Religion
See other Religion Articles
Title: Sharia for Dummies: Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf Claims US Constitution Is Sharia Compliant
Source:
Big Peace
URL Source: http://bigpeace.com/ndarwish/2010/08/26/sharia-for-dummies/
Published: Sep 8, 2010
Author: Nonie Darwish
Post Date: 2010-09-08 10:54:02 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 127288
Comments: 128
Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf Claims That the US Constitution Is Sharia Compliant Now let us examine below a few laws of Sharia to see if Imam Rauf is truthful or a fraud: 1- Jihad defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule. 2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force. 3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape. 4- A percentage of Zakat (alms) must go towards jihad. 5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust. 6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male. 7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph in one case, if he rejects Islam. 8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately. 9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of : 1) an apostasy 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Making vigilante street justice and honor killing acceptable. 10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim. 11- Sharia never abolished slavery and sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave. 12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging and other forms of cruel and unusual punishments even for crimes of sin such as adultery. 13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims and must comply to Sharia if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he commits adultery with a Muslim woman or if he leads a Muslim away from Islam. 14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. However, the opposite is not true for Muslims. 15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim. 16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed. 17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or a bathhouse attendant. Women in such low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce. 18- A non-Muslim cannot rule even over a non-Muslims minority. 19- Homosexuality is punishable by death. 20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls under Sharia. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and consummated at age 8 or 9. 21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home. 22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it. 23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death. 24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits. 25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and she has no right to divorce him even if he is polygamous. 26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs. 27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled. 28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man. 29- A woman looses custody if she remarries. 30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses. 31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim. 32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Some schools of Sharia allow the face and some don’t. 33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife caught in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women since he “could be married to the woman he was caught with.” The above are clear cut laws in Islam decided by great Imams after years of examination and interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Mohammed’s life. Now let the learned Imam Rauf tell us what part of the above is compliant with the US constitution?
Poster Comment: And we haven't even touched on these laws, if broken by a non-muslim (you and me), will be enforced! I have a feeling that if these laws were to ever take effect here in the U.S., most of us will just bypass our First Amendment, and just go straight to our Second.... BLOAT!! Lock n Load....
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 120.
#20. To: All, Sharia law, courts likely on 2010 ballot (#0)
Oklahoma Set to Ban Sharia, Muslims Not Happy June 8, 2010 Oklahoma lawmakers have seen the light, and are looking to follow in the footsteps of Louisiana and ban Sharia Law. This is a great step in our war with Islam. The reason is that, not only does it protect us from Islam, it will also expose the pro-Sharia Muslims. Personally I would like to take it one step further though. After the law is passed, I would arrest and deport if possible, any Muslim that calls for Sharia Law. All Sharia loving Muslims are to be looked upon as enemies of the state, just like Nazis were. Sharia law, courts likely on 2010 ballot Mark Schlachtenhaufen The Edmond Sun EDMOND — State lawmakers say it’s a pre-emptive strike against Sharia law, needed to prevent here what has happened in the United Kingdom. An Islamic leader says it’s another example of a rising tide of anti-Islamic bigotry in America. State Question 755, which likely will be on the ballot in November, would make in-state courts rely on federal and state laws when deciding cases and forbid courts from using international law or Sharia law when making rulings. The proposal, which has an Edmond connection, would amend Article 7, Section 1 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and stems from House Joint Resolution 1056, dubbed the “Save Our State” amendment, passed during the just-finished legislative session. State Rep. Lewis Moore, R-Edmond, a co-author of HJR 1056, said he wanted to express his support very early for the legislation, which is needed because of the “onslaught” coming Oklahoma’s way. “I don’t think we should accept or encourage Sharia law in any way, shape or form,” Moore said. State Rep. Rex Duncan, R-Sand Springs, primary author of HJR 1056, said Oklahoma is the first state to pass such legislation and he hopes other states will follow. Duncan, an attorney who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, said the amendment is needed because judges in other states and on the federal bench have increasingly cited international law in their decisions. He said he feels that action is inappropriate in a sovereign state. Duncan said Sharia law is entrenched in the United Kingdom. “It is a cancer upon the survivability of the UK,” Duncan said. “SQ 755 will constitute a pre-emptive strike against Sharia law coming to Oklahoma.” State Sen. Anthony Sykes, R-Moore, a co-author of HJR 1056, said American courts are being more frequently challenged that international law should trump U.S. law. “Sharia law coming to the U.S. is a scary concept,” Sykes said. “Hopefully the passage of this constitutional amendment will prevent it in Oklahoma.” Council on American-Islamic Relations spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said he has been working on Muslim civil rights issues for several decades and anti-Islam rhetoric is approaching “Nazi-like” levels. “This is just the flip side of the anti-Semitic coin,” Hooper said. Hooper said Duncan is voicing a misconception of Sharia, which is based on the Quran, the traditions of Muhammad and interpretation of scripture, that it is comparable to laws related to other religions. Regarding unintended consequences, Hooper wondered aloud what the amendment would mean for Muslims who want to wear a scarf in a driver’s license photo, for Muslims who want to pray in the workplace, if Muslims attending Oklahoma’s public schools will be forced to eat pork. Saad Mohammed, director of Islamic information for the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City, said 80 percent of the U.S. Constitution is compatible with Sharia, which leads to justice and equality for all. Mohammed said extremists have distorted Sharia. “Sharia is more of a protection than something used to oppress,” Mohammed said. Razi Hashmi, of Edmond, executive director of CAIR-Oklahoma, said the Sharia law proposal is a distraction from more urgent issues facing the state such as the economy, job creation and immigration. Hashmi said the proposal is a way of promoting division and bigotry instead of promoting unity and understanding of other faiths and cultures.
Hoo-RAH!! An Islamic leader says it’s another example of a rising tide of anti-Islamic bigotry in America. F*** you, rag head boy-effers and satanic cultists. AMERICANS AND OUR LAWS CALL THE SHOTS HERE - NOT IMAMS. Excuuuuuse us for hating E-V-I-L.
Hey fellows, please watch the video I just posted. Jezzzzus, Islamic muslims are out of control in Europe, and they do have their focus on the U.S.... My daughter and 3 of my g-kids live in Illinois, and I am terrified for them...not me, but for them. I repeat myself! BLOAT! Lock n Load, if you live anywhere near where these lunatics maybe, or soon will be! Stay safe! They have been such a protected species for so long, their angry, violent arogance knows no bounds....
Is there any other kind?
Praise Jezzzzus, the Holy Grail and Holy Hand Grenades; (not to mention Frenchmen farting in someone's general direction,) you are right. Murron has helped us see the light, Muslims are Islamic. Why, this could be a Revelation that sparks lots of other insight. For example, it could mean, Christians are followers of Jezzzzus. Though, Murron, I think there are actually only three 'Z's in the son of the Cosmic Muffin's name.
I hope you are just having some fun, but if your intentions are to join war and flame me all over LF....don' fk with me, Annica!
I assume that is your name. ;-D
OK..lol, I've stopped laughing, I was at your post, but looking up at freds...aha Anyway...wanna tell me why you would assume that is my name? Proceed...
You tell me, you used it in your post.
Ok! I do quite a bit of research, but I don't use google, for several reasons, most know you can't find hardly anything anymore. Over the years I've used several, very good, deep digging search engines, they go to places that even supposed to be invisable. In my search for everything I could dig up on radical islamist, shariah law..and the likes, I came upon the quaintest site...it was there that the name caught my eye...I never saw such...ambiance and charm. Lovely, eh?
And this site is?
Satisfied? &;-)
I sent the link to you again, did you get it?
Actually, the problem is, you don't.
I'll give you a chance to back off, then I will filter you.
Sweet heart, If you want to use the killfile function, you do not need my permission. You started this, and I've only been responding to you. Figure it out. Michael Joseph McCarthy
Haven't heard that term in years... She's infamous for doing that. Pinging you into a conversation and then melting down. Believe me, it's only a matter of time before she flees entirely for a week or so...and then comes back...extremely bi-polar.
She seems to think I hate her. I don't invest that kind of energy in forums toward other posters anywhere. In any event, it's her dime. If she wants to take me on, she is welcome to try.
I actually like her. She has a refreshing naivete that I find charming in a way.
She doesn't get it. When one encounters another interlocutor in forum, you assume they have the grit and thick enough skin to take what they dish out. She can cry I'm a mean person all she wants, but in truth, she obviously has no idea just how formidable I can be. And it would behoove her not to find out.
You g-damn gender confused fked up faggot. You want I should let everyone else here in on what I stumbled upon while researcing for a couple of theads I started, but decided to let you know in private....you thanked me for the 'heads up', then had the unmidigated fking gall to treaten to sue me... You, you g-damn lousy leftest POS, go around threatening members with lawsuits and turning them into the Secret Service because of some image they post on web- sites you take offence to? Yo DARE continue to mouth off about me when I asked you to fking back off? OK! I'm here, whatcha want, then I'll show what I got!
By all means, explain this. I have zero Idae of which you speak. I have never, ever talked to the Secret Service, the FBI, the CIA, or even Batman. Well, I may have flirted with batgirl, but hey; I'm only human.
Take that one up with Goldi biatch, the thread is still up and you got your fudgepacking ass sacked because of it.
Actually, she took issue with an anti minuteman article I posted and banned me. Show me the alleged Secret Service thing. The article of which I speak and was banned for is still there. Do a serch of Ferret Mike, and it will be my last post there, duh.
The article of which I speak and was banned for is still there. Do a serch of Ferret Mike, and it will be my last post there, duh. #57. To: Corn Flake Girl, BANNING NOTICE (#54) I've read through your comments made recently on multiple threads, and I find a shocking theme. You are attempting to intimidate other LP members from speaking freely on this site, by invoking various law enforcement agencies in a manner that is akin to KGB operatives controlling the proletariat!! ANY attempt for censorship of any kind, including intimidation or veiled threats is anethema to Liberty Post and its entire purpose; it flies in the face of the First Amendment. It is 100% NOT acceptable here. Please take your educated, opinionated, and intimidating remarks over to a site that encourages that behavior. It is clear that you do not visit here to participate in the liberty of free and unfettered speech. I have terminated your account. Goldi-Lox posted on 2008-10-16 17:
I sure did not do what Goldi talks about. Do you have the alleged post to which she refers? because I sure have not talked to any authorities. Show me the evidence of which you make wild accusations over. Goldi is infamous for her wild, self serving hyperbole. This means nothing, except in your deluded head. Remember, I was the one who outed that account I used solely to talk to sneakypete and others I had not seen online for a long while. ;-)
Goldi is infamous for her wild, self serving hyperbole. This means nothing, except in your deluded head. Remember, I was the one who outed that account I used solely to talk to sneakypete and others I had not seen online for a long while. ;-) I'm sure you have a couple of girlyboys here who might like the smell of that!
I remember the tone of the posting history of that account if not the details. There was never any need to get irritated or excited. No point in acting like I had any investment in the place, so what you cite Goldi as claiming never happened. In fact, the last post I made there was a pleasant one to Palo Verde. What you have going against you is we al know Goldi, and we have all seen her act too many times to buy your hyperboyle. Besides, the only ban that matters is the last one as Ferret Mike. That is the account I was last there representing my opinions and in that one I posted the URL of teh article and she claimed the URL which takes you to right where I got it was a deception. Go figure, that's Goldi/Sally for you.
You LIE mike, you lie, spin, and backpaddle, anything, but you NEVER will own up to the truth, even with staring you in the face, well I'm fking sick of it, after this, you will go on filter, I only do this because you stab people in the back if they avoid you, so I'd like to leave a little food for thought that they can see for themselves...and what you spin your way out of it! But right now, I have a cake in the oven, I will be right back!
That is normal behavior for leftwingnut idiots.
NO..NO, it's worse than that, the damn engines runnin, but there's no one behind the wheel....lol
#121. To: Murron (#120)
They are all cowards.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHere is a little preview of how Sharia loving Muslims, will treat us infidels.
#24. To: Murron (#20)
(Edited)
State lawmakers say it’s a pre-emptive strike against Sharia law, needed to prevent here what has happened in the United Kingdom.
#27. To: Liberator, Ignore Amos (#24)
(Edited)
#33. To: Murron (#27)
Islamic muslims
#34. To: war, Murron (#33)
"Is there any other kind?"
#37. To: Ferret Mike (#34)
#39. To: Murron (#37)
#47. To: Ferret Mike (#39)
I assume that is your name. ;-D
#49. To: Murron (#47)
#53. To: Ferret Mike (#49)
You tell me, you used it in your post.
#55. To: Murron (#53)
"In my search for everything I could dig up on radical islamist, shariah law..and the likes, I came upon the quaintest site...it was there that the name caught my eye...I never saw such...ambiance and charm."
#56. To: Ferret Mike (#55)
#58. To: Ferret MIke (#56)
#59. To: Murron (#58)
#62. To: Ferret Mike (#59)
#64. To: Murron (#62)
"I'll give you a chance to back off, then I will filter you."
#67. To: Ferret Mike (#64)
killfile function...
#69. To: war (#67)
"She's infamous for doing that. Pinging you into a conversation and then melting down. Believe me, it's only a matter of time before she flees entirely for a week or so...and then comes back...extremely bi-polar."
#70. To: Ferret Mike (#69)
#72. To: war (#70)
#73. To: Ferret Mike, Mad Dog, ALL (#72)
(Edited)
And it would behoove her not to find out.
#78. To: Murron (#73)
"and turning them into the Secret Service because of some image they post on web- sites you take offence to?"
#81. To: Ferret Mike (#78)
By all means, explain this. I have zero Idae of which you speak. I have never, ever talked to the Secret Service, the FBI, the CIA, or even Batman. Well, I may have flirted with batgirl, but hey; I'm only human.
#83. To: Murron (#81)
"Take that one up with Goldi biatch, the thread is still up and you got your fudgepacking ass sacked because of it."
#84. To: Ferret Mike (#83)
Actually, she took issue with an anti minuteman article I posted and banned me. Show me the alleged Secret Service thing.
#91. To: Murron (#84)
#94. To: Ferret Mike (#91)
I sure did not do what Goldi talks about. Do you have the alleged post to which she refers? because I sure have not talked to any authorities. Show me the evidence of which you make wild accusations over.
#107. To: Murron (#94)
#114. To: Ferret Mike (#107)
#119. To: Murron, Ferret Mike, skippy (#114)
You LIE mike, you lie, spin, and backpaddle, anything, but you NEVER will own up to the truth,
#120. To: Ibluafartsky (#119)
That is normal behavior for leftwingnut idiots.
Replies to Comment # 120. there's no one behind the wheel....lol
End Trace Mode for Comment # 120.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]