[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"

French doors

America THEN and NOW in 65 FASCINATING Photos

"CNN pundit Scott Jennings goes absolutely nuclear on Biden’s ‘farce’ of a farewell speech — and he’s not alone"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: Have you driven a Chevy Volt...lately?
Source: American Thinker
URL Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog ... you_driven_a_chevy_voltla.html
Published: Aug 8, 2010
Author: Isaac Martin
Post Date: 2010-08-10 05:26:28 by reaganisright
Keywords: None
Views: 35805
Comments: 65

Have you driven a Chevy Volt

The headline is a play an early ‘80s Ford car ad campaign. Have you driven a Ford. . .lately? was the tag line and it's instructive when considering Chevrolet's new Volt, the car that'll make GM a "leader" in green vehicle technology and create green blue collar jobs. The answer to Have you driven a Chevy Volt . . .lately? is most likely to be no.

I really love cars, and it pains me to criticize a vehicle, since my premise is all cars are good, some are better than others. Plus I know people at GM who love cars and worked diligently on this car, even if they thought it an answer to a question no one asked. While the Volt looks like smart product planning and business management to the Obama regime - people who don't know or care about cars - unfortunately, it fails on several levels.

Start with a $41,000 list price and with the $7500 Federal tax credit it drops to $33,500. I would even speculate that California, with a $20 billion deficit, could even be willing to spend money it doesn't have by kicking in a state hybrid vehicle credit to shave the price slightly. Regardless, tax credits mean more of what we don't need: government spending.

The President, and anointed government czars think the Volt is a good idea that consumers will clamor for, at least 10,000 of them. During his Michigan GM factory visit, the President looked so - what's the word - manly as he hopped behind the wheel to drive a Volt all of two car lengths off the prototype assembly line. I sure wouldn't buy a car he endorsed, because he wouldn't know a good vehicle even if it goosed him.

Consider the collision insurance unknown. I haven't seen any ratings, but a car with a big battery that might be damaged in a collision, will be expensive to replace or repair. That means potentially high premiums, unless the Federal government enacts a Volt insurance premium cap.

Another problem lies in the current automotive market. There's huge supply of new and used compact, fuel efficient vehicles for sale. So it's not like the Volt is only one of a few high-mileage brands available. Volt has to compete against Honda, Toyota, Suzuki, Ford Escort, Chevrolet Aveo, not to mention Hyundai and Kia.

Performance is also an important vehicle characteristic. I am not concerned about 0-60 times, but rather the car's battery, with a claimed 40 mile range before the gasoline engine takes over to drive the generator for electric propulsion. This claim to green power nirvana means if you have a 40 or fewer mile commute, you can escape Big Oil's clutches because, you won't need gas. Just don't forget to charge it every night.

The critical issue is under what driving conditions that 40 mile range claim is made. Is it a 20 or 30 mph average speed? Is that on flat highways, or does it include hills? Would it cover that distance at a steady 65 mph cruise?

Environment influences vehicle performance. How far would a Volt go on battery power alone, after sitting outside all night in minus 20 degree temperature. Then, the driver hops in at 5:30 am, when it's still dark out, and drives off, with the lights on, heater and defroster working and listening to radio. And, because there's no traffic, he merges onto the freeway and speeds up to 65 mph.

Driving reality further diminishes the Volt's value compared to my humble 2001 Ford Focus station wagon. It seats five, and with the rear seat folded down, can carry a lot of stuff. On a bad stop and go city traffic day, mileage is 23 mpg. But on the highway, during a recent solo cross country trip, cruising at 80 mph, with the A/C on, my Focus averaged only 32.9 mpg. Consider too, with its $4500 purchase price, the car is paid for. Money not spent by not buying or leasing a Volt would buy a lot of gasoline, pay down credit card debt or go into savings.

So my answer to Have you driven a Chevy Volt. . .lately? is firmly not in my lifetime. And I suspect, that you'll never see the First Family driving one on a vacation trip to Chicago.

And if I may borrow Greg Gutfeld's Big Hollywood blog signature close, if you disagree with me you are no doubt a racist, homophobic, child porn loving Global Warming believer or one of their useful idiots.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 62.

#1. To: Pan-Z-Boy (#0)

Why do you folks hate tax credits targeted @ the consumer?

The manufacturer gets his price and the consumer gets affordibility.

war  posted on  2010-08-10   8:10:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#1)

Why do you folks hate tax credits targeted @ the consumer?

So you must be for school vouchers, then?

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   9:31:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Ignore Amos (#19)

So you must be for school vouchers, then?

As long as they go only to property owners and are not used in sectarian schools, sure.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   9:41:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: war (#20) (Edited)

So you must be for school vouchers, then?

As long as they go only to property owners and are not used in sectarian schools, sure.

Wow - impressive.

Have you told the DNC and the teachers' unions (sorry, redundant) about this?

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   9:49:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Ignore Amos (#21)

I've actually had several personal discussions about vouchers with my Representative.

Vouchers have zipola to do with improving schools...as you've underscored above...

war  posted on  2010-08-11   9:51:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: war (#22)

Vouchers have zipola to do with improving schools...as you've underscored above...

I disagree.

Public schools are essentially a monopoly - so at least in theory if they had to compete for funding, they might improve.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   10:06:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Ignore Amos (#23)

Public schools are essentially a monopoly

I've put three through private and one went through public.

In other words, I disagree.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   10:07:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: war (#24)

I've put three through private and one went through public.

Must be nice to send your kids to whatever school you choose, and not have to pay extra.

Unfortunately for me, where I live, only the public schools get state and federal funding.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   10:19:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Ignore Amos (#25)

Must be nice to send your kids to whatever school you choose, and not have to pay extra.

I did pay extra to put them thru private school.

Unfortunately for me, where I live, only the public schools get state and federal funding.

I find that difficult to believe.

Buty why do you believe that someone who does not pay school taxes should get the benefit of a targeted tax benefit? Even tho I didn't buy a new car, should I have gotten a cash for clunkers credit?

war  posted on  2010-08-11   10:24:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#26)

Buty why do you believe that someone who does not pay school taxes should get the benefit of a targeted tax benefit?
Unless one is living under a bridge, he/she pays school taxes.
Even tho I didn't buy a new car, should I have gotten a cash for clunkers credit?
Nope. No one should have gotten it. It should not have existed.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   11:04:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Ignore Amos (#27)

Unless one is living under a bridge, he/she pays school taxes.

Any who does not pay property taxes isn't paying school taxes.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   11:19:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: war (#28)

Unless one is living under a bridge, he/she pays school taxes.

Any who does not pay property taxes isn't paying school taxes.

The landlord is writing the check to the local school district.

And he's passing the cost onto his renter(s).

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   11:48:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Ignore Amos (#30)

The landlord is writing the check to the local school district.

And I'm buying gasoline...

war  posted on  2010-08-11   11:53:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: war (#31)

And I'm buying gasoline...

Right.

And the price you pay per gallon includes all the costs incurred by the oil company to produce said gallon.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   12:00:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Ignore Amos (#33)

And the price you pay per gallon includes all the costs incurred by the oil company to produce said gallon.

So my question stands...if someone indirectly paying property tax can get a school voucher why can't I get an oil depriciation allowance?

war  posted on  2010-08-11   12:07:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war (#35)

So my question stands...if someone indirectly paying property tax can get a school voucher why can't I get an oil depriciation allowance?

A prerequisite to getting a school voucher is to have a school age child.

I assume a prerequisite to getting an oil depreciation allowance is to be actively engaged in oil exploration?

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   12:14:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Ignore Amos (#36) (Edited)

A prerequisite to getting a school voucher is to have a school age child.

I assume a prerequisite to getting an oil depreciation allowance is to be actively engaged in oil exploration?

Actually...oil picks up credits all along the supply chain...and each and every credit is money that I, as a taxpayer, have to make up somewhere some how.

Now, you want to take my tax dollars and redistribute them to a renter to go tpo a school that is tax abated because it's parochial.

Sweet deal...except for me because my choice of school now has less money because you've redistributed income away from it.

Again, I have no issue...limit it to those who pay property taxes and to non sectarian schools.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   12:21:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: war (#37)

and each and every credit is money that I, as a taxpayer, have to make up somewhere some how.

Welcome to the real world. Here's a clue: taxpayers (and consumers) pay for everything.

Now, you want to take my tax dollars and redistribute them to a renter . . .
The renter pays taxes just as you do. The fact that his funds "pass through" a landlord is irrelevant.
to go to a school that is tax abated because it's parochial.
If you wish to make a case that parochial schools should not receive vouchers, I might agree.
Sweet deal...except for me because my choice of school now has less money because you've redistributed income away from it.
No, it has to compete for money. The more students it can attract, the more money it will have.

Ignore Amos  posted on  2010-08-11   12:32:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Ignore Amos (#38) (Edited)

No, it has to compete for money.

So YES it has less money?

I say tax religious property anyway, btw.

Cut to the chase...health and education should be priority one in this nation. Yet, the debate is one of the most moronic in the history of modern western society. Pursuit of happiness, to Jefferson, meant the self/lie sustainable intangibles such as arts and letters. Life certainly has to have a certain minimal quality associated to it or why bother?

Do you know why we ended up with compulsory attendence laws? Because in a generation and a half we devolved from the Founding Fathers in to a nation of idiots.

Do you know why we ended up with the NDEA and then ESEA? Because we ended up even dumber...

war  posted on  2010-08-11   12:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: war (#40) (Edited)

health and education should be priority one in this nation

You've just illustrated the major problem I have with the left: You confuse the goal (producing educated kids) with reflexive support of a specific program, department, or institution (in this case, the public schools). Oh, the goal is not being met??? The answer is always the same -- throw more money at the failed institution.

America spends more money per student than almost any other country. The goal (educated kids) is not being met. Instead, the government monopoly schools are pumping out functional illiterates, who can't read, write, or perform simple arithmetic.

Half of all kids that are evaluated by the public schools as being retarded actually have genius level IQs. The schools are set up for mediocrity. One size fits all. Teachers with physical education degrees trying to teach math and science. Social promotion from one grade to another. It doesn't work and never will.

The public schools were set up at the beginning of the industrial era. Their original mission was to was to pump out kids who could work in factories. This is no longer relevant, yet nothing has changed. The kids know that its no longer relevant and many of them get bored and drop out.

Why doesn't anything change? Because the NEA is a major investor in the Democrat Party, so Democrat politicians who control most large cities refuse to take them on.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-11   13:05:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: jwpegler (#45) (Edited)

Why doesn't anything change? Because the NEA is a major investor in the Democrat Party,

The teacdher's union has ziplola to do with why a school might be failing. What has to do with why a school may be failing has more to do with the quality of student than of teacher.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   13:24:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: war (#47) (Edited)

The teacdher's union has ziplola to do with why a school might be failing. What has to do with why a school may be failing has more to do with the quality of student than of teacher.

You crack me up.

About 20 years ago I remember reading an article in the Detroit Free Press where some NEA official was blaming fall out from nuclear tests for why students in America are doing so poorly.

I learned something a long time ago. Successful people take responsibility while unsuccessful people blame others, or circumstances beyond their control for their failures.

The government monopoly schools are a failure. The NEA has had near monopoly control of those schools. The blame rests squarely on the NEA and their political stooges in the Democrat Party.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-11   13:45:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: jwpegler (#50)

So...one person in Detroit stated that and they spoke for everyone?

Talk about cracking someone up...

Every profession has the good and the bad. In NY, getting a bad teacher out of a classroom isn't all that hard. And even if you just might have a difficult time firing them, you can keep them away from the chalkboard.

I've never met a teacher who wasn't dedicated to their profession.

Ever.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   13:58:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: war (#51)

So...one person in Detroit stated that and they spoke for everyone?

That plus your comment demonstrates a pattern. ROTFLMAO.

I've never met a teacher who wasn't dedicated to their profession.

Sure, reasonable pay, loads of time off, pretty much can't get fired, better retirement security than just about anyone, and all you have to do is show up. There are lazy people all over the planet who could be dedicated to this profession.

How about being dedicated to producing results???

Regardless, that's not the point. The point is that the system is broken because it's a coercive monopoly that doesn't have any incentive to change, improve, or get results.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-11   15:54:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: jwpegler (#57)

Sure, reasonable pay, loads of time off, pretty much can't get fired, better retirement security than just about anyone, and all you have to do is show up. There are lazy people all over the planet who could be dedicated to this profession.

You have an interesting definition of dedication. Are you equally dedicated to your position?

I grew up in a family of school teachers. I have school teachers in my family now. My daughter is going to be a school teacher. You are, to borrow a phrase, cherry picking exceptions and applying them to the whole. We graduate millions of capable children from public school every year. Kids who go on to college, get degrees and have successful careers and family lives. I can name on one hand the number of bad teachers I had and two of them were in grad school who came out of the private sector. One a lawyer and one a corporate exec from Alcoa.

I'm sorry that your experience sucked. But your argument is not based in any kind of reality. The overwhelming majority of teachers are dedicated and capable and want their students to succeed. If you believe that they want to be "protected" then I point only to your willingness to make schools a political issue and the teachers the scapegoats. I'd want protection too.

war  posted on  2010-08-11   20:09:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: war (#61) (Edited)

Kids who go on to college, get degrees

In engineering and computer science? Not really. Our prosperity depends on our technical prowess. Yet, the vast majority of people in engineering and computer science programs in U.S. universities (especially in graduate programs) are foreign nationals.

We are damn lucky that a lot of these Chinese and Indian students decide to stay in the U.S. after graduation. Otherwise we'd be shit our of luck.

When I was in college in the 80s, half of the people enrolled in the computer science program switched to a business major during second semester calculus, because the public schools didn't prepare them to handle the math.

As India and China become more prosperous, these foreigners aren't going to stay in the U.S. This is a huge problem. Everyone from Bill Gates to Lew Gerstner (CEO who turned IBM around) have tried to raise the red flag over the last 20 years. No one is listening.

jwpegler  posted on  2010-08-12   13:36:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 62.

#63. To: jwpegler (#62) (Edited)

Our prosperity depends on our technical prowess

Okay...now here we are in 100% agreement but this is not a recent phenomena and, with a nudge from Sputnik, was the impetous behind the NSEA. The problem loooong predates any kind of political clout - real and imagined - that NEA/UFT had.

Are you familiar with Brian Cox?

war  posted on  2010-08-12 14:25:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 62.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com