Title: Pressure Mounts For Moderate Republicans To Support the DREAM Act (McStain's - Megan and Juan) Source:
Firedoglake URL Source:http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/72094 Published:Sep 18, 2010 Author:kyledeb Post Date:2010-09-18 22:35:14 by Hondo68 Ping List:*Border Invasion*Subscribe to *Border Invasion* Keywords:Illegal Alien, Invasion, Amensty Views:20219 Comments:24
Senator George LeMieux (R-FL) is starting to feel the heat of pro-migrant voters, specifically Latino voters. Tonight, Univision will air a debate in which current Florida governor and U.S. Senate nominee Charlie Crist will come out in support of the DREAM Act. The day before yesterday, Representive Kendrick Meek (D-FL), and also a nominee for U.S. Senate, hand delivered a letter to LeMieux. This part of Meek's letter says it all:
It is important to note that the State of Florida stands much to gain from the passage of this legislation. By alowing certain youths an opportunity at a solid education and a pathway to citizenship, we can stop the current cycle of immigrant poverty and break the social caste systems that discourage economic and personal growth. Passage of the legislation will also help reduce high school dropout rates, boost college attendance and increase the poll of nurses, teachers, highly qualified recruits for the U.S. armed forces, and other high-need areas of our workforce.
Further, Florida has had a standing tradition of bi-partisan support for immigration reform with Senators Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez helping lead the way with their sponsorship of the DREAM Act. On the House side the legislation enjoys bi-partisan support with eight Florida members currently signed on as co-sponsors.
Seven Republicans voted for the DREAM Act in 2007: Bob Bennett (R-UT), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Susan Collins (R-ME), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX), Richard Lugar (R-IN), and Olympia Snowe (R-ME). If they refuse to vote for the exact same bill in 2010 they will expose themselves as the "party of no" that Democrats have accused them of. It is bigger than just the 2010 elections, though. If the Republicans do not vote in favor of getting the DREAM Act passed, now, they will turn off an entire generation of Latino voters.
If the Democrats are playing politics with the DREAM Act, so be it. Moderate Republicans should not let politics get in the way of the lives of millions of migrant youth, or the lives of the voters in the communities that undocumented youth are intertwined with, for that matter. I personally can say that as furious as I've been at Democrats for tearing apart our communities with over a thousand deportations a day, they've got me focused on Republican votes and the upcoming elections, right now, like I've never been before.
If my senator from Massachusetts, Scott Brown (R-MA), votes against the DREAM Act I will work harder than I've ever worked on anything like this before to get him replaced with a pro-migrant Senator in 2012. As Latino migrant youth leader Carlos Saavedra said in the New York Times "Our people will remember in November. They will be ready to reward or punish."
Poster Comment:
Note the Mexican flag behind McAmnesty.
What is that on Megans left index finger, a magic 8 ball?
Should businesses have the freedom to hire whoever they want without government intervention, or do you favor policies that subject business to government control and restrict their freedoms?
Why are you giving support to the invasion of this country by a country that has a very recent record of RACISM and GENOCIDE against its own racial minorities (the Mayan Native Americans) using GUN CONTROL LAWS, Very European of Mexico if I do say myself. (Europe INVENTED "gun control" as a genocide enablement method while falsely calling it a "crime control" measure.)
Should businesses have the freedom to hire whoever they want without government intervention, or do you favor policies that subject business to government control and restrict their freedoms?
A good question. It's not businesses job to enforce immigration, tax, or any other legislation. So they should be free to hire whomever they want.
It's the governments job to "protect the States against invasion", and enforce immigration law including deporting illegal aliens. Ike rounded em up and shipped them to Puerto Vallarta, way down in central Mexico. Not so easy to return that way. The US Army should be on the border fighting the invasion, rather than on the Syran, Korean, etc. borders.
The hundreds of thousands of federal desk jockeys should be out rounding up illegal aliens. After they're done there will be lots of extra jobs in the private sector, so lay about 90% of them off. It will be quite a shock to them to have to work for a living, but they'll adjust.
Should businesses have the freedom to hire whoever they want without government intervention, or do you favor policies that subject business to government control and restrict their freedoms?
Should businesses have the freedom to hire whoever they want without government intervention, or do you favor policies that subject business to government control and restrict their freedoms by forcing them to hire minorities and women over more qualified white men?
