[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Weekly Jobless Claims Post Surprise Jump, Hit 500,000 (More proof stimulus a failure)
Source: CNBC
URL Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/38768328
Published: Aug 19, 2010
Author: NA
Post Date: 2010-08-19 09:25:45 by Nebuchadnezzar
Keywords: None
Views: 81783
Comments: 138

Weekly Jobless Claims Post Surprise Jump, Hit 500,000 Published: Thursday, 19 Aug 2010 | 9:05 AM ET Text Size By: Reuters

New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly climbed to a nine-month high last week, yet another setback to the frail economic recovery.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 500,000 in the week ended August 14, the highest since mid-November, the Labor Department said on Thursday.

Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims slipping to 476,000 from the previously reported 484,000 the prior week, which was revised up to 488,000 in Thursday's report.

A Labor Department official said there was nothing unusual in the state level data. The data covered the survey week for the government's closely watched employment report for August, scheduled for release early next month.

"There are some technical factors out there and the seasonal factors seem to be pushing it up a little bit. But given the trend of claims it looks like the economy ran into a wall in August," said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-MitsubishI UFJ in New York.

U.S. stock index futures turned negative after the report, while Treasury debt prices pared losses. The dollar fell against the yen.

A 9.5 percent unemployment rate and weak housing market are hobbling the economy's recovery from its most brutal recession since the Great Depression.

The economy's poor health has handed President Barack Obama a tough challenge and put at risk the Democratic Party's majorities in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate in November's mid-term elections.

Obama's approval ratings have tumbled to the mid- to lower 40 percent range and Congress' ratings are hovering at about 20 percent.

The four-week average of new jobless claims, considered a better measure of underlying labor market trends as it irons out week-to-week volatility, rose 8,000 to 482,500, the highest since early December.

Claims for unemployment benefits have been stuck at lofty levels for much of this year, which many economists say points to unemployment staying uncomfortably high for some time.

Claims have not come close to the 400,000 level that most analysts generally view as the dividing line between payrolls growth and contraction. Payrolls grew in the first five months of this year, partly due to hiring for the decennial census, and have declined in both June and July.

The economy grew at a 2.4 percent annualized rate in the second quarter, much slower than the 3.7 percent pace in the first three months of the year.

However, recent trade and business inventory data have indicated a much more sluggish pace. According to a preliminary Reuters survey, the government could lower the second-quarter growth estimate to a rate of about 1.4 percent when it publishes its first revision next Friday.

The number of people still receiving jobless benefits after an initial week of aid fell 13,000 to 4.48 million in the week ended Aug. 7 from an upwardly revised 4.49 million the prior week. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast so-called continuing claims rising to 4.50 million from a previously reported 4.45 million.

"The drop in continued claims is an encouraging sign," said Robert Dye, senior economist at PNC Financial Services in Pittsburgh.

"When you take the life signs on the labor market, it's not all bad news, but it's not where we would like," he added.

The insured unemployment rate, which measures the percentage of the insured labor force that is jobless, was unchanged at 3.5 percent during that period.

The number of people on emergency benefits increased 260,105 to 4.75 million in the week ended July 31.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-83) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#84. To: lucysmom (#81)

Those weren't the loans that exploded.

They were a part of it.

Good lending standards were discarded.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-19   20:40:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: lucysmom (#80)

The FBI did issue warnings in 2004, you're off by 2-3 years.

I was comenting on their 2007 testimony.

But thank you. It's good to see Sen. Dodd and Rep. Frank were warned and did NOTHING.

I remember Frank in 2008 saying how great FANNIE/FREDDIE were doing.

And we all know what happened right after that.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-19   20:42:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: lucysmom (#81)

Those weren't the loans that exploded.

Wiki disagrees with you.

"He noted that approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the CRA, and another 25% to 30% came from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. Barr noted that institutions fully regulated by CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that "the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight"

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-19   23:41:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: lucysmom (#81)

Those weren't the loans that exploded.

And Raines testimony:

During a 2008 House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing on the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the financial crisis, including in relation to the Community Reinvestment Act, asked if the CRA provided the "fuel" for increasing subprime loans, former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines said it might have been a catalyst encouraging bad behavior, but it was difficult to know.

THE US GOVERNMENT HAD NO BUSINESS TO FORCE BANKS TO MAKE LOANS.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-19   23:45:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: Liberator (#69)

For instance, if Mininggold wanted to purchase a used van as a workplace/home at the truckstop of her choice from a car lot vendor, she would indicate on her loan application that the income derived from her welfare check or night "work" was $200k. The finance person or loan officer would wink-wink and voila! MG just "purchased" that used GMC van plastered with Obama-Biden bumper stickers, "balloons" wedged between the seats, and 268,000 miles on the rebuilt engine. But the reality was that she really did NOT qualify for the loan based on her actual income.

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

Death to everybody who does not get outta my way. Below is positively the most hilariously BS overflowing comment from the resident obamunist spent-condom EVER:) "This is WHY I left the GOP in the mid 90's. ." Dwarf

e_type_jag  posted on  2010-08-20   0:24:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: e_type_jag (#88)

idiot

"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Jethro Tull to Rotara

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-08-20   0:28:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#86)

"He noted that approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the CRA, and another 25% to 30% came from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. Barr noted that institutions fully regulated by CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that "the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight"

What side are you arguing?

Where in your quote does it say that poor people and the CRA was responsible for the mortgage meltdown? It seems to say that institutions regulated by the CRA preformed better than those that were not.

It’s telling that, amid all the recent recriminations, even lenders have not fingered CRA. That’s because CRA didn’t bring about the reckless lending at the heart of the crisis. Just as sub-prime lending was exploding, CRA was losing force and relevance. And the worst offenders, the independent mortgage companies, were never subject to CRA — or any federal regulator. Law didn’t make them lend. The profit motive did. And that is not political correctness. It is correctness. Robert Gordon

Why was the CRA losing force?

Finally, keep in mind that the Bush administration has been weakening CRA enforcement and the law’s reach since the day it took office. The CRA was at its strongest in the 1990s, under the Clinton administration, a period when subprime loans performed quite well. It was only after the Bush administration cut back on CRA enforcement that problems arose...

http://www.businessweek.com/inve...with_subprime_crisis.html

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-20   0:34:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#86)

Wiki disagrees with you.

No it doesn't. You may want to go back and read what wiki actually said.

"...CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight..."

What is highlighted is not the banking industry.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   7:46:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#87)

You don't read well do you?

...asked if the CRA provided the "fuel" for increasing subprime loans, former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines said it might have been a catalyst encouraging bad behavior, but it was difficult to know.

And subsequent analysis has shown that it did not, in fact, do so.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   7:48:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: war (#91)

"...CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight..."

Are you still peddling this bullshit?

Yeah, that's right, most of the loans occurred completely outside of Federal oversight, but you, in your twisted logic want to blame Bush for lack of Federal oversight.

But beyond that, NONE of these loans would have occurred if not for the CRA and the GSEs establishing precedence and market momentum for them. If you think differently, point to how many occurred before those forces came into play.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   8:41:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: lucysmom (#27) (Edited)

The first jobless recovery occurred before Clinton signed NAFTA into law.

Just the words 'jobless revocery' are the give away.

Why not just say 'north south'. Or describing the Manhattan Sized Oil Lake 40 miles from Louisiana as "an ephemeral cloud." 8D

Since Nixon defaulted on gold payments.

A Hidden Agenda ALWAYS produces Absurdities.

The primary consequences of our fossil-fuel addiction stem from two primary phenomena: peak oil and global climate change. The former spells the end of western civilization, which might come in time to prevent the extinction of our species at the hand of the latter.

>Global climate change threatens our species with extinction by mid-century is we do not terminate the industrial economy soon. Increasingly dire forecasts from extremely conservative sources keep stacking up.

>Governments refuse to act because they know growth of the industrial economy depends (almost solely) on consumption of fossil fuels. Global climate change and energy decline are similar in this respect:

neither is characterized by a politically viable solution.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:09:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: war (#91)

"...CRA made "perhaps one in four" sub-prime loans, and that the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight..."

I have said in the past that CRA is part of the problem, not the whole problem.

On the other hand, you have routinely stated CRA had nothing to do with it.

Wiki supports me.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-20   9:15:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: war (#92)

...asked if the CRA provided the "fuel" for increasing subprime loans, former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines said it might have been a catalyst encouraging bad behavior, but it was difficult to know.

And subsequent analysis has shown that it did not, in fact, do so.

Sorry, what is "difficult" for people like you to "know" is code for "Of course we fucked up giving loans to people who were credit risks".

I noticed that the defense of the CRA came from people like Bernanke and the Treasury Dept.

Sorry, they have ZERO credibility with me. If they are defending something, then you know it's fucked up.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-20   9:17:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: mcgowanjm (#94)

he primary consequences of our fossil-fuel addiction

Oil doesn't come from fossils. If it does tell me how it got to the bottom of the ocean under all that rock.

Secondly Peak oil is a myth.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-20   9:17:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#95)

Wiki supports me.

By observing that some CRA loans were sub prime? Buck up the data that shows that they defaulted in significant numbers while keeping in mind that CRA loans are a very small % of the overall mortgage market.

So, no, it does NOT support you.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:30:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#96)

Sorry, what is "difficult" for people like you to "know" is code for "Of course we fucked up giving loans to people who were credit risks".

FNMA does not make loans.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:31:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: A K A Stone (#97)

On 2010-08-20 09:17:57, A K A Stone wrote:

To: mcgowanjm

he primary consequences of our fossil-fuel addiction

Oil doesn't come from fossils. If it does tell me how it got to the bottom of the ocean under all that rock.

Secondly Peak oil is a myth.

Then you're not gonna understand what's coming in the Days and weeks ahead.

The primary consequences of our fossil-fuel addiction stem from two primary phenomena: peak oil and global climate change. The former spells the end of western civilization, which might come in time to prevent the extinction of our species at the hand of the latter.

Global climate change threatens our species with extinction by mid-century is we do not terminate the industrial economy soon. Increasingly dire forecasts from extremely conservative sources keep stacking up. Governments refuse to act because they know growth of the industrial economy depends (almost solely) on consumption of fossil fuels. Global climate change and energy decline are similar in this respect: neither is characterized by a politically viable solution.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:32:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: mcgowanjm (#100)

You are a loon.

There is no peak oil.

Now tell me how all those fossils ended up at the bottom of the ocean under all that rock. Go ahead make my day.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-08-20   9:34:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: A K A Stone (#101) (Edited)

jm

You are a loon.

There is no peak oil.

Now tell me how all those fossils ended up at the bottom of the ocean under all that rock. Go ahead make my day.

And you're ignorant. Convincing someone who is getting paid not to understand is well nye impossible.

Note Peak Oil happened May 2005. Marked by Katrina/Federal Flood As Housing Peaked and Fell that Summer.

"There simply is no comprehensive substitute for crude oil.

It is the overwhelming fuel of choice for transportation, and there is no way

out of the crude trap at this late juncture in the industrial era. We passed

the world oil peak in 2005, which led to near-collapse(I would've/did said 'we

plateau'd;} of the world’s industrial economy several times between September

2008 and May 2010(Again the Plateau;}. And we’re certainly not out of the

economic woods yet(Never will be. That's what the DRAGON KING of Deepwater Horizon is about. Demand will now be crushed. See Housing/Fannie

/Freddie for details)."

Crude $30 the bbl by Xmas. But more expensive than now.

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:44:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: no gnu taxes (#93)

but you, in your twisted logic want to blame Bush for lack of Federal oversight.

Who is the cheif law enforcement officer of the US?

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:47:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: A K A Stone (#101)

Now tell me how all those fossils ended up at the bottom of the ocean under all that rock. Go ahead make my day.

Plate Tectonics. And note where the Deepwater Horizon is.

A River Delta. And 50 million years is a very long time. 8D

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: war (#103)

;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:49:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: mcgowanjm (#105)

What's even more hilarious is that when he was happy Fun Ball @ LP he was pointing to numbers similar to Obama's as being GREAT for the Boy Blunder's blunder in Iraq.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:52:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: war (#103)

Who is the cheif law enforcement officer of the US?

So I guess you are saying the Presidential motorcade has the authority to pull me over and write me a ticket for violating Ames, Iowa traffic ordinances.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   9:55:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: war (#106)

What's even more hilarious is that when he was happy Fun Ball @ LP he was pointing to numbers similar to Obama's as being GREAT for the Boy Blunder's blunder in Iraq.

Facts are irrelevant. History was yesterday.

;}

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   9:56:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: no gnu taxes (#107) (Edited)

Speeding is a local issue. The US financial system is a federal issue.

All that niggering it up has rotted what little brain you have.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:58:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: mcgowanjm (#108)

Paddy wanted Boy Blunder to write speeding tickets...the irony of that statement is probably lost on him.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   9:59:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#0)

Recovery Summer?

Sad punchline for late night these days.

And the fact is Owe-bama asking for ANOTHER stimulus package is the closest the man child POTUS can come to admitting his 1st stimulus failed exactly as so many of us predicted.

One failed term. The only question is how badly will this idiot hurt the nation before we can fire his incompetent ass.

Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-20   10:00:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: war (#109)

The Federal Government has no control over State banks. If Bush had tried to intervene in State banking practices, you would have been the first to call him a fascist.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   10:02:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: no gnu taxes (#112)

The Federal Government has no control over State banks.

Bzzzzt...

war  posted on  2010-08-20   10:11:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: war (#113)

Bzzzzt... yourself.

The managing Federal authority, the OCC, has no control over State banks. They MAY be subject to Federal Reserve policy, but that is independent of any Executive control.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   10:25:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: war (#110)

Yeah, that's right, most of the loans occurred completely outside of Federal oversight, but you, in your twisted logic want to blame Bush for lack of Federal oversight.

Sarah Palin is so excited that she can't even make up words to express how thrilled she is.” – David Letterman “

define irony in a job interview she said “Well, I can’t really define irony … but I know it when I see it.” - Winona Ryder

mcgowanjm  posted on  2010-08-20   10:37:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: no gnu taxes (#93)

Yeah, that's right, most of the loans occurred completely outside of Federal oversight, but you, in your twisted logic want to blame Bush for lack of Federal oversight.

After 911 Bush pulled 500 FBI fraud investigators and reassigned them to domestic terrorism leaving fraud investigations permanently under staffed. That is a pretty effective way to ease up on oversight.

But beyond that, NONE of these loans would have occurred if not for the CRA and the GSEs establishing precedence and market momentum for them. If you think differently, point to how many occurred before those forces came into play.

Fannie Mae was created in 1938 and the CRA was passed in 1977, explain how it took 27 years after the CRA passed for the melt down to occur if they were the cause.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-20   10:37:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: A K A Stone (#97)

Oil doesn't come from fossils. If it does tell me how it got to the bottom of the ocean under all that rock.

It would be impossible to explain to someone who doesn't think geology is a valid science.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-20   10:40:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: lucysmom (#116)

After 911 Bush pulled 500 FBI fraud investigators and reassigned them to domestic terrorism leaving fraud investigations permanently under staffed. That is a pretty effective way to ease up on oversight.

As has been pointed out, the vast majority of the loans occurred from State controlled lending agencies which the Federal Government had no control over.

Fannie Mae was created in 1938 and the CRA was passed in 1977, explain how it took 27 years after the CRA passed for the melt down to occur if they were the cause.

Because it was not until the Clinton Administration began pressuring lending institutions in 90s to give loans to shaky borrowers that the problems began to emerge.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   10:42:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: lucysmom (#116)

After 911 Bush pulled 500 FBI fraud investigators and reassigned them to domestic terrorism leaving fraud investigations permanently under staffed.

Irrelevant. Even when the FBI testified about the criminal conduct in the home mortgage business to congress, congress failed to act.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-20   10:53:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: war (#99)

FNMA does not make loans.

They back them, they shouldn't.

Being a Democratic shill means you check your humanity at the door.

Nebuchadnezzar  posted on  2010-08-20   10:53:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#119)

Irrelevant. Even when the FBI testified about the criminal conduct in the home mortgage business to congress, congress failed to act.

Just a guess, but Im betting that you're not referring to the FBI's 2004 testimony before the House subcommittee on housing and community opportunity. That would put the ball solidly back in the GOP court.

"Based on various industry reports and FBI analysis, mortgage fraud is pervasive and growing," Chris Swecker, then assistant director of the criminal investigation division, said in October 2004 before the House subcommittee on housing and community opportunity.

Then Swecker made a chillingly accurate prediction of the coming mortgage meltdown and financial collapse:

"The potential impact of mortgage fraud on financial institutions in the stock market is clear. If fraudulent practices become systemic within the mortgage industry and mortgage fraud is allowed to become unrestrained, it will ultimately place financial institutions at risk and have adverse effects on the stock market."

Swecker went on to describe the scenario that ultimately wrecked financial havoc around the world: "Often mortgage loans sold in secondary markets are used by financial institutions as collateral for other investments. ... When loans sold in the secondary market default and have fraudulent or material misrepresentation ... these loans become a nonperforming asset, and in extreme fraud cases, the mortgage-backed security is worthless. Mortgage fraud losses adversely affect loan-loss reserves, profits, liquidity levels and capitalization ratios, ultimately affecting the soundness of the financial institution itself."

www.seattlepi.com/national/397690_fbiweb28.html

According to the article, the FBI knew there was a problem in 2002, the Bush administration was briefed and chose to do nothing. I'd like to know what the justification for that decision was.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-08-20   11:37:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: no gnu taxes (#114)

FDIC most certainly shares oversight responsibilities you fucking moron.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   13:04:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: Nebuchadnezzar (#120)

They back them, they shouldn't.

That's what they do.

war  posted on  2010-08-20   13:09:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: war (#122)

The FDIC is not an executive agency...you fucking moron.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-08-20   13:34:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (125 - 138) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com