Title: @ One_Crazy_Jew Source:
me URL Source:http://me.com Published:Jun 24, 2006 Author:me.com Post Date:2006-06-24 22:43:08 by continental op Keywords:None Views:85701 Comments:97
Listen you kike bastard, if you want to insult me, insult me in the open and not by p.m. You only make yourself look cowardly and stupid.
Will crissy and zipped have a hissy fit if you post over here as Jethro?
Also why don't you come tell us why you took postliberty down. Was it getting to popular? It was about to eclipse christines site. Did they tell you to take it down or they wouldn't be your friend anymore?
It's the easiest way...there's not enuff hours in a day to try and establish the bona fides of multiple characters, imho...the duplicate screen names end up being post&runners, whereas the permanent screen name means you must be accountable for whatever positions you take and for the way you defend your position.
Say what you will, but THIS is not MUD...sure, I agree with him regarding the war and also about the EVIL that was the Kosovo Massacre, but the only FReeper Screen Names I have recently (since last year) posted under are relent_less and Beorn the Berzerker...MUD
I (as briefly as possible, trust me) removed "Mud" from the filter to check out these missing posts.. They're his and I say he's lying his ass off in #32.
The two handles he offered as some kind of backward, school yard "Mud proof" that he's not posting under multiple handles (?) are two that he's already burned..
Between this and the easy and almost institutionalized acknowledgement of using multiple nics as "being post&runners" when you don't want to have to "be accountable for whatever positions you take" I'd say our 'ole buddy "Mud" is little more than a serial disruptor.
Someone so throughly narcissistic, childish and mentally bankrupt that he must hide behind alternate personalities in a vain effort to defend his ridiculous political positions, statements and of course, his fragile ego.
"And now I'm a LePer. LOL...Beorn the Berzerker is...MUD" Mudboy Slim posted on 2005-04-23
LOL...Jimmy, you actually believe the Mods remembered this obscure comment I made 14 months ago when I signed on with the Beorn screen name this spring?
I'm not sure how I got nuked, but it had nothing to do with the comment you referenced, imho...MUD
"Ryan_Bailey (nonconformist) 06/06/06 11:28 AM Re: Bush's Place in History [ To: AdaC | Post 294674830, reply to 294647498 ] (Score: 1)
Dear Friend:
Thank you for your courtesy. It has been a pleasure to post here and at other, mostly lesser, forums of the public exchange. In this time( whilst avoiding anonymity, vulgarity and all forms of pettines, a mission which is terribly wanting at present on line as in western society in sum ) I have been greatly benefitted by discussions during the several courses of campaigns on which I have sought to learn and to raise awareness and support, respectively: Anglican Traditionalist Dissent to the ECUSA GC03 Apostasy, Bush-Cheney 2004, Lonegan Gubernatorial Campaign and others. I am presently supporting the Ginty Senate Campaign and in the beginning phases of a mayoral campaign which I am managing which shall be announced henceforthly.
My present retirement is one to the country backwaters of the hidden valleys of Southern New Jersey, there to see more closely to the needs of family and community. I do not abandon the political processes of which we are part but leave with the prayer that the Federal monstrosity may be in our lifetime tamed and that Pres. Reagan's nine most dangerous words may be taken for the uselessness that they represent.
"If we will not be governed by God then we will be ruled by Tyrants"
"Today: Couric Proclaims Mark Felt "Did the Right Thing;" Buchanan Reveals He'd Leaked Before
Posted by Ryan Bailey to All On News/Activism 06/01/2005 6:13:39 AM PDT · 92 of 151
This was, of course, a golden opportunity for the entire anti-Nixonian Washington establishment to pretend as if 'deep throat' was a real person.
Felt's age and possibly mental fitness, as Andrea Mitchell rightly points out are factors in the 'now or never' revelation agreed upon with serendipity just yesterday, even though Felt has been ruled out for years from the list of candidates, because he doesn't correlate in too many important details, accounts and characteristics with the 'deep' character of the story.
Can there be any doubt now that the WP was wrong in running the story ?
Responsible journalists cannot run a story aimed at taking down a President on one anonymous source. the Post not only ran it they virtually created an election year scandal by fiat. Then when Nixon won 49 States the Post was only too eager to override that vote.
Nixon was right; there was one standard for Democrats, one for Republicans and one for him. Still he remains one of the single most important Presidents ever. We'd still be in Vietnam ( a democrat war if ever there was one, as Sen. Dole rightly commented ) if not for Richard Nixon.
I also feel that there has been an obvious betrayal of the presumed conditions of anonymity for this Source since Woodward and Bernstein were clear that the Source would be revealed, after his demise. Recently they even broke the story that he was 'near death'.
These important facts do not add up.
At the 1997 Convention of the Nationalist Party, an offshoot of Buchananist Republicanism and T. Roosevelt's 'Bullmoose' Progressivism, I gave a policy address where I affirmed my belief that the entire Watergate epic of the leftist Washington Media elite was based on several important points, many of which were fictional, all part of a retribution spreading all the way back to Alger Hiss and also the 'bought' election of 1960.
This I traced as an important step in the evolution of the GOP into the lesser creature it had become. Then in the aftermath of the Gingrich revolution, many of us were passionate about a return to the idealism of the Eisenhower GOP based on reintroduction of the important planks which the Nationalist Party promulgated."
"When they come for your guns, it's time to use them."-Anthem
Please let me know what you find out...are IP addresses particular to a specific computer or are they accessible from various routes?
It depends, actually. The same IP address can show up for a lot of computers at one institution if all web traffic channels through a single proxy server. Users of AOL or similar huge online dialup services assign IP's dynamically every time someone connects to the net, so it's distantly possible 2 different people could happen upon the same IP given enough time.
But users with broadband access to the net usually have a single relatively constant IP address. Cable companies seem to like to change it only every few months, DSL seems to be a permanent IP.
Bottom line, it's a strong indicator of something common between 2 posters, but whether it's a long shot coincidence, 2 people from the same university, home or one person with one computer, it's a bit short of being sufficient for a conviction. It takes a little bit more evidence to convince me beyond reasonable doubt that there's a match. Like posting style, posting times, or other commonalities.
Hey con. I have NO clue what Stone is talking about. I never sent you a pm, nor have I posted here under that screen name. It appears Stone is keeping a close track of IPs. Sound familiar? PS: Stone. Pull my account. Thanks
#55. To: Jethro tull, continental op, neil mcIver (#52)
Hey con. I have NO clue what Stone is talking about. I never sent you a pm, nor have I posted here under that screen name. It appears Stone is keeping a close track of IPs. Sound familiar? PS: Stone. Pull my account. Thanks
Just noticed two jew names registered. They both had your ip number. That isn't revealing any personal info. Just that the same IP is posting as you and the two jew names. I'm not lying. Neil McIver is free to verify that information for you publicly. I can't control the ip numbers it registers. It registers you as three people. I could just ban people who do that like 4um does. Instead I decided to just reveal when two or more screen names are sharing the same IP. Closing your account is no problem. Do you want all three closed? Or should I leave them open since you claim not to be them, which is laughable.
When someone says that they are being harrassed by private message. And i know that person has two or more screen names. I'm going to let everyone know. That is the moral thing to do. And you did have 3 screen names. Don't lie about it.
If you want to send someone crap mail, be a man and let the person know who you are. Don't hide behind another name and send private mail, be a man. Im not indicting anyone here but seriously.
