#78. To: Rhino (#77)
DPHIL in biology from Oxford. Yea what a clown.
#79. To: Rhino (#77)
#80. To: no gnu taxes (#79)
Then suck on this:
#81. To: Rhino (#80)
#82. To: no gnu taxes (#81)
Are you naive enough to believe evolution has anything to do with biology?
#83. To: Liberator (#7)
I can't wait until Maher's gay indiscretions hit the street.
#84. To: Rhino (#82)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]