The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles
Title: 40 Religious Leaders Denounce Sarah Palin and Fox’s Hate Speech
Source:
Politicususa
URL Source: http://www.politicususa.com/en/palin-hate-speech
Published: Aug 13, 2010
Author: Politicususa
Post Date: 2010-08-13 20:28:56 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 46816
Comments: 73
Forty different Catholic, evangelical, mainline Protestant, Jewish and Muslim leaders and scholars came together to release a statement condemning the hate language of Fox News, Sarah Palin, and Newt Gingrich as it relates to the so called Ground Zero mosque, “Fear-mongering and hateful rhetoric only undermine treasured values at the heart of diverse faith traditions and our nation’s highest ideals.” The statement released by Faith In The Public Life condemned the religious bigotry of Gingrich, Palin, and Fox News, “As Catholic, evangelical, mainline Protestant, Jewish and Muslim leaders and scholars committed to religious freedom and inter-religious cooperation, we are deeply troubled by the xenophobia and religious bigotry that has characterized some of the opposition to a proposed Islamic center and mosque near where the World Trade Center towers once stood.” It continued, “Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, is the most recent prominent opponent to cast this debate in a way that demonizes all Muslims and exploits fear to divide Americans.”It is a sign of their contempt for Americans and their confidence in our historic ignorance that they would deliberately insult us this way,” Gingrich said in a statement. Sarah Palin called plans for the center a “provocation.” Fox News has aired a steady stream of irresponsible commentary and biased coverage that reduces what should be a civil debate into starkly combative terms.” Rev. Peg Chemberlin, President of the National Council of Churches said, “We are deeply saddened by those who denigrate a religion which in so many ways is a religion of compassion and peace by associating all Muslims with violent extremism. That’s like equating all Christians to Timothy McVeigh’s actions. This center will reflect not only the best of Islam, but the enduring hope that Christians, Jews and Muslims can together find common ground in addressing the most urgent challenges of our time.” Sister Simone Campbell, Executive Director of NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby said, “It’s simply wrong for Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin to malign all Muslims by comparing this cultural center and mosque with a radical ideology that led to the horrific attacks of 9-11. We fail to honor those killed by terrorists when we betray the bedrock principle of religious freedom that has guided our democracy for centuries.” The statement concluded by calling for an end to the fear mongering and hate filled rhetoric, “Mr. Gingrich, Ms. Palin and other prominent voices privileged to have the ear of the media would make a more lasting contribution to our nation if they stopped issuing inflammatory statements and instead helped inspire a civil dialogue between Christians, Jews and Muslims committed to a future guided by the principles of compassion, justice and peace. Fear-mongering and hateful rhetoric only undermine treasured values at the heart of diverse faith traditions and our nation’s highest ideals.” I wish more people of all faiths would stand up and denounce the divisive hate filled tactics employed on a daily basis by Gingrich, Palin, and Fox News. Gingrich and Palin are trying to create a wave of hate to ride to the presidency, and Fox News has found that peddling paranoia and hate is very, very profitable. Playing upon religious tensions is bad enough, but to intentionally create disunity for political gain, with no regard for the consequences to our nation is almost criminal. The politics of division and hate are the tactics that political movements always resort to when they are out of ideas and they possess no other means to motivate and inspire their supporters. Palin and Gingrich’s willingness to take us down this path is a reflective of their own personal ambitions combined with a complete lack of interest in actually solving our nation’s problems. A plea to our lesser emotions is easy, and sometimes effective, but by doing so, both Palin and Gingrich are demonstrating why neither one of them will ever be capable of inspiring the birth of a better America.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
(Edited)
Let me know when "Faith In the Public Life" advocates building a church or synagogue in downtown Riyadh or Terhan, and then denouces Saudi Arabia and Iran for being intolerant. Thanks.
Yeah, cause we ain't gotta do it until they do.
Let me know when "Faith In the Public Life" advocates building a church or synagogue in downtown Riyadh or Terhan, and then denouces Saudi Arabia and Iran for being intolerant. Yeah, cause we ain't gotta do it until they do. I suppose there's a point in there . . . somewhere?
The point is allowing a Muslim community center to be built two blocks away from the WTC is about who we are and what we believe concerning religious freedom, not about who Muslims in Tehran are.
The point is allowing a Muslim community center to be built two blocks away from the WTC is about who we are and what we believe concerning religious freedom, not about who Muslims in Tehran are. Would you be so kind as to answer a simple question for me? A short answer will do. 1. Who or what is the US presently at war with? Based on your answer, I'll comment further on your previous post.
Al-Qaeda. Here's what Wikipedia says about Al-Qaeda a militant Islamist group founded sometime between August 1988[6] and late 1989.[7] It operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless army[8] and a fundamentalist Sunni movement calling for global Jihad. It is considered a terrorist organization.
Al-Qaeda. Thank you. Now my next question: As distasteful as it is, does the emergency of wartime ever justify the temporary suspension of some Constitutional rights? Because if - as you say - we are at war with Al-Qaeda, then it follows that some extra-ordinary measures may need to be taken to insure Al-Qaeda does not prevail. Not allowing what might be viewed as a "victory mosque" to be built - a mosque potentially funded by Al-Qaeda - would be consistent to fighting that war.
Not allowing what might be viewed as a "victory mosque" to be built - a mosque potentially funded by Al-Qaeda - would be consistent to fighting that war. So have we officially declared war on them, or should we just open the WWII era detention camps again and shove them in? I guess you just don't appreciate Bush's balancing act.
Lol...Isn't that the point here sometimes?
Yet you are the one dealing in vague code phrases. Go figure
#35. To: mininggold (#33)
If you think that was "vague" OR "code," please move to the back of the class....waaaay back in the last row.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: Ignore Amos (#1)
Let me know when "Faith In the Public Life" advocates building a church or synagogue in downtown Riyadh or Terhan, and then denouces Saudi Arabia and Iran for being intolerant.
#7. To: lucysmom (#5)
#8. To: Ignore Amos (#7)
I suppose there's a point in there . . . somewhere?
#9. To: lucysmom (#8)
I suppose there's a point in there . . . somewhere?
#10. To: Ignore Amos (#9)
1. Who or what is the US presently at war with?
#11. To: lucysmom (#10)
Who or what is the US presently at war with?
#12. To: Ignore Amos (#11)
(Edited)
Because if - as you say - we are at war with Al-Qaeda, then it follows that some extra-ordinary measures may need to be taken to insure Al-Qaeda does not prevail.
#13. To: mininggold, lucysmom (#12)
So have we officially declared war on them,
My opinion? No. But ask lucy - she's the one who said we were. or should we just open the WWII era detention camps again and shove them in?
IF we declare war (which we haven't), and IF it is deemed necessary to WIN the war, yes . . . I guess you just don't appreciate Bush's balancing act.
Beyond stating the obvious fact that Bush was a shitty president, I'm not going to feed your paranoia and insanity. Sorry.
#32. To: Ignore Amos, mininggold, lucysmom (#13)
Beyond stating the obvious fact that Bush was a shitty president, I'm not going to feed your paranoia and insanity. Sorry.
#33. To: Liberator (#32)
Lol...Isn't that the point here sometimes?
Replies to Comment # 33. Yet you are the one dealing in vague code phrases. Go figure
End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]