The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles
Title: Skip Intro Challenging A K A Stone on Origins
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 24, 2010
Author: Dabney Coleman
Post Date: 2010-09-24 13:52:14 by Skip Intro
Keywords: None
Views: 79027
Comments: 110
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-34) not displayed.
.
.
.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#31)
ROFLMAO... SAY GOOD NIGHT GRACIE. You just invalidated the ENTIRE science of FORENSICS. Nice job.
When you don't have an original you are guessing and making assumptions.
So it's not a book abut dinosaurs as you claim it is. You have a gross underknowledge of the religion you proclaim to adhere.
They have plenty of originals.
You're stupid. See the above post. In human beings yes because we have studied what the insides are and can make conclusions based on that. But on dinosaurs and other long extinct species it would be assumptions.
So it's your belief that dinosaurs are an outlier species. That everything that has been discovered and held true in forensic biology is not applicable to dinosaurs. Got it...thanks...
Show me one of these dinosaurs with its insides intact. Actually you would have to show me every kind of dinosaur that existed to have a valid point. Get busy.
Chuckles...okay. You play ball like a girl.
That's an easy one. It's when god and his drinking buddies got to talking about faith and satan - no, not that one, bet god that even his most loyal and righteous subject, Job, could be made to curse god if the proper inducements were made. God said to go ahead, just don't kill him. So Job lost all of his family, his possessions, and then his health. Then his friends came along to further torment him, but he never cursed god, so god said "That's good enough for me", and gave him a brand new family, wealth, and his health back. It is never explained what his old family did to deserve being killed for a bet, and apparently Job never missed them once he got his new family.
You have a gross underknowledge of the religion you proclaim to adhere. The book of John is not a book about pharisees. There are pharisees ih the book but that is not the core of the subject. I'm not surprised that you don't get that. You threw your common sense out the window when you started imagining evolution.
That's not a very nice, Christian thing to say.
Nice job. Stone's going to be responsible for thousands of convicted criminals being let out.
It's what Stone always says when he's losing.
It is what I say when people say stupid things. Got it idiot?
I doubt you would be able to tell the difference between a mammalian skeleton or that of a bird or dinosaur anyway. You lack curiosity and are afraid you might learn something,
We're discussing the Book of JOB, numbnuts. And the passages are as I described them.
It's what Stone always says when he's losing.
You really need to seek serious mental help, Stone. You've got problems, BIG ONES.
People did not call them 'dinosaurs' before the 1800s' because, the word was not yet inverted. They referred to them being 'monsters', and 'dragons', and 'leviathians' and other such names. The word (dragon or dragons) is mentioned 34 times in King James Bible. Not only are Dinosaurs in the bible, but dinosaurs did not live 65 millions years ago like many claim. Check out the link below discovery of blood cells and soft Tissue inside Dinosaur bone. "Round and tiny and nucleated, they were threaded through the bone like red blood cells in blood vessels. But blood cells in a dinosaur bone should have disappeared eons ago. 'I got goose bumps. ...It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn't believe it. ...The bones are, after all 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?'" (Science, Research News, V.261, 9/7/'93)
Where'd Skip go, Goldi?
That and changing titles. A better one would be...watch what happens when Stone throws a snit fit because he can't debate worth a shit.
God turned him into a toad, for mocking creation?
Looks like he screwed up, because I'm back, but then he does that a lot.
How many posts do you want a day. 5, 10 or unlimited? Maybe it is zero. It is up to you.
Some species of chameleon lizards lay eggs. Others give live birth. Garter snakes lay eggs. Rat snakes give live birth. So explain how you could look at the skeletal structure (or anybody else, for that matter) and know from just that which lay eggs and which give live, yee of of infinite biological wisdom.
Baby dinosaurs would have been on the ark. I like your graphic. It shows how the dinosaurs would have crowded to higher ground and made all those footprints we see in the fossil record.
Please Paddy...as if I wouldn't know what an ovoviviparous reptile was.
You already demonstrated that you don't. Now you google a term and pretend you know something. Pathetic. You can never admit you are wrong.
They carry the egg inside of them, doof. Stop trying to argue with people who are no less that 50x smarter than you.
What? You think you are smarter then me? That is funny. You are so stupid that you think you came from an ape. I bet you fuck monkeys too.
I've already told you that we don't come from apes. There you go again...lying about the argument.
Okay you convinced me and since the Bible was written less than 2000 years ago they should be all around here. I think I'll be going out dinosaur hunting tomorrow instead of buying chicken on sale. Maybe I should check in with the Fish and Game to ask when the season starts though.
<2000 lol what a fool you are.
Want to join me? You could be the 'dog' and scare them out of those willows they love to hide in. I'll be on the stand, but I think I'll need to get a bigger rifle.
quit flirting with me. I'm happily married.
I was hoping you would do the skinning.
Ever see that sea dinosaur those Japanese fishermen brought on board?
You mean that big old fish? Alligators might qualify too. The theory is the sea was the safest place to be when the planet was being bombarded by space debris. I saw Fred's horse get a real nice third an hour ago. He led most of the race.
You haven't seen it.
Comments (76 - 110) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestUh no they can't.
#36. To: mininggold (#32)
You can tell by the pelvic bone structure, in most cases it's very similiar to that of chickens.
#37. To: A K A Stone (#34)
#38. To: A K A Stone (#36)
When you don't have an original you are guessing and making assumptions.
#39. To: war (#35)
#40. To: A K A Stone (#36)
#41. To: mininggold (#38)
They have plenty of originals.
#42. To: A K A Stone (#39)
You're stupid.
#43. To: war (#26)
What is the Book of Job about?
#44. To: war (#37)
So it's not a book abut dinosaurs as you claim it is.
#45. To: A K A Stone (#39)
You're stupid.
#46. To: war, A K A Stone (#35)
You just invalidated the ENTIRE science of FORENSICS.
#47. To: Fred Mertz (#45)
That's not a very nice, Christian thing to say.
#48. To: Skip Intro (#47)
#49. To: A K A Stone (#48)
(Edited)
#50. To: A K A Stone (#41)
how me one of these dinosaurs with its insides intact. Actually you would have to show me every kind of dinosaur that existed to have a valid point. Get busy.
#51. To: A K A Stone (#44)
The book of John is not a book about pharisees.
#52. To: Fred Mertz (#49)
That's not a very nice, Christian thing to say.
#53. To: A K A Stone (#52)
#54. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#55. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#53)
#56. To: reaganisright, .Fred Mertz, A K A Stone, mininggold, lucysmom (#47)
#57. To: war, A K A Stone (#55)
Where'd Skip go
#58. To: hondo68 (#57)
(Edited)
God turned him into a toad, for mocking creation?
#59. To: war (#56)
#60. To: war (#29)
#61. To: A K A Stone (#3)
Who said they weren't on the ark?
#62. To: Skip Intro (#61)
#63. To: no gnu taxes (#60)
#64. To: war (#63)
#65. To: A K A Stone (#64)
#66. To: war (#65)
#67. To: A K A Stone (#66)
#68. To: hondo68 (#54)
(Edited)
People did not call them 'dinosaurs' before the 1800s' because, the word was not yet inverted. They referred to them being 'monsters', and 'dragons', and 'leviathians' and other such names. The word (dragon or dragons) is mentioned 34 times in King James Bible.
#69. To: mininggold (#68)
Okay you convinced me since the Bible was written less than 2000 years ago they should be all around here. I think I'll going out dinosaur hunting tomorrow instead of buying chicken on sale. Maybe I should check in with the Fish and Game to ask when the season starts though.
#70. To: A K A Stone (#69)
<2000 lol what a fool you are.
#71. To: mininggold (#70)
Want to join me?
#72. To: A K A Stone (#71)
quit flirting with me. I'm happily married.
#73. To: mininggold (#72)
#74. To: A K A Stone (#73)
(Edited)
Ever see that sea dinosaur those Japanese fishermen brought on board?
#75. To: mininggold (#74)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]