Religion
See other Religion Articles
Title: (my title) An Islamic Practice: Temporary’ Marriage & Sex With 4 year old, Sodomizing; Masterbating on Child (no penetration) Who Did This? Video
Source:
Bare Naked Islam
URL Source: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/
Published: Sep 7, 2010
Author: na
Post Date: 2010-09-07 23:15:06 by Murron
Keywords: None
Views: 7637
Comments: 13
(my title) An Islamic Practice: Temporary’ Marriage & Sex with 4 year old, Sodomizing; Masterbating on Child (no penetration) Who Did This? Video Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, 1979-89, was attracted to the 4 year old daughter of a family he was visiting and asked the father if he could have her for a ‘temporary’ marriage. The father agreed, happily. The Ayatollah spent the night with the little girl, who was heard screaming and crying all night long. When asked about it the next day, he said,”there was no penetration, just grabbing, kissing, and thighing. ”Thighing” means masterbating between the legs of a female infant or actually sodomizing her. Thighing” is an Islamic practice still followed today even in Muslim communities in the U.S. and Britain. Khomeini Sexually Assaulting Crying and Screaming 4 year old Girl With Parents Consent
Poster Comment: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini "A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister." Bestiality Is there a proper Muslim way to have sex with animals? Indeed, there is! Guidelines for sex with animals can be found in the writings of Ayatollah Khomeini. Two excerpts from his writings serve to clarify the matter. "A man can have sex with sheep, cows and camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; however, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine." Khomeini's "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990 "If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as possible and burned."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#7. To: All (#0)
Sharia Law; Islamic Law~ Do yourselves a favor when you have the time, and research/read these laws muslims are expected to live by, and die by. These barbarians, they are a people who come here and expect Americans to respect their laws, and if they do get a foot hold here, they will demand we recognize their laws, and (your) the president, of what once was the freest nation upon this earth, he will go public and expect (maybe even make it a law) Americans to repect these same barbarians, and their laws, whether we live by them or not, we will see others suffer, but our hands will be tied. Well, all I have to say is, that skinny, bow-legged, nasty looking livered lip man who came out of nowhere, and I still don't know ZIP about him, not even if he's an America citizen, he'll have more luck getting blood from a turnip before I ever respect, or even recognize that perverted, barbaric, pagan religion. And if anyone here still thinks it cannot happen here, all I have to say is...if our men and women in uniform can help do this to Afghanistan and Iraq, they can do the same here at home, they will do what they are ordered to do, some won't, but many will do as they are ordered, that's a fact! jmho ~ Murron We have taken a tragically different course in Afghanistan and Iraq. Article One of the constitution of Afghanistan states that "Afghanistan is an Islamic Republic, independent, unitary and indivisible state." Article 2 of the constitution of Iraq states that: "Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation." Both states identify Islam as the bedrock of the state and also the law of the land. No law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established. -Article 2, A, constitution of Iraq In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam. -Article 3, constitution of Afghanistan Both Afghanistan and Iraq are Islamic states, as codified in their new American- supported constitutions. Sharia law is the law of Islam. Islamic law supersedes any laws in the constitution that are not Sharia law-compliant. Any review of the implementation of Sharia law anywhere in the world (or of Sharia itself) shows it to be brutal, cruel, misogynistic, anti-homosexual, anti-free speech, supremacist, anti-democratic, and anti-freedom of religion among its many unpleasant qualities. Even in Afghanistan as late as 2006, a Muslim Afghan convert to Christianity was sentenced to death for leaving Islam. Only American outrage prevented the implementation of the Sharia death penalty. Under Sharia law, leaving Islam is not permitted. It is considered a crime worse than murder and is punishable by death. A Sharia judge on the case commented at the time, "We are not against any particular religion in the world. But in Afghanistan, this sort of thing is against the law. It is an attack on Islam." The inherent contradiction between democracy and Islamic law did not go unnoticed by everyone, however. But, while democracy is taking root in Afghanistan, the country's constitution is not a truly secular document. -Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Sharia law is derived from the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, the three foundational documents of Islam. Sharia law therefore has the authority of both Allah and Mohammed, as it is the codification of their commands and the words, deeds, and example of the prophet. American support of this barbaric "legal system" anywhere on this planet is folly. Sharia law is antithetical to American concepts of freedom and democracy. What can be the reason why we have created two Islamic states founded upon American blood and treasure? Why did we take such a radically different approach to Iraq and Afghanistan from what we did with Japan after WW2? There is no overlap whatever between American concepts of decency and justice and Sharia law. Among the horrors of Sharia are death for criticism of Islam, death for leaving Islam, dhimmitude for non-Muslims living under Sharia, the near impossibility of rape victims to prove rape, wife-beating, child marriage, unequal rights for women, no legal rights for non-Muslims, and the subjugation of women. The list of Sharia's horrors is lengthy and disturbing. An illustration of Sharia from the definitive book of Sharia law, Reliance of the Traveller, is illustrative. The following are not subject to retaliation: a Muslim for killing a non-Muslim (o1.2(2)) a Jewish or Christian subject of the Islamic state for killing an apostate from Islam (O:because a subject of the state is under its protection, while killing an apostate from Islam is without consequences); (o1.2(3)) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring (o1.2(4)) Under Sharia law, there is no "retaliation" by the Islamic state against a Muslim who kills a non-Muslim for whatever reason. Can there be a more barbarous "legal" system that is more overtly opposed to our own concepts of right/wrong, good/evil, decency/barbarism, and justice/injustice? This is the system of "law" for which we fight in Iraq and Afghanistan? This is folly. No American who loves our Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed under it should accept Sharia law anywhere in this country or actively support it elsewhere. How can it be countenanced that American soldiers are told that they fight and die for "freedom" in Iraq and Afghanistan when in fact our soldiers fight to prop up two Sharia law states?
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]