United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Brian S: Over 40 continuous posts...Let's change the name from LF to "Brain's leftist Site" shall we?
Source:
none
URL Source: http://none
Published: Sep 16, 2010
Author: Me
Post Date: 2010-09-16 02:02:51 by Nebuchadnezzar
Keywords: None
Views: 83046
Comments: 130
What horse-shit is this? Look at the articles he posted. It was obviously a ploy to force to the bottom and off the front page all the anti-obama news of the day. Let's look at how fast he was posting: Post Date: 2010-09-15 19:26:48 by Brian S Post Date: 2010-09-15 19:26:52 by Brian S Post Date: 2010-09-15 19:26:55 by Brian S Post Date: 2010-09-15 19:27:07 by Brian S I could go on, but I won't. 4 and 3 seconds between posts???? He's not reading them and saying,"Man, I think we should debate this as it proves I was correct about X,Y and Z...". No way, He's literally posting within seconds of each post just to spam the site. He's spamming the site. He isnt' reading this stuff. Hell, he is just throwing as much shit against the wall trying to get rid of mine and other's posts. Mr. Stone, I respectfully as you to do something about this abuse of this great site. PS Thank you for all your work Mr. Stone. I know it's hard having to deal with the liberal BULLSHIT that eminates from Brians, GO65, etc, each and every day.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-62) not displayed.
.
.
.
#63. To: Brian S (#58)
(Edited)
When we were at Pipebomb, one person, Sunnyusa, accounted for 90% of the articles posted. I would post 3-4 articles a day that would send Boofer and others into a frenzy and Bill would delete them.
He doesn't have an insane hatred of Obama is going to be my guess.
I think Brian posted an article that wasn't heaped with glowing adjectives about Palin.
When I first got here, Nebby owned the sidebar. A typical article was: Baskin Robbins in Bumblefucksville To Lay-off 3 Workers. Then you'd read the article and learn that the store had been slated to close since 2005.
An insane adoration of Palin was my second guess.
Posting pro-obama material iirc.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
Hey...I WON!!!!
Even Goldi acknowledged my great works back in the day: I hope you keep posting, you find a lot of interesting stuff.
Thanks for the answer.
I will give Tull and his squeeze props tho. On their front page they are fairly uneqivocal that they value their right to association over free speech. You can't quibble over a banning when they say that up front.
I never found Pipebomb. My first forum experience was on FR and purged from there when the zionistas took over.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
Obsession with the number sixty-nine means you might be one of them there homo- sexuals. You might need the miracle product, Homo No Mo Anita Bryant talks about here:
Say what you want about her...she gave one of the BEST Playboy interviews a Moobat ever did.
True, and she does look nice in banana cream pie as well.
lol Let me assure you, there is no meaningful debate on the country on these sites. None. It's all a complete waste of time. Someday you'll realize this.
"Were you ever in the music or song writing business?" ... e_type_jagoff to Mudboy lol ..... AND ....... "But his decent into vile absurdity is still actually kind of sad and pitiful really" .... mad doggie
The interviews. That's the only reason I ever got that magazine.
"Were you ever in the music or song writing business?" ... e_type_jagoff to Mudboy lol ..... AND ....... "But his decent into vile absurdity is still actually kind of sad and pitiful really" .... mad doggie
And Hustler was for the cartoons.
You can't quibble over a banning when they say that up front. When I reread it and realized the whole site was set up as a social club I was kind of glad I didn't make the cut.
Darn it! I got readmitted. But I rarely post.
What a whiner.
I don't waste my time with egocentric, micromanaging piss-pots like you are with such a chore. And you are behind the learning curve in knowing how to even run a forum. You didn't even know that an interlocutor is, don't understand fair use, are too closed minded and temperamental for your own good and your idea of free speech is no toleration for views you hate the most. I would bet you as much as you want to lose that unless you put a knowledgeable and impartial manager in the moderator's chair and a couple of people under them if this place grew; someone who could keep the flow going and respectfully manage the ad hominem problem here, this place will be about this size for as long as you can endure seeing it failing. This is no attack, this is my blunt assessment. And as you can't handle the truth, I bet this irritates the dog snot out of you. And therein lies your problem; you are your own worst enemy. You need rules that even you are made to follow once you adopt them. Or this place will forever be just an exercise in running a forum worse then little boys play cowboys and Indians. Whore-mones acting up again...? Somebody chop down a tree with your favorite knothole in it...? Playing 'cowBOYs' and 'Indians' bad..huh..? I have an old set of 'Barbie Dolls'....you game...?
"I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
Who the hell do you think you are, you pompous arrogant fuck, to open your mouth and pass judgment (that no one but you gives a shit about) about this forum from your imbecilic point of view of the world, when you believe sitting in a tree like some fucking monkey is your life's purpose, moron? (By the way, the above paragraph is not an attack.) I don't believe Stone needs to know how to get banned from forums.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
In the old days, it was called a "protection racket".
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
chop down a tree with your favorite knothole in it...? These Westboro Baptists are SO sensitive to the slightest criticism, of their tree hugging and Qur’an burning!
The object of a protection racket isn't to kill off your mark by subsuming and quashing the truth.
Well, [war's] got to do something for attention, his multiple personalities aren't speaking to him any more, and his imaginary friends keep finding excuses not to come over. (Murron)
Well said. I agree. The point I was getting at was "Give it to us to control, or we'll destroy it." Seems this "small-time-nothing" of a website has garnered some attention from someone.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care. Pete, MD doesn't know or care what Palin says or writes, he'll support her no matter what.
I think I'm gonnna puke! Talk about really fked up priorities, they chain and tie themselves to trees to keep them from being ...tortured, torn limb from limb, or burned, and I'm supposed to drop what matters to me and CARE? Until the day this sick, twisted fk comes to the defense, or rescues a human baby from being torn limb from limb, or burned to death, or it's tiny little brains sucked out...he'll get nothing from me but utter contempt and loathing. Just as a trees have, these little ones had limbs, and roots, and would have had branshes too, if they had survived! Let this miserable creature sit in a linin closet, cradling a little one, dying from the effects of a fkied up abortion, suffering, gasping for breath, insuferable pain, un-loved....then get back to us how it felt... "I really wanna care. I wanna feel somethin'. Let me dig a little deeper:. No, My give-a-damn's busted"~ Messina Jo Dee
Oh bullshit. You come into the forum, insult the guy that granted you access, and now want to be self righteous about it. Hypocrite. If you don't like it, leave.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
You are funny, thanks for sharing the jester act. It is common for conservatives who can't answer specifics to attack the person writing them. Your flaming hardly is something I worry about, your judgment and attack is meaningless, other then that, have a nice weekend, you hear? ;-D
Mike I would really like a ferret coat. Do you have any furs you wanna sell?
Have your mama burp you Sonny, I don't do nurse maid work for the mentally infirmed like you. ;-)
Going for your master baiter rating? Gee, that is original; and when I originally first heard something that lame, it's been so long ago, and was so unimportant then as it is now, I can't recall. You are lame, and amusing too.
And of course moron, excuse me, murron I am against abortion too. So your point is...?
Her point is that you care more for trees then human beings. You have used your time to protect trees but wont do the same for the murdered babies. Making her and other normal good people wonder if you really are anti abortion of if you just want that issue taken off of the table.
And my point being she is an idiot who plagiarizes her posts with cut and paste to try to look more formidable, and someone took cut and paste, made an account after seeing the personal attacks over a meaningless throwaway account to eLPee Ms. little miss cut&paste 'miraculously' discovered. Therefore nothing she says to me has any credibility. It would behoove her to just stifle herself and put me on her killfile function list. Much of the time Stonie, ad hom attacks seek first and foremost to try to discredit the messenger instead of answering the message or specifics of the post. Your forum has a bad reputation ad a venue geared primarily to the ends of trying to cut people off at the knees instead of talking to them engaged in debate or lively discussion. And by the way, I am doing different activism as a focus then forest protection. But as you are not here not talking as a mature adult in good faith, it is not up for grabs to hear about merely to use to attack me as some allegedly bad person with your, 'so enough about your violent nature; how long have you beaten your wife' tactics you so immaturely love. You just prove here I was spot on in my assessment of your forum. And in a word, that is all I care about in reference to this series of exchanges with your Confederacy of dunces and you.
So we can look forward to hearing of your anti abortion crusade in Eugene?
Nope. You are not putting me on the defensive with a contrived attack like this.
So your anti abortion position seems to be a ruse so you wont take the flack for being for baby killing. You will sit in a tree. But no stand taken against your fellow liberals against baby murder. Telling indeed.
Got a deal for you Mike. If you talk one person out of an abortion. I will plant 10 trees. I'll even take pictures to prove it to you.
As I said, you care more about trying to accomplish character assassination, and no matter what I say regarding anything will change your focus to make personal attacks rather then to discuss the motive for this. Which is the specifics of my criticism of your forum and what it needs to grow and flourish. Your posting is personal attack, and you should be ashamed you are using the blood of aborted children to make a go at me. That is the only pertinent association this focus now on the issue of abortion has with what you are saying to me as you vainly try to assassinate my character. I am not giving my power away by losing my cool Stone. You are not putting me on the defensive, nor are you going to anger me.
Comments (103 - 130) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#64. To: Fred Mertz (#60)
Why did Tull ban you at 4um?
#65. To: war (#64)
He doesn't have an insane hatred of Obama is going to be my guess.
#66. To: Skip Intro (#62)
(Edited)
#67. To: mininggold (#65)
#68. To: Fred Mertz (#60)
#69. To: Brian S, mininggold (#68)
#70. To: Brian S (#58)
I think that is a bit of an stretch but I did post quite a few articles and helped establish the site.
And the Conservative plan to create jobs is......?????
#71. To: Brian S (#68)
#72. To: mininggold (#65)
#73. To: war (#63)
#74. To: war (#69)
#75. To: Ferret Mike (#74)
(Edited)
Anita Bryant
#76. To: war (#75)
#77. To: Rudgear (#54)
here to disrupt debate on the destruction of the country.
#78. To: war (#75)
#79. To: Abu el Banat (#78)
#80. To: war (#72)
I will give Tull and his squeeze props tho. On their front page they are fairly uneqivocal that they value their right to association over free speech.
#81. To: mininggold (#80)
#82. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
#83. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
He's always done this since 2002 at eLPee. Personally, I wouldn't post an article here to save my life after the disrespectful censoring of the real article title of the Westboro Baptist Church piece by you, Mr. Blah blah blah.
#84. To: Ferret Mike (#29)
(Edited)
I could be cruel and laugh as Stone and mock how badly his forum is doing,
or I can be blunt and give him the benefit of my fifteen years plus experience with forums.
#85. To: Rudgear (#54)
One will plant either objectionable or illegal content and then dog-pile the thread, exclaiming 'this is intolerable. You need a moderator on this site. We offer our services'.
#86. To: Murron, Ferret Mike (#83)
the Westboro Baptist Church
#87. To: Wood_Chopper (#85)
In the old days, it was called a "protection racket".
#88. To: Rudgear (#87)
(Edited)
The object of a protection racket isn't to kill off your mark by subsuming and quashing the truth.
#89. To: hondo68, Ferret Mike, A K A Stone (#86)
"are SO sensitive to the slightest criticism, of their tree hugging and Qur’an burning"!
#90. To: Ferret Mike (#45)
#91. To: Wood_Chopper (#84)
#92. To: Ferret Mike (#91)
#93. To: Badeye (#90)
#94. To: A K A Stone (#92)
(Edited)
#95. To: Murron (#89)
#96. To: Ferret Mike (#95)
#97. To: A K A Stone (#96)
(Edited)
#98. To: Ferret Mike (#97)
#99. To: A K A Stone (#98)
#100. To: Ferret Mike (#99)
#101. To: All (#100)
#102. To: A K A Stone (#100)
(Edited)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]