[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Memo to Republicans: It’s Big Government, Stupid!
Source: National Review
URL Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic ... vernment-stupid-michael-tanner
Published: Aug 13, 2010
Author: Michael Tanner
Post Date: 2010-08-13 15:29:04 by go65
Keywords: None
Views: 13368
Comments: 33

Riding a record of unprecedented government spending, rising debt, a government takeover of the health-care system, high unemployment, and proposals to tax everything they stumble across, Democrats have put themselves in position for an epic electoral defeat that will rival the Republican debacles of 2006 and 2008.

Given this record of Democratic ineptitude and the voters’ reaction to it, one would think that Republicans would be talking about these issues every day. Instead, Republicans and conservatives have spent recent weeks talking about such distracting side-issues as immigration, the 14th amendment, gay marriage, and when and where mosques should be built.

No doubt these are important issues to various constituencies. But, the merits of the issues aside, if Republicans believe that the key to victory this year is to refight the culture wars, they are mistaken. Today, the Republican base is fired up, and Democrats are dispirited. To see how important that is, look no further back than 2008, when overall Republican voter turnout was down by 1.5 percent. Putting this in perspective, in the crucial swing state of Ohio, Barack Obama received 40,000 fewer votes in 2008 than did John Kerry in 2004. Yet, Obama carried the state while Kerry lost it.

Despite their repeated threats to stay home if Republicans deviated from a commitment to conservative social issues, it wasn’t the Religious Right that deserted Republicans in 2008 (or 2006, for that matter). Turnout among self-described members of the Religious Right remained steady from 2004 to 2008, and these voters remained loyally Republican. Roughly 70 percent of white evangelicals and born-again Christians voted Republican in 2006, and 74 percent in 2008, essentially in line with how they have been voting for the past two or three decades.

It was suburbanites, independents, and others who were fed up with the Republican drift toward big government who stayed home — or, worse, voted Democratic in 2008. Republicans carried the suburbs in both 2000 (49 to 47) and 2004 (52 to 47), but in 2008, suburban voters — notably wealthy, college- educated professionals, many of whom consider themselves moderate on social issues but economically conservative — voted for Barack Obama by a margin of 50 to 48. The switch among voters in the suburbs of Columbus, Charlotte, and Indianapolis, for instance, was largely responsible for moving Ohio, North Carolina, and Indiana into the Democratic column. Democrats also continued their gains in the more independent, libertarian West.

These independent and suburban voters are now regretting their Democratic flirtation. They didn’t vote for record deficits, the health-care bill, bailouts to banks and auto companies, or cap-and-trade. Having rejected big-government conservatism, they never realized they were going to get even-bigger- government liberalism. But these voters are not culture warriors. Polls show that while they are fiscally conservative, and very upset by excessive government spending and rising deficits, they are socially moderate, tending toward indifference or even support on issues like gay marriage.

It is true that many vulnerable House Democrats this year represent culturally conservative districts. But those Democrats are likely to share the same positions on social issues as their Republican opponents. One is not likely to get to the right of, say, Tom Perriello (D., Va.) on social issues. But if cultural issues come to dominate the fall campaign, it could hurt Republican candidates in more moderate suburban districts — candidates like, say, Keith Fimian, who is challenging Gerry Connolly in northern Virginia. On the other hand, both Connolly and Perriello voted for the stimulus, the health-care bill, and cap-and- trade.

If one needs a template for victory, Republicans need look no further than last year’s gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. Bob McDonnell and Chris Christie did not run as culture warriors. Instead they won their upset victories on issues like jobs, the economy, and a commitment to limited government.

The polls are overwhelming. Those are the issues that voters care about, not whether two men in California get married. Republicans should focus on creating jobs, reducing spending, repealing Obamacare, and cutting the size of government — and leave the culture wars for another day.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#1. To: All (#0)

t was suburbanites, independents, and others who were fed up with the Republican drift toward big government who stayed home

While I agree with the author's conclusion that the GOP ought to focus on issues that actually matter, the author is dead wrong about 2006 and 2008 - the GOP got slaughtered because of Iraq.

go65  posted on  2010-08-13   15:30:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: go65 (#1)

While I agree with the author's conclusion that the GOP ought to focus on issues that actually matter
Why? Your hero Zero is so out of touch and so hellbent to take his party down, that the reps can run Alfred E. Neuman and still win.

Not that they'll govern any better than they did before. As soon as Brian Williams or Katie Couric call them racists, they'll fold like a cheap suit.

And probably give Zero everything he wants. Hell, even Zero's gonna vote rep this time around. It will guarantee him success in 2012.

Rah rah rah, sis boom bah . . . go team go, rah rah rah.

. . .the author is dead wrong about 2006 and 2008 - the GOP got slaughtered because of Iraq.
Bullshit. The GOP got slaughtered because - after getting hosed by Bush and his clowns in Congress - the base stayed home.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   15:53:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ignore Amos (#2)

Bullshit. The GOP got slaughtered because - after getting hosed by Bush and his clowns in Congress - the base stayed home.

Do you have evidence for this? 2008 had the biggest voter turn out since 1968. 2006 had above average turn out as well.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-13   16:43:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rhino, go65 (#3)

The author of this article (and go65, for that matter) are of the view that - "if/when republicans act MORE like democrats (code for when they toss the social conservatives over the side) - they are successful.

Here's a clue: given the choice of a genuine democrat vs. a faux democrat, the voters will choose the real one. Every time.

Since go65 is a statist/democrat - it's easy to see why he/she gives that advice. He/she is for whatever advances statism.

Remember how "out of the mainstream"; "right-wing" and "kook" Reagan was portrayed?

He carried 49 states.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   16:57:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Ignore Amos (#5)

The author of this article (and go65, for that matter) are of the view that - "if/when republicans act MORE like democrats (code for when they toss the social conservatives over the side) - they are successful.

Here's a clue: given the choice of a genuine democrat vs. a faux democrat, the voters will choose the real one. Every time.

Since go65 is a statist/democrat - it's easy to see why he/she gives that advice. He/she is for whatever advances statism.

Remember how "out of the mainstream"; "right-wing" and "kook" Reagan was portrayed?

He carried 49 states.

I think social conservative issues can still compete in elections, but as more and more of the WWII generation dies, it will be less and less effective. Voters my age almost uniformly are okay with homosexuality, and feminism.

Right now these younger people are a small voting block. But Obama carried the youth vote by a huge margin. As these people grow up they will grow more fiscally conservative. They'll actually have to pay taxes. However they aren't going to grow more religious, or more anti gay, or more anti immigration.

Remember how "out of the mainstream"; "right-wing" and "kook" Reagan was portrayed?

Exactly the same way the conservative mainstream media portrays Obama. When in reality the Obama administration is hardly much different from the Bush administration.

And Reagan did extremely well amongst the youth of 1980, especially for a conservative. And it launched a generational shift towards conservatism. Reagan himself wasn't even a hard liner. He wasn't an extremist, he made thoughtful policy changes.

Ignoring today's youth is a mistake. You may get a generation of faithful liberals.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-13   17:10:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Rhino (#6) (Edited)

When in reality the Obama administration is hardly much different from the Bush administration.

Therein lies the problem. Whatever differences they do have is only in degree. Bush may have said the Constitution is a "g*d-damned piece of paper", but Zero believes it with all his heart.

Ignoring today's youth is a mistake. You may get a generation of faithful liberals.
I'm in my mid-50s - I'm going to assume you're quite a bit younger. My generation may have had a choice between liberalism (which I call statism because it's not the liberalism of Jefferson) and conservatism.

Your generation is going to have a choice between statism and survival.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   17:57:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Ignore Amos (#9)

Therein lies the problem. Whatever differences they do have is only in degree. Bush may have said the Constitution is a "g*d-damned piece of paper", but Zero believes it with all his heart.

I honestly don't see why Obama is worse. Bush socialized healthcare (medicare Rx Drugs) more than Obama did, did Tarp, etc etc.

There isn't a measurable difference really.

I'm in my mid-50s - I'm going to assume you're quite a bit younger. My generation may have had a choice between liberalism (which I call statism because it's not the liberalism of Jefferson) and conservatism.

Your generation is going to have a choice between statism and survival.

Nah, I think that is Chickenlittlism. The sky isn't falling. The "communists" we face are people trying to give us a national health-care system, the communists you faced had nuclear submarines with nuclear missiles pointed at our cities.

In the 1960's our stupid wars were killing 50K, now they kill 5K.

Crime is lower than the 70's, racial and social strife is slowly receding.

It's not a bad time to be an American.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-13   18:51:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Rhino (#12)

The sky isn't falling. The "communists" we face are people trying to give us a national health-care system,
give? GIVE?

Take just a moment, and really reflect on that statement.

the communists you faced had nuclear submarines with nuclear missiles pointed at our cities.
The communists we faced were - for the most part - external. Yours are internal - much more dangerous.
In the 1960's our stupid wars were killing 50K, now they kill 5K.
They're killing just as many - if not more - of the indigineous populations. And, that aside, they're just as un-Constitutional.
Crime is lower than the 70's,
Really? What about the crimes that barely existed in the 70's and are rampant now? Crimes like identity theft? Computer espionage? Crimes that could bring the entire system crashing down?
racial and social strife is slowly receding.
Not since Zero's election - there are rumblings that indicate it's getting worse.

An economic collapse would be a real test . . .

It's not a bad time to be an American.
A challenging one, to be sure.

Americans have gone through hard times before, certainly. My parents went through the Great Depression and then WWII.

That generation had something called "character" and "self-reliance", however. Something that is in short supply in 2010.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-13   21:40:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Ignore Amos (#19) (Edited)

Really? What about the crimes that barely existed in the 70's and are rampant now? Crimes like identity theft? Computer espionage? Crimes that could bring the entire system crashing down?

Because complex identity systems and computers didn't exist. This is like arguing the world is ending because in 1908 there was an infinite increase in plane crashes.

Not since Zero's election - there are rumblings that indicate it's getting worse.

An economic collapse would be a real test . . .

I only hear rumblings from idiots who think blacks should be judged by Obama's presidency.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   15:20:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Rhino (#22)

I only hear rumblings from idiots who think blacks should be judged by Obama's presidency.

He's supposed to be the best they have to offer, isn't he? Community organizer, lawyer, and part term US Senator.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   15:35:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Ibluafartsky (#23)

He's supposed to be the best they have to offer, isn't he? Community organizer, lawyer, and part term US Senator.

Anyone who thinks you can judge millions on individuals on the actions of 1 person is an unmitigated retard. I hope you aren't one.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   15:50:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Rhino (#24)

Anyone who thinks you can judge millions on individuals on the actions of 1 person is an unmitigated retard.

Isn't that exactly what you and your ilk are doing?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   16:19:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Ibluafartsky (#25)

Isn't that exactly what you and your ilk are doing?

No.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   16:30:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Rhino (#26)

No.

You're blinded by prejudice.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   16:33:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Ibluafartsky (#27)

What are you referring to.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   16:34:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Rhino (#28)

What are you referring to.

Totally blinded are you? The Tea Party being accused of being racist? Conservatives being judged by the actions of Boooosh? Are you really that ignorant?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   16:39:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Ibluafartsky (#29)

Totally blinded are you? The Tea Party being accused of being racist? Conservatives being judged by the actions of Boooosh? Are you really that ignorant?

There is a difference between freely supporting a political movement, and being born with a skin color.

I don't think the Tea Party is racist inherently, though some are, but it's not a part of the movement.

I do think Conservatives should be judged by the actions of Bush, they supported him to the bitter end.

Rhino  posted on  2010-08-14   16:45:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Rhino (#30)

I do think Conservatives should be judged by the actions of Bush, they supported him to the bitter end.

That's total bullshit. How do you explain the number of off-shoot conservative parties? You support the part term US Senator, Rev. Wright acolyte, incompetent occupant of the White House.

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-08-14   17:04:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

        There are no replies to Comment # 31.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com