[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Obama Wars Title: Journalists Have Bad Case of 'Americaphobia' Journalists Have Bad Case of 'Americaphobia' By Dan Gainor Published August 27, 2010 | FoxNews.com Print Email Share Comments (14) Text Size To most Americans, the battle over the Ground Zero mosque is about honoring the victims of 9/11. To those in the news media, the numbers tell a different story. For weeks on end, news outlets have parroted the most left-wing talking points crying racism or Islamophobia in an attempt to paint mosque opponents as bigots. The medias attack on Americans who still remember what happened on Sept. 11 2001, could be called a crusade. But that word that makes you a pro-Western bigot in their eyes. So lets call it what it is jihad. An out-and-out pro-Islamist assault on American values. In a term they might understand, its Americaphobia. And its failing miserably. The numbers tell the tale better than most network journalists. A Time magazine poll from Aug. 16-17 showed 61 percent of Americans nationwide still oppose this mosque despite the best efforts of the Washington elites of all three major political parties Democrats, Republicans and Journalists. And even that poll question has more spin than the top in the movie Inception. Here it is: Overall, do you favor or oppose the building of the Muslim community center and mosque near where the World Trade Center stood?" That certainly embraces the media viewpoint however inaccurate that its more community center than mosque. Every church Ive ever attended has had numerous facilities schools and gyms and cafeterias and more. Yet every one of them was called one thing a church. Sure, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf might try to model his mosque on the Jewish Community Center, but that isnt the issue. The mosque is. YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN Analyst: Citigroup Is Cooking the BooksTen Worst Places to LiveDow Dips Below 10000 as Gloom PersistsBernanke?s Message: We can Get Out of this HoleStop Saving to Pay Off Credit Card Debt?Its an issue that resonates with a huge chunk of Americans from all walks of life right wing, left wing, Christian and Muslim. The only group that doesnt believe its an issue is journalists. So they twist and manipulate the story in dozens of ways so it turns out their way. Only it hasnt. The unseen hand of journalism manipulating American democracy is no longer unseen, nor is it as effective as it once was. But that hasnt stopped the media from trying its best. The Associated Press Standards Center issued a staff advisory on covering New York City mosque on Aug. 19 as just one piece of that spin. We should continue to avoid the phrase ground zero mosque or mosque at ground zero on all platforms. Since that spin memo, finding the term Ground Zero Mosque on network news is all but impossible. Before the memo came out, journalists like ABCs David Kerley were allowed to use it. On Aug. 15, there was Kerley talking about Obama trying to steer through the treacherous waters of the Ground Zero Mosque debate. Early Today host Lynn Berry talked about the Ground Zero Mosque controversy. Other reporters echoed the term. But AP had to choose sides. To the great spinmeisters in that organization, a building near the World Trade Center that was actually damaged in the attack isnt at Ground Zero. Had AP headquarters been in that building, you can bet they would have covered their own damage like it had been Ground Zero. Its the terminology game reporters and editors play. Lefty terms like pro-choice are OK, but dont dare say pro-life. Conservatives can be far right but try finding liberals who are far left. Thats just one of the games journalists play. They cant claim the mosque opposition is bigoted if Muslims oppose it as well, so those voices are almost never heard on network broadcasts. In the past month, ABC, CBS and NBC evening news shows intereviewed Muslims 10 times for their mosque stories. Nine of those interviewed supported the mosque. Only one Muslim opponent was quoted. Other critics, such as the first Muslim Miss USA and the director of Al-Arabiya, a popular Arab-language news station, were ignored. They would have interfered with the prearranged news agenda. So would showing the hateful person who cursed out an anti-mosque protester who had survived the Holocaust. Thats a consistent theme. The controversial imam who is pushing the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is a moderate who wants only peace and even eulogized Daniel Pearl. His questionable funding, a refusal to call Hamas a terror group and his many controversial statements largely get a pass in the news media. Remember, this is the man who said: the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than Al Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims. If Rauf were a tea party supporter and blasting Obama, his views would lead the evening news. Thankfully, fewer and fewer people care about the spin. While journalists go one way with their coverage, Americans are going another to the exits. Just last week, the Big Three broadcast networks recorded less than 19 million viewers. CBS Evening News was watched by less than 5 million people. Yes, some have turned to those shows on the Internet. More often, they have simply been turned off by them. That is the state of American journalism. No matter what issue is seizing the news racism, the stimulus, health care reform, tea parties, the Ground Zero Mosque and more journalists pick the most liberal side. Its a sad reality that at the upper levels of journalism, they simply dont like the America that many others love. Finally, America is returning the sentiment. Dan Gainor is The Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Centers Vice President for Business and Culture. His writes frequently for Fox News Opinion. He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|