U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: An Artist Protests Obama’s Abuse of the Constitution (Video)
Source:
National Review
URL Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic ... -raises-his-brush-brian-bolduc
Published: Sep 19, 2010
Author: Brian Bolduc
Post Date: 2010-09-19 12:31:01 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 147471
Comments: 144
An Artist Protests Obama’s Abuse of the Constitution (Video) Author: Brian Bolduc Artist & Narrator: Jon McNaughton A man, crestfallen, is sitting on a bench in front of the White House, contemplating his country’s future. At his feet lie the causes of his distress: tattered dollars, representing a weak currency, and scraps of paper, symbolizing an abused Constitution. Behind and around him stand the 43 presidents of the United States, most of whom are outraged. One of them, James Madison, reaches pitifully for the ground, trying to collect the shards of American greatness. Unfortunately, he can’t retrieve our founding document from the dust, for it’s beneath the foot of Barack Obama. The title of this portrait is “The Forgotten Man,” and its creator is Jon McNaughton, a 42-year-old artist from Spanish Fork, Utah. McNaughton unveiled the piece last Tuesday with a video describing its origin and a website explaining its meaning. “For a long time, I didn’t know if I wanted to paint this picture, because I worried that it might be too controversial,” McNaughton intones in the video. Now, however, he’s courting controversy. The Forgotten Man A husband and father of six, McNaughton graduated in 1993 from Brigham Young University, where he studied art and design. Today, he runs the McNaughton Fine Art Company, which offers mostly landscapes and Biblical images for retail. McNaughton models his work after the French Barbizon Impressionists, artists in the mid–19th century who painted scenes from the countryside in subtle shades. That said, there’s nothing subtle about his latest creation. McNaughton first conceived of the portrait after Obamacare became law in March. “I was just frustrated with what was happening with Obama and the out-of-control spending,” he tells NRO. “As an artist, I thought this was a way to get my message out.” What is that message? “I wondered, ‘If the presidents of the past could speak to us today, what would they say to us?’” McNaughton explains. Clearly, they would oppose the unprecedented expansion of government. Yet the focus of the painting is the forgotten man — the ordinary American. “If that man doesn’t get off his bench and try to change what’s going on in our country . . . we’re on the verge of bankruptcy. That was the point I wanted to make,” he says. On McNaughton’s website, you can move your cursor over the faces in the painting and read an idiosyncratic summation of each president’s tenure. Yes, each of them. For instance, George Washington, who’s front and center, “instituted the First Bank of the United States in 1791.” But even Rutherford B. Hayes, who’s in the nosebleed section, gets a blurb for increasing “the government’s supply of gold.” Working twelve-hour days, McNaughton spent five months researching the portrait, reading everything from Wikipedia to history books. “I tried to focus on the fiscal spending of these different presidents and how it has to do with the devaluing of the dollar,” he notes. “I didn’t go into civil rights or war.” His educational forays led him to some unconventional conclusions. For example, McNaughton criticizes the Founders for their fiscal profligacy. “Our founding fathers weren’t adept at managing debt either,” he writes on the website. “In 1791, the national debt was a mere $75 million. But that is equivalent to $5.2 trillion in 2008 dollars.” To be fair to the Founders, though, a revolutionary war is kind of expensive. Despite McNaughton’s good faith, the Left will censure him, and he knows it. He did his first overtly political portrait last October. Entitled “One Nation under God,” it shows Jesus Christ holding the Constitution while surrounded by figures from American history. The painting drove liberals bonkers. Comedian Bill Maher dubbed it “‘Where’s Waldo’ for wing nuts.” “I did go to the Huffington Post to see what they said,” McNaughton reports. “They reminded me of a junior-high-school locker room. They all want to outdo each other with the grossest comment they can think of.” Still, McNaughton thinks the opposition to this painting will be different. Whereas for the previous portrait, a viewer can accept Christ’s authority only on faith, in this one, “the facts are the facts. The people who trash the painting say, ‘Oh, it’s just another right-wing Republican.’ But I don’t feel my position is very threatened. I feel that the truth is just behind me.” If people object to the portrayal of Obama stepping on the Constitution, McNaughton reasons, he’ll tell them everything Obama’s done to deserve being characterized that way. McNaughton knows his political background makes him a target. A former state delegate for the Utah Republican party, he now considers himself an independent. He left the GOP because of George W. Bush, who “ruined the Republican party.” Accordingly, in the portrait, Bush eyes the suffering man from afar — distant in location and in feeling. But McNaughton also knows he’s got a hit. He’s already sold several prints, and his video has racked up over 170,000 views on YouTube. His video for “One Nation under God” — after spending almost a year online — has garnered more than 3 million views. At the rate “The Forgotten Man” is going, he expects it to surpass its predecessor in popularity. “They’re quite the conversation pieces. People will have one hanging in their house and people will come in and there’s so much to talk about,” McNaughton says. In “The Forgotten Man,” McNaughton groups the presidents into two categories: those who oppose Obama’s actions, such as Washington and Madison, and those who support them, such as Franklin Roosevelt and Bill Clinton. Viewers routinely object to the placement of their favorites in either category. “It’s fun to have people talk about it,” he says. He hopes to keep them talking. McNaughton just started a third portrait, which he plans to release by the end of the year. This one will be more religious in tone — at least, more religious than “The Forgotten Man” — though he hints that “I’ve got one painting [in mind] that might be affected depending on whether Obama runs for reelection.” Whether or not Obama runs, McNaughton’s art has ensured that his message won’t be ignored. ONE NATION UNDER GOD 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Murron (#0)
Why do Christians hate sick people? Jesus was a healer. Would He say "tough shit" to someone who needed health care? Would He state that people should be healed by any means necessary? I really am sick to death of people wearing Christ on their sleeve while being so unwilling to have a modicum of compassion for the ill that would translate into assuring that they have access to medical care.
Apparently, it's absolutely wrong, wrong, wrong that kids with pre-existing conditions can now get health coverage. It ain't fittin'...It just ain't fittin'
You really should educate yourself to the alternatives to BIG BROTHER stepping in and taking over Suzanne, no one, especially me, wants to see any child turned down for for healthcare, yourr argument sucks, and it's a lie.
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
They were and are being turned down. What is your solution? To fret about it?
The insurance companies suck. Kids with pre-existing conditions were routinely turned down for coverage before health care reform; that was meant to stop this year with the phased-in approach to health care reform. However, the insurance companies are fighting hard and are saying that they are only forced to cover kids with pre-existing conditions if that child is already part of a family plan. The insurance companies are refusing to cover kids who are not part of a family plan. That's the truth.
They'll never get it. .
Kids with pre-existing conditions were routinely turned down for coverage before health care reform; that was meant to stop this year with the phased-in approach to health care reform. However, the insurance companies are fighting hard and are saying that they are only forced to cover kids with pre-existing conditions if that child is already part of a family plan. The insurance companies are refusing to cover kids who are not part of a family plan. That's the truth. You won't get an arguement out of me over that, they do suck, but the good part is, you have a CHOICE of whether you will take it, or not take it, and seek out another, but the feds WILL NOT give you a choice...except pay up or pay a fine, or even prison.... One of my sisters was terribly injured in the car accident that claimed the life of our mother, and unborn brother, she spent two years in a state charitable hospital, the feds had nothing to do with her healthcare...the state took care of their own.
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
You are such a lying, deliberately obfuscating asshole. I am really sick of assholes on the left deliberately misrepresenting Christ and communism. Thank God he'll put you and yours where you belong.
Well, [war's] got to do something for attention, his multiple personalities aren't speaking to him any more, and his imaginary friends keep finding excuses not to come over. (Murron)
I don't know how much "choice" insurance companies give you. If you have a pre- existing condition and aren't already part of a group plan, you've pretty much just joined the legions of the uninsurable. There are state risk pools for the uninsurable, but they're even costlier than private insurance. So, if you can't afford that, you're in trouble.
Yes
Ok say someone has a kid and the don't have healthcare. Say their kid gets sick and it costs a million dollars for coverage. Should they be able to go sign up for healthcare for 300 bucks a month or whatever. Then have the health care company take care of them?
We get it. You are a commie. We don't want commies.
You're asking me a question, Stone? I think not. You wouldn't answer my question on a previous thread. After that, you lost the privilege of me answering your questions. It's equitable.
I answered your question. Now answer mine before I lose my interest in having you post here. I don't like smart asses.
On the previous thread, you asked me a question and I answered it. Then I asked you a question and all you did was refuse to answer mine until I had, to your satisfaction, answered your "setting parameter" questions. It wasn't equitable and I refused to play. I'm not playing now, either.
I am always prepared to answer your question. But first we had to define some terms to make sure it is accurate. You're a smart ass. I changed your status to introductory. When you answer the question I will put it back to full. And if you take to long I will consider you a troll and delete you.
Jeeze, man, ease up. That's bullshit.
"Were you ever in the music or song writing business?" ... e_type_jagoff to Mudboy lol ..... AND ....... "But his decent into vile absurdity is still actually kind of sad and pitiful really" .... mad doggie
I asked her a simple question. She went smart ass.
If someone want someone wants to come here and participate in the discussions. That is fine. But when they are participating and they tell the host to basically fuck off they aren't good enough to get an answer. Then they get the reaction they get.
Exactly. Look at Stone's immature reaction to the HIV problem and his lack of compassion for sick - and mostly heterosexual people - in Africa. He's quick to be judgmental and narrow minded. When he speaks, he sounds as intolerant and cruel as his stereotype he believes resembles the average Muslim in the world. He talks the Christian line, but he does not walk the walk.
Traditionally, on these sites, the host isn't supposed to use their ability to ban to shape the discussion. You should have an admin name, and never discuss anything with that, and a discussion name. And then no one should know they are the same person. Anyhoo, do whatever you like. It is amusing to me at least.
"Were you ever in the music or song writing business?" ... e_type_jagoff to Mudboy lol ..... AND ....... "But his decent into vile absurdity is still actually kind of sad and pitiful really" .... mad doggie
He goes zero to scary crazy in 1.1 seconds. This world is full of religious intolerance, and the Christian contingent certainly has it's share of cultural jihadists. Look at 'the Order,' a group of behind the scenes fundies that work to pass laws throwing people in prison or kill them if they are not Norman Rockwell portrait grade heterosexuals. Or the Ted Haggard sort of talk trash about gays and then get meth up the rear with the help of his male masseuse. This is a world where it's not whether you are a decent person who believes into doing unto others as you would have them do unto you. To many people narrow minded about their faith, be it whatever major religion it is, the Golden Rule actually means,'he who has the gold makes the rules.' This is sad. And I don't like extremists who are Muslims, Christians, Jews or whatever. When they are wrong they need to be called on their B.S no matter who they are organizationally.
Stone the good 'Christian' deleted my truthful post about his Ziofundism and lack of following Jesus's teachings as shown by his behaviors. It's not like it's not here for everyone to see.
I was expecting the demonstration of immaturity from him. I'm in no way surprised.
He goes zero to scary crazy in 1.1 seconds. This world is full of religious intolerance, and the Christian contingent certainly has it's share of cultural jihadists. It seems rather obvious he has accepted Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot rather than Christ.
These types always need to have someone to beat up on. Always
The state of California will too - after the family has gone through its assets. Health care vs financial ruin - some choice!
In California the state will pay, however, the parents have to legally abandon their child.
It sounded more like "what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander" to me.
Suzanne is one of the nicest persons on the internet. She tries to be friendly to all - even in the face of overwhelming stupidity. And if the internet pisses you off this much, maybe you shouldn't be on it. IN no way, shape or form was #15 a smart ass answer. It's Suzanne giving you an evenly stated yet resounding slap in the manner in which YOU "debate".
Chuckles...if I'm a commie then that must make you a......moron.
Challenge. NATIONS will be judged Stone... There is no doubt in my mind that you know nothing of Jesus.
How is ensuring that sick people are healed Communism?
Jesus is going to send me to hell because I want the sick healed?
Nah, just a bully. I'm putting him on bozo for a while, or permanently. I would never answer his questions anyway he's such an infant about it, so why not?
Better watch yourself. Ruddy and Nebu are making up lists of who should be liquidated once the TP'ers win.
Several of my articles are mysteriously disappearing as of late.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
Comments (41 - 144) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestMcNaughton first conceived of the portrait after Obamacare became law in March. “I was just frustrated with what was happening with Obama and the out-of-control spending
#2. To: war (#1)
Jesus was a healer. Would He say "tough shit" to someone who needed health care?
#3. To: Suzanne (#2)
#4. To: Murron (#3)
(Edited)
....no one, especially me, wants to see any child turned down for for healthcare, yourr argument sucks, and it's a lie.
#5. To: Murron (#3)
yourr argument sucks, and it's a lie.
#6. To: Suzanne (#5)
(Edited)
#7. To: Suzanne (#5)
(Edited)
The insurance companies suck.
#8. To: war (#1)
#9. To: Murron (#7)
but the good part is, you have a CHOICE of whether you will take it, or not take it, and seek out another,
#10. To: war (#1)
Jesus was a healer. Would He say "tough shit" to someone who needed health care?
#11. To: Suzanne (#5)
#12. To: war (#6)
They'll never get it.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#11)
Then have the health care company take care of them?
#14. To: Suzanne (#13)
#15. To: A K A Stone (#14)
Now answer mine
#16. To: Suzanne (#15)
(Edited)
#17. To: A K A Stone (#16)
#18. To: Abu el Banat (#17)
#19. To: Abu el Banat (#17)
#20. To: war (#1)
"I really am sick to death of people wearing Christ on their sleeve while being so unwilling to have a modicum of compassion for the ill that would translate into assuring that they have access to medical care."
#21. To: A K A Stone (#19)
#22. To: A K A Stone (#19)
#23. To: Abu el Banat (#21)
#24. To: Ferret Mike (#20)
#25. To: mininggold (#24)
#26. To: Ferret Mike, All (#24)
#27. To: mininggold (#26)
#28. To: Ferret Mike (#25)
#29. To: Ferret Mike (#27)
I was expecting the demonstration of immaturity from him. I'm in no way surprised.
#30. To: Murron (#7)
...she spent two years in a state charitable hospital, the feds had nothing to do with her healthcare...the state took care of their own.
#31. To: A K A Stone (#11)
Say their kid gets sick and it costs a million dollars for coverage.
#32. To: A K A Stone (#19)
But when they are participating and they tell the host to basically fuck off they aren't good enough to get an answer. Then they get the reaction they get.
#33. To: A K A Stone (#16)
(Edited)
#34. To: A K A Stone (#12)
#35. To: A K A Stone (#10)
Yes
#36. To: Rudgear (#8)
#37. To: Rudgear (#8)
Thank God he'll put you and yours where you belong.
#38. To: war (#34)
"Chuckles...if I'm a commie then that must make you a......moron."
#39. To: war (#37)
Jesus is going to send me to hell because I want the sick healed?
#40. To: mininggold, Ferret Mike, War, All (#26)
Stone the good 'Christian' deleted my truthful post...
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]