At least, thats judging by the evidence in A Journey. Take, for example, the passage about President Obamas Cairo speech in June 2009. Blair acknowledges that it was a brilliant exposition of the case for peaceful coexistence with the Muslim world, and that the speech was carefully calibrated. But his tone rapidly changes to one of disapproval as he notes that President Obama offered the hand of friendship even to Syria and Iran. This passage is especially damning (even sarcastic): It was part an apology, and taken as such. The implicit message was: We have been disrespectful and arrogant; we will now be, if not humble, deeply respectful. But join us, if you will.
The trouble is: respectful of what, exactly? Respectful of the religion of Islam, President Obama would say, and that is obviously right; but that should not mean respectful of much of the underlying narrative which many within Islam articulate in its politics today.
Tony Blair neednt spell it out much more. The Cairo speech, he suggests, was misguided it made President Obama look apologetic and, consequently, the integrity of the United States seemed in some way compromised.
To my surprise, Blairs words about Barack Obama dont get much kinder: indeed, the only positive references to the US President in 717 pages - concern his abillity to reach out over
partisan divisions and his suasion in argument. But even the latter example implies that he doesnt have the simplicity in approach of George W. Bush.
And it is President Bush, as youd expect, who is heaped with praise. The most striking example is in late 2001, as the US President prepares to deliver a speech to Congress. He was unbelievably, almost preternaturally calm
I marvelled at it, looked carefully at him; but yes, he did appear completely at ease.
All of which, if he were to read A Journey, would probably not apply to President Barack Obama.