An Artist Protests Obamas Abuse of the Constitution (Video)
Author: Brian Bolduc
Artist & Narrator: Jon McNaughton
A man, crestfallen, is sitting on a bench in front of the White House, contemplating his countrys future. At his feet lie the causes of his distress: tattered dollars, representing a weak currency, and scraps of paper, symbolizing an abused Constitution. Behind and around him stand the 43 presidents of the United States, most of whom are outraged. One of them, James Madison, reaches pitifully for the ground, trying to collect the shards of American greatness. Unfortunately, he cant retrieve our founding document from the dust, for its beneath the foot of Barack Obama.
The title of this portrait is The Forgotten Man, and its creator is Jon McNaughton, a 42-year-old artist from Spanish Fork, Utah. McNaughton unveiled the piece last Tuesday with a video describing its origin and a website explaining its meaning. For a long time, I didnt know if I wanted to paint this picture, because I worried that it might be too controversial, McNaughton intones in the video. Now, however, hes courting controversy.
The Forgotten Man
A husband and father of six, McNaughton graduated in 1993 from Brigham Young University, where he studied art and design. Today, he runs the McNaughton Fine Art Company, which offers mostly landscapes and Biblical images for retail. McNaughton models his work after the French Barbizon Impressionists, artists in the mid19th century who painted scenes from the countryside in subtle shades. That said, theres nothing subtle about his latest creation.
McNaughton first conceived of the portrait after Obamacare became law in March. I was just frustrated with what was happening with Obama and the out-of-control spending, he tells NRO. As an artist, I thought this was a way to get my message out.
What is that message? I wondered, If the presidents of the past could speak to us today, what would they say to us? McNaughton explains. Clearly, they would oppose the unprecedented expansion of government. Yet the focus of the painting is the forgotten man the ordinary American. If that man doesnt get off his bench and try to change whats going on in our country . . . were on the verge of bankruptcy. That was the point I wanted to make, he says.
On McNaughtons website, you can move your cursor over the faces in the painting and read an idiosyncratic summation of each presidents tenure. Yes, each of them. For instance, George Washington, whos front and center, instituted the First Bank of the United States in 1791. But even Rutherford B. Hayes, whos in the nosebleed section, gets a blurb for increasing the governments supply of gold.
Working twelve-hour days, McNaughton spent five months researching the portrait, reading everything from Wikipedia to history books. I tried to focus on the fiscal spending of these different presidents and how it has to do with the devaluing of the dollar, he notes. I didnt go into civil rights or war.
His educational forays led him to some unconventional conclusions. For example, McNaughton criticizes the Founders for their fiscal profligacy. Our founding fathers werent adept at managing debt either, he writes on the website. In 1791, the national debt was a mere $75 million. But that is equivalent to $5.2 trillion in 2008 dollars. To be fair to the Founders, though, a revolutionary war is kind of expensive.
Despite McNaughtons good faith, the Left will censure him, and he knows it. He did his first overtly political portrait last October. Entitled One Nation under God, it shows Jesus Christ holding the Constitution while surrounded by figures from American history. The painting drove liberals bonkers. Comedian Bill Maher dubbed it Wheres Waldo for wing nuts.
I did go to the Huffington Post to see what they said, McNaughton reports. They reminded me of a junior-high-school locker room. They all want to outdo each other with the grossest comment they can think of.
Still, McNaughton thinks the opposition to this painting will be different. Whereas for the previous portrait, a viewer can accept Christs authority only on faith, in this one, the facts are the facts. The people who trash the painting say, Oh, its just another right-wing Republican. But I dont feel my position is very threatened. I feel that the truth is just behind me. If people object to the portrayal of Obama stepping on the Constitution, McNaughton reasons, hell tell them everything Obamas done to deserve being characterized that way.
McNaughton knows his political background makes him a target. A former state delegate for the Utah Republican party, he now considers himself an independent. He left the GOP because of George W. Bush, who ruined the Republican party. Accordingly, in the portrait, Bush eyes the suffering man from afar distant in location and in feeling.
But McNaughton also knows hes got a hit. Hes already sold several prints, and his video has racked up over 170,000 views on YouTube. His video for One Nation under God after spending almost a year online has garnered more than 3 million views. At the rate The Forgotten Man is going, he expects it to surpass its predecessor in popularity.
Theyre quite the conversation pieces. People will have one hanging in their house and people will come in and theres so much to talk about, McNaughton says. In The Forgotten Man, McNaughton groups the presidents into two categories: those who oppose Obamas actions, such as Washington and Madison, and those who support them, such as Franklin Roosevelt and Bill Clinton. Viewers routinely object to the placement of their favorites in either category. Its fun to have people talk about it, he says.
He hopes to keep them talking. McNaughton just started a third portrait, which he plans to release by the end of the year. This one will be more religious in tone at least, more religious than The Forgotten Man though he hints that Ive got one painting [in mind] that might be affected depending on whether Obama runs for reelection.
Whether or not Obama runs, McNaughtons art has ensured that his message wont be ignored.
I am more than willing to consider other options if I heard actual IDEAS--not platitudes like "Do You Love Your Freedom." I want ideas...boring, dull, but meticulously thought-out ideas on these major issues. What is the Republican plan to bring back jobs, deal with what had been an unsustainable health care system, and end the war in Afghanistan? What is the Tea Party approach to these same topics? I want specifics!
The only way you will ever get answers to what it is you want is to first learn about the nation you live in, it's history, the men who fought, and died, for this nation, and why would they do such a thing...what was it they longed for so desperately that they'd give up every possession they had, their homes, their fortunes, and even their lives?
52 men signed the Declaration of Independence, the best way to understand what it is we fight for today, aquaint yourself with them. They knew, better than most, what was, and would be, in the minds of men like G.W.B and obama, and they did their best to warn us of these men, and women too.
These men were willing to, and all of them did, risked everything they had to help build a nation where men and women were free from the evil tyrany of kings and lords. Have you take a good look lately at what's wallowing at the trough of this government, do you think there is one royal pig among them that knows about or actually gives a rats ass about your homelife and desperate situations? I mean...puleeeze....
Today, if we were to come under some major attack that threatened to wipe out intire cities, there wouldn't be a one of those lazy, fat-cat cowards left in this country, because they are so fking wealthy they can call ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD their home....that means, they have no real loyaties here.
I believe that the only way we stand a chance to turn things around and put it right, is if we find people who put this nation and her people first, not who can accumulate the most un-godly amount of money, rip this nation apart, then run like hell with their booty.
Take a look at the men who actually did build this nation, then look what's at the helm today. Men like G.W. Bush and Obama, they'd be hangin from a yardarm if they talk the smack they do today, to these men....tar, feathers, the whole nine yards.
This nation isn't perfect, never was, never will be, and if you think loud mouthed community racketeers and their mafia extortionist can give this nation everything it wants...just remember this....
"A government big enough to give you what you want, is also big enough to take it all away"
sorry for the rant! This thing is an octopus, it's too big for one person to try and explain, and I'm not very good at it...but I do care.
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
Why don't you go back to that one thread. And answer the question. Then I will finish answering yours. You will get an answer.
I have answered your question on the other thread just today. Look at #233...
Stone, I think I know where you are on the abortion issue. Why I questioned it was because Murron thought that you and she were on the same page and that abortion in cases of rape or incest were understandable "exemptions" to the anti-abortion stance. But, as she noted, Stone should speak for himself. And I asked you to do just that. You didn't. You went into a fencing match with me instead, deciding that you had to set parameters before you would answer. It was all about setting me up for a fall, and I don't play those games. I simply wanted a non-dramatic discussion and since Murron thought that the two of you were on the same page, I wanted to see confirmation, because I doubted it.
From what I remember from previous, unrelated posts, Stone, you believe that abortion, in any instance, is wrong--even in cases of rape or incest. I know there's a philosophical battle here--whose rights should be supreme...the rape/incest victim's or the cells that will quickly form into a human life. It's a fencing match. I believe you would base yours on "absolutes" (a sperm has hit egg) and I would base mine on "conditions" (has the egg implanted into the uterus [which is the standard definition of pregnancy since many fertilized eggs pass out of a woman's system]...how far along is the development, etc.).
Abortion is a tough subject and, if we're insightful enough it makes us look at our own underpinnings and compassion. How many of us have really had honest "sex" talks with our kids? Do we know what they're doing and thinking about? Do we listen or do we just offer up "lectures"? How many of us have adopted kids from pregnant teenagers? How many of us have adopted kids from pregnant teenagers who were raped by a family member? How many of us have adopted kids from girls who thought so little of themselves that they became addicted to substances--and so did their babies? These, too, are tough questions. Where are the answers?
Stone, I'm so grateful to the people who taught me about personal responsibility and self-esteem (thinking well enough of myself that I didn't fall for some horny guy's line) and for access to birth control when I made the decision to become sexually active. I do make a contribution in that arena--as best I can.
So, here we are, Stone. I haven't exactly answered your question and you haven't exactly answered mine. You can ban will or whatever; it's your choice, it's your site. I think I have a "reasonable" point of view to be considered, but perhaps you do not. It's your choice.
In total, I respect your right as the owner of this site, and I honor my own right to free speech. As a parting note, I will say that I have been reasonably respectful (I am a Southern lass) along the way.
I'm sorry, Murron, since I mentioned you I meant to include you in the posting list. It wasn't a slight (since, geez, I didn't post anymore else, either), but simply the ferocity of typing. Please forgive me.
I'm sorry, Murron, since I mentioned you I meant to include you in the posting list. It wasn't a slight (since, geez, I didn't post anymore else, either), but simply the ferocity of typing. Please forgive me.
Think nothin of it...I didn't think that at all, but you owe me a drink...&;-)
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
I don't want to...but it may be forced upon me. And, golly, I so would like to share reviews with you about "Secretariat" the movie. I still think that anyone who is going through a bad day--or bad stretch--should watch Secretariat in the Belmont. It has to make you think that "all things are possible."
I still think that anyone who is going through a bad day--or bad stretch--should watch Secretariat in the Belmont
I can't get to the races like I used to, but we have OTB here...but my everyday joy is to go outside and watch the 5 horses, two (awesome) mules, and a colt (stallion), from my front porch....a little piece of heaven.
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
I still think that anyone who is going through a bad day--or bad stretch--should watch Secretariat in the Belmont. It has to make you think that "all things are possible."
Secretariat had a big heart, literally. So did Native Diver.
Brian this is for stone, going to use this posting scar to address him. Ping him of you would please, thank you.
I just read a letter from Neil at 4UM. I asked if you, Stone could of killed the posting screen and caused that disgusting pop-up, he said no, so I have to give you the benefit of doubt on this point. He noted spyware could cause this, and though I'm careful; that certainly might be the case.
Suffice it to say though, the deletions and bullying; your total lake of empathy and consideration for anyone not of your political stripe breeds this distrust and dislike.
I am done with you here. I of course will hound and eviscerate you at 4UM, but you asked for it, pal.
There is no chance for any thing less then this as things stand with your total lack of consideration and bully tactics. I hope you eventually grow up. Good luck and health to you and yours anyway. I just give as good as I get, I am sorry you went too far this time. But that is how it goes.
Brian this is for stone, going to use this posting scar to address him. Ping him of you would please, thank you.
I just read a letter from Neil at 4UM. I asked if you, Stone could of killed the posting screen and caused that disgusting pop-up, he said no, so I have to give you the benefit of doubt on this point. He noted spyware could cause this, and though I'm careful; that certainly might be the case.
Suffice it to say though, the deletions and bullying; your total lake of empathy and consideration for anyone not of your political stripe breeds this distrust and dislike.
I am done with you here. I of course will hound and eviscerate you at 4UM, but you asked for it, pal.
There is no chance for any thing less then this as things stand with your total lack of consideration and bully tactics. I hope you eventually grow up. Good luck and health to you and yours anyway. I just give as good as I get, I am sorry you went too far this time. But that is how it goes.
A request was made to ping you, stone, to this message.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
(I believe the number 5 is good luck in Japanese culture, right, Meguro?)
More so in Chinese culture than Japanese, really. The luckiness is associated with the five elements (water, wood, fire, earth and metal) in Chinese philosophy, and in turn was historically associated with the Emperor of China. For example, the Tiananmen gate, being the main thoroughfare to the Forbidden City, has five arches.
But a lot of what exists in Japanese culture today originated in China, so I'm sure some of the older, more traditional Japanese may consider 5 a lucky number too. For example, the five elements appear in the Japanese days of the week from Tuesday - Saturday. Tue (fire day/79;32;85;), Wed (water day/00;32;85;), Thu (wood day/08;32;85;), Fri (metal day/u29;32;85;), Sat (earth day/ß03;32;85;)