United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Why Do Some of You Dumbasses Prefer Obama Over Bush
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 28, 2010
Author: you are a dumbass
Post Date: 2010-08-28 11:31:43 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 56542
Comments: 99
Why do some of you idiots think Obama is God-like and Bush was Satan-like? What are you basing this on? War on Terror? Frankly, I see the Kenyan pretty much continuing Bush's policies (the one thing to his credit). Illegal Immigrants? Do you think the Bush Administration would be filing lawsuits against Arizona? Deficits? Obama is Bush x 10. Obama was absolutely AWOL during the Gulf oil crisis (yeah, he made token appearances that even the leftards found pathetic) yet you want to excoriate Bush personally because it took the Federal Government 72 hours to fully respond to a local situation in New Orleans. Do you realize what fucking idiots you are? Please just slink away and STFU.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-36) not displayed.
.
.
.
#37. To: jwpegler (#32)
Ron Paul isn't strongly pro life. If he was he would support constitutional amendment to protect the pre born.
Damn you're stupid. Where did you get that minningold likes Obama?
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
From her posts. She always defends him. Just like you like Obama. You constantly defend him. Same with war.
Prove it. Also prove you don't love Bush. And try to grasp how idiotic your "arguement" that minningold is a baby killer is, if you can.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
There wasn't any Constitutional amendment prior to 1973 and it wasn't a national issue. It only because a national issue when the Supreme Court overstepped it's bounds with the Roe decision in 1973. Paul is correct that abortion needs to go back to the states, as it was prior to Roe in 1973.
Not everyone is as fookin dense as you skippy!
No he is wrong. Murder is murder. Ron Paul is also weak on the faggots effort to redefin marriage into perversion.
Murder isn't a states rights issue.
Don't get me wrong I like Ron Paul. He is great on most issues. I think his son Rand is maybe a little better though.
You're never going to get a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion. But, if you can overturn Roe, the decision will go back to the states. A majority of states will put various restrictions on abortion. Some states will almost completely outlaw it. We can save some kids or we can let themall die. Paul has introduced the most pro-life bill in the Congress over the last several years. No one has introduced anything close. What's your problem with making some progress from the horrible situation we are in today?
It certainly fookin is. Almost all fookin laws about murder are fookin state's laws. They fookin vary considerable both in fookin terms of fookin definition and fookin punishment.
He's been around too long. He did nothing to close the porous border of his state, Texas. In that regard he's no different than McCain or Bush.
Tell me Obamabot, in which states is murder legal?
You're not too fooking smart are you? Laws against fooking murder are fooking states laws, not fooking federal laws. The fooking definitions of fooking murder and the fooking punishments for fooking murder are defined by the fooking states not the fooking federal fooking government. The fooking same was fooking true of fooking abortion before fooking Row versus fooking Wade. The fooking states are fooking in fooking control of fooking life and fooking death decisions under the fooking Constitution. No fooking one had a fooking problem with this until the fooking Supreme fooking court fooking overstepped their fooking authority in fooking Row versus fooking Wade in fooking 19 fooking 73.
You're the poster who is unable to answer a simple fookin question, Obamabot. Try again, in which states is murder legal?
You are fooking not to fooking smart because you fooking completely fooking misunderstand my fooking original fooking point. You are still not fooking geting how the fooking Constitution fooking works. Back to the fooking jersey jerk for you.
Says the Obamabot that can't answer a simple question.
No problem making some progress. What is Ron Pauls problem not supporting a constitutional amendment?
I don't know. I suspect that he's a 100% states rights guy who sees any and all federal domestic authority as a treat to our liberty. History as shown that central authority ultimately lead to tyranny. So I can't blame him for being pragmatic. Regardless, the only hope we have today is to overturn Roe. It was improperly decided. One more good Supreme Court justice and it can be overturned. Paul's sanctity of life act does three things: A.) It defines that life begins at conception B.) It would recognized that each state has authority to protect the lives of unborn children residing in the jurisdiction of that state C.) It would amend the federal judicial code to remove Supreme Court and district court jurisdiction to review cases arising out of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or practice, or any act interpreting such a measure This is great stuff. We should support it.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
Mininggold supports Obama. Obama supports murdering babies. You support Obama. You must think that killing millions of American babies is less evil then whatever Bush did.
Still waiting for you to back your lies up, Stoner.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
I'm still waiting for you to deny you're a tube steak receptacle, skippy!
I don' lie. What lie?
Mininggold supports Obama. Obama supports murdering babies. You support Obama. You must think that killing millions of American babies is less evil then whatever Bush did. Back it up or take it back. You asserting something doesn't make it true.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
You have the nerve to make a post like that, you lying little weasel.
mininggold does support Obama. Obama did vote to allow people to kill babies born alive. He is a big supporter of infanticide. I do believe you support Obama. If not show me a few negative comments you have made about him. I thought you voted for Obama. If so you must be ok with kiilling millions of babies or at least think it is better then whatever Bush did or McCain would have done.
And I keep asking you to back that up. While you're at it, show my comments supporting Obama too. You're the admin here. You can do anything. Searching for "Obama" in any of my posts should be easy for you.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
Are you going to vote against Obama?
Skippy has a liplock on Obama's tubesteak. Is it possible that skippy may in fact be Barney Frank.
Considering I didn't vote for him the first time, I can safely say I won't be voting for him the next time.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
Did you vote?
Not for president.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
Are you for the healthcare bill they passed?
I saw yesterday that the US had the lowest number of births in 100 years. That was revealing.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#36)
Damn you're stupid. Where do you get that I like Bush?
#39. To: Skip Intro (#38)
#40. To: A K A Stone (#39)
Just like you like Obama. You constantly defend him.
#41. To: A K A Stone (#37)
Ron Paul isn't strongly pro life. If he was he would support constitutional amendment to protect the pre born.
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#42. To: Skip Intro, A K A Stone, minningold (#38)
Where did you get that minningold likes Obama?
#43. To: jwpegler (#41)
#44. To: jwpegler, A K A Stone (#41)
Paul is correct that abortion needs to go back to the states,
#45. To: Ibluafartsky (#44)
#46. To: A K A Stone (#43)
No he is wrong. Murder is murder.
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#47. To: Ibluafartsky (#44)
(Edited)
Murder isn't a states rights issue.
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#48. To: A K A Stone (#45)
Don't get me wrong I like Ron Paul.
#49. To: jwpegler (#47)
It certainly fookin is.
#50. To: Ibluafartsky (#49)
(Edited)
Tell me Obamabot, in which states is murder legal?
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#51. To: jwpegler (#50)
You're not too fooking smart are you?
#52. To: Ibluafartsky (#51)
(Edited)
in which states is murder legal?
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#53. To: jwpegler (#52)
You are fooking not to fooking smart
#54. To: jwpegler (#46)
What's your problem with making some progress from the horrible situation we are in today?
#55. To: A K A Stone (#54)
What is Ron Pauls problem not supporting a constitutional amendment?
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#56. To: jwpegler (#55)
American public policy has been dominated by Democrats who don't care and Republicans that don't dare -- Dick Armey
#57. To: Skip Intro (#40)
And try to grasp how idiotic your "arguement" that minningold is a baby killer is, if you can.
#58. To: A K A Stone (#57)
#59. To: Skip Intro, A K A Stone (#58)
Still waiting for you
#60. To: Skip Intro (#58)
#61. To: A K A Stone (#60)
I don' lie. What lie?
#62. To: Skip Intro (#61)
You asserting something doesn't make it true.
#63. To: Skip Intro (#61)
#64. To: A K A Stone (#63)
mininggold does support Obama.
#65. To: Skip Intro (#64)
#66. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro (#65)
Are you going to vote against Obama?
#67. To: A K A Stone (#65)
#68. To: Skip Intro (#67)
Considering I didn't vote for him the first time, I can safely say I won't be voting for him the next time.
#69. To: A K A Stone (#68)
#70. To: Skip Intro (#69)
#71. To: mcgowanjm (#2)
Like, how exactly did America manage to raise its wheat production this year, despite a plunge in plantings to their lowest in nearly 40 years?
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Tull to Rotara
#72. To: A K A Stone (#70)
I don't know. What's in it for me?
Are you for the healthcare bill they passed?
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
#73. To: Skip Intro (#69)
Not voting against Obama is supporting Obama.
Not for president.
#74. To: A K A Stone (#73)
Again you've pegged the stupid meter on maximum.
Not voting against Obama is supporting Obama.
"How many confirmed NV Mig kills do YOU have general? I only have three." - Mad Dog, the village idiot's hemorrhoid.
#75. To: A K A Stone (#30)
Tull calling your shots again, aka loser? Hey, I won a few bucks at the track today for a change.
I know. I'm a softie.
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Tull to Rotara
#76. To: Skip Intro (#74)
It is a fact. You not voting against a usurper is defact support.
#77. To: A K A Stone, mininggold (#63)
Challenge! Back it up. Have Tull back it up...you two fracking losers!
mininggold does support Obama.
"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Tull to Rotara
.
.
.
Comments (78 - 99) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]