[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: GOP plan to extend tax cuts for rich adds $36 billion to deficit, panel finds
Source: The Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy ... 010/08/11/AR2010081105864.html
Published: Aug 12, 2010
Author: Lori Montgomery
Post Date: 2010-08-14 09:53:34 by lucysmom
Keywords: Tax, Deficit, Economy
Views: 66552
Comments: 89

A Republican plan to extend tax cuts for the rich would add more than $36 billion to the federal deficit next year -- and transfer the bulk of that cash into the pockets of the nation's millionaires, according to a congressional analysis released Wednesday.

New data from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation show that households earning more than $1 million a year would reap nearly $31 billion in tax breaks under the GOP plan in 2011, for an average tax cut per household of about $100,000.

...

Republicans accuse Democrats of plotting one of the biggest tax hikes in American history, arguing that raising taxes on wealthy households would punish the very people capable of creating jobs, spurring economic growth and reducing the 9.5 percent unemployment rate. About half of all small-business income is reported on the individual returns of people making over $250,000 a year, according to the taxation committee's data, though those taxpayers represent only about 3 percent of small businesses.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 86.

#5. To: lucysmom (#0)

Nobody has ever received a job from a poor man, goofy.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-14   13:46:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Badeye (#5)

Nobody has ever received a job from a poor man, goofy.

Wars don't pay for themselves. We had a deficit before the war, you wanted a war, you go the war. Pay for it.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   16:33:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Rhino (#12)

Nobody has ever received a job from a poor man, goofy. Wars don't pay for themselves. We had a deficit before the war, you wanted a war, you go the war. Pay for it

Actually, some wars do in fact 'pay for themselves' so you are incorrect.

Yep, we had a deficit before the war. We've been running deficits for about 50 years now. Whats your point?

Next up, I didn't 'want a war'. Unfortunately, we had no choice in either Afghanistan or Iraq. Both governments at the time the wars began had many opportunities to avoid 'war', they choose this path on their own. As the old saying goes 'We regret the actions others force us to take'. It applies here.

Finally, only a brain dead liberal can suggest 'the wars' created the staggering deficits we now face. You should enter a basic math or general accounting class to avoid saying something like this in a public forum, and inadvertently humiliating yourself.

Have a nice day.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-16   9:46:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Badeye (#51)

some wars do in fact 'pay for themselves'

Well yeah, the ones where the victor rapes and pillages the defeated population.

When did the U.S. ever do this? Never.

Our wars never pay for themselves.

Sometimes wars are necessary. The Cold War comes to mind.

The Iraq cost us at least $800 billion and 4,400 American kid's lives (to date) and was completely unnecessary.

We will be paying for this for a long, long time.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-16   18:50:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: jwpegler (#60)

The Iraq cost us at least $800 billion and 4,400 American kid's lives (to date) and was completely unnecessary.

I think it was in fact 'necessary' and the long term impact will be viewed as the turning point in the Middle East.

Just my opinion, obviously we won't know for a couple of decades.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-17   10:08:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Badeye (#72)

I think it was in fact 'necessary'

Why?

the long term impact will be viewed as the turning point in the Middle East

Yeah, that's what the neo-commies claim. But they also claim we need to invade Iran, Syria, and Lebanon to get that "turning point" situated. No thanks. War mongering and nation building were anathema to the founders because they knew a.) you can't force "democracy" on others and b.) we'd go bankrupt if we tried.

obviously we won't know for a couple of decades.

More people where killed in Iraq in July than any month since the war started. There was a major bombing about a week ago that killed 60 people, and another one yesterday. The two major Shiite political parties (which are allied with Iran) are stalemated and the Sunnis are completely locked out (which is why they are throwing bombs).

Iraq could degenerate into civil war very easily. When it does, the entire middle could be destabilized, starting with the Iraqi Kurds agitating and terrorizing to bring about a Kurdish state (which would threaten Turkey's stability, given that huge Kurdish populations inhabit regions far into the heart of Turkey).

The winner in all of this will be Iran, who are allied with the Shiites in Iraq.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-17   19:12:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: jwpegler (#73)

I think it was in fact 'necessary'

Why?

Because the only way to end the bullshit in the Middle East is to get average people involved in selecting their leadership.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-18   14:02:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Badeye (#74) (Edited)

Because the only way to end the bullshit in the Middle East is to get average people involved in selecting their leadership.

So we're going to force democracy down their throats whether they like it or not.

Great, there are over 100 countries in the world aren't democracies. Are you prepared to bankrupt America and kill countless American kids to take care of them all?

Oh, just in the middle east? Great. We already know that you neo-commies want to pummel Iran (which does allow "average people to get involved in selecting it's leaders"). On the other hand, our buddies in Saudi Arabia run the most brutal regime in the world. Should we invade them too? How about our dictator buddy in Egypt? Or the rest of the Gulf Sheikdoms, none of which let "average people get involved in selecting their leadership".

Two important questions:

A.) Why is this any of our business?

B.) How much money and blood are you willing to waste on this?

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-18   15:09:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: jwpegler (#75)

Because the only way to end the bullshit in the Middle East is to get average people involved in selecting their leadership. So we're going to force democracy down their throats whether they like it or not.

Great, there are over 100 countries in the world aren't democracies.

'So we're going to force democracy down their throats whether they like it or not.'

Its that or continue killing them on a regular basis, and suffering attacks like we did on 9/11 in my view.

'Great, there are over 100 countries in the world aren't democracies.'

Yep. And out of this strawman you bring up, how many are supporting international terrorism against us?

1st Rule of Holes applies here.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-19   11:38:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Badeye (#76)

how many are supporting international terrorism against us?

All of the ones where the U.S. government continued to prop up dictators after the Cold War ended, including and especially Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

What terrorist act did Sadam Hussein perpetrate on the U.S.??? None.

On the other hand bin Laden is related to the Saudi Royal family and 15 of the 9/11 terrorists were from Egypt.

We spend more money on the military than the next 15 countries combined. It can't be sustained any longer.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-19   16:12:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: jwpegler (#80)

You need to pick a argument and stick with it.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-20   9:57:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Badeye (#82)

You need to pick a argument and stick with it.

I am. You neo-commies on the other hand cannot make any legitimate case on how Saddam Hussein was a threat to the U.S.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-20   13:39:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: jwpegler (#83)

You neo-commies on the other hand cannot make any legitimate case on how Saddam Hussein was a threat to the U.S.

Don't feel the need. He attacked our planes 750 times AFTER the Gulf War.

The first one was reason enough.

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-20   15:36:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Badeye (#84) (Edited)

He attacked our planes 750 times AFTER the Gulf War.

So... after the U.S. government invaded his country, he tried to defend himself and it's somehow his fault.

Right...

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-20   15:46:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: jwpegler (#85)

So... after the U.S. government invaded his country, he tried to defend himself and it's somehow his fault.

Right...

Intentional misstating the facts related to my post, or are you just ignorant of the cease fire agreement signed concluding the ground war?

Badeye  posted on  2010-08-20   16:56:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 86.

        There are no replies to Comment # 86.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 86.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com