[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles

Title: Food for Thought: Taking a stand against genetically modified organisms
Source: Encore Online
URL Source: http://www.encorepub.com/articles.p ... d&article_id=1275§ion_id=3
Published: Aug 10, 2010
Author: : Evan Folds
Post Date: 2010-08-16 08:25:59 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 249

Ever heard of genetically modified organisms (GMO)? I dare say that the majority of the population eats them in abundance on a daily basis. Why? Well, for one the USDA does not require the labeling of “food” products that contain GMOs. Some history of how we got here may help.

In 1978 a company called “Genentech” inserted a human insulin gene into an E. Coli bacterium in order to create functional insulin, marking the first use of the technology called “recombinant DNA,” where genes from different organisms combine to form a hybrid molecule.

In 1981 Amanda Mohan Chakrabarty successfully inserted foreign genes into a Pseudomonas bacterium and created an organism capable of eating oil spills (hmmm, BP, take note!). This marked the first time a living organism had been altered genetically. The ethics of this procedure were actually upheld by the Supreme Court in what has become the wartershed moment in GMO history. From 1981 onward companies would be incentivized to change life in order to patent and make money of off living organisms.

And we’ve never looked back.

This is the legacy we deal with today. We are so entrenched in this world view that we cannot bring ourselves to recignize what we’re eating.

Think about that.

There is no transparency in the US food system. Plants and animals that have had their genetics fundamentally altered are not being disclosed to consumers, and this is not a hard thing to accomplish. The reasons vary.

One: If GMO foodstuff were labeled, people would not eat it, and other countries would not buy our “food” exports. This has been proven in Europe where most countries disclose GMO products by law.

Two: Companies such as Monsanto and Cargill lobby heavily to prevent disclosure of what is in our food in order to reap huge monetary rewards. They do this by direct sale of the GMO seed and plants, and also by creating products that complement their GMO offerings. For instance, RoundUp is an herbicide containing glycophosphates invented by Monsanto in 1973. Glcophosphates have been marketed as “biodegradable” and “non-toxic,” but they subsist in the environment for up to three years, according to a Swedish study. Better yet, they are linked to Alzeihmers, reproductive issues, and many other horrific health problems.

Monsanto is also responsible for inventing RoundUp-ready soybeans. “RoundUp-ready” means that the soybeans, with the special genes inserted, are capable of withstanding treatment with RoundUp. So, they invent living organisms that can survive the stress of being doused with the toxic soups they create. That’s a brilliant business model, but it’s killing people and it’s simply evil. The only thing that RoundUp-ready crops ensure is more RoundUp!

The perspective that allows this blatant abuse of humanity and Earth’s ecosystems is hard to understand for the average individual, but it is alive and well. COO of Hugh Grant explains Monsanto’s development from a chemical company (RoundUp) to a biotech company (GMO) over the years:

“The answer that we developed was that we believe that the world needs about 35 to 40 percent more food produced on every acre. Chemicals weren’t the answer to that next increment of production. It was in genetics. It was in better seed. So, really, that’s been driving us for more than 10 years now.”

An entire article could be written on the faults of this logic, but the idea that we need more space to grow food is folly. For example, the largest irrigated crop in the U.S. is grass, with 40 million acres. That’s more than three times corn, which has 13 million acres under irrigation. If everyone simply turned their lawns into a garden, we’d be fine. (Suggested reading: “Food, Not Lawns.”)

Besides this, there is no doubt that GMO foods disrupt living systems. For example, Indian activist Dr. Vandana Shiva’s organization Navdanya conducted a study that verified a 14.2 percent decrease in bacteria and a 17 percent decrease in actinomycete populations in soil, from the use of GMO Bt Cotton over a three-year period. The repercussions of this have resulted in over 25,000 suicides by Indian farmers since 1995. Even more terrifying, there has yet to be one study that tests the effects of these frankenfoods on the human organism—yikes!

How can Monsanto and company possibly justify the idea that we do not need to label GMO “foods”? Let’s quote COO Hugh Grant of Monsanto again:

“Let me tell you the Monsanto view on labeling today. We believe very strongly—very strongly—that these products are safe. And in their safety, there is no need to label, and that’s the position that has been held by the FDA. The FDA labeling requirements are really triggered by if a product is essentially the same, then there is no labeling requirement.”

Should we trust the FDA? Should it really be up to a tool like Hugh Grant to determine whether or not what we eat is safe? Can you say, “Conflict of interest”? Is he really suggesting that fundamentally altering the genetics of a plant is “essentially the same” as a natural plant? All due respect to Monsanto’s “beliefs,” the real question is: Should we believe them?

No.

So, how can we avoid GMO crops? The “big four” consist of corn, soy, canola, and cotton. All processed foods also contain GMOs, in addition to corn flours, oils, sweeteners and meals created by the “big four” commodity crops. Think salad dressings, cookies and anything with high-fructose corn syrup (isn’t that everything?). To be clear, unless buying from local farms or “organic” whole foods—and this includes restaurants too—it most likely contains GMO products.

For more information, contact Progressive Gardens, refer to the Center for Food Safety Web site, or read Jeffrey M. Smith’s “Seeds of Deception” and “Genetic Roulette.” There’s even a non-GMO iPhone App , www.NonGMOProject.org.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com